Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Guardian: US Intelligence On Iran Doesn't Stand Up  
User currently offlineJoni From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1413 times:

Does this sound familiar?

Much of the intelligence on Iran's nuclear facilities provided to UN inspectors by American spy agencies has turned out to be unfounded, according to diplomatic sources in Vienna.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,2019666,00.html

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineQANTAS077 From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 5855 posts, RR: 40
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1403 times:

Quoting Joni (Thread starter):
Does this sound familiar?

now you being to understand why the US objected to Dr Elbaradei being re-elected as IAEA director general...they'd rather have a puppet in Vienna who won't ask the questions than an educated man who'll dig deep to find the answers.



a true friend is someone who sees the pain in your eyes, while everyone else believes the smile on your face.
User currently offlineAirCop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1378 times:

Besides at this point so call intelligence gather by US spy agencies must be viewed skeptically by most of the world's countries. In short, US intelligence agencies credibility will take years to restore.

User currently offlinePadraighaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1359 times:

Quoting AirCop (Reply 2):
Besides at this point so call intelligence gather by US spy agencies must be viewed skeptically by most of the world's countries. In short, US intelligence agencies credibility will take years to restore.

This is unfair. The intelligence agency professionals were not wrong. The so-called 'intelligence' that was used to bootstrap the case for war came from Chaney's inner circle that ignored what the professionals were telling them.

Even if we put the best possible face on the pre-war analysis, let's not forget we hear claims all the time about things being true that we don't accept simply because they were sincerely believed. Very few jews become christians, or chirstians become muslim because someone else claims a truth they believe intensely.

Therefore, it is not the sincerity of belief, nor the assertion of truth, that necessarily makes something compelling. Our political leadership failed to properly weigh supposed truths and simply took the easy path at the time. Democrats were as gutless as republicans were gullible. The advantage the Democrats have going into the next election is they have backed off from their support for the war, while the republicans still cling to this millstone.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why The US Sanctions On Iran posted Tue Apr 1 2003 20:25:42 by Ammunition
Best Analysis Of US/Israeli Options On Iran posted Thu Feb 1 2007 04:04:19 by RJpieces
Article On Iran And The Israel Lobby posted Mon Jan 29 2007 17:12:25 by Cba
Tomato Juice On The Plane - What's Up With That!? posted Thu Jan 18 2007 22:37:04 by Birdwatching
Israel Plans Nuclear Strike On Iran posted Sun Jan 7 2007 03:24:24 by NWDC10
Stand Up Comedy By "Biff" From Back To The Future! posted Mon Oct 9 2006 04:13:01 by Falcon84
US Senator On Taxi-driving Terrorists posted Thu Aug 31 2006 20:02:24 by Maury
Analyst: Massive Air Attack On Iran Likely posted Tue Aug 29 2006 15:56:42 by AerospaceFan
Would You Stand Up For Your Country? posted Sun Jul 9 2006 14:57:33 by Wrighbrothers
US Military On US Borders? posted Fri May 12 2006 19:23:58 by ANCFlyer