Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pro Union Or Anti Union?  
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Posted (13 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1813 times:

Do you believe that unions are a necessity in todays multi-corporate society or are you against them in the believe that they prevent a free market economy?

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 46
Reply 1, posted (13 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1772 times:

We've had this discussion before. In case you missed it, you just opened the Pandoras Box that you wished you hadn't, cuz this is gonna get UGLY.

My thought has always been that the only people that support Unions are those who will get "benefits" that they might not otherwise deserve, such as higher medical coverage, higher pay, longer vacations, fewer responsibities, etc.

Also, I am of the belief that Unions tend to (but not always) encourage laziness and low productivity; a lazy worker under Union "protection" is difficult, if not impossible to get rid of.

But on the flip side, Unions can be beneficial in shielding workers from unreasonably low pay, dangerous working conditions, etc.

In a perfect world, Unions and Corporations should be able to co-exist harmoniously, but we don't live in a perfect world, so you have both sides always trying to strongarm the other.

I think that with the advent of the numerous OSHA, ADA, and Fair Labor acts, that Unions are somewhat of an archaic concept. They are frequently guilty of manufacturing, or blowing a 'grievance' way out of proportion just to enrage their members. It allows them to justify higher "dues", which of course increases their positive cash flow.

I also believe that Unions tend to be very short sighted. They are not afraid to "kill their golden goose" to get an extra buck today. They would rather see that extra dollar or two an hour raise, then consider the possibility of putting the host corporation out of business (and putting their members out of work) tomorrow. Just look at what they did with Comair. they were willing to sacrifice that airline and all of those jobs just so they can have the satisfaction of claiming to have a bigger set of balls.

But that is just my $.63.


User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16370 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (13 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1767 times:

I think they were necessary 100 years ago when mining and factories employed the masses in sweat-shop conditions....but I don't think they're needed today.

Unions rarely offer to tie wage or benefit increases to productivity improvements, and are generally against incentives to encourage workers to work harder or smarter. Too much emphasis is placed on longevity to rank employee job assurance, as opposed to ability or productivity.

I see all unions as a drag on productivity, free enterprise and ultimately our collective standards of living.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (13 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1761 times:

Like Yyz717 said, Unions did have a place @ one time. Today, many unions have been taken over by people who do not care about the “little people” but about advancing their own agenda. The time for national unions have passed. A mini-union inside a company that is only concerned with its local members wouldn’t be a bad thing.

I’m not going to get into this discussion any further since it is going to deteriorate into a flame war within 15-20 posts.



"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16370 posts, RR: 56
Reply 4, posted (13 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1756 times:

Matt D & B757300....I agree with both of you completely!

I have the same sense that this thread may descend into a war. Time to batten down the hatches!

hehehe

Neil/Toronto





Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineGalilee From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1756 times:

On the good side, Unions have the potential to;a) create a higher standard of living by negotiating higher wages than non-union employees, and b) protect the jobs of the older less educated generation workers.

On the bad side, however, is protecting the jobs of the afore mentioned really in the company's best interest. Also, I agree that unions tend to drive the productivity down and create a sort of preastablished laziness.

Also, unions tend to be bad on the overall economy because as wages increase-corporate profits fall-prices rise. When prices rise, the value of money decreases. What you have is an inflationary period. And it just so happens that when inflation occurs there is an increase in the unemployment rate. All of this points to a decrease in GDP (gross domestic product) thus inducing the economy into a recessionary period.

Hope this helps! Regards,


User currently offlineTwotterwrench From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1745 times:

Anti - 100 years ago they were necessary. Now all they do is allow the shit to float to the top and eliminate any incentive one might have had to try and work hard and better yourself, since your wages and advancement are strictly seniority based rather than merit. Unions are bad for productivity.

Now, mark my words, this won't get ugly til some ALPA puke gets here and starts in on ALPA being the only reason airlines are safe and pilots are saving the airlines and blah blah make me fucking puke. The only thing unions due is inflate wage and benefit standards for those who don't deserve it, and ALPA is the biggest proof that this is true.


User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1736 times:

Well, I may as well add my bit of gasoline to the fire. Chalk me up to the anti-union side. Granted, they did have their time and place, but now well others have already posted sentiments that pretty much match mine. My experience as a flight crew member with a major airline was a real eye-opener. In our world, if you don't or can't perfom up to snuff, you are simply given your walking papers. In the wonderful world of ALPA, well... when was the last time you ever heard of a crew getting the axe - unless it was associated with a major screwup that made national headlines. You haven't, because it doesn't happen. I have seen plenty of incompetence in the cockpit, but there is almost always a way to cover it up. IMHO, pilot unions do little to enhance safety, rather they tend to entrench mediocracy or worse.

User currently offlineRamper@IAH From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 240 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (13 years 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1723 times:

Twotterwrench wrote:
The only thing unions due is inflate wage and benefit standards for those who don't deserve it, and ALPA is the biggest proof that this is true.

Why don't you think pilots deserve fair wages. It sounds like you might be jealous. Are you a union member? Obviously not. Without the checks and balances that pilot unions provide between labor and management, pilots would be over-worked and under-compensated for duties that they perform. Who wants a fatigued pilot at the controls of their flight? No one! Look at the AA incident in Little Rock. If more stringent rest requirements and work rules were made into law, people would be enjoying the holidays with the loved ones who perished in this tragedy. ALPA has lobbied congress for years to have rest requirements changed. You only see one side of the picture. The media makes the pilot groups and the unions that represent them seem like greedy, money-hungry villians that care about nothing but $$$$. If you only knew the other issues that face pilots that would go unrecognized without ALPA and other pilot unions. Be thankful unions exist, otherwise air travel would not be as safe.


User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 40073 posts, RR: 74
Reply 9, posted (13 years 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1721 times:

Hmmm.....
Most union households are having a much Merrier Christmas this year than a lot of non-union households. During tough economic times, it is a lot better to have a union job than not. My job is not unionized but I wish it was.



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 46
Reply 10, posted (13 years 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1722 times:

I agree wuth what you said with regards to safety. Pilots are entrusted with the lives of 100's of thousands of people in the course of their careers. Plus, the training and experience that needs to be built to become a pilot is very labor intensive and costly. And their skills are highly, well..shall we say skilled.

No one is saying that pilots (or anyone else for that matter) isn't entitled to just compensation.

But look at everything else that is Union.

Do we really need a person (fully paid with benefits) to operate a tow tractor? And another (fully paid with benefits) to hook up the towbar? And another (fully paid with benefits) to UNhook the towbar? And another (fully paid with benefits) to guide the plane in? And another (fully paid with benefits) to guide the plane out? And another (fully paid with benefits) to watch the left side of the plane? And another (fully paid with benefits) to watch the right side of the plane? And other (fully paid with benefits) to open the cargo doors? And another (fully paid with benefits) to close the cargo door?

Are you beginning to catch my drift now?

If a person shows up late for work 4 days out of the week, takes 3 naps a day while on the job, and takes a 90 minute lunch break? Is there any legitimate reason why that person shouldn't be fired?

If said worker was Union, you'd have a hell of a time getting rid of that person. It would be a process that would take YEARS-if it could be done at all.


User currently offlineRamper@IAH From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 240 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (13 years 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1706 times:

MattD,

The scenario you described about the fully paid employees with benefits is the job description of ONE person. At my company, however, the ramp workers aren't unionized...but I wish we were. It would be nice to have someone watch our backs in case of a goof up that was not entirely out fault.


User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 46
Reply 12, posted (13 years 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1699 times:

Well then things must be done differently at IAH cuz everytime I've been to LAX, I've seen armies of people surrounding ONE plane just like I described, leading to that scenario.

User currently offlineWatewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (13 years 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1689 times:

I used to work for a non-unionized company competing with a unionized one just across the street from us. Sure, the other guys received higher wages in general, but after union dues and crappier scheduling for those on the bottom of the seniority, it really didn't benefit most.
I'm a firm believer in rewarding and promoting those who prove their worth. I understand that it's difficult, if not impossible, to apply such principle to pilots, but there exist unions in other sectors that would be better served without.


User currently offlineJessman From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1506 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (13 years 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1684 times:

I am pro union, at the very least in some aspects. I feel that if unions unilaterally did not exist, or were not allowed to exist corporations would eventually succumb to the desire to exploit the employees who rely on them for a living. In a competitive environment if even one company in a certain niche is unionized other companies in direct competition will have to at least try to match the union's offerings or they will have VERY unhappy employees, and a terrible employer/employee relationship. For example Delta has a largely non union workforce, Delta also treats its employees fairly well, because it knows its employees have a choice in where they work. I doubt Delta would treat its employees so well if other Unionized airlines did not have the unions fighting to keep their employees treated well. If everyone is mistreating labor, labor has nowhere to go, and simply does the job to survive as best possible. We all know that good management comes and goes, Unions simply keep management in check. And as with any competition a strong union will encourage talented management, they sharpen each other in a way.
I firmly believe Unionization has been the greatest single contributor to the rise of the middle class in the USA. Without Unions we would still be in the mindset that we were in in the 20's and 30's, the rich would have remained rich, and the poor would have remained poor. The cowardly lion of labor found its courage in unions, and took what rightfully belonged to the working man.
And then major corporations moved their workforce to Asia and Mexico where they can pay a worker $3 a day and the worker will be happy, and then the American worker loses his job anyway.
Oh well, things are never as simple as they seem, are they?


User currently offlineAviatsiya From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (13 years 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1681 times:

Galilee

There is a MAJOR fault in your reasoning here.

Also, unions tend to be bad on the overall economy because as wages increase-corporate profits fall-prices rise. When prices rise, the value of money decreases. What you have is an inflationary period. And it just so happens that when inflation occurs there is an increase in the unemployment rate. All of this points to a decrease in GDP (gross domestic product) thus inducing the economy into a recessionary period.

Under the principles of macroeconomics, when there is inflation, the unemployment rate actually decreases. With low inflation, you will normally see higher unemployment.

And to even try and pin this problem on unions is both short-sighted and uninformed.


User currently offlineHSV From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (13 years 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1671 times:

Aviatsiya, maybe what Galilee said might not agree with your understanding of the Phillips curve but the fact remains that unions reduce the productivity of labour and that will ultimately be reflected in a lower GDP.

And FYI, there are instances when inflation actually causes increased unemployment due to endogenous price setting by firms, which generally is what happens in the economy. So who's the uninformed one now...


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 17, posted (13 years 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1668 times:

Those circumstances were known as "Stagflation", HSV, and comprehensively screwed up the economies of many countries in the 1970's when the accepted economic models no longer worked. Governments wre frankly at a loss as what to do next, and as a result ideas such as monetarism came to the fore before becoming equally discredited by the mid eighties when the supply of money increased but inflation still fell.

One thing to remember about union power and the criticisms associated with it is that in many cases the problems a company suffers are caused just as much by poor management.

Provided the unions are not overpowerful (as they are in the US aerospace industry) they are valuable and necessary. The problems are caused when there is an imbalance in power and either management or unions have too much influence. Then you either have the tail wagging the dog, or workers exploited. A difficult balance to achieve but where you get it, it benefits all.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 18, posted (13 years 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1664 times:

Too many unions are overpowered these days.You need to strike a balance between protecting worker's rights and encouraging hard work and some times the power of the union disencourages hard work.

User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 19, posted (13 years 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1659 times:

prevent a free market economy?

What are you, capitalist? Only 10% of the US are capitalists the rest are working class citizens. It is unfair how the few order the many, for what, insane profits at the cost of safety/labor?

I would be Pro-Union, but if a business actually respected their employees a little more to the point where joining a Union would prove worthless, then I'm Anti-Union. I agree that sometimes Unions ask much, but it is usually deserved. Why when businesses in particular didn't bother volentarily, say, increase pay, is their problem; they asked for it.

IMO, minimum wage should run along with inflation, it's just too low in some parts.



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineChris28_17 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1439 posts, RR: 10
Reply 20, posted (13 years 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1646 times:

Alright, i didnt really read any replies but i found this topic right up my alley. Believe it or not, i just spent an entire semester doing research on labor unions for an advanced academic writing class. (about 50 pages worth of writing)

Needless to say i feel confident i could whoop anyone's ass in a labor union discussion!

First off i will say that unions are good for an economy such as ours; but not the unions we currently have. Small unions created by small groups of workers will still have power to accomplish their objectives without a negative influence on society.

During my research, I found ALPA to be one of the best unions, however they are chartered by the AFL-CIO of whom i could rattle off hours of negative things to say about them.

Having said that, in theory i am against unions... but really just BIG unions.

Lets put it this way, the Teamsters is basically a huge crime family. They are just as much a part of the mafia as Jimmy Hoffa once was, and his son James still is (james is the current president).

Members of the AFL-CIO used cigarettes and other "goodies" to bribe a myriad of clueless people into the polls during the Bush-Gore election last year.

Gosh i have so many facts on this, i dont know where to quit... fortunetely my papers arent in front of me right now... i do remember in pennsylvania the AFL-CIO actually paid the salary of 80+ workers to leave their jobs and work on the AFL-CIO political campaign to help Gore.

That money comes from union dues that workers HAVE to pay. If memory serves there are 4 million registered republicans who are forced to pay union dues, in all reality their money probably bought more Gore votes than their own genuine votes could even compete with.

Finally, the reason unions have so much power is because back during the depression, we NEEDED unions and so congress gave them all sorts of power to get the economy through it.... However, these laws are still in place!! and the unions are using them to pile up the profits..


trust me, i've got 50 pages worth of stuff i could go on forever.... in summary, unions in theory are good, but the current unions that control america are NOT good.


CHRIS


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21521 posts, RR: 53
Reply 21, posted (13 years 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1634 times:

It depends a lot on how the unions behave and what the framework is.

In Germany, the Unions are an important (even if not universally loved) part of the economic system. They are a lot more powerful, but also a lot more responsible than those in many other countries.

I´m self-employed, so I don´t and I won´t have direct interest here.

But as I see it, unions are tools like many others. You can use them to split someone else´s skull or you can use them to build something. That´s the decision!


User currently offlineJetfixer From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (13 years 3 days ago) and read 1625 times:

I am guessing you are a CO employee.

If I remember correctly about 3 to 6 months ago the IAM filed with the NMB for representation of the CO ramp and the ramp voted no.

A good out come in my opinion. If you were one of the ones who voted yes then you probably should do some more research on the IAM. This is not a union you want to represent you.

If you like your union to lie to you, blame others for their incompetence, use your union dues to fly their corpoate jet around to exotic locations to negotiate with yor management, then these are the fools for you. Why you need to negotiate in Hawaii one week and Vegas the next week is beyond me.

Although this is a mechanic pay scale, look at where the IAM negotited wages are. If not at the bottom, then close to it. How many are at the top.
http://www.amfanow.org/AMT-Wages_scales.htm

For 2 years the IAM has been negotiating the United employees an industry leading contract that now is not going to happen. Once again, its not their fault. Its the company, Its AMFA, Its the NMB, Its Bin Laden, now Its the President's fault.

Check out this site for mechanic opinions on the IAM. http://www.the-mecanic.com/mainbb.html

As was mentioned before, unions allow the shit to float to the top. Delta, non union, decent employee-mangement relationships and sometimes higher pay than unionized workers.

Do not be sucked into the IAM lies and deceipt. Union is not always best.


Jetfixer  Smokin cool



User currently offlineJetfixer From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (13 years 3 days ago) and read 1616 times:

Damnit, links didn't work, try these.

http://www.amfanow.org/AMT-Wage_Scales.htm

http://www.the-mechanic.com/mainbb.html


Jetfixer  Smokin cool


User currently offlineQantas744 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 246 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (13 years 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1601 times:

Nicely timed thread Donder10.....


I work in a heavily unionised industry (railway/railroad)where the unions have traditionally been able to get what they want by calling their members out on strike and endangering the financial position of our employers.When the industry was in the public sector the unions knew that more money could always be found from somewhere in the public purse.Since it was all privatised and broken up from 1 big company into 100 smaller companies the unions have found it more difficult to get what they want.They now have to deal with employers from the real world where people lose their jobs if the company goes bankrupt from paying too much wages etc.

The company I work for is now in its third dispute with the unions in 12 months,and we are looking at operations being almost entirely suspended on January 3rd,4th,6th and 7th.Not surprisingly it is a dispute about money.However,3 months ago our managers decided they wanted to lengthen the opening hours of my station and all four of us that work there were against it.The matter was taken up by the union (who are supposed to represent OUR interests) who went into a meeting with our managers and agreed to the new hours.After that incident I cancelled my membership-there is no point being in a union that doesn't fight for it members.The current dispute has only resulted in strike action because there is a power struggle going on within the union and we have two potential candidates to take over the leadership,both of whom see that starting a strike will make them look bigger.

It's a pointless strike,it causes loads of problems for our customers-most whom will take it out on people like me in the days prior to the strike.In addition,the customers have to be compensated for the strike action-which just creates more work for us.

Unions have their place,there are plenty of bad employers out there who exploit their workers as much as possible-that is where unions should be,preventing exploitation instead of starting a strike when there is nothing to strike about.

Qantas744



you can't buy time but you can sell your soul and the closest thing to heaven is to rock'n'roll
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 25, posted (13 years 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1598 times:

I dont like the militant style of some unions such as ALPA.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Are You Pro-life Or Pro-choice? posted Tue Sep 23 2003 21:30:09 by 727LOVER
Pro-American And Anti-American Threads posted Thu Jan 31 2002 01:28:26 by Sonic
Ospreys Beat Australia - Rugby Union posted Wed Nov 1 2006 23:50:39 by Christa
The Union Jack - Question posted Mon Oct 16 2006 21:09:50 by 7474ever
Pizza Delivery Driver Forms A Union posted Sat Sep 23 2006 03:08:51 by NWOrientDC10
Macbook Pro Or Macbook? posted Mon Aug 7 2006 09:14:54 by AirWillie6475
Macbook Or Macbook Pro? posted Sat Jun 24 2006 19:51:31 by Cadet57
Rugby Union : Australia V England posted Sun Jun 11 2006 15:00:16 by TSV
NFL Meets With Players Union At DFW posted Tue Mar 7 2006 19:34:39 by DeltaFFinDFW
Anti-War, Pro-Marine, Meet Paul Hackett posted Thu Feb 9 2006 22:26:06 by Tbar220
Are You Pro-life Or Pro-choice? posted Tue Sep 23 2003 21:30:09 by 727LOVER
Pro-American And Anti-American Threads posted Thu Jan 31 2002 01:28:26 by Sonic
Illinois Civil Union Bill Passes posted Tue Nov 30 2010 19:18:28 by texan
Why Are A.netters So Anti-union? posted Tue Nov 23 2010 02:08:40 by NorthstarBoy
Ireland Goes For Bailout From The European Union posted Sun Nov 21 2010 13:06:37 by OA260
France Deports Fellow European Union Citizens Back posted Thu Aug 26 2010 13:04:23 by OA260
Harley-Davidson Union Woes posted Mon Aug 9 2010 17:55:19 by thegreatRDU
Former F4 Pilot Marine Faces Union Wrath! posted Thu Jun 10 2010 04:28:46 by usscvr
Union Graft: SF Bus Drivers Making Over $100K! posted Wed Apr 14 2010 19:47:21 by Aaron747