Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
More Security Gripes Part II  
User currently offlineChris28_17 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1439 posts, RR: 9
Posted (14 years 5 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1240 times:

My 56K was having trouble loading the first topic but i thought i would give an interesting story.

Last week i was flying out of ZRH and set off the metal detector. Now no big deal, for this trip i took a total of 10 flights in a week and got about 5 other "pat downs". Well, this dude takes me into a little room and, well, lets just say he didnt miss anything. Security workers are instructed to use the *back* of thier hands; so already he's doing this wrong, all palms. He might as well said "turn your head and cough" although i would have rather gotten a physical than this sicko. Excuse my frankness, but the guy basically fondled my nuts, and he didnt speak english so there was no use saying anything to him. Honestly it didnt bug me that much and i just toughed it out but it still wasnt called for at all.

Thats my story. im sorry but security is a joke. There will ALWAYS be a loophole. These new security measures probably wouldnt have prevented what happened last week, only if that guy was randomly selected to do the EDT machine on his shoes which would have been very unlikely.

I'm beginning to think the only answer for preventing bombs is dogs. Yes bomb sniffing dogs although there are not nearly enough of them to go around, these are the only things that can screen everyone, there is no way to use the EDT on everyone, it's too time consuming and airlines wont allow it. Also dogs would be able to screen checked baggage as well... remember PanAm?? there are no security regulations in place that would prevent that EXACT thing from happening again.

just some thoughts, i'd rather be barked at by a dog than fondled by an old man....

(i am, however, a sexy irresistable bitch)


8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offline704tangoalpha From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 58 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (14 years 5 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1204 times:

Yikes! I fly quite often and I may have just flipped out on the guy...


User currently offline5280AGL From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 414 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (14 years 5 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1186 times:

I hear ya Chris...When my wife and I were going through security at DIA over Xmas, my wife was "randomly" selected for the wand and pat-down search. She and I both noticed the screener taking an abnormally long time in some sensitive areas...My wife, being a very outspoken woman, just said; "like what ya feel buddy?"

Just what we needed, some low-life scumbag that is probably here illegaly, feeling my wife's tits. I have many gripes about security, especially here at DIA...First of all, none of them can speak English and are more than likely illegal Mexicans, plus, they are screening the wrong people. All I have seen them do is search little old ladies, children and attractive young women. Secondly, all of these new security procedures are complete B.S., they don't make any difference at all, except waste people's time and ultimately will make the airline's lose big time $$$.

User currently offlineIrishFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 5 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1176 times:

I would of probably knocked the shit outta them!


User currently offlineCarmy From Singapore, joined Oct 2001, 627 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (14 years 5 months 2 days ago) and read 1168 times:

Yeah. Agree with 5280AGL on the part about searching the wrong people. My 80 year old grandmother was asked millions of questions when they found a nail clipper in her carry on baggage. Quite ridiculous if you ask me. The last time I checked, there's never been an 80 year old woman who's ever hijacked a plane with a nail clipper.

I don't know, maybe things have changed. Maybe airline passengers these days are so vain the best way to scare them into submission is to threaten to cut their nails off.

User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 30408 posts, RR: 57
Reply 5, posted (14 years 5 months 2 days ago) and read 1167 times:

Its a good thing she didn't try to get knitting needles past the guards.

They probably would have accused her of conspiricy to make an Afgan! Laugh out loud

User currently offlineTurbolet From Cape Verde, joined Nov 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (14 years 5 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1159 times:

I'm waiting for someone to invent an automatic x-ray machine and automatic bodyscan. Wouldn't that be great? The only personnel around would be a security guy to check if it's working fine and a dog to bite him if he touched the passengers.

User currently offlineChris28_17 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1439 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (14 years 5 months 10 hours ago) and read 1144 times:

I'm waiting for someone to invent an automatic x-ray machine and automatic bodyscan

already been done. Believe it or not, you walk through a thing similar to a metal detector and up on a screen comes an X-ray image at different strengths of your entire body... the reason we arent using them is because, well, people dont want screeners seeing their *privates* because thats exactly what the machine does. There is only a very small group of people lobbying for this machine right now, i wouldn't doubt we all at least hear about it sometime down the road....

but yes, i work for the airlines and i see first hand how all the new security measures are mindless and stupid; it amazes me how the illusion of security can have so much power....


User currently offlineTurbolet From Cape Verde, joined Nov 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (14 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1137 times:

Yeah, I know a bodyscan exists, I was talking about one which would automatically match the metal objects found on a passenger to some common shapes (i.e. handgun, knife...) and decide itself whether to 'pass' or 'fail' the passenger.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Visiting Florida's Space Coast, Part II posted Wed Jan 3 2007 03:01:21 by DesertJets
Why Execution? Part II posted Wed Jan 3 2007 02:04:38 by EZEIZA
Wussification Of America's Kids - Part II posted Wed Oct 18 2006 17:44:49 by Mdsh00
TedTAce Divorce Thread Part II (Don’t Read) posted Mon Oct 2 2006 05:31:36 by TedTAce
Florida Justice Part II Suspect Shot 68X posted Sun Oct 1 2006 17:58:54 by TedTAce
The West Has Lost Its Nerve (Part II) posted Thu Sep 14 2006 11:09:16 by AerospaceFan
PRG Aftermath Part II posted Fri Sep 1 2006 01:51:43 by Jap
Tiger Is GOD Part II posted Mon Aug 28 2006 00:48:26 by NIKV69
Library Masturbator - Part II posted Mon Jul 31 2006 03:37:39 by WellHung
Matt D And Jen (Part II) W/ Pictures posted Mon Jul 31 2006 03:36:19 by Matt D