Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A Thought On Iraq Government Contracts  
User currently offlineFlynavy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 2 months 18 hours ago) and read 995 times:

Recently, I started applying for jobs and started planning for my transition back to civilian life after being in the military for five years. I've posted resumes online at sites like HotJobs, Monster, and directly to companies through their web sites. Last week, I received a phone call from an unidentified number. It was a company responding to my resume that I'd posted on Monster. The company, who wanted to remain unidentified, wanted to move me out to Southern California to work as an avionics technician on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs).

Sounds like a good gig, right? Guess again...

The company apparently sends maintenance crews over to Iraq and wanted to send me. The representative from the company told me that the frequency of Iraq deployments is roughly 90 days in duration with a four month-long gap in between deployments. The compensation for each 90-day period is roughly $40,000 (and that's just starting out), and assuming at least two deployments in a year, we're talking $80,000+, all tax-free!

I didn't realize it until a few days later after thinking about it when it became clear to me that to take that job would be immoral. Why?

Because, simply put, their are soldiers serving in Iraq RIGHT NOW -- some on their second or third tour there -- who don't make $80,000 in an entire YEAR, much less in six months.

I think I did the right thing by turning down this job offer. Thoughts?  whistleblower 

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 months 17 hours ago) and read 986 times:

Your call.

Not right or wrong IMO.

If you think you did right, fine. Good for you.


User currently offlineMCOflyer From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 8661 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 17 hours ago) and read 979 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 1):
If you think you did right, fine. Good for you.

I agree with ANCFlyer on this one. You can probably do better than going all the way to Iraq.

Hunter



Never be afraid to stand up for who you are.
User currently offlineYOWza From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 4863 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 17 hours ago) and read 973 times:

Quoting Flynavy (Thread starter):
Because, simply put, their are soldiers serving in Iraq RIGHT NOW -- some on their second or third tour there -- who don't make $80,000 in an entire YEAR, much less in six months.

There are tens of thousands of mercs (sorry, private security personnel) in Iraq nothing wrong with it if you ask me. You would be filling a need and being paid well for doing so. If you don't take it somebody else will.

YOWza



12A whenever possible.
User currently offlineUH60FtRucker From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 months 17 hours ago) and read 969 times:

Quoting Flynavy (Thread starter):
Recently, I started applying for jobs and started planning for my transition back to civilian life after being in the military for five years.

First, let me say congratulations on serving a successful stint in the Navy. Good job.

Quoting Flynavy (Thread starter):
The company apparently sends maintenance crews over to Iraq and wanted to send me.

I worked with a ton of civilians. And they were all making really good money. Hell, go work for Black Water, and you'll be making upwards of $150,000. I know plenty of people who finished their term in the military, and went to work for civilian contractors.

It's a decent living and decent pay.

Quoting Flynavy (Thread starter):
Because, simply put, their are soldiers serving in Iraq RIGHT NOW -- some on their second or third tour there -- who don't make $80,000 in an entire YEAR, much less in six months.

I dunno... I guess it's a choice. The civilian contractors make way more than soldiers, but the companies also need to pay them that much in order to entice them to go work in Iraq. People aren't going to willingly go work in Iraq for $20,000!

Quoting Flynavy (Thread starter):
after thinking about it when it became clear to me that to take that job would be immoral.

Anyway, I would have thought that you would have turned this job down for other personal moral/ethical objections? I know you're opposed to this war, and as a contractor, you would be still supporting the war effort. Would you be OK with that?

Quoting Flynavy (Thread starter):

I think I did the right thing by turning down this job offer. Thoughts?

So yeah... it's good money. I don't think it's unethical that you take the job, a lot of soldiers are doing the same thing. You would still be supporting the war effort, which I don't know how you would feel about that.

But you're what? 23ish? This would most likely be a short term deal - a company where you wouldn't spend decades working for. And you'd be making really good money. There are a lot of people our age who don't come CLOSE to what you'd be making!

If you took that money and saved/invested it wisely, you could easily set yourself up for success later in life. I'm talking about being a millionaire by the time you retire (no lie, it's not that hard to do). You have a marketable skill, and you can turn that into hard cash.

I think the real ethical dilemma for you, is how you feel about the war in general, and do you want to be apart of it again?

-UH60


User currently offlineFridgmus From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 1442 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 921 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

First off, thank you for your service to our Great Nation!  bigthumbsup 

Second, it would not be tax-free unless you did not come back to the US on your time off. You have to remain outside the US for 330 days in a one year period starting from the day you depart the US, otherwise, all federal and state taxes (if applicable) would apply. Trust me on that one!!!

I also agree with ANCFlyer. Your decision and I respect that.

Good luck in your future!

Marc



The Lockheed Super Constellation, the REAL Queen of the Skies!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Report From General Barry McCaffrey On Iraq posted Thu Mar 29 2007 15:13:25 by DL021
New Strategy On Iraq,heres My Take posted Tue Jan 9 2007 06:19:35 by Wardialer
Pentagon Wants Another $99.7billion On Iraq/Afghan posted Thu Dec 21 2006 00:17:11 by Jimyvr
Airplane Director Takes On Iraq Study Group Report posted Tue Dec 19 2006 19:33:12 by RJpieces
Koran Prophecy On Iraq/9.11? posted Sun Nov 12 2006 19:58:38 by PPVRA
Woodward: Kissinger Advising Bush On Iraq posted Fri Sep 29 2006 18:34:21 by Falcon84
Hamas On Unity Government - Palestine posted Sat Sep 23 2006 12:37:34 by ANCFlyer
US Military Hearing On Iraq Rape Case Begins posted Sun Aug 6 2006 19:16:46 by Rammstein
Pure Pacifists On Iraq: Kind Of Clueless posted Sat Mar 18 2006 12:20:44 by AerospaceFan
Blair Says God Will Judge Him On Iraq posted Sat Mar 4 2006 14:21:01 by Scotty