Alberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 2685 posts, RR: 0 Posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1118 times:
KaiGywer From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 12027 posts, RR: 43 Reply 1, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1100 times:
As much as I hate baggy pants, there is NO reason to ban it.
Banco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 55 Reply 4, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1094 times:
Funny how the establishment never learn, isn't it? Every generation has its time when the clothing of the young is about to cause the collapse of western civilisation, and then the older people make themselves look bloody stupid (and make said clothes even more popular) by doing something laughable like banning it.
She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
Seb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9832 posts, RR: 17 Reply 7, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1072 times:
I always think it is funny watching a person with a size 30 waist trying to run in size 54 pants! Don't ban them, I need a good laugh! But, seriously, maybe it is the fact that I live in Oregon, or I see it every day, but so what if someone is showing their underwear? IMO, as long as nothing explicit is happening, let them show it all! Walk to work wearing only shoes, ride a bike in only boxers..... what harm is it doing to anyone?
AirTran737 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3639 posts, RR: 12 Reply 8, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1072 times:
I was driving to ATL the other day and there was a guy sagging so low that his pubes were hanging out. This kind of shit is disgusting. Buy a belt, and pants that fit.
Nice Trip Report!!! Great Pics, thanks for posting!!!! B747Forever
Superfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 38512 posts, RR: 80 Reply 11, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1054 times:
What scares me the most is that this old bag is concerned about young guys underwear.
This law certainly has many legal flaws however the argument against this ban is really stupid!
This does not discriminate agaisnt Blacks, it discriminates against stupid people with no tact.
I don't like the idea of fashion police either.
AeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 18888 posts, RR: 64 Reply 12, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1052 times:
I don't understand this one. Exposing one's underwear in public is suddenly the equivalent to "exposing one's private parts". ::shake head::
When did Louisiana get taken over by the Puritans?
EDIT: It just occurred to me, how would Eldridge Cleaver pants go over?
KaiGywer From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 12027 posts, RR: 43 Reply 13, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1029 times:
Quoting Dtwclipper (Reply 9): Now if we could pass a law and ticket cars with UeberBass stereos I'd be all for that!
That law is already in place in many cities. Cars are indeed stopped and ticketed for it.
AsstChiefMark From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 15, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1022 times:
Quoting Dtwclipper (Reply 9): Now if we could pass a law and ticket cars with UeberBass stereos I'd be all for that!
We have one in here. A cop just nailed a kid in a thump-thump car in front of my house on Tuesday evening. $349. Cha-ching! You can't tell me the kid didn't know there was a law against thump-thump cars.
Dtwclipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 16, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1015 times:
Quoting KaiGywer (Reply 13): That law is already in place in many cities. Cars are indeed stopped and ticketed for it.
Quoting AsstChiefMark (Reply 15): We have one in here. A cop just nailed a kid in a thump-thump car in front of my house on Tuesday evening. $349. Cha-ching! You can't tell me the kid didn't know there was a law against thump-thump cars.
I want that too! Problem is the street behind our house divides to municipalities, so I would assume both the City of Livonia and Northville Township would have to pass similar laws?
KaiGywer From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 12027 posts, RR: 43 Reply 17, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1011 times:
Quoting AsstChiefMark (Reply 15): You can't tell me the kid didn't know there was a law against thump-thump cars.
Especially being as most cities will have signs posted on the entrance to the city "Noise Ordinances Enforced" or something similar.
AsstChiefMark From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 18, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 988 times:
Quoting Dtwclipper (Reply 16): so I would assume both the City of Livonia and Northville Township would have to pass similar laws?
Depends. In some places, when a street is the dividing line between two jurisdictions, either municipality may enforce their laws on the entire width of the street. In other places, the middle of the street is the dividing line.
I've actually seen where one side of the street had a 45 mph speed limit and the other side had a 25 mpg speed limit. Each side was in different municipalities.
Jhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6195 posts, RR: 13 Reply 19, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 986 times:
The law is the law, fair or not. Obey it or move to another town (or pay the fine and go to jail).
Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
TheCol From Canada, joined Jan 2007, 2010 posts, RR: 6 Reply 21, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 952 times:
You'd think they have more pressing concerns in the community than that. Why waste time and money drafting and tabling legislation when they can be concerning themselves with more crucial matters that need to be addressed?
No matter how random things may appear, there's always a plan.
AsstChiefMark From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 22, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 938 times:
Quoting TheCol (Reply 21): You'd think they have more pressing concerns in the community than that.
No. They're ultra-moral down there. They're so squeeky clean that "gosh darned" is considered swearing. However, screwing your 13 year old daughter is considered a proper way to pass on the family name.
Kmh1956 From Bermuda, joined Jun 2005, 3324 posts, RR: 8 Reply 24, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 901 times:
The law may or may not be fair, but if it means fewer people in those godawful baggy pants with their underwear hanging out.......yay!
'Somebody tell me why I'm on my own if there's a soulmate for everyone' :Natasha Bedingfield
25 Airfoilsguy: Actually it originated in the jails. When people are put in jail they take away their belts, thus a lot of people in jail had to walk around with the
26 Itsjustme: With regard to Michigan, it's a bit tricky. If a state law exists, then yes, local officers have bordering reciprocity and can enforce state laws in
27 Superfly: They may be exempt because they usually don't wear underwear. The law targets 'exposed underwear'. This law does not address sealing the cracks. That
28 LTU932: While it's ridiculous to ban those pants (though I personally hate them), what individual institutions should do is just ban those pants as part of a
29 Deskflier: This law makes "...it a crime to wear trousers that show underwear..." So what happens if You forget to zip Your fly?
30 AirframeAS: At my high school in Washington State, there is a rule that baggy pants are not allowed. Those who violate it will get a written warning and letter s
31 CaptainJon: How is underwear any different than swimsuits? I mean not just in regards to this law but also with how some people seem to think seeing them in their
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 2685 posts, 
From Thailand, joined May 2000, 38512 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, 
But, seriously, maybe it is the fact that I live in Oregon, or I see it every day, but so what if someone is showing their underwear? IMO, as long as nothing explicit is happening, let them show it all! Walk to work wearing only shoes, ride a bike in only boxers..... what harm is it doing to anyone? 
From Netherlands, joined Sep 2003, 4506 posts, 
From Canada, joined Jan 2007, 2010 posts, 
From Bermuda, joined Jun 2005, 3324 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
