WorkFlyer From New Zealand, joined Dec 2006, 203 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2753 times:
Al Jazeera is getting better. I have only read the online English version, not seen the station. It's op ed stuff can be a little off the wall sometimes, but maybe that is because we are seeing a different angle to things. It is certainly in the main less sensational than it used to be. Though the coverage it has given to terrorists who held hostages who were then beheaded is unforgivable - I think it may have encouraged the actions taken by the terrorists if they knew they were going to get their film on the news.
No idea about the Arabic version as I cannot speak Arabic.
The term FoxNews is a misnomer. The last thing this Rah Rah station is is a news channel. It is unbalanced infotainment aimed at the braindead whilst masquerading as news
ConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2743 times:
Quoting WorkFlyer (Reply 2): The last thing this Rah Rah station is is a news channel. It is unbalanced infotainment aimed at the braindead whilst masquerading as news.
...or, could it just be a reflection of your (and quite a few others') inability to distinguish between the hour-long OpEd shows which overrun Fox's primetime (which MSN is also highly "guilty" of) and the news presentation that the channel provides for the overwhelming majority of the day?
Not insulted at all. The problem is that the "news" and I use that term advisedly, is buried in all of the op ed that comes out of Fox. The end result being that the op ed is sold as news to the watching public.
To be honest if I wasnt to watch people screem at each other, I will go to a local workingmens bar around 10PM, not sit watching a cartoon channel (With over made up cartoon people).
Its whole design is one of attracting an audience with the attention span of a gnat and then telling them that all they need to know is available on that station. As someone who reads online news from Asia, North America, the UK Australia the Middle East and New Zealand (Yes I do some work sometimes) I can safely say that Fox is well off the mark as far providing "all the news you need".
If you want a good comparison between Fox News and Al Jazeera, just open up both of thier webpages. Al Jazeera leads with Issues such as Bushes veto on stem cell research, the Palastinian President ruling out talks with Hamas and what role Tony Blair will have now he is no longer going to be Prime Minister of England.
Over on Fox, while the Bush verto is covered, bigger prominance is given to stories about Hilary Clinton spoofing the Sopranos, Bob Barker's opinion about whther Rosie O'Donell is right to take over a game show and Paris Hilton's neighbours being concerned about press packs outside their homes. What is more important here folks?
ConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2718 times:
Quoting WorkFlyer (Reply 4): the "news" and I use that term advisedly, is buried in all of the op ed that comes out of Fox.
It's also in great company:
As stated, MSN is just as guilty at overrunning its primetime with OpEds; and the once-respectable CNN Headline now includes a celebrity gossip hour for cryin' out loud. So again, why isolate Fox?
Quoting WorkFlyer (Reply 4): The end result being that the op ed is sold as news to the watching public.
Define "sold as"?
I'm also curious as to how much of this you're gleaning 2ndhand, as anyone who'd ever spent any time watching their OpEds would be well acquainted with the fact that (with the notable exceptions of Hume and van Susteren) most of the shows go out of the way to emphasize that they're a factor of the host's impression of issues as he sees it.
Heck, "the truth as I understand it" was Hannity's tagline 1998-2004.
Quoting WorkFlyer (Reply 4): and then telling them that all they need to know is available on that station. A
Only a fool would choose a single source of news and consider themselves informed, Fox or otherwise.
Levent From France, joined Sep 2004, 1718 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2711 times:
In my place I receive BBC World, CNN, Fox and Al Jazeera in English. I think that the best two of those are BBC and Al Jazeera. CNN used to be very good but their quality has dropped considerably. Fox... well, I won't even comment on them. BBC and Al Jazeera give full news coverage and it is interesting to compare both in terms of angles and viewpoints.
ME AVN FAN From Algeria, joined May 2002, 13934 posts, RR: 25
Reply 8, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2675 times:
Quoting ConcordeBoy (Thread starter): the English broadcast itself was celebrating the milestone of their 100millionth household.
I have seen the TV-broadcasts in Arabic and in English a few times, but look up in the internet-news fairly often. They are competent and open-minded and quite balanced and objective in their reporting. Very swift at times, but sometimes a bit slow.
well-said, But news is getting boring now, tired of listening to whats happening to the Paris Hilton or the other celebrities, or hearing about the latest deaths in Iraq, its same boring news, and some of the crap they put out there isnt even newsworthy, for example last couple of months the news was concentrating on an alligator in a city lake... go figure.
"Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel" Samuel Johnson
to defend the news-people right here, a look-back. In the 1950ies and 60ies, you had a news bulletin at 6 am which was repeated at 7 am and 8 am; you had another news bulletin at 12.30, supplemented by some correspondents (radio, not TV) a bit later on on the radio, and then another "late" bulletin at around 8pm . NOW, those news-producers are expected to come out each hour.
Not really. We get it here in Portugal on cable for free, and it's actually pretty interesting. It does a huge service in the Arab world by offering a choice to viewers who could previously only watch hugely censored or biased government approved news. The Algerian government shut down power to half of Algiers once just to prevent a program being seen there.
100 million households is completely feasable as it can be viewed worldwide, not just in the Mid East.
Breakfast in BHX, lunch in FAO, dinner in TIP, baggage in YYC.
Plateman From United States of America, joined May 2007, 923 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2602 times:
Josh Rushing, star of Control Room and an Al-Jarezza reporter spoke to my class at college. I wrote a long article about the channel and misconceptions related to it for the school newspaper. That should give a little more background on it. I am re-posing it below for your reference/enjoyment. 'Any comments are welcome. Since it was journalism, I obviously do not provide my opinion on the subject. But I learned how many misconceptions I had while researching it.
Title: Al-Jazeera journalist urges students to view other media
Run Date: 2/1/07
Reporter: Brian _________
More people across the world trust Al-Jazeera than Western press, said Josh Rushing, star of the documentary "Control Room" and a correspondent for Al-Jazeera English, during a speech in Mary Graydon Center Tuesday.
"It's critical to understand that there are different perspectives about how the world works," said Bill Gentile, a professor in the School of Communication, whose class hosted Rushing. "[People] have to understand that there is more then just the American way of seeing the world."
Gentile said it is critical to understand that "the world is not CNN and most certainly is not FOX News."
As a result of these networks and "part of this administration's narrow vision of the world, an increasing part of the world rejects the American vision of the world, [and] this is very, very dangerous," Gentile said.
Rushing, a former marine lieutenant, was made famous in "Control Room," a film produced by AU graduate students that won the CDS Filmmaker Award at the Sundance Film Festival in 2004.
Rushing served as a spokesperson at Central Command in Doha, Qatar, during Operation Iraqi Freedom and was not expecting to be a star of the documentary film, he said. The producers, unknown to him, cast him in a starring role, expanding a 15-minute conversation to the entire length of the film.
Due to his role working with Al-Jazeera in Qatar as their military spokesperson, Rushing was offered a job for their start-up English network, based in Washington, D.C.
Both Rushing and Gentile said many people have an incorrect view of Al-Jazeera.
They also explained the difference between Al-Jazeera.com and Al-Jazeera.net. According to both, the two Web sites are separate news sources. Al-Jazeera.net is the news organization, while Al-Jazeera.com is not. Al-Jazeera, a Qatar-based network, is named after the Arabic word for peninsula.
"Everybody thinks - even some faculty - that Al-Jazerra is where you go to see people getting their head chopped off," Gentile said. "But that's just not true."
Students said they enjoyed Rushing's speech.
"I found it very intriguing to listen to a person whose views changed so much over a short period of time," said Summer Simpson, a second-year graduate student in the master's of arts in film and video program, in an e-mail. "I think Mr. Rushing represents a role model American citizen, one who is informed and stands up for his views, but can be diplomatic about his views."
Rushing explained how Al-Jazeera is an international media station that has headquarters in Washington, London, Qatar and Kuala Lumpur.
Joseph Alfred, a sophomore in the School of Public Affairs, said the speech changed his view of Al-Jazeera.
"It changed my perspective because I thought it took only an Arab viewpoint, instead of a plurality of viewpoints," he said.
p.s. Mods-I own the righs to it and that is why I can republish it with no problems. Thank you.
well quoted, hehe, before we all start saying "violent media supporting jihadist activities", might wanna learn about it a bit, everyone has to realize that its an alternative news source, something with "worthwhile" news, with women anchors on TV, yes (surprising) and professional as any news media outlet. The news is supposed to do one thing and that is to report what they see, Al jazeera takes you indepth to places that most western news organizations dont go and simply cant access, thus bringing to us a new perspective. You watch the news and then make up your own mind, i do think the news is there to tell us okay this is what is happening, and thats the only side of the story. I personally dont have Al Jazeera, infact ive given up on all news, Im sick and tired of what i see everyday, i just read a couple of links on the Internet, because practically everything that is occurring globally are the same problems everytime, and im tired of listening to whats happening to Paris Hilton, infact its become so bad that Mongolian American newspapers have started reporting about her.
"Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel" Samuel Johnson
Andz From South Africa, joined Feb 2004, 8485 posts, RR: 10
Reply 20, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2580 times:
It started here recently and I haven't really watched it, but from what I have seen they are trying to be BBCish. Looks like they have poached some people from other networks too, I saw Riz Kahn the other day. If I watch any news channel at all it is Sky.
After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
I wasn't the one who made the original assertion of 100,000,000 households. What evidence do they have to support that claim? Let's see the latest Nielsen (or whatever might be a reputable third-party source) ratings for all English-speaking countries where AJ is available. Until they can show that, I call it bullshit.
: It's not about ratings. It's about availability. And some people's opinions frighten me. Open your minds.
: ...so in other words, you have none. Figured as much.
: ...you look at how many providers you're available on. Then you add up how many subscribers these providers have. And then you have your availability.
: 80 Million "unconfirmed" households, and an interesting overview of BBC World, France 24, and Al Jazeera. Of course, target audience and who's actual
: I isolated Fox in my post as you had asked for a comparison between Al Jazeera and Fox (in your OP). If you want my opinions on CNN, Skynews, CCTV (E
: I can't comment on the English version, because I don't receive it where I live. However, I've seen the Arabic version of Al Jazeera in Palestine. Eve
31 ME AVN FAN
: - I have seen it on both my last visit to Beirut and the last visit to Tunis, and I did NOT see any "bias against the West", I did rather see a pro-W