Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Supreme Court Bans School Integration In WA, KY  
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11155 posts, RR: 52
Posted (7 years 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1765 times:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070628/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_rdp

Wrongly decided.


Here we have two cities that are concerned that their school systems are being segregated, and so adopt policies to maintain diversity. And the Supreme Court knocks down these policies.

Do you know who should be upset most? Republicans.


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTsaord From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1754 times:

Well. Can we get to a point where race doesnt matter in what schools children go to. Just let things fall where they may?

User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11155 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1749 times:

Quoting Tsaord (Reply 1):
Just let things fall where they may?

"Just letting things fall where they may" at the current time usually results in severely segregated schools. Is that ever a good thing?


BTW: here is a summary of the plans the schools used: http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletyp...hives/2007/06/the_school_plan.html



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineSeb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11465 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1733 times:

I don't understand the Kentucky way of integrating schools, but the Seattle way of doing it seems fair. Let the students and parents decide what school to send their kids to and apply. I don't know how the schools in Seattle are but I do know two neighborhoods in the western parts of the city have money and should have better facilities. It would reason that someone from a poor area in the southeast section of the city would want their kids going to a school in the west or north part of the city for a better education. What is the problem with that? Portland used to have schools divided up. Benson was the tech school, Jefferson was the arts school, Lincoln was the sports school and so on. Parents could apply if they thought their child could get into a particular school out of their district. Seems like a good idea to me. But, what do I know. I am just a voter/citizen/tax payer.

GO CANUCKS!!



Life in the wall is a drag.
User currently offlineJetsGo From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3079 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1721 times:

Quoting Tsaord (Reply 1):
Just let things fall where they may?

 checkmark 

Quoting D L X (Reply 2):
Is that ever a good thing?

It is not good nor is it bad. It's not like anyone is forcing segregation on them. If certain groups of people tend to live in one area, then so be it.

Quoting Seb146 (Reply 3):
What is the problem with that?

The problem is where are the kids in the western part of the city supposed to go if all the inner city kids are coming to their schools?

The better idea in my opinion is to change the way schools are funded. Schools that score lower should be receiving more aid to try and boost those scores. If not that, then at least provide equal funding across the board. Providing less aid to lower scoring schools doesn't really set them up for anything but failing.



Marine Corps Aviation, The Last To Let You Down!
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13005 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1708 times:

It is going to be interesting how this will be in real life. One issue in these cases is where black kids had to be bussed to the other side of a city to a mainly 'white' school where often they faced unofficial segeration and hate by fellow white students, in an effort to 'balance' the schools rather than have access in their part of town to a good school. No white kid (or the parents) want to ever go to a 'black' school in a far too often crime infested school or neighborhood where most blacks live due to the generations of discrimination by law and custom. All schoolchildren should have access to the same high quality education no matter what town or part of a town they live in, their race, their income or family situation. Problem is that to deal with those issues requires a lot more money for the schools or change the economic patterns of residential neighborhoods many cities cannot afford. Until that 'affirmative action' takes place, the band aids of desegeration policies over the last 50+ years will continue to be rejected by a conservative US Supreme Court.

User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1701 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 2):
"Just letting things fall where they may" at the current time usually results in severely segregated schools. Is that ever a good thing?

Have you ever thought that perhaps people prefer to be with people of their own kind whether that be white, black, green, purple? The segregation of a city based on where people decide to live and the performance of the schools is two different things and should be handled as such.

One other thing, why is there always this impetus to integrate at the K-12 level of schools but when going off to college there is segregation with no issues, whether it be a historically black college or the self segregation of cultures (black student union, asian student union, race based Greek organizations) at mixed race schools? Why is that ok in the upper levels but we just can't have it at the lower levels because it is considered bad and evil?

Heaven forbid we spend money to make all the schools better regardless of the majority race within it. It has always seemed dumb to me to bus rich kids to the poor schools and vice versa just in the name of racial diversity and an attempt to boost test scores. Just spend the money to increase the scores at the poor school regardless of the race.



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8502 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1699 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 2):
"Just letting things fall where they may" at the current time usually results in severely segregated schools. Is that ever a good thing?

Yes, it is a good thing if that's how parents want it to be. Pretty much everyone who has kids or is planning to have kids researches the local schools when buying or building a house, and generally most people have some idea of what they're getting into. It is natural for people to self-segregate themselves. What is unnatural and wrong is for it to be forced by government, either through Jim Crow-type forced segregation or forced-busing type forced integration.


User currently offlineDeltaDC9 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 2844 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1694 times:

Quoting Seb146 (Reply 3):
I don't understand the Kentucky way of integrating schools

I have lives across the river from, or in Kentucky most of my life, and NOONE understands why or how they do a lot of things. This is why the federal government sued Kentucky and mandated massive changes.

Knowing Louisville like I do, I cant imagine a scheme that would make anyone happy.



Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
User currently offlineMdsh00 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4124 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1688 times:

Quoting D L X (Thread starter):
Wrongly decided.


Here we have two cities that are concerned that their school systems are being segregated, and so adopt policies to maintain diversity. And the Supreme Court knocks down these policies.

So you favor reverse racism? If any "affirmative action" should be done, it should be based on socioeconomic class and not race.

I tend to be socially liberal but I agree with the court on this one. The whole idea of busing Black kids far from home, and White kids far from home in the name of diversity and filling some quota is stupid. And that's the problem. Theres no attempt to really integrate, but rather dumping the kids there in order to show some pie charts and say, "Look! Our schools are diverse, give us funding!"

Sometimes letting it fall the way it does is better, or readjusting school boundaries. I don't know about the racial makeup and integration in the KY area but schools in my city tend to have a mix of Whites, Hispanics, and Asians.



"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a big fat white guy who is threatened by change."
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11155 posts, RR: 52
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1675 times:

Quoting JetsGo (Reply 4):
If certain groups of people tend to live in one area, then so be it.

I can't disagree with you more. That is a sure fire recipe for continued discrimination and ignorance for people of other groups. Integrated schools are the answer to hate.

Quoting JetsGo (Reply 4):
Schools that score lower should be receiving more aid to try and boost those scores.

I'm with you there. The problem is, schools are usually funded by property taxes. That means rich neighborhoods have the well funded schools. Poor neighborhoods get equipment when the rich schools are done using them. How's that for equality?

Quoting LTBEWR (Reply 5):
All schoolchildren should have access to the same high quality education no matter what town or part of a town they live in, their race, their income or family situation.

 checkmark 
I'd go one step further - balancing the schools helps to ensure that the same quality education is granted to all residents and areas of a jurisdiction. That was the promise of Brown v. Topeka, which is being chipped away.

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 6):
Have you ever thought that perhaps people prefer to be with people of their own kind whether that be white, black, green, purple?

Yes, and that thought is unacceptable to me. If you sue the schools because you can't deal with having your white kid be in a class with minorities, the problem clearly isn't with the school, and it is the children that will be harmed. It is that child, segregated from those who do not look like him, that will carry the torch of ignorance into the next generation.

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 6):
One other thing, why is there always this impetus to integrate at the K-12 level of schools but when going off to college there is segregation with no issues, whether it be a historically black college or the self segregation of cultures (black student union, asian student union, race based Greek organizations) at mixed race schools?

I don't think that's the case at all! I think there are strong rallies against segregation in higher education. My college and others nearby went well out of their way to make sure that their campuses were not segregated.

However, the minority interest groups are a completely different thing. YOu have to tackle the problem from both sides. One thing that really annoys me about many conservatives is that they say (sometimes disingenously) "let's just all be color blind." Well, that's not reality. While you may honestly not care about color, your peer standing next to you might. Minorities often need a support group to help them deal with the people that aren't color blind -- often because members of the majority that are honestly color blind fail to take their side in dealing with those members of the majority that cause minorities hurt.

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 6):
Heaven forbid we spend money to make all the schools better regardless of the majority race within it.

Do you believe that separate can be equal?

Quoting MD-90 (Reply 7):
Yes, it is a good thing if that's how parents want it to be.

So, if parents raise their kids to be openly racist, the government should stand back and say "well, that's how the kid's parents want it to be?"

Quoting Mdsh00 (Reply 9):
So you favor reverse racism?

That's a nice buzzword, but tell me what exactly do you mean by it? Then I'll answer.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineFalstaff From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 6056 posts, RR: 29
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 1665 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I teach in a school that is nearly all black. Most of the time I am the only white person in the classroom. On dozens of occasions I have had parents and students say that black students shouldn't be tought by a white teacher. I have not ever known a black teacher who had white parents and students say a black teacher shouldn't teach white students.

Quoting D L X (Reply 10):
I'm with you there. The problem is, schools are usually funded by property taxes. That means rich neighborhoods have the well funded schools. Poor neighborhoods get equipment when the rich schools are done using them. How's that for equality?

Exaclty. We spend about $7000 per students. Some of the better performing districts spend over $11,000 per student. We just can't compete.

Quoting JetsGo (Reply 4):
It is not good nor is it bad. It's not like anyone is forcing segregation on them. If certain groups of people tend to live in one area, then so be it.

A lot of people like to live with people like them, regardless of income. Here in metro detroit there are parts of town where seening a white or black person is kind of rare. Where I live is mostly white, but lower income. There are other parts of town that are white, but higher income. There are neighboorhoods that are black that are very poor and others that are very high income. Same goes with the Arabic peoples around here. Living in a neighborhood that is filled with one type race around here doesn't always mean rich or poor.

Quoting JetsGo (Reply 4):
Schools that score lower should be receiving more aid to try and boost those scores.

There are other issues too. Teachers I know is higher end schools (even those with large minority populations) have differnt issues. Many studnets in higher end schools don't live in neighborhoods plagued with gangs, drugs, crime, and other social ills. Teen pregnancy is a huge problem at my school, but is almost nonexistant at some schools in better neighborhoods. The largest problem we have is actually getting kids to come to school. To many parents school is not important and they don't send their kids to school. This is a huge problem in poorer areas, regardless of race. You can teach stuff all you want but when you have students who don't think they will be alive next year or will be in prison most of their lives they just don't care. If you have a 11th grade student who can't read or write (happens all the time) you can't teach him/her to read and write to grade level in short order.

Urban schools also face large imagrent populations that make it hard for a teacher to teach when the child doesn't speak english. The child might be as smart as a whip, but if they can't read the standardized tests they will fail. Urban schools have a large amount of transiant studnets. They switch schools regularly. If I have a student who is new at my school take an a standardized test to show compentcy at grade level and they bomb it it shows on my school even if they have only been there a week. You have to give the tests at specific times. To have sucessful schools you need students there a long time. It is the only real way to show if a school is really suceeding

Quoting Mdsh00 (Reply 9):
The whole idea of busing Black kids far from home, and White kids far from home in the name of diversity and filling some quota is stupid. And that's the problem. Theres no attempt to really integrate, but rather dumping the kids there in order to show some pie charts and say, "Look! Our schools are diverse, give us funding!"

I went to a school like that in suburban St. Louis. 20% or so of our population was bussed into our school from black neighborhoods in St. Louis (mostly the northside). By and large there was very little mingling of the races. The black kids from the suburbs hung out with the whites from the suburbs. The problems were more social in nature. Asking lower income students to fit in with upper and upper middle class kids is never going to work. I remember once in a class where a friend was complaining that his parents wanted to take away his Porsche and give him a BMW becuase he had too many tickets was interrupted by a desegragation student who complained about a real problem of not having hot food at home. To very different worlds....



My mug slaketh over on Falstaff N503
User currently offlineMdsh00 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4124 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (7 years 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 1659 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 10):
That's a nice buzzword, but tell me what exactly do you mean by it? Then I'll answer.

I don't favor unfair advantages based on race. I know it still plays a factor in admissions in higher education.

Quoting Falstaff (Reply 11):
The black kids from the suburbs hung out with the whites from the suburbs. The problems were more social in nature. Asking lower income students to fit in with upper and upper middle class kids is never going to work.

I think this is key, and that is why I would favor socioeconimic classifications. The only problem with this is that Americans are very resistant to ideas of social class and therefore it gets put down to just race. I too have seen white kids, black kids, and asians hang out with each other; but like you said, they all come from similar neighborhoods.



"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a big fat white guy who is threatened by change."
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11155 posts, RR: 52
Reply 13, posted (7 years 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 1654 times:

Quoting Falstaff (Reply 11):
I have not ever known a black teacher who had white parents and students say a black teacher shouldn't teach white students.

Well, that would be racist.  Smile

The "need" for a black teacher to teach black students is for role models. (Of course, I personally believe that blacks shouldn't only look to other blacks as role models, but that's another thread.) There is no analogous need for whites - white role models grow on trees.

Quoting Falstaff (Reply 11):
I went to a school like that in suburban St. Louis. 20% or so of our population was bussed into our school from black neighborhoods in St. Louis (mostly the northside). By and large there was very little mingling of the races.

Sounds like a high school, no?

If it were an elementary school, there would be a lot more mingling. I don't know how someone can think that they can "reprogram" someone at the high school level after they've been programmed to believe a certain thing their whole lives before then.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineFalstaff From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 6056 posts, RR: 29
Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1649 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting D L X (Reply 13):
Sounds like a high school, no?

It was.

Quoting D L X (Reply 13):
There is no analogous need for whites - white role models grow on trees.

That seems to be the case.

Quoting D L X (Reply 13):
I personally believe that blacks shouldn't only look to other blacks as role models

That is true. Many of the kids I deal with only see performers (sports and music) to be role models. When a black business man or community leader is discussed many of my students consider him a sellout and not really black.

Back in January a student in class burst out about why doesn't our school celebrate black history month. He went on about how racist the school is (there is hardly anybody but blacks in the school). Several students informed him that Black history month was next month. He was embarrassed as can be.

A lot of my kids see racism where there is none. I was in the assistant Principal's office when a girl was in there for carrying a purse in the school (no bags, purses, hats, etc in classrooms). The AP asked her to put it away in her locker and she refused and started pushing him around. She went on to say that white girls are allowed to carry purses. She called her mom and she came up and yelled that we were all racist because white girls could carry a purse. What makes this dumb is that at that time there was only one white girl in the entire school and she never carried a purse. In a school of 350 we have about 15 white students and about 10 other races. A big complaint from parents and students was that more blacks were being suspended than whites. There were more blacks in detention than whites. Of course that is going to happen when your enrollment is skewed in one direction. In my high school there was more whites in trouble than blacks. It had nothing to do with behavior of either group, it was just probability.

Quoting D L X (Reply 13):
If it were an elementary school, there would be a lot more mingling.

I would agree with that. My Elementary school in suburban Denver had mostly white and Hispanic people, there were a few Asians and blacks. Everyone got along just fine and everyone played together nicely. It seems that it takes people a while to decide that they shouldn't get along. This goes back to what I was saying before. If a person goes through the same school system their entire career they likely will have many of the same friends they had the entire time. That is good, it helps blur the color, race, and religion line. Not only that but it creates a sense of community and builds quality schools regardless of location. However at many Detroit schools you have kids who never have gone to school with a white person. In the suburbs you will be hard pressed to find a white kid who never shared a classroom with a black student. Years of hatred for reasons that may or may not make sense causes problems on both sides of the aisle.



My mug slaketh over on Falstaff N503
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11155 posts, RR: 52
Reply 15, posted (7 years 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1641 times:

Quoting Mdsh00 (Reply 12):
I don't favor unfair advantages based on race.

How is it an unfair advantage based on race when all races are affected equally?

Quoting Falstaff (Reply 14):
However at many Detroit schools you have kids who never have gone to school with a white person. In the suburbs you will be hard pressed to find a white kid who never shared a classroom with a black student. Years of hatred for reasons that may or may not make sense causes problems on both sides of the aisle.

Yeah... the D's problems go way deeper than anything I think schools can fix. White flight was so vast in Detroit (in part to avoid integration of the schools) that the only way to integrate the schools now would be at the state level. And do we really want to bus kids from Livonia to downtown and vice versa? No. For one, they'd spend 2 hours a day on the road.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8502 posts, RR: 12
Reply 16, posted (7 years 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1625 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 10):
So, if parents raise their kids to be openly racist, the government should stand back and say "well, that's how the kid's parents want it to be?"

I don't favor government thought control, do you?


User currently offlineGalapagapop From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 910 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (7 years 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1622 times:

Quoting JetsGo (Reply 4):
The better idea in my opinion is to change the way schools are funded. Schools that score lower should be receiving more aid to try and boost those scores. If not that, then at least provide equal funding across the board. Providing less aid to lower scoring schools doesn't really set them up for anything but failing.

As good and simple as that idea sounds, public schools in many districts in the country already bleed money through poor management. The idea is to motivate these districts to actually take care of their schools and motivates them to actually manage them properly, not that some schools in inner city areas need more money, but there is a lot systems that have low test scores as a result of decades of mismanagment of school resources. And as DLX points out a lot of the money schools have is local property taxes so areas that are poorer tend to have poorer schools.


User currently offlineFalstaff From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 6056 posts, RR: 29
Reply 18, posted (7 years 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1618 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting D L X (Reply 15):
And do we really want to bus kids from Livonia to downtown and vice versa? No. For one, they'd spend 2 hours a day on the road.

No school kids need to be bussed that far. Lots of wasted times and energy. One of the biggest complaints I remember from the desegregation students at my high school (where I attended) was the long bus rides.

The Desegregation program in St. Louis was voluntary. So what really happened was the best students and best athletes went to suburban schools. Leaving the City district with few top students. St. Louis's desegregation program is nearly over, but its effects are still being felt in the city schools. Usually the opponents to that city's desegregation program were black. They were mad the best students were leaving their city.

My high school had a 98% plus graduates going to college. That included everyone. High expectations and quality programs will help every kind of students.

The School I teach at: I have had more convicted murderers than kids who have gone to college. For five years we only sent one student to college. Recently that number has increased 7.



My mug slaketh over on Falstaff N503
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11155 posts, RR: 52
Reply 19, posted (7 years 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1592 times:

Quoting MD-90 (Reply 16):
I don't favor government thought control, do you?

That's nice spin, but that's not what I suggested either.

Yes, it is the school system's responsibility to tell kids what is civicly right and what is civicly wrong. That means educating children on the evils of racism, despite a parent's educating the child that racism is correct.

The point was that a single child's parents are not the end-all and be-all of education. In this case, the residents of the City of Seattle chose a policy, and that policy was overturned by people 3000 miles away because a handful of people in Seattle did not like the policy. Why aren't conservatives pissed?



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineN229NW From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 1925 posts, RR: 32
Reply 20, posted (7 years 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1581 times:

Quoting Falstaff (Reply 14):
Quoting D L X (Reply 13):
If it were an elementary school, there would be a lot more mingling.

I would agree with that. My Elementary school in suburban Denver had mostly white and Hispanic people, there were a few Asians and blacks. Everyone got along just fine and everyone played together nicely. It seems that it takes people a while to decide that they shouldn't get along. This goes back to what I was saying before. If a person goes through the same school system their entire career they likely will have many of the same friends they had the entire time. That is good, it helps blur the color, race, and religion line.

Agree. I also went to a high school where there were bused in kids from inner city neighborhoods. By and large, the "diversity" did not pan out in social interactions, as the black, white, and Hispanic kids largely remained in separate social groups. This could be attributed to several factors: race, language, socio-economic background, and of course the practical fact that kids who spent a couple hours a day on the bus together got to know each other, while kids from the local area knew each other from the feeder school and as neighbors.

In general, high school is too late to start forced integration programs. I think that affirmative action is most justifiable at the youngest ages, so the playing field will be more level later in life. To a certain extent, people will probably still separate themselves later, but they will still have better links to other groups.

In the long run, I also believe there is an inherent value in having diverse classrooms, workplaces etc. in many cases, in that more viewpoints are available, more debates can open up, and ultimately there should be more mutual understanding. Of course, that "diversity" should not be limited to race--as it too often is. It should also be about class, religion, etc.



It's people like you what cause unrest!
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17281 posts, RR: 46
Reply 21, posted (7 years 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1509 times:

Quoting D L X (Thread starter):
Supreme Court Bans School Integration In WA, KY

Integration was not banned. That is spin and you know it. The Supreme Court further restricted the use of race as a factor in placing children in schools, which I fully support. You can't simultaneously purport to want to create a "colorblind society" and simultaneously use color as a factor in deciding where a child goes to school.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (7 years 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1504 times:

As Chief Justice Roberts said, "The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."

http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=11655

Quoting JetsGo (Reply 4):
The better idea in my opinion is to change the way schools are funded. Schools that score lower should be receiving more aid to try and boost those scores.

I sympathize with what you are trying to do, but that's just silly. Then schools won't even bother to even try to teach their kids at the necessary level to pass. You would be rewarding failure!

The best solution IMHO is to let bad schools fail. Bring in the voucher system, and let all parents choose what school they want to send their kids to. The good schools thrive, the bad ones will go bankrupt, and a new, better school can be built on the ashes of the old ones through the purchase of its fixed assets, unencumbered by imbedded teachers unions and all other pre-existing problems that might have existed.

Quoting Mdsh00 (Reply 12):
I think this is key, and that is why I would favor socioeconimic classifications. The only problem with this is that Americans are very resistant to ideas of social class and therefore it gets put down to just race.

I agree.


User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17281 posts, RR: 46
Reply 23, posted (7 years 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1503 times:

Quoting Cfalk (Reply 22):
"The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."

It's almost too simple Silly



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13005 posts, RR: 12
Reply 24, posted (7 years 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1490 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 23):
Quoting Cfalk (Reply 22):
"The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."

It's almost too simple

The terrible weakness in his decision is that it took over 16 years to really implement the first US Surpreme Court decision (1954) with further court actions and finally congressional acts as to school funding to really act on primary and secondary school racial segeration. The southern USA States made deliberate choices to not obey the decisions as to school desegeration of the US Supreme Court and the Congress well into the 1970's. As much as I despise race based affirmative action where significantly under or less qualified persons because of their race get an educational or employment opportunity, one cannot ignore race as THE factor that needs to be considered in any plan to 'intergrate' our schools, places of employment and so on.


25 MaverickM11 : Absolutely not, need is the factor, not race. I bet you'd end up with the same result as "integration" simply because those that need improved educat
26 DeltaGator : I was traveling and forgot to respond but just saw the thread was bumped back up. As did my college but the black community didn't care and ignored al
27 Aa757first : I think this was the best way to do things. Set up schools with a focus and let parents send their kids to whichever school suits them best. Then whi
28 Post contains images D L X : How is that relevant to this discussion? NO... as you are doubtless aware, those are your words, not mine. I'm saying that students from those areas
29 Post contains images DeltaGator : I mentioned the way that schools are all desgregated from K-12 but there is a segregation at the higher levels brought on by the minorities themselve
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Supreme Court Reviews The PIT posted Mon Feb 26 2007 18:36:53 by MDorBust
Supreme Court Hearing Arguments On Abortion Law posted Thu Nov 9 2006 15:30:18 by AerospaceFan
'06 Midterm Elections & The Supreme Court posted Sun Oct 29 2006 19:54:51 by N174UA
School Shooting In SW Wisconsin (Weston High) posted Fri Sep 29 2006 23:14:42 by MUWarriors
Supreme Court Says "Yes" To Military Recruiters posted Mon Mar 6 2006 18:09:15 by AeroWesty
Stopping School Shootings In The US posted Sun Feb 26 2006 08:02:00 by AAden
School Shooting In Oregon? posted Fri Feb 24 2006 01:03:28 by FutureSDPDcop
Alaska Supreme Court OKs Same-Sex Benefits posted Sun Oct 30 2005 09:50:10 by Johnboy
Anna Nicole Gets Her Day Before The Supreme Court posted Tue Sep 27 2005 21:08:19 by N1120A
New Supreme Court Nominee Is . . . posted Wed Jul 20 2005 01:46:58 by Diamond
Gore Wins Appeal In Florida Supreme Court posted Fri Dec 8 2000 22:34:57 by SKYTEAM
UAE Supreme Court: OK To Beat Wife And Kids posted Mon Oct 18 2010 15:33:46 by LOT767-300ER
"Thank God For Dead Soldiers" Supreme Court Case posted Wed Oct 6 2010 09:33:59 by Longhornmaniac
Senate Confirms Elena Kagan To The Supreme Court posted Thu Aug 5 2010 14:06:04 by Ken777
Supreme Court Rules On Chicago Gun Laws! posted Mon Jun 28 2010 20:03:48 by FlyASAGuy2005
Obama To Nominate Kagan To Supreme Court. posted Sun May 9 2010 19:22:29 by fxramper
Justice Stevens Retiring From US Supreme Court posted Fri Apr 9 2010 08:06:26 by texan
Supreme Court Justice Barack Obama? posted Fri Feb 19 2010 17:59:53 by ken777
United Against Supreme Court Decision. posted Wed Feb 17 2010 17:54:35 by WarRI1
Supreme Court Halts Chrysler Sale To Fiat posted Mon Jun 8 2009 14:38:56 by Sv7887