Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Successful Countries Not Involved With US  
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (6 years 12 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2030 times:

The way that the US interacts with so much across the world got me to thinking. What countries out there are successful but have little to no interaction with the US? Trade, financial, military, etc.

Of course, I am not trying to imply that the many successful countries across the world depend on the US, but most of them do interact with the US greatly.

To further the question, are there any successful countries out there that don't have much interaction with any of the more powerful countries out there? (such as Russia, China, any of those in western Europe, etc.)

Thanks all!

24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBofredrik From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1895 times:

Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland.
4 examples.


User currently offlineDoona From Sweden, joined Feb 2005, 3768 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1890 times:

Quoting Bofredrik (Reply 1):
Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland.

Are you saying those four countries have little or no interaction with the US? Look at the Swedish arms industry, and think again. Norway and Denmark are both part of NATO, BTW. We're perhaps not dependant on the US, but trade and co-operation, military and otherwise, with the US has certainly helped the Nordic countries.

Cheers
Mats



Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8956 posts, RR: 40
Reply 3, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1882 times:

Quoting Flyf15 (Thread starter):

Guernsey, Malta, Monaco. . I think any of the bigger nations are pretty involved with the U.S. in different matters.



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineLijnden From Philippines, joined Apr 2003, 563 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1846 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I can think of the following countries:
France, Cuba, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, North Korea, Iran, Mongolia, Syria, The Lebanon, Rwanda, Zaire (Congo), Angola, Laos, Libya, Kiribati & Tungaru, Sudan, Djibouti, Burkino Faso, Swaziland, Madagascar, Mozambique, Chad, Mali, Malawi, Gabon



Be kind to animals!
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29792 posts, RR: 58
Reply 5, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1839 times:

Quoting Lijnden (Reply 4):
France, Cuba, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, North Korea, Iran, Mongolia, Syria, The Lebanon, Rwanda, Zaire (Congo), Angola, Laos, Libya, Kiribati & Tungaru, Sudan, Djibouti, Burkino Faso, Swaziland, Madagascar, Mozambique, Chad, Mali, Malawi, Gabon

France and the US definately have something to do with each other.

I would also argue that Cuba interacts with the US-negatively.

Venzualea I belive gets most of her oil money from the US

Mongolia, the US provides military cooperation. One of my brothers buddies did training over there last year.

Lebanon, the US has been involved there.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineGkirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24923 posts, RR: 56
Reply 6, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1838 times:

Quoting Lijnden (Reply 4):
Venezuela, North Korea, Iran



Quoting Lijnden (Reply 4):
Rwanda, Zaire (Congo),



Quoting Lijnden (Reply 4):
Sudan, Djibouti

Successful?  crazy 



When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineArniePie From Belgium, joined Aug 2005, 1265 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1838 times:

Quoting Lijnden (Reply 4):
I can think of the following countries:
France, Cuba, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, North Korea, Iran, Mongolia, Syria, The Lebanon, Rwanda, Zaire (Congo), Angola, Laos, Libya, Kiribati & Tungaru, Sudan, Djibouti, Burkino Faso, Swaziland, Madagascar, Mozambique, Chad, Mali, Malawi, Gabon

He specifically asked for successful countries, which basically almost non in your list are, except France and they do have many and deep-going ties with the US.



As for the question at hand, IMHO it is a bit of a non issue, almost all big countries in the world have far going ties with almost all other countries in the world.



[edit post]
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 8, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1828 times:

How about Switzerland? They're always neutral! LOL!  wave 


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineBSBIsland From Brazil, joined Jul 2005, 376 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1825 times:

Quoting Flyf15 (Thread starter):
As for the question at hand, IMHO it is a bit of a non issue, almost all big countries in the world have far going ties with almost all other countries in the world.

Exactly.

It all depends on the level of involvement with each of them.


User currently offlineLAXspotter From India, joined Jan 2007, 3650 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1784 times:

The US is always trying to form a relationship with someone, somwhere. Most countries have some ties to the USA, unless it really doesnt matter on a global scale or on a region scale. My guess in that South Africa would be a much better partner to the US to have than say Swaziland or Lesotho.


"Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel" Samuel Johnson
User currently offlineItsnotfinals From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1762 times:

Quoting Bofredrik (Reply 1):
Sweden, , Finland.

I would hate to see how Nokia in FInland would do without the US, they have a massive organization in the US . Finland's economy is very much influenced by trade with the US.


User currently offlineOldeuropean From Germany, joined May 2005, 2085 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1755 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 5):
Venzualea I belive gets most of her oil money from the US

It's more the other way round.  Big grin

Axel



Wer nichts weiss muss alles glauben
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21552 posts, RR: 55
Reply 13, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1665 times:

Quoting Flyf15 (Thread starter):
What countries out there are successful but have little to no interaction with the US?

There aren't any. The US is deeply involved with every successful country in the world, as well as many unsuccessful ones.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineSandroZRH From Switzerland, joined Feb 2007, 3428 posts, RR: 50
Reply 14, posted (6 years 12 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1659 times:

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 8):
How about Switzerland

To a large extent, yes, and quite rightly so.


User currently offlineNoelg From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (6 years 12 months 10 hours ago) and read 1570 times:

It depends to what extent you are talking. I doubt any country has absolutely no trade with the US (with the obvious exceptions of Cuba, N Korea etc). Countries that have few political or military dealings with the US that spring to mind would be Russia, China and maybe New Zealand. Russia is almost entirely self-supportive (although they are dealing with more foreign countries these days), China who again are mostly self supporting, and NZ who compared to many western countries don't play along to the US's every whim like many other countries.

User currently offlineCheckraiser From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (6 years 12 months 10 hours ago) and read 1567 times:

Quoting Noelg (Reply 15):
China who again are mostly self supporting

China wouldn't be half of what it is without its US trade.


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 17, posted (6 years 12 months 10 hours ago) and read 1560 times:

Successful countries are successful in large part because they trade internationally. To find a nation that is successful without interacting with the largest economy, the greatest importer on the planet would be difficult, for reasons which should be obvious.

Whereas 150 years you could make a case for countries being successful without interaction with the superpower of that era, Britain (especially landlocked countries!), the world is different, with communication instantaneous.

In fact, it's not just a question of the United States. You'd be hard pressed to find a successful country that doesn't trade (and therefore, interacts) with someone like, say, France. The world is that much of a village these days.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineDerico From Argentina, joined Dec 1999, 4304 posts, RR: 12
Reply 18, posted (6 years 12 months 9 hours ago) and read 1547 times:

Argentina became successful in the 20th century with virtually no interaction or trade with the United States.

It also stagnated in the middle of the century because it decided to interact with no one, not just the United States.

Argentina is still trying to regain is former status. The lesson there is that trade, even if it's not completely fair, as long is is not mostly unfair, is good.



My internet was not shut down, the internet has shut me down
User currently offlineNoUFO From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7948 posts, RR: 12
Reply 19, posted (6 years 12 months 9 hours ago) and read 1534 times:

Quoting Gkirk (Reply 6):
Successful?



Quoting ArniePie (Reply 7):
He specifically asked for successful countries,

It's Lijnden. He just didn't want to miss an opportunity to mention France in the same breath with some crackpot nations (or what he thinks are crackpot nations).



I support the right to arm bears
User currently offlineSP90 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 388 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1413 times:

Quoting Bofredrik (Reply 1):
Finland.

Doesn't Nokia employ over half the workforce in Finland? I see a lot of people using Nokia cell phones in the US. Then there is also the GSM/UMTS/WiMax infrastructure of companies like Sprint, AT&T and T-Mobile also being partly Nokia.  Smile


User currently offlineSW733 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6311 posts, RR: 9
Reply 21, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1400 times:

Quoting SP90 (Reply 20):
Doesn't Nokia employ over half the workforce in Finland

No way, at least I don't think so. They have a huge impact on Finland, and they bring in upwards of 30% of the market capital in Finland, but half the workforce of the country...I would be very surprised. I do, however, think they are the largest employer in Finland.


User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39825 posts, RR: 74
Reply 22, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1394 times:

Quoting Bofredrik (Reply 1):
Sweden

Let's not for get that cheap furniture store Ikea that has huge big-box stores throughout the suburbs of the United States.
ABBA is still played in dance clubs across the USA.

Quoting Lijnden (Reply 4):
France

Are you serious?
...and how many US made parts does Airbus use and vis-versa?



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineAirPacific747 From Denmark, joined May 2008, 2385 posts, RR: 21
Reply 23, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1372 times:

Quoting Itsnotfinals (Reply 11):
I would hate to see how Nokia in FInland would do without the US, they have a massive organization in the US .

Actually, they wouldn't be doing too bad. India and China are BIG markets for Nokia too and they are constantly growing...


User currently offlineAndaman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1256 times:

Quoting SP90 (Reply 20):

Doesn't Nokia employ over half the workforce in finland?

in 2006 Nokia employ some 70,000 world wide (Nokia Siemens Networks not included), 24,000 of them in Finland.
After Finland comes 2) China 3) India 4) US

About US and Finland: in 2006 US was Finland's 5th largest trade partner.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Gas Companies Not Involved With Middle East posted Sun Sep 18 2005 21:53:22 by Flyf15
The Countries Not In Ruins Yet Then... (UK) posted Wed Jun 27 2007 23:48:07 by ThePRGuy
18 Years Later - Case My Partner Was Involved With posted Sat Jun 10 2006 23:33:41 by AirCop
I Am NOT Happy With The U.S. Government! posted Wed Feb 8 2006 17:50:32 by UAL777
Why Are Countries Not Spelled The Native Way? posted Wed Sep 14 2005 06:32:41 by Swisskloten
Interesting Interview With A US Military Sniper posted Sat Aug 27 2005 08:13:14 by NWA742
Syria Cuts Ties With US . . . . posted Wed May 25 2005 01:51:14 by ANCFlyer
Not So Liberal US Press posted Tue May 3 2005 03:42:33 by Schoenorama
South America Not Involved In Major War? posted Sat Apr 2 2005 05:16:47 by B741
Atheist Fares Poorly With US Supreme Court posted Thu Mar 25 2004 02:13:26 by EA CO AS