Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Good LCD Screens - 19 Or 20 Inch  
User currently offlineBagpiper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1143 times:

Mkay. So, I'm starting a home build computer for my business I started... doing mostly web design and work, with some video editing.

What I'm stuck on is the LCD screen. I know a fair amount about everything else.... but the LCD screens, I have no idea. Right now I'm on a 15 inch 1400x1050 pixel laptop display. Pretty nice screen. Now, if I go to 19 inch, most that I see are 1440x900. Seems like the 19 inch wide screen would be taller than my 15 inch full screen display, yet it has fewer "height" pixels.

So... running photoshop, dreamweaver, a few games... would 1440x900 be a let down? Should I go to a 20 inch 1680x1050?

I'm planning on eventually getting a second monitor, so I can run all the chat windows w/ clients in one screen, and do the work in the other. Stuff like that.

What brands? Acer? Asus? Samsung? ViewSonic? Dell? Good ones, or bad ones? How about contrast.... 1,000:1 is ok? 700:1?

Response time, I'm not too worried about. 5ms should be fine for me, I'd think.... unless 2ms is only 5 bucks more.

Thanks for the help!

Oh, and I'll be running these off of the analog video ports... VGA or D-sub, whatever it is called. The actual computer will be running behind me, while I'll be routing the cables through a wall into a wall face plate, where I can attach the cables. DVI can only go 12 feet or whatever, so that probably won't reach. It might... we'll see....

I assume VGA or D-sub is still an ok connection to use?

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineScottieprecord From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 1363 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1131 times:

I found a 22" LG with 2ms and 3000:1 for $300. I'm absolutely in love with this monitor; no complaints whatsoever as of yet (bout 3 weeks now).

Looks like it's now up to $350, but still a good deal in my opinion:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....2%22&type=product&id=1177112467150

-Mike


User currently offlineAC773 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 1730 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1120 times:

I just got a 22" Planar PX2210MW LCD, and it's great. Planar makes professional displays for just about any purpose, and the PX is their pro graphics line. I do photo editing and web design myself, so backlight even-ness and color accuracy were really important. If you can get past the ugly (and useless for me) integrated speakers, it's a steal at $285 - even less than some consumer displays.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824016083



Better to be nouveau than never to have been riche at all.
User currently offlineAg92 From India, joined Jul 2006, 1317 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1102 times:

Why settle for second best?

Go for 24 or 30 inch

Regards
Ag92


User currently offlineBagpiper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 day ago) and read 1084 times:

mkay... I think I'm gunna run over to Office Depot or Best Buy so I can actually look at them and see them.... then I'll decide. I'll definitely check out the ones you guys suggested! Thanks!

User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21442 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (7 years 22 hours ago) and read 1072 times:

Getting any decent monitor and then feeding it an analog signal is a complete waste of money. Especially when you're doing anything that's got to do with image quality, VGA is a big no-no. (But even text will visibly deteriorate via VGA.)

The digital-to-analog-and-back-to-digital double conversion loses colour accuracy and edge precision, makes the image susceptible to any kind of analog interference and is a general nuisance to begin with.

The analog era is over. VGA is a legacy port for CRTs which has no place in any new computer setup. Trading quality for minor convenience is a bad long-term deal.

If your computer is too loud for you, get a less noisy one or silence it with improved cooling.


A few hints:

- Very short switching times of an LCD can make matters worse, actually, because they often come at the expense of a multi-frame latency which can cause an annoying "mouse lag" and asynchronous audio/video presentation.

- Extreme contrast may be less relevant than uniformity of the backlight if you're doing photo or video work.

- In my opinion one can't have enough screen resolution, especially if you're working with many windows/palettes. That's why I'm using two 20" 1600*1200 LCDs.  Smile


User currently offlineBagpiper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 21 hours ago) and read 1064 times:

thanks Klaus!

I want widescreen... so I'm looking at a 20" or 22" WSXGA+ (1680x1050). I don't have a whooole lot of money to blow on this, so I'm not wanting to get something really massive or really really nice.

The reason the computer will be a little ways away from the monitor is not noise issues.

I just checked DVI specs, and 15 feet is the limit, so it looks like I can use DVI after all... I hope. Depends on how I hard-wire the cords. Should work out ok.

Klaus, any specific suggestions for a 20" - 22" LCD, around $250 USD, since you're into this stuff?

I assume they have different products in Germany than in the US, so if thats the case, I guess you can't suggest stuff too well.


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21442 posts, RR: 53
Reply 7, posted (7 years 17 hours ago) and read 1049 times:

Quoting Bagpiper (Reply 6):
Klaus, any specific suggestions for a 20" - 22" LCD, around $250 USD, since you're into this stuff?

Not really, at this point. I've not been looking for a new monitor for a while, and apart from the high end manufacturers there is little you can go on besides actually checking out the individual models through competent tests or looking at them yourself.

Price is not always a good indicator for quality, so attractive bargains can be found on occasion.


User currently offlineBagpiper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 15 hours ago) and read 1035 times:

I'm looking at the Samsung 206BW [url="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-206BW-20-Inch-Digital-Widescreen/dp/B000N5WNKM/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-9211773-8006051?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1188506842&sr=1-1"](link on amazon[/url])

Or, maybe the 216BW, which is the 21" version.

[Edited 2007-08-31 00:17:58]

User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21442 posts, RR: 53
Reply 9, posted (7 years 15 hours ago) and read 1031 times:

One of the user comments remarks that it emits a relatively loud buzzing noise at some settings. You might want to check it out in a store if possible...

It doesn't look too bad for its price, but as I said I don't have a current overview of the market.


User currently offlineWGW2707 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 1197 posts, RR: 34
Reply 10, posted (7 years 15 hours ago) and read 1028 times:

The two brands of monitors I personally like are the IBM ThinkVision and the Dell flatpanels. The ThinkVision monitors are rather dramatically bright, perhaps excessively so from a color management perspective, but they do look hot nonetheless. The Dell flatpanels (at least, as of 2005) offer very good color fidelity...I'm looking at one as I type this.

I personally vastly prefer non glossy LCDs to glossy LCDs...I have two Lenovo laptops with glossy screens that drive me crazy. Colors appare more consistent on an LCD with a matte finish.

I have to say though, I've yet to find an LCD that could replace my CRT. The superior refresh rates and resolution-changing capabilities of the CRT platform simply can't be beat, IMO.


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21442 posts, RR: 53
Reply 11, posted (7 years 14 hours ago) and read 1025 times:

Quoting WGW2707 (Reply 10):
I have to say though, I've yet to find an LCD that could replace my CRT. The superior refresh rates and resolution-changing capabilities of the CRT platform simply can't be beat, IMO.

Refresh rates are largely irrelevant with LCDs as they inherently don't flicker anyway. The only remaining reason to care about it any more is video frame synchronization (24p).

And as for resolution changing, that depends a lot on what you're using it for. If you're playing a lot and so are using different lower resolutions frequently it may be a worthwile issue; But that is pretty much the only reason to switch resolutions any more.

I'm glad I got rid of my last CRT a while ago - the energy saving alone is substantial (max. 50W against max. 120W), and that at a much better (sharper) picture and larger viewable area. Some few high-end CRTs may still offer somewhat better colour reproduction (which is increasingly unlikely), but for almost everything else LCDs are much better nowadays.


User currently offlineMdodd From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 14 hours ago) and read 1024 times:

When video editing, I use a MacPro with two 30" HD Cinema Displays. They are the best monitors I have personally seen, but I know by specs they can be beaten. I recommend them as a fellow video editor (the 20", version though).

User currently offlineBagpiper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 hours ago) and read 1007 times:

Quoting Mdodd (Reply 12):

at 600 USD a piece?  Wow!

I wish!

Quoting Klaus (Reply 9):
buzzing

Seems like its only on lower power settings... so it should be ok. I'm gunna run over to my local computer store though.


Thanks for the info, guys!


User currently offlineAC773 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 1730 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (7 years 9 hours ago) and read 998 times:

Quoting Bagpiper (Reply 13):
at 600 USD a piece?

At that price, you may as well get an Eizo.  Wink

I just don't understand the Apple displays beyond their aesthetic value.



Better to be nouveau than never to have been riche at all.
User currently offlineWGW2707 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 1197 posts, RR: 34
Reply 15, posted (6 years 12 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 971 times:

Quoting Klaus (Reply 11):
Refresh rates are largely irrelevant with LCDs as they inherently don't flicker anyway. The only remaining reason to care about it any more is video frame synchronization (24p).

Video frame rate synchronization caused by lower refresh rates IS the problem! This is why, when watching certain action films or playing certain games, on certain lower quality LCDs you get disgusting blurring effects.

That said, I do believe this problem will be corrected, as will the problem of screen resolution (once natives resolutions cross a certain threshold, it should be possible to emulate lower resolutions with no perceptible loss of quality), but until then, I will retain at least one 19" CRT.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Top 10 Or 20 Selling Vehicles In Your Country posted Sun Nov 6 2005 06:29:48 by Jmc1975
The Good Old Days: Fact Or Myth? posted Mon Aug 19 2002 16:52:13 by Mcdougald
Notre Dame Football...Overrated Or Good? posted Thu Aug 9 2007 14:41:46 by DeltaGator
LCD Or Plasma? posted Mon May 28 2007 05:22:28 by Halls120
Condominiums - Ripoffs Or Good Investments? posted Thu May 10 2007 01:17:28 by 2H4
Amtrak News Regarding Trains 1/2 And 19/20 posted Sat May 5 2007 17:05:20 by MSYtristar
Armed Guards In Schools: Good Or Bad? posted Wed Apr 25 2007 23:05:36 by Blackbird
Religious Self-Segregation -- A Good Or Bad Idea? posted Sat Jan 13 2007 00:08:30 by AerospaceFan
Smacking Kids - A Good Or Bad Thing? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 22:23:53 by BA757
Surprising A Friend- Bad Or Good Idea? posted Sun Jul 16 2006 00:29:24 by RJ100