Klaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21592 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 871 times:
As far as I'm aware even in the newer games the multi-core support is rather limited right now and most of them are primarily limited by the graphics processor anyway. A faster dual core will generally be more useful in practice than a slower quad, unless you're heavily into image processing or movie rendering.
Bagpiper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 854 times:
I agree... faster dual core is better than slower quad. Unless you're transcoding 4 DVDs at a time.
If anything is multi-threaded right now, it'll work best with a dual core. In the mean time, a program will only use one of the cores, which is lower clock speed on the quad you listed, thus lower performance.