Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
4000-pixel Aerial Stitched Pano Of Manhattan  
User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6748 posts, RR: 7
Posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3760 times:

Wonder how long the helicopter has to hover to get this-- says he took it on 13 Sept. Doesn't say how many pics it took, or what camera/lens.

http://www.rafaelstudio.com/images/NYC_enl.jpg

(don't forget to enlarge it to full size)

[Edited 2007-09-30 01:58:37]

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWestJetYQQ From Canada, joined Jan 2007, 2987 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3686 times:

Wow.... Someone has some expensive equipment.  Wow!

I wouldn't mind hanging that in my living room If I could get it without his name in the middle.  Smile

Cheers
Carson



Will You Try to Change Things? Use the Power that you have, the Power of a Million new Ideas.
User currently offlineMonteycarlos From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 2107 posts, RR: 29
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3600 times:

Looks like it was gyro-stabilised and at least a 6 image stitch... very nice work.


It's a beautiful night to fly like a phoenix...
User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5669 posts, RR: 45
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3550 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting WestJetYQQ (Reply 1):
I wouldn't mind hanging that in my living room If I could get it without his name in the middle

You can... just go to the website, click add to cart and enter credit details, really easy you send money he will send picture.
That's how commerce works!!



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6748 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3460 times:

Quoting Monteycarlos (Reply 2):
Looks like it was gyro-stabilised

How would a gyro help?


User currently offlineATCT From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2259 posts, RR: 39
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3437 times:

Quoting Timz (Reply 4):
How would a gyro help?

Not sure the phsyics of the whole she-bang, but when we went from a non-gryo stabilized camera to a gyro stabilized WESCAM, it made a world of difference. (then at the same time the other news chopper got a laser something or other that blew us out of the water)

ATCT



"The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing." - Walt Disney
User currently offlineBA757 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2832 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3433 times:

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 3):
You can... just go to the website, click add to cart and enter credit details, really easy you send money he will send picture.
That's how commerce works!!

Only $30 too...


User currently offlineINNflight From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 3765 posts, RR: 60
Reply 7, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3429 times:

A gyro mainly helps to prevent from camera shake on a tripod or other issues that could come up in a helicopter.

Certainly some very impressive stiches this guy did! Thanks for sharing!

Btw.... as all his shots (not the model ones of course) are HDR images, they involve a whole lot more than just the images one actually sees.

Here's an impressive vid of the stiching for the NY panorama!

http://www.rafaelstudio.com/nyc_anim.htm

[Edited 2007-10-01 22:56:55]


Jet Visuals
User currently offlineDavestanKSAN From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 1678 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3412 times:

Very cool. Glad he did La Jolla too, very neat.  thumbsup 

Dave



Yesterday we've sinned, today we move towards God. Touch the sky....love and respect...Safe Star!
User currently offlineFumanchewd From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3402 times:

Forgive me for not knowing....why can't he just take a wide angle picture from a good vantage point? Why are the multiple pictures and stitching necessary? I could understand if it was a 360 or 180 degree panaroma.

User currently offlineWaterpolodan From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1649 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3395 times:

Quoting Fumanchewd (Reply 9):
Forgive me for not knowing....why can't he just take a wide angle picture from a good vantage point? Why are the multiple pictures and stitching necessary? I could understand if it was a 360 or 180 degree panaroma.

I'm also not sure, but probably because he can get a much higher resolution if he combines a bunch of individual photographs. That La Jolla picture series is great, I found the restaurant I went to last year when I visited!


User currently offlineToast From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3393 times:

Beautiful pic, but it would be so much more beautiful without that gaping hole in Lower Manhattan... New York, please get your ass in gear, it's been long enough like that.  Sad

User currently offlineINNflight From Austria, joined Apr 2004, 3765 posts, RR: 60
Reply 12, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks ago) and read 3383 times:

Quoting Fumanchewd (Reply 9):
Forgive me for not knowing....why can't he just take a wide angle picture from a good vantage point? Why are the multiple pictures and stitching necessary? I could understand if it was a 360 or 180 degree panorama.

It's purely for the resolution of the final product. One of those panoramas on his site has a width of 30,000 pixels!!! So far, the best and most expensive sf DSLR camera (Canon 1DsmkII, 16 megapixels I think) produces original files of close to 4,000 pixels in width.

If you'd now imagine that he sells that photo to an ad agency who wants to put this one on a billboard next to an interstate, a 4,000 pixel photograph will simply not be good for use because it's too small. The quality is not there to have it printed that large, same goes for the details. If you have ten times the original size....there's a whole more of room to work with.

Cheers!



Jet Visuals
User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6748 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks ago) and read 3377 times:

Quoting Fumanchewd (Reply 9):
why can't he just take a wide angle picture from a good vantage point?

Here's an even better example of somebody stitching a pano rather than doing a single wide-angle shot-- and look at the quality that resulted. This time the total horizontal angle of view is only 50-60 degrees, so he easily could have done a single shot. (I posted this one before, and its 5 MB, so ...)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...m_Staten_Island_Ferry_Jan_2006.jpg


User currently offlineDavestanKSAN From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 1678 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks ago) and read 3354 times:

Quoting INNflight (Reply 12):
So far, the best and most expensive sf DSLR camera (Canon 1DsmkII, 16 megapixels I think) produces original files of close to 4,000 pixels in width.

Check this out Big grin

http://www.roundshot.ch/xml_1/intern.../de/application/d438/d925/f934.cfm  drool 

There's also 22 megapixels, 38 I think, etc.

Dave



Yesterday we've sinned, today we move towards God. Touch the sky....love and respect...Safe Star!
User currently offlineAirfoilsguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3348 times:

Quoting DavestanKSAN (Reply 14):
Check this out

A bargain at only $36,000  Smile

http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/20/s...-digital-shoots-at-160-megapixels/


User currently offlineFumanchewd From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3339 times:

Quoting INNflight (Reply 12):
If you'd now imagine that he sells that photo to an ad agency who wants to put this one on a billboard next to an interstate, a 4,000 pixel photograph will simply not be good for use because it's too small. The quality is not there to have it printed that large, same goes for the details. If you have ten times the original size....there's a whole more of room to work with.

Ok thanks. Makes sense, although I haven't noticed a lack of quality on other billboards.

Quoting Timz (Reply 13):
Here's an even better example of somebody stitching a pano rather than doing a single wide-angle shot-- and look at the quality that resulted. This

Damn. I need to get a 1080 monitor. The buildings look very clear but the background looks grainy. I assume its my monitor. I guess that we are getting to the point that large print/billboards will soon look better than real life!  Wink


User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6748 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3320 times:

Quoting INNflight (Reply 12):
an ad agency who wants to put this one on a billboard next to an interstate, a 4,000 pixel photograph will simply not be good for use

4000 pixels will be plenty for a billboard. A 40-meter billboard would be pretty big, wouldn't it? Would 1-cm pixels be too big, viewed from passing cars?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Pixel Size Of A4 Paper posted Tue Feb 13 2007 20:52:36 by AirbusA346
Paradox Of US History posted Sat Sep 29 2007 07:08:33 by LAXspotter
Anyone Of Us Could Be Dead, And We Not Know It posted Fri Sep 28 2007 19:11:58 by UAL747
Rant Of The Week: Character Encoding On PCs posted Fri Sep 28 2007 16:13:37 by Toast
Interesting Database Of Chinese Cars(pics)... posted Fri Sep 28 2007 04:28:29 by Alberchico
Judge Rules Part Of Patriot Act Unconstitutional posted Thu Sep 27 2007 16:32:52 by B752fanatic
Rep. Dingell Wants To Tax Us Out Of Global Warming posted Thu Sep 27 2007 15:43:42 by RJdxer
Songs You Can`t Get Out Of Your Head posted Tue Sep 25 2007 01:18:35 by Wolverine
Just How Big Of A Tosser Are You? posted Mon Sep 24 2007 20:15:04 by BananaBoY
Starbucks Kicked Out Of Forbidden City posted Mon Sep 24 2007 18:43:51 by Alberchico