Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MI Supreme Court Hears Gay Marriage Case!  
User currently offlineDtwclipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 2216 times:

Today, The Michigan Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the hotly contested proposal 2 of 2004, the marriage amendment. At issue, Does the Marriage Amendment to Michigan’s Constitution bar various public sector employers from providing health insurance benefits to employees’ qualified same-sex domestic partners?
At the time Proposal 2 was adopted, many public employers were offering same-sex domestic partner benefits. After its passage, Governor Granholm convinced the unions to put a hold on these benefits, stating there was a “legal cloud” over the current contracts.
Although supporters of Proposal 2 has assured the public that the passage of the amendment would not affect domestic partner benefits, Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox wrote an opinion that “same-sex benefits are now in violation of Michigan’s Constitution.”
Even though the Ingham County Circuit Court held that the amendment “does not prohibit public employers from entering into contractual agreements with their employees to provide domestic partner benefits,” the Michigan Court of Appeals in 2007 overruled the circuit court and eliminated benefits for same-sex couple that work for public entities.
The Michigan Supreme Court heard arguments from Cynthia Ann Paul, Attorney for amicus curiae Michigan Pride At Work; Governor Granholm’s office and Attorney General Mike Cox’s office.
A decision is expected within three to six months.

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAirCop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2197 times:

This decision when it comes down should make for some interesting reading. The one good thing about this amendment was it was used in the Arizona campaign in 2006 has an example of why not to vote for the marriage amendment.

User currently offlineFoppishbum From Taiwan, joined Mar 2006, 896 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2172 times:

Yay? I think it's easier if we all just move to Canada.  Angry

foppish bum

Taiwanese-American :D
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2125 times:

Quoting Foppishbum (Reply 2):
Yay? I think it's easier if we all just move to Canada.

...ah yes, the way of least resistance-- always the optimum choice for longterm results.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Highest Court In New York Tanks Gay Marriage posted Thu Jul 6 2006 15:59:09 by Dougloid
Supreme Court Dismisses Pledge Case posted Mon Jun 14 2004 16:50:25 by B757300
US Supreme Court To Decide Mandatory ID Case posted Tue Mar 23 2004 01:14:34 by Jhooper
Court Rules Ban On Gay Marriage Unconstitutional posted Tue Nov 18 2003 17:36:03 by Delta777-XXX
New TV Ad Aims To Change Minds On Gay Marriage posted Sat Oct 13 2007 11:48:09 by Aaron747
New Ad Campaign For Gay Marriage In California posted Tue Oct 9 2007 17:32:42 by Johnboy
Supreme Court To Decide Photo ID Voting Law posted Tue Sep 25 2007 23:03:45 by Cfalk
San Diego Mayor Announces Support For Gay Marriage posted Thu Sep 20 2007 23:20:56 by RJpieces
Supreme Court Bans School Integration In WA, KY posted Thu Jun 28 2007 17:45:20 by D L X
Gay Marriage Safe In Massachusetts posted Fri Jun 15 2007 05:29:42 by Johnboy