Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Green Light To Create Human-animal Embryos  
User currently offlineMadameConcorde From San Marino, joined Feb 2007, 10875 posts, RR: 37
Posted (6 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1177 times:

I have no idea what will be the limit to this once the scientists will have started creating these new human-animal "species". What if they try to bring one to life without telling anybody outside of their labs?
This is rather freaky I think...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7193820.stm

Green light for hybrid research

embryo
Hybrids are made using an animal egg mixed with human genes

Regulators have given scientists the green light to create human-animal embryos for research.
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority granted permission after a consultation showed the public were "at ease" with the idea.


There was a better way to fly it was called Concorde
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNWADC9 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4896 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (6 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1170 times:

Will we see talking animals?  Wink


Flying an aeroplane with only a single propeller to keep you in the air. Can you imagine that? -Capt. Picard
User currently offlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5970 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (6 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1163 times:

The furries are coming! The furries are coming!


Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8681 posts, RR: 43
Reply 3, posted (6 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1150 times:

Isn't the animal genetic material removed from the eggs? I think it would have to be, further ruling out the creation of a "hybrid species" in addition to the fact that none of the cells created are supposed to be implanted in the womb of a woman.

I've read the HFEA summary of the project but that wasn't really helpful: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/en/375.html



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (6 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1142 times:



Quoting Aloges (Reply 3):
Isn't the animal genetic material removed from the eggs?

Correct. All the animal DNA from the nucleus is removed.

They aren't trying to produce some kind of human/animal hybrid, they want to be able to create human embryos for experimentation - research into disease basically - and there is a shortage of human embryos. Hence this approach.

It's a matter open to debate, of course, and there are perfectly reasonable arguments against it. Personally, I don't have a problem with it. It's not like they're experimenting on babies, although no doubt some will try to categorise it as such.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineAvt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (6 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1126 times:

I like the one line about "tampering with nature". Presumably when these critics get sick, they don't take medicine, or have surgery, since that's "tampering with nature".
"John Smeaton, national director of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC), said: "The HFEA decision represents a disastrous setback for human dignity in Britain. "
Maybe this guy ought to worry less about the "unborn" and worry more about the "born" children who are suffering with disease and birth defects.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...