Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why The Construction Of The ECB Is Nonsense  
User currently offlineLHStarAlliance From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1802 times:

Hi guys !

Now we see how the American Central Bank is reacting , how it should be , following the Keynesian economics .
In Europe we've done a complete nonsense with the construction of the ECB , which is bound to the stability of the money but not to support the economic growth . As Helmut Schmidt said one day : It's better for someone to have a Job and have 4% of inflation than unemployed with 2% . This is so logical ! All the world does it , just we in Europe have this stupid construction !

We need a strong regulation of the financial transactions and a monetary policy that supports the economic growth , with the regulations it'd be able to avoid bubbles as they have happened in America , and have 4+% of growth .


Constantin



Edit : Very good Article (just in German)

http://www.ftd.de/meinung/kommentare...iges%20Nichtstun%20EZB/307382.html

[Edited 2008-01-25 11:30:25]

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21495 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1792 times:

Sure. Who wants stable money value anyway...?  crazy 

User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1785 times:



Quoting Klaus (Reply 1):
Sure. Who wants stable money value anyway...?

Shock, horror; me and you are going to agree on this Klaus. The ECB can only do what it is doing. Loosening the purse strings to help one country doesn't remotely help in the long term if it screws up everyone else. And actually, the only possible (whether desirable or not) way it could do anything else is with a central European government.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently onlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21495 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1777 times:



Quoting Banco (Reply 2):
Shock, horror; me and you are going to agree on this Klaus.

 faint 

Well, at least we disagree about some things:

Quoting Banco (Reply 2):
Loosening the purse strings to help one country doesn't remotely help in the long term if it screws up everyone else.

With the common market that aspect is receding anyway. The Euro, the ECB and the common market are intrinsically linked. Neither can exist without the others.

Quoting Banco (Reply 2):
And actually, the only possible (whether desirable or not) way it could do anything else is with a central European government.

I don't see much sense in currency manipulations trying to salvage a flawed economical or financial policy. Keep the currency value stable (which is also important for a major global reserve currency) and then put sensible economical and fiscal policies on top of that foundation.

Maybe it's just a matter of preference to a degree, but from a german perspective it's a well-proven approach.


User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8969 posts, RR: 39
Reply 4, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1768 times:



Quoting LHStarAlliance (Thread starter):
Keynesian economics

Largely discredited.



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1758 times:



Quoting Klaus (Reply 3):
With the common market that aspect is receding anyway.

Um. I think that's pure wishful thinking. You'd like it to be true, but it isn't.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 3):
I don't see much sense in currency manipulations trying to salvage a flawed economical or financial policy. Keep the currency value stable (which is also important for a major global reserve currency) and then put sensible economical and fiscal policies on top of that foundation.

I agree. It's not something I was advocating, I was just saying that an intervensionist policy in the way that a lot of French politicians would like to see would require a central authority to implement it.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 3):
Maybe it's just a matter of preference to a degree, but from a german perspective it's a well-proven approach.

To an extent. German economic patterns over the last 20 years or so have been less than stellar in terms of performance. The German "economic miracle" is now being reassessed in the light of some severe structural problems that became highlighted. Nevertheless, the British certainly adopted it, and it has worked well enough for us over the past decade, though with a rather different economic base and structure to begin with.

Even so, the most successful central bank over the last half century is not the German or the British one, but the Federal Reserve.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 6, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1752 times:



Quoting PPVRA (Reply 4):
Quoting LHStarAlliance (Thread starter):
Keynesian economics

Largely discredited.

Ahhhh, ummmm....sort of. Keynesian economic theory seemed to work perfectly well for 30 years or more, before stagflation seemed to blow a hole in it. Monetarism of the kind espoused by Friedman became the new thing, but that too became discredited when the British (of all people!) adopted it in the early years of the 1980s. Money supply rocketed and inflation plunged, wrecking the central tenet of the theory. Over the last 20 years elements of both theories have been adopted, and other discarded. But to say it's "largely discredited" goes a bit too far in dismissing the work of a great economist whose theories remain extremely valuable. It's a bit like saying Newton's theories are largely discredited because of the arrival of Einstein, when they remain true for a given value of truth.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26626 posts, RR: 75
Reply 7, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1743 times:



Quoting LHStarAlliance (Thread starter):


Now we see how the American Central Bank is reacting , how it should be , following the Keynesian economics .

Actually, if we were following a true Keynsian model, that money would be spent creating job programs and on infrastructure. Which is actually something we need desperately in the US right now.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineDougloid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1733 times:



Quoting N1120A (Reply 7):
Actually, if we were following a true Keynsian model, that money would be spent creating job programs and on infrastructure. Which is actually something we need desperately in the US right now.

the best social program is a job you can support a family on.


User currently offlineLHStarAlliance From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1713 times:



Quoting Dougloid (Reply 8):
the best social program is a job you can support a family on.

exactly , and this is far better than unemployment and just 2% inflation !


User currently offlineLHStarAlliance From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1708 times:



Quoting N1120A (Reply 7):
Actually, if we were following a true Keynsian model, that money would be spent creating job programs and on infrastructure. Which is actually something we need desperately in the US right now.

by sinking the base rate the credits are cheaper this makes that Companies invest more which produces more jobs . If you keep the base rate high , less companies will invest what will produce less economic growth and higher unemployment .


User currently offlinePyrex From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 4027 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1684 times:



Quoting LHStarAlliance (Thread starter):
This is so logical ! All the world does it , just we in Europe have this stupid construction !

If it's so logical and the whole world sees it then why does the current Chairman of the Fed, Ben Bernanke, has been quoted saying he would like to have a single mandate to control inflation as the ECB has rather than the dual mandate imposed by Congress?

Quoting N1120A (Reply 7):
and on infrastructure. Which is actually something we need desperately in the US right now.

 checkmark  Though actually to be fare the US desperately needs a lot of investment in infrastructure not so much to stimulate growth (that is just a bonus side effect) but because its infrastructure is crumbling under a ridiculous notion that government spending money = bad - it would be necessary even in a booming economy. But I am sure if the Congress and the President finally manage to get their heads out of the sand and start digging a lot of people will bring in the "New Deal" slanders as if it was a bad thing.



Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8969 posts, RR: 39
Reply 12, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1654 times:



Quoting Banco (Reply 6):
Keynesian economic theory seemed to work perfectly well for 30 years or more

Ehh, sort of.  Smile Frederic Bastiat blew a hole on Keynesian theory before Keynes was even born:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window

With that you have to wonder if things would have been better off without Keynes's ideas, without even taking stagflation into consideration. However, you are right that he was very influential and an important figure.



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26626 posts, RR: 75
Reply 13, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1637 times:



Quoting Dougloid (Reply 8):

the best social program is a job you can support a family on.

Precisely. And infrastructure building jobs would kill many birds with one stone there.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlinePelican From Germany, joined Apr 2004, 2531 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1614 times:



Quoting Banco (Reply 5):
To an extent. German economic patterns over the last 20 years or so have been less than stellar in terms of performance. The German "economic miracle" is now being reassessed in the light of some severe structural problems that became highlighted. Nevertheless, the British certainly adopted it, and it has worked well enough for us over the past decade, though with a rather different economic base and structure to begin with.

Even so, the most successful central bank over the last half century is not the German or the British one, but the Federal Reserve.

Indeed. Sometimes I wonder whether the German central bank could sell itself better than any other central bank. The approach of the ECB is too fixed on monetary stability especially when compared to the Fed. Inflexible monetary politics have cost Germany dearly.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 3):
I don't see much sense in currency manipulations trying to salvage a flawed economical or financial policy.

What do you call currency manipulations? The ECB does it all the time with the goal to achieve monetary stability... It's called monetary policy and it's at as important as economical policy and financial policy.

pelican


User currently onlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21495 posts, RR: 53
Reply 15, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1609 times:



Quoting Banco (Reply 5):
Quoting Klaus (Reply 3):
With the common market that aspect is receding anyway.

Um. I think that's pure wishful thinking. You'd like it to be true, but it isn't.

So you're saying that the coordinated economic policies, the common market and the common currency have increased the disparities and the friction between the member countries?

Oookay...!

Quoting Banco (Reply 5):
I agree. It's not something I was advocating, I was just saying that an intervensionist policy in the way that a lot of French politicians would like to see would require a central authority to implement it.

Not going to happen either way. Sometimes french politicians are chafing at the necessities, sometimes ours, sometimes others. But necessities are still necessities nevertheless.

Quoting Banco (Reply 5):
To an extent. German economic patterns over the last 20 years or so have been less than stellar in terms of performance.

We're standing pretty solidly. We've got certain domestic problems which have nothing to do with currency or the common market, such as the lingering aftermath of the unification, lagging immigrant integration and various education difficulties.

We're under way paying off many sins of the past and at the same time investing in our infrastructure. Not flashy, spectacular or "sexy" in any way, but definitely necessary for sustainable development.

Among all that, we're one of the biggest sponsors but also one of the biggest beneficiaries of the common market and of the enlarging EU, with an excellent competitive position in various industrial and consumer markets.

We could definitely do much, much worse under the circumstances.

Quoting Banco (Reply 5):
Nevertheless, the British certainly adopted it, and it has worked well enough for us over the past decade,

If you just narrow down the period enough, you can "prove" pretty much anything.  mischievous 

Too bad that a large part of that "success" seems to have been based on exactly that same bubble we're now seeing deflate again - basically a mortgage on the future which still needs to be repaid after all.

And while the bizarrely inflated real estate prices in Britain apparently propped up the Pound, I don't see the monetary policy of the Bank of England as the main driver of the bubble - nor as the culprit for the normalization that seems to be under way now (with a corresponding decline of the Pound).

I've said it before and I repeat: When that predicted normalization will be complete in several months, I expect the Euro to be on the british agenda again, under more realistic conditions than before. But we can expand on that in the usual separate thread(s).

Quoting Banco (Reply 5):
though with a rather different economic base and structure to begin with.

One could say that.

The question is where and how the respective central banks and their monetary strategies really figure into that. Looking at the completely different backgrounds, circumstances and political approaches, I don't think that they really made that much of a difference besides providing a foundation for the respective path.

Quoting Banco (Reply 5):
Even so, the most successful central bank over the last half century is not the German or the British one, but the Federal Reserve.

That probably depends on the metric one applies.


User currently offlineAverageUser From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1603 times:



Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
So you're saying that the coordinated economic policies, the common market and the common currency have increased the disparities and the friction between the member countries?

I think you're right. When the common market area has been enlarged, and the states will be out of sync economically, then out of sheer necessity the friction will grow. A country like Finland is increasingly trading truly globally, external to the EU, while some states are by their industry structure more bound to intra-EU trade.


User currently onlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21495 posts, RR: 53
Reply 17, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1603 times:



Quoting Pelican (Reply 14):
What do you call currency manipulations?

Abandoning monetary stability in order to satisfy political demands.


User currently onlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21495 posts, RR: 53
Reply 18, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1601 times:



Quoting AverageUser (Reply 16):
A country like Finland is increasingly trading truly globally, external to the EU, while some states are by their industry structure more bound to intra-EU trade.

An internally stable home currency is an asset in that case as well, especially when it serves as a major global reserve currency at the same time.


User currently offlineAverageUser From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1593 times:



Quoting Pyrex (Reply 11):
Quoting N1120A (Reply 7):
and on infrastructure. Which is actually something we need desperately in the US right now.

Though actually to be fare the US desperately needs a lot of investment in infrastructure not so much to stimulate growth (that is just a bonus side effect) but because its infrastructure is crumbling under a ridiculous notion that government spending money = bad - it would be necessary even in a booming economy.

Agreed. There was one spectacular accident not long ago -- I think you know what I'm talking about -- that underlines an urgent need to shift priorities within the U.S. state and federal spending towards a major infrastructure overhaul.


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 20, posted (6 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 1569 times:



Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
So you're saying that the coordinated economic policies, the common market and the common currency have increased the disparities and the friction between the member countries?

Oookay...!

I didn't say any such thing. Your desire to see things as you wish them to be rather than they are is leading you to make claims about me that aren't there. I simply said that your claim that that aspect is receding to be wishful thinking. Not the same at all.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
Not going to happen either way

No it isn't. Again, I didn't say it was. I just said that's what would be needed IF that approach was felt desirable.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
If you just narrow down the period enough, you can "prove" pretty much anything.

No. That is the only period you can choose for a meaningful comparison. The Bank of England has only been independent for the last decade. No selectivity there.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
I've said it before and I repeat: When that predicted normalization will be complete in several months, I expect the Euro to be on the british agenda again, under more realistic conditions than before. But we can expand on that in the usual separate thread(s).

Er...no. I know you'd love it to be like that, but it isn't going to be. Not for the forseeable future, and absolutely definitely, 100% not in "several months". You quite simply do not understand the reality in Britain.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
Too bad that a large part of that "success" seems to have been based on exactly that same bubble we're now seeing deflate again - basically a mortgage on the future which still needs to be repaid after all.

What is it with you? Why are you trying to pick an argument about something where the German model was actually being praised? I referred to the independence given to the Bank of England in 1997 under German lines having been a good move by Britain, yet you now try to pick holes in something that you actually believe in!

Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
I don't think that they really made that much of a difference besides providing a foundation for the respective path.

Of course. But the foundation was the critical factor.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
That probably depends on the metric one applies.

Perhaps the one I was applying was the one with the US being the most successful economy on the planet over that time period.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
And The Moral Of This Story Is... posted Fri Sep 3 2004 06:19:22 by MxCtrlr
Why Is The Price Of Oil Still So High? posted Fri Jul 7 2006 03:21:44 by MaxQ2351
This Is Why Cops Cross The Line... posted Tue Jul 16 2002 03:18:58 by Clipperhawaii
Multiculturalism Is Not The Opposite Of Racism posted Mon Nov 19 2007 10:20:38 by AerospaceFan
Why Don't Brits Use The Article Of Speech "the" posted Mon Oct 15 2007 11:52:12 by DeltaGator
What Is The Name Of The Song In This Video? posted Mon Oct 8 2007 11:08:42 by Chi-town
The Oil Law That Iraq Is Not Passing posted Wed Aug 29 2007 16:22:22 by Baroque
Larry Birkhead Is The Father Of Dannielynn posted Tue Apr 10 2007 21:46:48 by AeroWesty
The Drama That Is The Life Of TedTAce (don't.. posted Fri Mar 23 2007 21:30:30 by TedTAce
The President Of Iraq Is Fatigued posted Mon Feb 26 2007 09:27:54 by Mir