D L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 12250 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 2665 times:
Hillary won in a state where she was the only one on the ballot, but lost to "none of the above."
Hillary won in a state where she campaigned even though signing a pledge that she wouldn't campaign there.
Sounds to me like Hillary can't keep her promises.
I don't think Obama is terribly concerned - those delegates will not be seated. A re-vote is more likely than seating the delegates from those non-primaries.
Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
Pope From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 2652 times:
I think you'll see absolute outrage if this happens. The DNC told candidates not to campaign in these states. Changing the rules after the fact is just not right. Plus the DNC loses all authority to regulate the process going forward. Every state in the country is going to shoot for an early primary next time around because there's no penalty for ignoring DNC instructions.
Daedaeg From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 666 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 2639 times:
There is going to be mayhem if those delegates are seated. You'll have people like Ted Kennedy having a hissy fit. There will definitely be a walk out and protest by the Congressional Black Caucus. Overall it would be a bad idea for the dems. All the candidates agreed to the rules. Can't change the rules towards the end of the game.
DL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11454 posts, RR: 72
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 2628 times:
Quoting D L X (Reply 1): Hillary won in a state where she campaigned even though signing a pledge that she wouldn't campaign there.
Does this surprise anyone?
Quoting Pope (Reply 2): I think you'll see absolute outrage if this happens. The DNC told candidates not to campaign in these states. Changing the rules after the fact is just not right. Plus the DNC loses all authority to regulate the process going forward. Every state in the country is going to shoot for an early primary next time around because there's no penalty for ignoring DNC instructions.
I would saythat the Clintons would do anything they thought necessary to win on the assumption that they could fix it all after they win. It's arrogant and wrong, and bad for their party, but there you have it.
Quoting Daedaeg (Reply 3): Can't change the rules towards the end of the game.
Tell that the New Jersey Democrats. Or the Clinton Democra
Aloha73G From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2401 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2548 times:
I don't think the rules will be changed after the fact. The Obama people would (and should) go nuts if they do. If he had been campaigned in those states the results could have been quite different.
I thought that the Republicans "punishment" of stripping half the delegates was more....democratic.....but the rules were set and to change them in the situation the Democrats are in now would stink of smoke filled rooms and king making.
Now, if Hillary ends up with enough delegates to secure the nomination WITHOUT Michigan & Florida, I could see the party seating the delegates to keep the peace. If Obama is ahead or it is too close to call.....they'd be foolish to do it!
Aloha Airlines - The Spirit Moves Us. Gone but NEVER Forgotten. Aloha, A Hui Hou!
Quote: On the Democratic side, fourth quarter reports from Florida showed Clinton with statewide donations of $1.3 million compared to Obama's take in the Sunshine State - $ 692,000. The Clinton total comes mainly from three South Florida counties -population centers from Miami to West Palm Beach.
4th Quarter of 07, long after they knew delegates wouldn't count. They might not have campaigned there, but they both still raised a ton of money. Which in a way is indirect campaigning. Everyone does it. They are not going to pass up a way to get money.
Home Airport: Capital Region International Airport (KLAN)
Yellowstone From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3071 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (8 years 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 2422 times:
Quoting Aloha73G (Reply 7): Now, if Hillary ends up with enough delegates to secure the nomination WITHOUT Michigan & Florida, I could see the party seating the delegates to keep the peace.
I was talking with someone who shared much the same opinion. He figured that the DNC assumed that, as has almost always happened in the past, a clear front-runner would have emerged by the convention. If that were the case, then the Florida and Michigan delegates wouldn't matter one way or the other. Once one candidate had become the presumptive nominee and the others had conceded, all the candidates would call on the DNC to reseat the FL and MI delegations, the DNC would agree to do so, and everyone would go home happy.
Hydrogen is an odorless, colorless gas which, given enough time, turns into people.
It proves they raised money in Flordia. Thats all the whole point was. Poeple attack Clinton and people attack Obama, my point was to me it seems like Obama gets a free pass on so many issues, such as raising money in Florida.
Just take a minute and take a deep breath, relax. I was not stabbing in the dark with the point I was originally trying to make. People asked me to prove both candidates raised money in Florida after the seating of delegates was in question and that is wjat I did.
Home Airport: Capital Region International Airport (KLAN)
Wingnut767 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 1 week ago) and read 2400 times:
Quoting JetBlueGuy2006 (Reply 5): And Clinton did go to Florida, but it had absolutly no outcome in the election sice she went after the polls were closed
And maybe you should do some research
She appeared here on Sunday before the tuesday election. That is not after the polls has closed. That is two days before they opened in case you could not read a calendar.
Hillary's Florida Flip
"The Clinton campaign claims that the senator from New York is abiding by the no-campaigning pledge because Sunday's two Florida events were technically closed to the public. But the stops were treated as major news events in a state where many Democrats have expressed anger over the absence of the party's presidential candidates during a period when Florida is overrun by Republican contenders.
The truth of the Clinton strategy was writ large in a memo from top strategist Howard Wolfson, who announced on the day of the campaign's dismal showing in South Carolina that, "Regardless of today's outcome, the race quickly shifts to Florida, where hundreds of thousands of Democrats will turn out to vote on Tuesday. Despite efforts by the Obama campaign to ignore Floridians, their voices will be heard loud and clear across the country, as the last state to vote before Super Tuesday on February 5."
"Efforts by the Obama campaign to ignore Floridians"?
Obama's just abiding by the pledge. Admittedly, it's a foolish pledge. None of the campaigns should have taken it, and they all should have agreed to drop it. But in the absence of such an agreement, Obama is not ignoring Floridians. He is remaining true to his word.
Of course, Obama is surging, while Clinton is desperate."