WASHINGTON - Ralph Nader is launching a third-party campaign for president.
The consumer advocate made the announcement Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." He says most Americans are disenchanted with the Democratic and Republican parties, and that none of the presidential contenders are addressing ways to stem corporate crime and Pentagon waste and promote labor rights.
Now all we have to do is convince H. Ross Perot to step into the fray! Common Ross, you can do it one more time!!!!!
Isn't it true that independent candidates usually siphon votes away from the Democrats? Are you saying that Perot's 19,743,821 votes all came from former Bush supporters? A stronger Bush Presidency and campaign would have prevented the loss of votes to Perot, wouldn't it?
Pope From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 22, posted (5 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1264 times:
Quoting Diamond (Reply 21): Isn't it true that independent candidates usually siphon votes away from the Democrats?
Ross wasn't your typical independent candidate. He was an extremely successful business person who had personally financed a rescue of his employees when they were stuck behind enemy lines in Iran. He was for fiscal restraint in a period following Reagan's deficit spending and Bush's betrayal on his no new taxes pledge.
While nobody can say for sure, it is widely believed that Perot's presence in the 1992 election fractured the GOP base of fiscal conservatives and drew some middle of the road moderates and that was a major factor in Clinton's first victory.
D L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 10794 posts, RR: 52 Reply 24, posted (5 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1228 times:
Nader -- just have to shake my head. WTF? At least McCain will be able to say he's not the oldest man running for president anymore.
I would suspect at this point that the Nader campaign will get a LOT of money from Republican contributions. Think about it! individuals are maxed out at $2300, but they can each give an additional $2300 to a second candidate, if I'm not mistaken.
Quoting Pope (Reply 22): While nobody can say for sure, it is widely believed that Perot's presence in the 1992 election fractured the GOP base of fiscal conservatives and drew some middle of the road moderates and that was a major factor in Clinton's first victory.
An awful lot of people who normally vote for democrats voted for Perot.
25 Agill: Fantastic how many people there are who belive that all votes belong to either GOP or the Democrats. Much better in Cuba where there's no risk that pe
26 RJdxer: Although I think he drew more from fiscal conservatives and libertarians than he did middle of the road types. I voted for him simply beause Bush 41
27 CasInterest: Nader, is consumer oriented, and I don't think he strikes me as a person capable of leading this country in international relations, or domestic secur
28 LTBEWR: Let us hope that in many states he cannot get on the ballot. Problem is that he probably will and could screw up the Democrats, drawing those on the l
29 Klima: I think he will have no impact on the outcome of the '08 election, same as in the '04 race. Plus, I think a lot of democrats feel they actually have a
30 LH423: Also, depending on the composition of the voter base, it might not have made much of a difference since the spread of the votes could have been sprea
31 ConcordeBoy: What you talking about cheri-- you're ten thousand years older than sand! It's as amusing as it is ironic that the "s/he'll raise taxes" mantra-mouth
32 RJdxer: Yes they are. Fortunately I've been consistent in calling for spending cuts my entire adult life as well as getting control over out of control entit
33 Steeler83: Hey, I think he's better than either the Democrats and Republicans IMO! Hillary Clinton is scary as hell, and I don't trust Obama. McCain I have some