Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Porsche Acquires Volkswagen AG  
User currently offlineUTA_flyinghigh From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 6495 posts, RR: 50
Posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1672 times:

Wonder why no one picked this up. Porsche becomes the majority shareholder of Volkswagen AG  Wow!
Your thoughts ?

UTA   

[Edited 2008-03-05 08:48:47]


Fly to live, live to fly - Air France/KLM Flying Blue Platinum, BMI Diamond Club Gold, Emirates Skywards
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKay From France, joined Mar 2002, 1884 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1662 times:

Sad news if you ask me.
I love Porsches, but as the make-money-bug settles in, the cars are getting less and less specialized and more and more commercial. For example. today's Porsche 997 GT3 is the equivalent to what the 993 was. dry-sump, based on the same race engine, and a sports car as opposed to a GT which is what today's carrera, although a fabulous car, is.

Also, the Cayenne and the Panamera desperately need to go. What crap.
Yes, this new way of thinking rescusitated Porsche in the mid-90's when it was almost doomed. But from that extreme to other extreme of mass production is not good neither. They don't need to make that much money. It's their engineering, race wins and tough products that got them their reputation, not that flimsy interior that some of them have today (although still very well built compared to other manufacturers).

Kay


User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8826 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1655 times:



Quoting UTA_flyinghigh (Thread starter):
Wonder why no one picked this up. Porsche becomes the majority shareholder of Volkswagen AG
Your thoughts ?

Pretty amazing, considering that Volkswagen once owned most of Porsche, and Porsche grew out of VW, with ideas and engineers who came from VW.

Kinda like if Pontiac were to buy out General Motors.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26415 posts, RR: 75
Reply 3, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1640 times:



Quoting Kay (Reply 1):

Also, the Cayenne and the Panamera desperately need to go.

Unfortunately, the Cayenne makes up some ridiculously high portion of Porsche's revenues and profits.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 2):

Pretty amazing, considering that Volkswagen once owned most of Porsche, and Porsche grew out of VW, with ideas and engineers who came from VW.

No, wrong, incorrect. The original Volkswagen was designed by Ferdinand Porsche and built by Dr. Ing h.c. F. Porsche AG, which is the company you know today as Porsche. Porsche owned VW, not the other way around.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 13985 posts, RR: 62
Reply 4, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1627 times:



Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 2):
Quoting UTA_flyinghigh (Thread starter):
Wonder why no one picked this up. Porsche becomes the majority shareholder of Volkswagen AG
Your thoughts ?

Pretty amazing, considering that Volkswagen once owned most of Porsche, and Porsche grew out of VW, with ideas and engineers who came from VW.

Kinda like if Pontiac were to buy out General Motors.



Quoting N1120A (Reply 3):
Pretty amazing, considering that Volkswagen once owned most of Porsche, and Porsche grew out of VW, with ideas and engineers who came from VW.

No, wrong, incorrect. The original Volkswagen was designed by Ferdinand Porsche and built by Dr. Ing h.c. F. Porsche AG, which is the company you know today as Porsche. Porsche owned VW, not the other way around.

As far as I know the original Volkswagen company was founded by the Nazis in the 1930s to mass-produce an affordable car for the general public, designed by Porsche. It was state-owned for a large part. After WW2, as part of Germaby's armament industry (it build e.g. the Kuebelwagen for the Wehrmacht and Porsche was also involved in the design of the Tiger tank), it was supposed to be dismanteled, but the British Army, in which's zone of occupation the factory was based, needed a car for their occupational troops, so they continued to build the beetle.
Porsche himself wanted to build high performance cars, while VW built cars for the mass market (first the Beetle, later the Van and the Variant) and started his own company in the 1950s.
The current CEO of VW, Piech, is a member of Porsche's family, which also owns the Porsche company. Basically VW has been taken over by the Porsche/Piech family.

Jan


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26415 posts, RR: 75
Reply 5, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1618 times:



Quoting MD11Engineer (Reply 4):
As far as I know the original Volkswagen company was founded by the Nazis in the 1930s to mass-produce an affordable car for the general public, designed by Porsche.

Well, kinda sorta. Dr. Porsche founded Porsche AG in 1931 and his company designed and built the Type 12/Porsche 60/Beetle at the "request" of Adolf Hitler. Production of the Volkswagen then shifted to the state-owned company town of Wolfsburg, where VW still has its HQ. Then Porsche, mostly led by Ferdinand Porsche's son Ferry, really started with performance cars in earnest in 1948 with the introduction of the 356

Quoting MD11Engineer (Reply 4):
It was state-owned for a large part. After WW2, as part of Germaby's armament industry (it build e.g. the Kuebelwagen for the Wehrmacht and Porsche was also involved in the design of the Tiger tank), it was supposed to be dismanteled, but the British Army, in which's zone of occupation the factory was based, needed a car for their occupational troops, so they continued to build the beetle.

VW was indeed state-owned after the Third Reich took over production of the VW. I believe it remained so for some time after the war.

Quoting MD11Engineer (Reply 4):
The current CEO of VW, Piech, is a member of Porsche's family

Actually, Piech hasn't been CEO of VW since 2002. He is indeed Ferry Porsche's nephew

Quoting MD11Engineer (Reply 4):
Basically VW has been taken over by the Porsche/Piech family.

Essentially.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6484 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1598 times:



Quoting UTA_flyinghigh (Thread starter):
Wonder why no one picked this up. Porsche becomes the majority shareholder of Volkswagen AG

They haven't become majority shareholder, they simply gave the go-ahead for that to occur.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineME AVN FAN From Switzerland, joined May 2002, 13920 posts, RR: 25
Reply 7, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1589 times:

The cartel-authority still has to give their approval. I knew that Mr Porsche once developed the VW Beatle, and I in a way regarded Porsche as a VW subsidiary. That the majority owner of SEAT and Skoda now becomes majority owned by a former subsidiary is a bit confusing.

User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26415 posts, RR: 75
Reply 8, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1546 times:



Quoting N328KF (Reply 6):

They haven't become majority shareholder, they simply gave the go-ahead for that to occur.

Actually, PAG was quite reluctant to do so, preferring to keep VW independent. The decision to effect the takeover came when the signs were that VW was going to be the subject of a hostile takeover.

Quoting ME AVN FAN (Reply 7):
The cartel-authority still has to give their approval.

That happened, for all intents and purposes, last year.

Quoting ME AVN FAN (Reply 7):
That the majority owner of SEAT and Skoda now becomes majority owned by a former subsidiary is a bit confusing.

I think you are confused much in the same way others have been. VW sprung from Porsche, not the other way around.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6484 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1546 times:



Quoting ME AVN FAN (Reply 7):
The cartel-authority still has to give their approval. I knew that Mr Porsche once developed the VW Beatle, and I in a way regarded Porsche as a VW subsidiary. That the majority owner of SEAT and Skoda now becomes majority owned by a former subsidiary is a bit confusing.

They were not a subsidiary, though. Porsche and Volkswagen/Audi Group have been partners for years (witness the early 356 engines, the 914, and the Cayenne) but one was never a 'subsidiary' of the other.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4797 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1502 times:



Quoting Kay (Reply 1):
Sad news if you ask me.
I love Porsches, but as the make-money-bug settles in, the cars are getting less and less specialized and more and more commercial.

It'd be more shocking to know that the move was intended to enable the acquisition of a combined Scania/MAN AG giant to manufacture TRUCKS.....

http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/309029



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6484 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1478 times:



Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 10):
It'd be more shocking to know that the move was intended to enable the acquisition of a combined Scania/MAN AG giant to manufacture TRUCKS.....

Porsche's interest is not in trucks (though that's a booming market, and is very profitable. For Porsche, the MAN-Scania-VW Commercial Vehicles merger is just a sideshow. Porsche wants VW because of the ambitions of Ferdinand Piech, to help their carbon credit issues, and because VW makes a lot of money.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26415 posts, RR: 75
Reply 12, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1472 times:



Quoting N328KF (Reply 11):
Porsche wants VW because of the ambitions of Ferdinand Piech, to help their carbon credit issues, and because VW makes a lot of money.

Issues 2 and 3 are the most important. If they wanted to, Butzi and the rest of the big Porsche family shareholders could tell Piech to take a flying leap. The carbon credits and the fact that owning just 30% of VW meant Porsche took over 12 billion Euro in profits last year are the biggest economic motivations. Then again, as stated before, Porsche's biggest motivation is to shield VW from a hostile takeover by private equity.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineZBBYLW From Canada, joined Nov 2006, 1984 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 1461 times:

So will this mean Porsche now will have control over VW and Audi? Maybe they were intimidated by the R8 (This comes from a heavily Porsche bias person). Not trying to knock on the 911 just saying the R8 is an amazing car!


Keep the shinny side up!
User currently offlineDuff44 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 1723 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1434 times:

I remember reading somewhere (looking for a source right now, I'll post it if I find it) that Porsche had first right of refusal to buy VW if they were looking to sell, mainly to keep the company "in German hands". I think Porsche was worried that VW would fall to Chinese/Japanese/other hands not from Germany.


I'll rassle ya for a bowl of bacon!
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26415 posts, RR: 75
Reply 15, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1421 times:



Quoting Duff44 (Reply 14):
that Porsche had first right of refusal to buy VW if they were looking to sell

They did as soon as they bought 30%.

Quoting Duff44 (Reply 14):
I think Porsche was worried that VW would fall to Chinese/Japanese/other hands not from Germany.

The main issue was the potential for a hostile takeover and subsequent raid by private equity, which would have likely eroded the profits Porsche takes in from their share of VW.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineME AVN FAN From Switzerland, joined May 2002, 13920 posts, RR: 25
Reply 16, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1382 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 3):
Porsche owned VW, not the other way around.

-
Non-existing companies canNOT own a company, neither does a leading engineer. If you look under
www.volkswagen.com/vwcms_publish/vwcms/master-public
www.porsche.com/germany/aboutporschehistory/milestones
you can see that VW was established on 28th Mary 1937, and the first VWs or at that time "KdF = Kraft durch Freude - power through pleasure" got produeced in 1938. And under the command of British Major Ivan Hirst, the VW production started in late 1945. BUT the first "Porsche" car only got produced in 1948. So that whenever Messrs Porsche were managing VW, the separate brand and company only emerged later.
-
And apparently as a separate company. A close look into the history above reveals that the two companies were far more separate then I thought they were.

[Edited 2008-03-06 01:14:30]

User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26415 posts, RR: 75
Reply 17, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1376 times:



Quoting ME AVN FAN (Reply 16):
BUT the first "Porsche" car only got produced in 1948.

That is incorrect. Porsche AG was founded in 1931 and the first car developed was the Type 12/Porsche 60/Beetle. The first Porsche built in-house was the Porsche 64, which used a lot of Type 12 parts.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineME AVN FAN From Switzerland, joined May 2002, 13920 posts, RR: 25
Reply 18, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1369 times:



Quoting N328KF (Reply 9):
They were not a subsidiary, though. Porsche and Volkswagen/Audi Group have been partners for years (witness the early 356 engines, the 914, and the Cayenne) but one was never a 'subsidiary' of the other.

-
True. More important however is that the famous DKW which for years had a dominant role, was dropped by Audi later on.
-


User currently offlineME AVN FAN From Switzerland, joined May 2002, 13920 posts, RR: 25
Reply 19, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1362 times:



Quoting N1120A (Reply 17):
Porsche AG was founded in 1931 and the first car developed

Sure, the company was founded in 1931, but the various cars they developed, were developed for other companies like VW and NSU, but were not marketed under the Porsche name. There according to the WEBsite of Porsche were no Porsche cars produced between 1931 and 1948.
-
Amazing is that there were a number of Porsche prototypes, for instance an electric car, between 1900 and 1906 when Porsche got into employment at Daimler Austria.
-
All this from their WEBsite.


User currently offlineCXfirst From Norway, joined Jan 2007, 3054 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1348 times:

I find this incredibly surprising. If I had to guess, I would say Volkswagon were by far the biggest, and would be able to buy Porsche, not the other way around!!!

-CXfirst



From Norway, live in Australia
User currently offlineME AVN FAN From Switzerland, joined May 2002, 13920 posts, RR: 25
Reply 21, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1336 times:



Quoting CXfirst (Reply 20):
If I had to guess, I would say Volkswagon were by far the biggest

your "guess" would be completely correct, as VW indeed IS the biggest, but apparently not the one with the most money
-
And in a German forum I found heaps of anti-VW comments, some of them claiming that VW at present produced for storage, that dealers had their warehouses full from the bottom to the top with unsold cars, etc. Difficult to check and to judge, but it does not sound good, not at all .


User currently offlineCXfirst From Norway, joined Jan 2007, 3054 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1329 times:



Quoting ME AVN FAN (Reply 21):
And in a German forum I found heaps of anti-VW comments, some of them claiming that VW at present produced for storage, that dealers had their warehouses full from the bottom to the top with unsold cars, etc. Difficult to check and to judge, but it does not sound good, not at all .

I was not aware of that at all. Is VW really doing that bad compared to an automobile producer that is directed at the upper-end of the market?

I am awedropped

-CXfirst



From Norway, live in Australia
User currently offlineSAS A340 From Sweden, joined Jul 2000, 778 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1328 times:



Quoting CXfirst (Reply 20):
find this incredibly surprising. If I had to guess, I would say Volkswagon were by far the biggest, and would be able to buy Porsche, not the other way around!!!

They say that size doesn't matter,it's how u use it that counts.....  Wink



It's not what u do,it's how u do it!
User currently offlineME AVN FAN From Switzerland, joined May 2002, 13920 posts, RR: 25
Reply 24, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1317 times:



Quoting CXfirst (Reply 22):
Is VW really doing that bad compared to an automobile producer that is directed at the upper-end of the market?

-
I don't know really. BUT, a German who worked here told me a year ago that he after having had VW cars for 18 years was now switching to either Peugeot or Renault, as the new VW models were not to his liking and far too expensive. Looks a bit as the man was with a trend.
-
The long term chief of VW, Mr Piech, whose mother was a born Porsche, apparently has given up the chairmanship of VW right now. So that it looks as if something heavy is going on in Wolfsburg.
-
I suppose that those in Rüsselsheim/Wartburg and those in Stuttgart and those in Munich are quite pleased with this.


25 N1120A : It isn't that VW is doing bad, it is that they are a bit over-extended because they went acquisition happy in the 1990s and were ripe for a hostile t
26 Post contains links ME AVN FAN : I based my statement on press reports as this one - www.sueddeutsche.de/wirtschaft/artikel/216/161770/ - and this shows him as Aufsichtsratsvorsitzen
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Mensa AG posted Mon Feb 25 2008 15:54:02 by IAirAllie
Videos: Porsche @ Le Mans posted Wed Jan 23 2008 23:40:59 by Confuscius
Volkswagen Pickup posted Thu Jan 17 2008 20:30:57 by Seb146
AG Nominee: President Can Break The Law posted Sun Oct 28 2007 20:55:41 by Falcon84
Porsche Cayenne....hybrid?! posted Wed Jul 25 2007 15:38:00 by KaiGywer
Deputy AG McNulty Is Leaving DOJ posted Tue May 15 2007 04:28:39 by Halls120
Volkswagen VS. Volvo Wagons VS. Nissan posted Mon Apr 9 2007 19:48:53 by Md11fan
'petrol Ruined My Porsche' posted Fri Mar 2 2007 18:36:25 by 9V
Anyone Own A Porsche Boxter? posted Sun Jan 7 2007 19:33:04 by AA787823
My New Desk Companion: A Red Porsche. posted Tue Nov 7 2006 12:40:11 by Kay