Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canada Extends Afghan Mission To 2011  
User currently offlineSKYSERVICE_330 From Canada, joined Sep 2000, 1422 posts, RR: 5
Posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1067 times:

Commons votes to extend Afghan mission to 2011
Mike Blanchfield, with files from Jill St. Marseille, Canwest News Service
Published: Friday, March 14, 2008

OTTAWA -- As a chorus of protest rang out from Parliament's public galleries, the House of Commons voted overwhelmingly Thursday night to extend Canada's military mission in Afghanistan to 2011.

Though the result was never in doubt, the outburst of more than two dozen anti-war protesters chanting, "End it, don't extend it," from the public galleries added a poignant dramatic twist as they were peacefully escorted out by security guards.

Both the minority Conservative government and the Liberal opposition heralded the vote as a historic compromise that set aside partisan politics and advanced Canada's international interest, as they easily passed the motion by a 197-77 margin.

From:
http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/s...bf4-496f-a365-2efe16ea328b&k=84700

More at:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...afghanvote14/BNStory/National/home
http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/346019
_______________

Thoughts? Good move/bad move?

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21495 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1064 times:

The extension itself is most probably realistic.

The question, however, is whether the strategy currently employed in Afghanistan should just be extended without change (which this decision was not about). That is the salient point in this matter.


User currently offlineNeilYYZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1063 times:

I think it's a good move. Hopefully by 2011 Afghanistan will be stable enough to run and police itself. I have no problem with Canada searching for Al Qaida in Afghanistan. I have some friends who've been over, they're proud of their work, and I think the country needs to back them 100%.

I don't think the Liberals would have supported the motion had they been ready to have an election anytime soon, but I'm glad with the overall result anyway. Other NATO countries do need to step up though and make the same type of commitment in my mind.


User currently offlineTheCol From Canada, joined Jan 2007, 2039 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1046 times:

It was a good move. We need to finish what we started. I have full confidence in the men and women of the CF, and they think that the mission can be completed successfully.
Though the NATO officials need to sit down and have another heart to heart about the current strategy. They should also agree on a rotation of forces in out of the high risk provinces.



No matter how random things may appear, there's always a plan.
User currently offlineBoeing744 From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1843 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1031 times:

I think it's a decent compromise by the Conservatives and Liberals. Of course the Bloc and the NDP didn't agree, but that's to be expected. I do hope though that our troops focus on rebuilding the country to get it on its feet when it's time for us to leave, rather than go on an Al-Qaida witch hunt.

User currently offlineNeilYYZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1027 times:



Quoting Boeing744 (Reply 4):
rather than go on an Al-Qaida witch hunt.

It's not a witch hunt when they're shooting at you.

Quoting Boeing744 (Reply 4):
Of course the Bloc and the NDP didn't agree, but that's to be expected.

Do they ever agree with the Liberals or Conservatives? They're so used to saying "Nay" I'm starting to think their horses.


User currently offlineSKYSERVICE_330 From Canada, joined Sep 2000, 1422 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1005 times:



Quoting Klaus (Reply 1):
The question, however, is whether the strategy currently employed in Afghanistan should just be extended without change (which this decision was not about). That is the salient point in this matter.

Part of the compromise in Canada was that the strategy had to reflect diplomacy and development, not only combat. That said, it is hard to build roads and schools when they will be blown up the next day.

Quoting NeilYYZ (Reply 2):
I think it's a good move.



Quoting TheCol (Reply 3):
It was a good move.

 checkmark 

Quoting NeilYYZ (Reply 2):
Hopefully by 2011 Afghanistan will be stable enough to run and police itself.

Fingers crossed. Hopefully, between now and then, we will be hearing stories about responsibility for certain things being handed over to the Afghan National Army.

Quoting NeilYYZ (Reply 2):
I don't think the Liberals would have supported the motion had they been ready to have an election anytime soon, but I'm glad with the overall result anyway.

I'm not so sure about that. I think both parties recognized the importance of the issue and tried their damndest to work with one another, be statesmen like, and find an acceptable compromise that would suit both sides. Additionally, I think both parties recognized the disastrous consequences that having an election over Afghanistan could result in, for both the country/national unity and the mission.

Quoting NeilYYZ (Reply 2):
Other NATO countries do need to step up though and make the same type of commitment in my mind.

Agreed. The caveats need to be lifted and the heavy burden needs to be shared.

Quoting TheCol (Reply 3):
We need to finish what we started.

 checkmark  Our internationl reputation and the fate of the Afghan people are on the line.

Quoting Boeing744 (Reply 4):
I do hope though that our troops focus on rebuilding the country to get it on its feet when it's time for us to leave

Agreed. But as I stated before, development can only occur where there is security.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Visiting Banff, Canada In July - What To Do? posted Fri Jan 12 2007 04:43:18 by Zootrix
US Owes Canada $5 Billion And Refuses To Pay! posted Thu Aug 11 2005 16:10:18 by Clickhappy
Is Canada Better Than USA To Live In? posted Wed Apr 28 2004 13:10:58 by Bofredrik
Snags In Canada's Healthcare, Patients Sent To US posted Sun Aug 24 2003 19:42:21 by JAL777
Beware Canada! We're Going To Invade posted Sun Jul 20 2003 19:38:11 by Matt D
Does Afghan. Want To Be Bombed? posted Tue Sep 18 2001 18:25:48 by JetService
We (Canada) Should Send More Garbage To Michigan posted Wed Feb 6 2008 09:24:24 by CF188A
A Week In Canada: Need Help To Plan! posted Sun Dec 23 2007 09:40:17 by WCS
Canada Asks Japan To Apologize For WW2 Sex Slaves posted Fri Nov 30 2007 07:19:11 by Aaron747
Getting To Canada From BUF - Advice Needed posted Tue Nov 27 2007 05:17:55 by Swiftski