Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
If Gore Was The President, Will 911 Still Happens?  
User currently offlineJiml1126 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1303 times:

Do you people think that if Al Gore won US Presidential election in 2000, will the terrorist still launching terrorist attack against the US?

I think no, because Gore was following Clinton's route about the policy to the Middle East. Gore is more "neutral" guy rather than "tough" Bush.

55 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1240 times:

Are you for real? It would not have mattered who was president. 9-11 was going to happen no matter what. Give me a break.

User currently offlineEIPremier From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1549 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1219 times:

Personally, I don't think Al Gore has the capability to halt the hands of time, despite his efforts following the 2000 election.

User currently offlineHepkat From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 2341 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1206 times:

Didn't you guys see that report from CNN? Apparantly, 9/11 was being planned from way back in '96. The Phillipino government arrested Islamic radicals in that year and discovered written plans to fly aircraft into American skyscrapers. This evidence was turned over to the FBI but they never acted on it. I suspect that you all in the U.S. probably didn't see too much of this report, and I suspect it has to do with the FBI's embarassment. But the fact is, we had ample warning both from Bin Laden and the Phillipines that something major was going to happen but no one paid attention. Whether Gore or Bush, at the rate our intelligence was heading, it would have happened anyway.

User currently offlinePanAm747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4242 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1201 times:

Don't forget, they were planning the attack when Clinton was in office.


Pan Am:The World's Most Experienced Airline - P(oor) S(ailor's) A(irline): San Diego's Hometown Airline-Catch Our Smile!
User currently offlinePanAm747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4242 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1194 times:

>>I suspect that you all in the U.S. probably didn't see too much of this report<<

What do you mean by this?

Sometimes you imply that the American people act like puppies, blindly following the owner with a leash around its neck.



Pan Am:The World's Most Experienced Airline - P(oor) S(ailor's) A(irline): San Diego's Hometown Airline-Catch Our Smile!
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13220 posts, RR: 77
Reply 6, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1182 times:

That attack was probably years in planning, I doubt if fanatics really care about who is leading 'The Great Satan' at any one time.
However, I think that the US response, initially at least against the Taleban/Al-Queda, would have beem similar.
None of Bush's homespun retoric though.
Before all the right-wing Zealots flame me, Gore would have taken military advice from pretty much the same people as Bush, (the Joint Chiefs of Staff), Powell may have even still been in the goverment.
Even AF1's movements of 11th Sept may have been similar, if Gore too was far from Washington at the time.
Your airwaves over there would be filled with the nutcases like Limbaugh calling Gore a coward for flying around from bunker to bunker that terrible, uncertain day.
Want to guess who on here would have joined in?
After the Taleban and Al-Queda were routed, things under a Gore administration might start to differ from how things seem to be going now, but who can say? Such an unpredented event after all.
This is just the view of an outsider with only a limited knowledge of US politics, and while no fan of Bush, he is your President so I'm trying to be impartial here!
At the end of the day, the same servicemen would have to risk their lives doing their duty, and before you shout 'Gore was a pinko', remember the Reagan goverment's less than impressive record against terrorism, although the US was not directly attacked then.
Maybe Gore would have not coped too well, maybe Bush has because of the team around him.
This administration's memoirs will make interesting reading for sure.


User currently offline174thfwff From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1175 times:

"If Gore Was The President, Will 911 Still Happens?"

If Gore was the president would 9/11 have happend?


User currently offlineSEVEN_FIFTY7 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 957 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1166 times:

>>Sometimes you imply that the American people act like puppies, blindly following the owner with a leash around its neck.<<

But it's true. We do act like that because we're a gullible lot. As long as it doesn't interfere with us making our millions (the rich), or as long as it doesn't interfere with our ability to survive from paycheck to paycheck (the working poor) we usually still don't care enough about world affairs to actually scrutinize the bs we're being fed. We often have very short memories and despite the many scandals we've endured over the past decades we still do not actively question the information we receive today.

Sometimes I wonder if our own propaganda machine is as bad as China's or Cuba's.


User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1162 times:

I'm forced to agree with GDB...to a point.

A President Gore would have reacted much the same way in the initial hours following the attack....BUT...our response may have been placed on a political timetable rather than a military one....& that would have been bad.

Democratic Presidents since Kennedy have historically 'overcompensated' in military response, in an effort to make up for a perceived reluctance in "getting tough". Kennedy went against his better judgement and sent 'advisors' to South Vietnam so as not to be labelled 'soft' on communisim. Carter approved the fiasco in the Iranian desert because an election was forthcoming and polls showed the electorate was tiring of trying to negotiate for our hostages. Clinton went apeshit with cruise missiles after every slight, a hugely visible and amazingly ineffective response.

Because of this tender subject among Dems, a President Gore may have pushed the military to action before they had assets in place....and I agree with GDB completely on the subject of the right wing smear machine. The unity that President Bush enjoyed following 9/11...with even liberal columnists in the main establishment papers praising his leadership...would have been nonexistent if Gore was in the White House. The vast conservative media empire would have launched into a collective and damaging "we told you so" within hours of the last girder falling.


User currently offlineJj From Algeria, joined Jun 2001, 1227 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1166 times:


Guys Please!!!! The attack was to occident, not just to the states! It was chosen to attack them, I guess, because they're the best exponent of occident. But terrorists didn't care if the president was bush, gore, clinton, or my momma. The attack was already planed. And it wasn't only because of Clinton's policy of the middle east!!!


User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1161 times:

Absolutely. Without a doubt. This wasn't some plan thrown together in a matter of a few months. I'd wager they were working on the plan while Clinton was still in office. They don't care if a Bush or a Gore or a Clinton or whomever is in the White House. These scum hate ALL Americans; they hate what we stand for; it would have happened exactly the way it did.

User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1150 times:

And Hepkat, for God's sake, stop thinking all us Americans are idiots. I get tired of that schidt from you. I know you're better than the rest of us, but do you have to proclaim it ALL THE TIME???

God, you're so arrogant!!


User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16285 posts, RR: 56
Reply 13, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1144 times:

I thought Hepkat WAS American? Just living in Austria. Whatever.

ANYWAY, I see Gore as crying publicly over 911 (if he was Pres) and apologizing to the Taliban, not rooting them out. I'm being sarcastic but I just don't see Gore as having ANY balls.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1141 times:

Yyz717, I didn't think George W. had gonads, either, but he's surprised me with his decisiveness in this conflict. I think such an earth-shattering event can focus a man, and bring out resolve in a man in ways the he-and we-cannot see before such a cataclysmic event happens. I imagine Gore would have acquitted himself quite well, just as President Bush has.

User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16285 posts, RR: 56
Reply 15, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1132 times:

Yes, Alpha 1, perhaps you're right. Shades of grey.

Neil



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1119 times:

Had Gore been elected, things would be exacly the same, except half the administration wouldn't be tied into Enron.

User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16285 posts, RR: 56
Reply 17, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1115 times:

We also wouldn't have Condoleezza Rice, the NSA. That woman is an amazingly intelligent, competent cabinet member. Not too hard on the eyes either.





Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineSKYTEAM From France, joined Nov 2009, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1117 times:

Gore would of Bombed the hell outta them to.

SKYTEAM


User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16285 posts, RR: 56
Reply 19, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1111 times:

Gore? No...he would have cried.


Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineN400QX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1113 times:

I can't even believe the question was posed... of COURSE the attack would have happened. It isn't like Al Qaeda members are also card-carrying DNC members (hmm... jk).

If anything would have gone differently had Gore been elected, I would think it would be the war.... or lack thereof under Gore. We probably would have hit a $10 tent and a camel in the butt.


User currently offlineRolex01 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1110 times:

It would have happend 7 times over.


User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1108 times:

Zach, you're letting your intensse dislike of anything Democratic color your response, as usual.

I expected Bush to go in guns blazing on the night of Sept 11th, but he didn't-he held his fire and his response longer than I would have expected any Republican to do. I think you would have found that Gore or anyone else, for that matter, to have prosecuted the conflict just as vigorously as Bush has. You have to separate your "business as usual" views about any president set against such a monumental event as 9-11.

Gore would have been hunting these scumbags just the same as Bush has. Although I wonder how much support the GOP would have given him. I won't go any further with that thought than I did, because we won't ever know, will we?


User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16285 posts, RR: 56
Reply 23, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1103 times:

I agree Alpha 1, Bush has been remarkedly restrained since Sept 11.


Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlinePROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5644 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (12 years 7 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1098 times:

ANYWAY, I see Gore as crying publicly over 911 (if he was Pres) and apologizing to the Taliban, not rooting them out. I'm being sarcastic but I just don't see Gore as having ANY balls.

He would have had no choice but to respond with military force. If he didn't, and instead said that we should negotiate, the American people would never have allowed him to continue. One of two things would have happened if Gore had wimped out:
Scenario A - Congress holds an emergency session, and within the space of a few hours the House votes to impeach and the Senate votes to convict. They'd probably get rid of Lieberman too, and the new President Dennis Hastert would have proceeded immediately with war plans similar to what Bush did in real life.
Scenario B - a military coup overthrows Gore, and whomever the new leader is hits Afghanistan much, much harder than Bush ever imagined. As the joke goes, the weather forecast for Kandahar would have been very bright, temperature 5,000 degrees. After the dust settles (literally), some means would have been set up to restore civilian power, probably to Hastert.





"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
25 Alpha 1 : PROSA, your second scenario is preposterous! A military coup would happen with the same likelyhood as bin Laden receiving the Nobel Peace Prize-it wil
26 Heavymetal : Prosa, just to clarify, your first scenario is preposterous too.
27 Post contains images Alpha 1 : PROSA, to clarify further, impeachment wouldn't happen within a few hours-impeachment WOULD happen, but there's a set way that impeachments are carrie
28 Mika : Guys. Notice that there's a difference between planning something and acting something out. Someone can plan to do something but not act it out until
29 Psa188 : The rat bastards who attacked us on 9/11 would have done so regardless of who was president. We're all infidels to those warped assholes. The differen
30 Alpha 1 : Psa188, I think you'd be sadly mistaken. Again, you're acting as you would have before 9-11, and putting in pathethic stereotypes. In fairness, had Go
31 FLY 8 : Sure, it would have happend anyway. Like Hepkat said the plans started as early as 1996!
32 Psa188 : You're entitled to your opinion, but you're wrong. When our embassies were attacked on Clinton's watch, Gore's boss responded by firing a couple of mi
33 Jj : Some say, that the attack was planned from as early AS 1994! And this whol thread is a piece of s***!!! Instead of thinking what would have happened
34 Alpha 1 : Psa188, you're talking about his boss, for crying out loud. Get over your petty little hatreds. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT GORE WOULD HAVE DONE!! Don't tell
35 Alpha 1 : Jj, speculating is human nature. We always are asking "what if", so if it bothers you that much-and it obviously does-just don't reply. Simple, isn't
36 Mika : I really don't understand people who think it's better to let a discussion board stand empty instead of it being used (that includes speculating). It'
37 PROSA : PROSA, to clarify further, impeachment wouldn't happen within a few hours-impeachment WOULD happen, but there's a set way that impeachments are carrie
38 Post contains images Alpha 1 : PROSA, you can stand by what you say all you want-there is a set formality on any of this stuff, and it wouldn't happen "in a few days", no matter how
39 Hepkat : Gentle People, whether Gore, Bush, Lieberman or whoever, the reaction to 9.11 would have been the same. Bush took the course of action he did because
40 Alpha 1 : For once, I have to say that Hepkat hit the nail right on the head. Well said, Hepkat.
41 PROSA : PROSA, you can stand by what you say all you want-there is a set formality on any of this stuff, and it wouldn't happen "in a few days", no matter how
42 Cfalk : Hepkat is pretty much correct. Action such as was made would have occured even if Pee-Wee were president. However the endgame in Afghanistan, and the
43 Heavymetal : Prosa, HOW do you imagine a President Gore 'disavowing' military action? In some whiny, Rodney King-ish "Can't we all just get along" plead? If you fo
44 PROSA : Prosa, HOW do you imagine a President Gore 'disavowing' military action? In some whiny, Rodney King-ish "Can't we all just get along" plead? If you fo
45 Psa188 : Alpha1 flames me, saying I don't have a crystal ball and can't predict what Gore would/wouldn't do, then he does exactly the same thing when he writes
46 Alpha 1 : Psa188, there's a difference between what you said and what I said: you said he'd wimp out because he was VP for Clinton. You throw all those tired ol
47 Psa188 : Like it or not, we were both inferring. It's too bad that you can't realize in your blind attempt to defend Gore.
48 Alpha 1 : ROTFL, I'm not attempting to defend anyone!! I'm making an educated deduction. You, on the other hand, are just throwing one-liners from the GOP Platf
49 Airlinelover : Yeah.. It would've still happened.. And Al Gore would've gone and hugged a tree afterwards.. Chris
50 Post contains images Lehpron : Jiml1126: Do you people think that if Al Gore won US Presidential election in 2000, will the terrorist still launching terrorist attack against the US
51 Blink182 : Would it have mattered? The point is, it happened whether we like it or not and we can't do anything about it. The 9/11 attacks were on a country, not
52 Alpha 1 : Lephron, why is it up to Bush to TRY to stop the violence. That is up to the Palestinians and Israel, is it not? The US can offer it's good offices as
53 Yyz717 : Sorry Alpha 1, you're wrong (again). The US can't have it both ways. IE, provide more foreign aid to Israel than any other country (indirectly allowin
54 Alpha 1 : I disagree Yyz, so I think you're wrong-again. The US has tried to be an honest broker in the Northern Ireland dispute. The US even sells arms to Engl
55 Yyz717 : Much of the funding for the IRA comes from comfortable Irish-Americans. The US has been anything but a peace broker in Northern Ireland. As for the Mi
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
If You Were The President... posted Wed May 30 2001 19:02:34 by An-225
What Would You Do If You Met The President? posted Fri May 25 2001 00:35:25 by 757pf
What If George Bush Was A Black President? posted Fri Oct 6 2006 16:57:37 by VHVXB
If Saddam Was Still In Power... posted Thu Apr 13 2006 07:08:24 by AndesSMF
If You Knew The World Was Ending Next Week posted Thu Jan 5 2006 23:27:19 by Jafa39
If Saddam Uses WMDs What Will The Antiwar Posse Do posted Wed Apr 2 2003 19:06:42 by Go Canada!
What If The UN Was The Target? posted Wed Sep 25 2002 09:29:59 by Apathoid
If I Was The Coach Of My National Team (football): posted Tue Jun 25 2002 20:04:20 by LY772
If Gore Had Won The Election.... posted Fri Nov 16 2001 18:23:26 by Ikarus
If A.net Was A Country... posted Thu Nov 9 2006 07:12:50 by Lazarus31