Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
2009 Cadillac "dts" Presidential Limo Uncovered  
User currently offlineStasisLAX From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 3280 posts, RR: 6
Posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 9814 times:

The below Cadillac limousine has been photographed twice within the last month during testing on public roads. It's believed to be more of a armored truck than a true Caddy limousine. With so much armor being added, Cadillac appears to have utilized a truck chassis along the lines of the Topkick medium truck platform. In fact, the limo was seen testing with two regular GM Topkick trucks and the wheels and tires on the limo appeared to be the same size as the Topkick. The tires on the limo are Goodyear Regional RHS, possibly on 22.5 inch wheels.

According to reports, "a very large diesel is under the hood" as the exhaust note coming from the back of the limo was akin to "the medium-duty Topkick" diesel truck.

The styling of the new Presidential limo pulls elements of different Cadillac models. The grille, front clip, and headlights seem to be from the Escalade; the rear seems to display some STS styling. Reports also state that photographers see "holders on the top of the front fenders where two small American flags would traditionally go."

The armored doors on this limo "are at least 8 inches thick". The thick doors indicate it’s bullet and bomb-proof and/or the passenger cabin is pressurized for protection from biological agents like nerve gas. The vehicle is rumored to weight about 25,000 lbs....

This new vehicle is expected to be delivered to the U.S. Secret Service by January 20, 2009 - but that's just a wild guess.   

2009 Cadillac "DTS" Presidential Limo


The full article and more photos of the "limousine" are available at: http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-limo.html

[Edited 2008-07-31 18:11:02]


"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety!" B.Franklin
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 9811 times:

That thing is fugly.. rear of a DTS, doors off a god knows what, and the front of an Escalade, thou, the side quarter panels look like DTS ones...


Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineKhelmDTW From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 269 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 9780 times:

Good God that thing is ugly.

But, wow, 25,000lbs. Being rear ended by that thing would be like being rear ended by a garbage truck.  eyepopping 



In Thrust We Trust
User currently offlineComorin From United States of America, joined May 2005, 4895 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 9756 times:

Not quite a lean green machine...

User currently offlineJetstar From United States of America, joined May 2003, 1636 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 9742 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

On the current presidental limo, only the grill is from a production Caddy, the rest of the car is hand made, not counting the engine.

I guess with what IED's have been doing to armored troop carriers in Iraq, there is a need for a much stronger presidental limo


User currently offlineSv7887 From United States of America, joined May 2008, 1025 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 9726 times:

That is the ugliest limo I have ever seen..If I were President Bush or future Obama/McCain I wouldn't want to be seen in that thing..GM is the same company that produced the CTS, so what gives here? That is just YUCK!

What's wrong with the current limo? I think it's pretty new from 2004 or something. I mean how many miles does a Presidential Limo rack up a year? Like 500? Seems like a big waste of taxpayer dollars.


User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 31
Reply 6, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 9723 times:



Quoting Jetstar (Reply 4):
I guess with what IED's have been doing to armored troop carriers in Iraq, there is a need for a much stronger presidental limo

Becasue after all. Washington is Bagdad and all those crazy liberals up on Penn Ave  Wink

Quoting Sv7887 (Reply 5):
Seems like a big waste of taxpayer dollars.

Can you say?:




Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineBohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2661 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 9697 times:

My tax dollars are being wasted on THAT??? It looks like something created by someone using leftovers from the parts bin. Is there really a need for it?

User currently offlineStasisLAX From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 3280 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 9672 times:

Quoting Jetstar (Reply 4):
I guess with what IED's have been doing to armored troop carriers in Iraq, there is a need for a much stronger presidental limo

Maybe the Executive Branch relationship with the "mob" in the U.S. Congress has gotten really mean and nasty??

Quoting Cadet57 (Reply 1):
That thing is fugly.. rear of a DTS, doors off a god knows what, and the front of an Escalade, thou, the side quarter panels look like DTS ones...

I loved the elegant Lincoln limousines of the 1960's and 1970's. Here's a 1964 Continental limo - classy and elegant!

1964 Lincoln Continental Limousine


[Edited 2008-07-31 20:56:40]


"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety!" B.Franklin
User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8373 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 9642 times:



"Hello OnStar? I'm the President and have no idea how to run the country... Can ya help me?"

"Certainly, sir! O Happy dayz!"


User currently offlineUAL757 From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 806 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 9613 times:



Quoting Flighty (Reply 9):
"Hello OnStar? I'm the President and have no idea how to run the country... Can ya help me?"

Good one!


User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8439 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 9582 times:

What's wrong with an open top Lincoln?  duck 

User currently offlineNA From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10594 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 9582 times:

While I see the need of an heavily armoured car, and that armoured cars are more clumsy than the car they derive from, I must say that with respect that is not coming directly from a standard car the designers made a very bad job. What an ugly truck, Bush current car is ugly as well though. A wasted opportunity altough its not easy to make anthing pretty under the current Cadillac design mode.
While not directly comparable as its not as heavily plated here is a picture of an similarly sized one-off state limousine where the designers got it right despite they had the hard task to have to deal with an especially high roof:
http://www.rrab.com/bgoldjub.htm


User currently offlineSWISSER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 9579 times:

Looks like the result of an escalade crashing into a Rolls Royce Phantom!

Quoting NA (Reply 12):
altough its not easy to make anthing pretty under the current Cadillac design mode.

I think the new CTS is a very crisp looking car!
(not saying it's a good car!)
But I do like hooks and corners on vehicles and I guess I' am the only one...
On the other hand, a current Lamborghini is good looking and a Cadillac not...explain that!


User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13010 posts, RR: 12
Reply 14, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 9557 times:

For image reasons, it has to some 'car' cues, and from an American brand. Basically they have created a very sophicated Armored Personal Carrier. I am surprised at the disclosure of some of the details. I bet that GM takes a huge loss on making this car, but it's own pride is at stake here too. The use of a truck chassis is also needed as if there is an attack, they can jump curbs, go over rough surfaces and ram other vehicles out it's way.

User currently offlineNA From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10594 posts, RR: 10
Reply 15, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 9537 times:



Quoting SWISSER (Reply 13):
Looks like the result of an escalade crashing into a Rolls Royce Phantom

Take away the Escalade part and it would make a nice car!


User currently offlineElite From Hong Kong, joined Jun 2006, 2791 posts, RR: 10
Reply 16, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 9533 times:

What is with the black and gray body? Looks terrible, hopefully it is better inside.

User currently offlineJetstar From United States of America, joined May 2003, 1636 posts, RR: 10
Reply 17, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 9503 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Elite (Reply 16):
What is with the black and gray body? Looks terrible, hopefully it is better inside.

I would assume it has not been painted yet.


User currently offlineMCOflyer From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 8654 posts, RR: 15
Reply 18, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 9496 times:



Quoting StasisLAX (Thread starter):

According to reports, "a very large diesel is under the hood" as the exhaust note coming from the back of the limo was akin to "the medium-duty Topkick" diesel truck.

I hope he gets a ticket for polluting our atmosphere should he violate California emission requirements.

Cop: Do you know why you're being pulled over
Driver: No sir
Cop: You're polluting our atmosphere with that engine and I am going to have to cite you for this.
Driver: how much?
Cop: $350 due to the courts in one week

Hunter



Never be afraid to stand up for who you are.
User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8373 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 9460 times:



Quoting Jetstar (Reply 17):
I would assume it has not been painted yet.

This car has camouflage to disguise its appearance slightly.

We won't know how these panels fit together until the final version rolls out. It might actually look nice when they are done!

Oh, and the budget for these vehicles appears to be $5 million each, minimum. Probably more.


User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39660 posts, RR: 75
Reply 20, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 9385 times:

That thing is hideous!

Quoting StasisLAX (Reply 8):
I loved the elegant Lincoln limousines of the 1960's and 1970's. Here's a 1964 Continental limo - classy and elegant!

Agreed!
Bill Clinton was the last President to have a nice looking limo. It was the last to be based on a retail version.
This new DTS thing is hideous!
It doesn't share a single square inch of the retail DTS.



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineStasisLAX From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 3280 posts, RR: 6
Reply 21, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 9376 times:

Notice on the rear doors there's a "patch" over what appears to be a circular hole. I wonder if this is a rifle port? It seems likely that it is. This rifle port would be invisible once the vehicle receives its final paint and clearcoat applications.

If the Presidential Limo is using a GM Topkick diesel engine as reported, it could be an Isuzu motor (GM owns Isuzu) that produces 300 horsepower and up to 800 lbs/ft of torque.



"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety!" B.Franklin
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 22, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 9371 times:



Quoting Bohica (Reply 7):
Is there really a need for it?

Unless you want to pay the vastly higher costs of an assassination there probably is. The threat has changed, will change again.

* * *


Quoting StasisLAX (Reply 21):
300 horsepower

Well, that, combined with this:

Quoting StasisLAX (Thread starter):
25,000 lbs....

would give it a power-to-weight ratio that compares very unfavorably with the Fiat 600  Wow!



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39660 posts, RR: 75
Reply 23, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 9369 times:



Quoting SlamClick (Reply 22):
Unless you want to pay the vastly higher costs of an assassination there probably is. The threat has changed, will change again.

 checkmark   checkmark   checkmark 

The thing may be hideous but it needs to offer protection for such a high-level figure.
I wish they made a variant based off the existing Lincoln Town Car.



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 24, posted (5 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 9358 times:



Quoting Superfly (Reply 23):
I wish they made a variant based off the existing Lincoln Town Car.

With a Kevlar (TM) Landau top?
 Smile



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
25 Post contains links HuskyAviation : That spot is usually where the Presidential Seal goes. I don't know if that conceals a rifle port as well. Agreed. It may be kinda fugly but I think
26 SWISSER : True! Although the Phantom is sooooo vulgar! Great BMW though! Oops, RR
27 Superfly : Yep.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Do We Say "ow"/"ouch" ... Universal? posted Sat Jan 19 2008 00:24:15 by Kaitak
Chinese Couple Name Baby "@" posted Thu Aug 16 2007 16:09:06 by AA787823
Baby Boomers.. Most "F"-ed Up Generation? posted Wed Feb 28 2007 07:56:45 by Boeing7E7
Bar In The Movie "the Right Stuff", "Armageddon"? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 21:34:21 by Aerosol
Kid's Costume Teaches The "F" Word posted Fri Oct 27 2006 19:10:46 by AsstChiefMark
Motorola "Q" Anyone Have It? posted Sat Sep 2 2006 20:50:40 by Cadet57
The "F" Word On Channel 4 posted Wed Aug 2 2006 22:37:03 by Cosec59
"Droplifting" - A "Subversive" Marketing Technique posted Tue Jun 20 2006 09:54:20 by AerospaceFan
Abolish The "N" Word. Should It Happen? posted Wed May 24 2006 19:23:48 by Jetjack74
"South Park": "The Dog Whisperer" posted Fri May 5 2006 06:11:59 by Bobster2