Blackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 7, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1250 times:
I'm quite certain I could be identified -- I'm a handgun-owner, my fingerprints are on record for one, as for my face -- I have a driver's license now don't I?
TZ757300 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 2839 posts, RR: 7 Reply 10, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1192 times:
You live in 2008, and you have pictures that grainy?
None of them can be you, unless the transmission from your computer distorted by all your tinfoil.
David L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9248 posts, RR: 42 Reply 11, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1175 times:
Quoting Blackbird (Reply 7): I'm quite certain I could be identified -- I'm a handgun-owner, my fingerprints are on record for one, as for my face -- I have a driver's license now don't I?
But they're not linked to the comments you post here, exposing the pure evil of the government to us poor, unsuspecting innocents. Putting a face to the comments would, as you say, result in your "disappearance" to protect their dastardly schemes.
I think you may be #2, as you've previously posted a similar picture of "yourself" in other threads and on other websites. Nonetheless, I can't really see the point of this thread, as you have admitted to misrepresenting yourself on other forums.
Even if you claim one of the photos is "really" you, why should we believe it? Moreover, what is the point if one or more, or none of the photos is really you? I think you are just trying to misrepresent yourself once again, in the hope you may get some benefit out of it in your own twisted way !
Regards, JetMech
JetMech split the back of his pants. He can feel the wind in his hair.
IAirAllie From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 17, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1068 times:
None. None of the ladies in the pics look like they have gender identification issues. They all look like they identify well with female. None of them look like amazons either.
Luv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 11957 posts, RR: 51 Reply 18, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1055 times:
Quoting TZ757300 (Reply 10): None of them can be you, unless the transmission from your computer distorted by all your tinfoil.
Quoting Moo (Reply 6): None, you wouldn't ever let a picture of you get into the wild - it would make identification of you by the 'authorities' far too easy...
Quoting David L (Reply 11): But they're not linked to the comments you post here, exposing the pure evil of the government to us poor, unsuspecting innocents. Putting a face to the comments would, as you say, result in your "disappearance" to protect their dastardly schemes.
Quoting JetMech (Reply 12): Even if you claim one of the photos is "really" you, why should we believe it? Moreover, what is the point if one or more, or none of the photos is really you? I think you are just trying to misrepresent yourself once again, in the hope you may get some benefit out of it in your own twisted way
Quoting IAirAllie (Reply 17): None. None of the ladies in the pics look like they have gender identification issues. They all look like they identify well with female. None of them look like amazons either.
StarAlliance38 From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 1445 posts, RR: 4 Reply 19, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1020 times:
Vikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 8319 posts, RR: 28 Reply 20, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 999 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Quoting FLY2HMO (Reply 14): I think Blackbird is the type of man-eating guy that loves to mess with guys minds. And you're all falling for it.
(slightly edited for truth)
Quoting JetMech (Reply 12): Nonetheless, I can't really see the point of this thread, as you have admitted to misrepresenting yourself on other forums.
Even if you claim one of the photos is "really" you, why should we believe it? Moreover, what is the point if one or more, or none of the photos is really you? I think you are just trying to misrepresent yourself once again, in the hope you may get some benefit out of it in your own twisted way
Quoting David L (Reply 11): But they're not linked to the comments you post here, exposing the pure evil of the government to us poor, unsuspecting innocents. Putting a face to the comments would, as you say, result in your "disappearance" to protect their dastardly schemes.
Blackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 21, posted (4 years 10 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 980 times:
IAirAllie
Quote: None. None of the ladies in the pics look like they have gender identification issues. They all look like they identify well with female. None of them look like amazons either.
Believe it or not, I actually *do* try to look as normal as possible -- especially when I'm trying to pick up people (I'm bisexual).
The fact that I'm nearly 6-3, and am athletically built is enough to get people to think of me as being amazon-like regardless of a gender identity disorder I could dress in the most dainty fashion and that wouldn't change...
Sponsor Message: 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 814 posts, 
From Netherlands, joined Jul 2001, 3239 posts, 
From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 8542 posts, 
Thought the same...
From Hong Kong, joined Jun 2006, 2762 posts, 
From Falkland Islands, joined May 2007, 3615 posts, 
From Germany, joined Mar 2004, 1190 posts, 
From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 2589 posts, 
!
From Ireland, joined Mar 2008, 2076 posts, 
From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 3639 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
