Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Thai High Court Bans Ruling Party  
User currently offlineLufthansa411 From Germany, joined Jan 2008, 692 posts, RR: 1
Posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1272 times:

"Thailand's constitutional court has dissolved the governing People Power Party (PPP) saying there had been vote fraud during the last election."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/7759960.stm


Well, I guess it was the next logical step as Thailand becomes a bit more unstable.

What do you think is next? Will the remaining politicians form a new party, or will there be (more) chaos in Thailand. At least there seems to be relatively little violence.


Nothing in life is to be feared; it is only to be understood.
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 1, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1267 times:

In Thailand only 30% of all representatives in the paliament are freely elected-the remaining 70% are appointed.Which obviously leaves plenty of room for corruption and political honky-tonk.The country should finally adept a modern,truely democratic system .Monarchy and paliamant go well together in many democracies-so why not in Thailand ?


Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineSeb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11720 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1210 times:

Not being a world traveler, I have to ask something:

There was a story on the news over the weekend about a woman and her daughter, both US Citizens, but immigrated from Thailand, are there now. The family live here in the Portland area, but the husband and son stayed behind and are now waiting to see if they are alright. The TV made it sound like since the two major airports are closed (according to the TV), there is literally no way out of Thailand. But, couldn't someone take a bus or train to a neighboring country and then get a flight out or at least get to an American consulate or embassy in a neighboring country?



Life in the wall is a drag.
User currently offlineVictrola From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 518 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1204 times:



Quoting Seb146 (Reply 2):
But, couldn't someone take a bus or train to a neighboring country and then get a flight out or at least get to an American consulate or embassy in a neighboring country?

Sure, lots of people are doing this. However, the nearest border is Myanmar, which is not a very good option, It's quite a trek over to the Cambodian border, and the Malaysian border is also a long trip. Furthermore, since the closure of the airports I am sure that any forms of land transportation have been swamped.


User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8184 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1174 times:



Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 1):
Monarchy and paliamant go well together in many democracies-so why not in Thailand ?

The most stable government Thailand ever had was a seven-party coalition, but that only lasted five years.

All this ruling does is further delegitimize anything that Thaksin touched. I'm not sure it will put an end to the instability as his supporters and cronies will see it only as a political ruling and either appeal or go directly to another fraudulent election with all manner of vote-buying in the rural parts of the country. They must change the election system or this nonsense will continue unabated.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineVictrola From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 518 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1161 times:

What is the background on this situation? It seems as if Thailand has a freely elected government. However the opposition thinks it has a right to depose that government. I have heard it said that the opposition doesn't like the idea of ignorant farmers having the vote. Could someone out there give us a better explanation of the grievances of each side? I have yet to see a good explanation of the situation.

User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8184 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1158 times:



Quoting Victrola (Reply 5):
It seems as if Thailand has a freely elected government. However the opposition thinks it has a right to depose that government. I have heard it said that the opposition doesn't like the idea of ignorant farmers having the vote. Could someone out there give us a better explanation of the grievances of each side? I have yet to see a good explanation of the situation.

Both the PPP party of deposed PM Somchai and Thai Rak Thai party of criminal ex-PM Thaksin Shinawatra were found guilty of election fraud, including a landmark 2006 court decision on the illegality of the TRT party itself following the military junta that kicked Thaksin out of the PM seat.

The grievances of the opposition are rather simple: the parties that have been in power since 2001 represent not "ignorant farmers" but out and out exploitation of the Thai political process. When Thaksin won his huge landslide in 2001, he was elected on promises of debt forgiveness for farmers and a 1 billion baht handout to rural provinces, none of which actually happened. His rule could best be described as authoritarian and self-serving, as he immediately imposed controls on the media and telecommunications industries, the latter of which was intended to benefit his family's immense telecom business, which was sold for billions to Temasek of Singapore just three years later. Primarily for those reasons, the military supported the opposition's calls for his ouster and the King backed the imposition of martial law as well.

The PPP party has been, until this week's ruling, essentially the TRT by another name, with many of Thaksin's cronies and friends at the helm, culminating in his criminal wife's brother Somchai being elected as PM, this time with rampant vote-buying to capture the rural majorities once again. This time, middle class Thais and Bangkok residents would have nothing of it, hence the creation of the PAD alliance early this year.

The grievance of the late PM and his party is simply that they were freely elected and the opposition doesn't represent true democracy. I don't know where they got the idea that election fraud constitutes a free and fair election, but that's the line they've been using all year with denial after denial.

Unfortunately the Thai supreme court lacks the authority to do anything other than rule this or that party's activities as being illegal. It will take parliamentary reform to change the election system to create more safeguards against voter fraud (as well as criminalization of it and related activities), and without a strong ruling coalition, it will be difficult to achieve such legislation.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Colorado High School Bans US Flag posted Sun Apr 2 2006 03:04:59 by ANCFlyer
Ruling Party Wins 94% Of The Seats In Tunisia posted Tue May 10 2005 01:09:41 by MaverickM11
Taiwan Ruling Party Verbally Bashes Female.... posted Sun Dec 16 2001 00:25:22 by Jiml1126
Dutch Court Allows Paedophile Political Party posted Tue Jul 18 2006 00:48:38 by Yanksn4
TV Sex Offender Cases AZ Court Ruling posted Thu May 25 2006 15:11:46 by AirCop
Congress To Subvert Supreme Court Ruling - Schiavo posted Fri Mar 18 2005 18:52:50 by Gigneil
US Court Makes Hypocritical Ruling On Terror Case posted Sat Dec 6 2003 02:52:06 by BarfBag
Shameful: Thai Hotel Bans Americans posted Sun Mar 23 2003 07:47:36 by PHX-LJU
Supreme Court Ruling posted Sat Dec 16 2000 04:20:20 by Brissie_lions
Finally, High-level Bi-partisan Common Sense posted Mon Nov 17 2008 13:44:03 by WunalaYann