Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Caution: US Made Toys Contain Lead Too!  
User currently offlineGeekydude From China, joined Apr 2004, 401 posts, RR: 2
Posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1381 times:

Here is a piece I found on cnn.com:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/03/news...s/index.htm?postversion=2008120314

"Researchers for the Michigan-based Ecology Center tested more than 1,500 popular toys for lead, cadmium, arsenic, PVC and other harmful chemicals. They said they found that one-third of the toys contain "medium" or "high" levels of chemicals of concern."

"The study does not associate country of origin with the presence of toxic chemicals. According to the release, 21% of toys from China and 16% of toys from all other countries had detectable levels of lead.

Of the 17 toys made in the United States that were tested, 35% had detectable levels of lead. A U.S.-made Halloween pumpkin pin had 190,943 ppm of lead. "

Maybe it's time to do away with toys all together this year given the bad shape of the economy and the safety of those toys.


FLIB 152 'heavy' low approach...Caution wake turbulance!
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFLY2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1361 times:



Quoting Geekydude (Thread starter):
"The study does not associate country of origin with the presence of toxic chemicals. According to the release, 21% of toys from China and 16% of toys from all other countries had detectable levels of lead.

Ok, so it was detectable. I bet it was 1 part in 1 gigabillionbajillion  Yeah sure

Quoting Geekydude (Thread starter):

Maybe it's time to do away with toys all together this year given the bad shape of the economy and the safety of those toys.

Oh please. Another case of the media blowing things out of proportion.

You can find any amount of those "harmful and deadly" chemicals in anything anywhere.

Throughout my flying carrier I've had well over a gallon of leaded fuel spilled over myself, and lots of other "dangerous substances" throughout my life. And I'm still here in good health to rant about it.

Now, if you eat a pound of lead for breakfast every day, that's gonna kill you.


User currently offlineGeekydude From China, joined Apr 2004, 401 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1342 times:



Quoting FLY2HMO (Reply 1):
Ok, so it was detectable. I bet it was 1 part in 1 gigabillionbajillion

"A U.S.-made Halloween pumpkin pin had 190,943 ppm of lead. " That's how many percent?

Quoting FLY2HMO (Reply 1):
Oh please. Another case of the media blowing things out of proportion.

That's CNN quoting a research report. There's nothing subjective there.

Quoting FLY2HMO (Reply 1):
Throughout my flying carrier I've had well over a gallon of leaded fuel spilled over myself, and lots of other "dangerous substances" throughout my life. And I'm still here in good health to rant about it.

But you would not let your childern play with 100LL aviation fuel, would you?



FLIB 152 'heavy' low approach...Caution wake turbulance!
User currently offlineFLY2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1334 times:



Quoting Geekydude (Reply 2):
But you would not let your childern play with 100LL aviation fuel, would you?

I'd let them handle it. "Playing" with it is different.


User currently offlineAKiss20 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 627 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1315 times:



Quoting FLY2HMO (Reply 3):
Quoting Geekydude (Reply 2):
But you would not let your childern play with 100LL aviation fuel, would you?

I'd let them handle it. "Playing" with it is different.

Would you let them stick it in their mouth? Fly2HMO's analogy is not valid here in that he had the experience/knowledge that these substances were dangerous, and as such, did not drink/eat them. The problem with leaded toys is that they are marketed to well, inexperienced users (aka babies/tots). Try keeping a toy out of a 5 year old's mouth.



Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are
User currently offlineGeekydude From China, joined Apr 2004, 401 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1246 times:



Quoting AKiss20 (Reply 4):
Would you let them stick it in their mouth? Fly2HMO's analogy is not valid here in that he had the experience/knowledge that these substances were dangerous, and as such, did not drink/eat them. The problem with leaded toys is that they are marketed to well, inexperienced users (aka babies/tots). Try keeping a toy out of a 5 year old's mouth.

Agreed. The problem with toys really lies the toy companies' lack of will to rein in with their contractors. If you market the toy under your name, then you have an obligation to make sure they're safe regardless who make them and where they're made. Simply shifing the blame onto contractors and subcontractors does not absolve toy companies' culpability.



FLIB 152 'heavy' low approach...Caution wake turbulance!
User currently offlineDougloid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1215 times:



Quoting Geekydude (Reply 5):
Agreed. The problem with toys really lies the toy companies' lack of will to rein in with their contractors. If you market the toy under your name, then you have an obligation to make sure they're safe regardless who make them and where they're made. Simply shifing the blame onto contractors and subcontractors does not absolve toy companies' culpability.

I think you're putting the cart before the hoss, Mr. Dude. Placing the burden of compliance on the party who is paying for the entire exercise is a shady business.

It is the obligation of the contractor to comply with the terms of the contract. In exchange they get paid. If the contractors aren't going to do what they're obliged to and what they've agreed to, tell me why anyone would patronize them? That's what's called breach of contract.

Let me give you an example. Say you run a diner. I walk in, sit down at the counter, lay a ten dollar bill down and say "I'll have the Denver omelette, side of hash browns, wheat toast, no butter, and black coffee." Bring me that, and the Hamilton's yours.

Ten minutes later you bring me a dead raccoon that expired in the road in front of the place.

By your standard, I'm to blame because of your noncompliance.

Please pass this along to the guy who puts those "QC Passed 32" stickers all over stuff that doesn't work around here.


User currently offlineGeekydude From China, joined Apr 2004, 401 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1177 times:



Quoting Dougloid (Reply 6):

Let me give you an example. Say you run a diner. I walk in, sit down at the counter, lay a ten dollar bill down and say "I'll have the Denver omelette, side of hash browns, wheat toast, no butter, and black coffee." Bring me that, and the Hamilton's yours.

Ten minutes later you bring me a dead raccoon that expired in the road in front of the place.

By your standard, I'm to blame because of your noncompliance.

Your analogy is flawed. Btw you and the diner, it's diner who's at fault. But if you run a catering business, and you indiscriminately pass along whatever the diner gives you, the dead raccoon in your case, to those school children in the hope to make a quick buck due to the restaurant owner's claim of low cost, then you can't clear yourself of guilt simply by saying it's entirely the diner's fault and that you bear zero responsibility. At the end of day, it's you that're marketing the product, under your brand name, to those school children. If the children get harmed, you are inexorable. You can sue the diner however you want. But btw you and the school children, you can't escape the accountability.



FLIB 152 'heavy' low approach...Caution wake turbulance!
User currently offlineDougloid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1167 times:



Quoting Geekydude (Reply 7):
At the end of day, it's you that're marketing the product, under your brand name, to those school children. If the children get harmed, you are inexorable. You can sue the diner however you want. But btw you and the school children, you can't escape the accountability.

You're entirely correct that the person at the end of the chain bears liability but you seem to be suggesting that that is the only person who's responsible in the supply chain and I disagree with that. The primary responsibility of the subcontractor is to perform to the contract and not to cheat.

In a perfect world they'd do their jobs and everyone would make money and be happy.

the subtext here is that the vast majority of toys sold here in the US and in Europe come from China. Noncompliance with contract requirements directly threatens the viability of that business relationship. What efforts are underway to address the issue there?


User currently offlineGeekydude From China, joined Apr 2004, 401 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1153 times:



Quoting Dougloid (Reply 8):
the subtext here is that the vast majority of toys sold here in the US and in Europe come from China. Noncompliance with contract requirements directly threatens the viability of that business relationship. What efforts are underway to address the issue there?

I am not in charge of, nor am I familiar with, toy manufacturing and supply chaining. But it's important that we realize that toy companies should make every attempt seeking out reliable suppliers and contractors, those that are ISO certified. It's just common sense. In a place where free market capitalism is still in the wild wild west stage, those toy companies should be and should have been even more cautious. There are reputable contractors and manufactures out there, but sometimes the toy companies have lost sense of reality and pursued the route of lowest cost with shady producers at the detriment of quality and safety. You get what you pay for, and that applies everywhere, in China as well.



This CNN article is simply showing that in terms of toys, people should exercise caution regardless their countries of origin. The sample statistics have shown that US made toys suffer just the same quality and safety problems as those produced overseas, if not worse (the numbers shown here are actually suggesting worse). That's an indication of an industry wide problem, not just those contractors in a particular geographic region.



FLIB 152 'heavy' low approach...Caution wake turbulance!
User currently offlineDougloid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1140 times:



Quoting Geekydude (Reply 9):
There are reputable contractors and manufactures out there, but sometimes the toy companies have lost sense of reality and pursued the route of lowest cost with shady producers at the detriment of quality and safety. You get what you pay for, and that applies everywhere, in China as well.

I tend to agree with you particularly with ISO certification. You DO get what you pay for.


User currently offlineAsuflyer05 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2373 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (5 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1119 times:

OMG AAAAAHHHH we're all going to die of lead poisoning!!!!111one!!!1!!

The media needs to get a life.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Should The US Follow Mexico's Lead? posted Thu Apr 13 2006 16:29:42 by Slider
Daschle Will Lead Us To Ruin posted Fri Oct 26 2001 08:52:24 by Twotterwrench
Post Us Your Best Self Made Pic posted Thu Jan 17 2002 01:43:05 by Herbman
US Security Measures Going A Bit Too FAR! posted Mon Jan 19 2004 01:58:26 by LeoDF
Self-Important Pols Exist Inside US Too... posted Sat Jan 22 2005 19:29:15 by Flyboy36y
Has US Post Office Made Concessions? posted Sun Sep 4 2005 05:08:13 by Logan22L
Does The US Have Too Much Power Over The Internet? posted Tue Nov 15 2005 18:44:29 by 9VSPO
Has The US Now Made An Eternal Enemy In The Arabs? posted Sat Aug 5 2006 04:56:41 by Derico
Toys R Us Can Save Lives! posted Sat Jan 19 2008 11:17:46 by L-188
"State Of Emergency" Used Too Liberally In The US? posted Mon Sep 8 2008 20:18:52 by StuckInCA