Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Windows Vista Question  
User currently offlineSXDFC From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 2297 posts, RR: 19
Posted (5 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1704 times:

Hey Guys:

I currently have a computer that was built in 2005 and I bought it in 2006, and it says on the bottom that it was designed for Windows XP. I however would like to know if it is still possible to install Windows Vista and have it working properly on this computer. My computer is a HP Pavilion a1330n,the one pictured below..




Thanks for your help!


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (5 years 7 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1679 times:

If you really want to upgrade to Vista (It's not a bad OS IMHO, but your mileage may vary), your best bet would be to download the Vista Upgrade Advisor from Microsoft. It will run some tests on your computer and let you know what version(s) of Vista will work on your computer. My old computer, which was made in 2003, was Vista Premium Ready according to the upgrade advisor, mainly because over the nearly five years I had it, I had upgraded the RAM and the video card.

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win...ows-vista/get/upgrade-advisor.aspx

Looking at the basics for your computer, you'll definitely need a lot more than 1 GB of RAM. When I bought my current computer last February, I made sure I got a computer with as much memory as I could because I had read about it being slow on computers with a gig of RAM. I'm running with 3GB of RAM on an AMD Athlon 64 X2 dual core 5000+ (2.6 GHz) and it pretty much runs very smoothly. So if it's possible to add an additional gig of RAM, do it.


User currently offlineAfterburner From Indonesia, joined Jun 2005, 1209 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (5 years 7 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1667 times:

Why do you want to upgrade to Vista? If you want to upgrade to Vista, your computer should have at least 2 GB of RAM.

User currently offlinePhoenix9 From Canada, joined Aug 2007, 2546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (5 years 7 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1665 times:

As others have said...u need more ram and performance on vista will be quite low. If I may ask...why would you want to use Vista over XP in terms of functionality. If it is just the cosmetic changes that you desire e.g. AERO....it is not really worth it.


Life only makes sense when you look at it backwards.
User currently offlineSXDFC From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 2297 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (5 years 7 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1655 times:



Quoting Phoenix9 (Reply 3):
If it is just the cosmetic changes that you desire

That is one of the reasons actually I thought it would be actually better then XP, but more and more people are urging me NOT to do it. I also heard it is better with regards to spy ware,etc. I am smart with most things with Computers,but this is an area where I wanted to ask another opinion on, and I am glad I did otherwise I think I would have spent 200+ dollars on Vista.


Not to hijack my own thread, but does anyone know of a reliable source to download music from that wont give you a virus, as Lime wire seems to give computers Viruses correct?



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineHawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3188 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (5 years 7 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1637 times:



Quoting SXDFC (Reply 4):
Not to hijack my own thread, but does anyone know of a reliable source to download music from that wont give you a virus, as Lime wire seems to give computers Viruses correct?

I use iTunes, but Amazon.com has an online music store and there are several others as well (Napster, Rhapsody, etc). The peer to peer software is more likely to end up causing problems and most of the content is illegally shared.


User currently offlinePhoenix9 From Canada, joined Aug 2007, 2546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (5 years 7 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1629 times:



Quoting SXDFC (Reply 4):
That is one of the reasons actually

Well in that case even 2GB RAM won't give you the best experience. If you want the full Aero effects and all that then you should be looking to change your video card that is DirectX 10 compatible and 128/256 MB VRAM. All in all...you'd be better off buying a new computer. As for the malware/spyware...it might be a bit better but you have to have other applications dedicated for such purposes...e.g. AVG Antivirus, Spybot Search and Destroy etc.

Seriously...cosmetic enhancements are not really worth it...I got sick of it in a few days and changed it back to windows classic  Wink You can actually download some programs that emulate vista looks on XP without the additional cost of RAM and video card.



Life only makes sense when you look at it backwards.
User currently offlineAverageUser From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (5 years 7 months 5 days ago) and read 1598 times:

The best money spent on your computer setup I think would be to buy a pair of 1 GB DDR memory modules (the original bus speed is 400 MHz, but bus speed 667 MHz memory is probably the most common & will suit you), which would bring the total RAM to 3 GB. Although your computer will be able to run Vista even in its present configuration all right, I see such an upgrade as pointless. If you are dissatisfied with the video performance in games, the only point upwards is to get a later generation graphics card (PCI express).
Here's the HP documentations, for your computer's motherboard: http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/d...=en&dlc=en&cc=us&docname=c00496280


User currently offlinePhoenix9 From Canada, joined Aug 2007, 2546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (5 years 7 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1586 times:

Try this for cosmetic changes:

http://www.download.com/Transform-XP...html?tag=mncol;pop&cdlPid=10888657



Life only makes sense when you look at it backwards.
User currently offlineMham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3573 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (5 years 7 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1558 times:



Quoting Phoenix9 (Reply 6):
As for the malware/spyware...it might be a bit better but you have to have other applications dedicated for such purposes...e.g. AVG Antivirus, Spybot Search and Destroy etc.

Vista is significantly more safe than XP, just by virtue of UAC (User Access Control). Many hate it but it is exactly what makes Apples safer too(besides not being popular enough to attract hacker attention).
Vista forces you out of Admin mode. You can do the same in XP but few do.


User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 10, posted (5 years 7 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1469 times:



Quoting Mham001 (Reply 9):
Vista is significantly more safe than XP, just by virtue of UAC (User Access Control). Many hate it but it is exactly what makes Apples safer too(besides not being popular enough to attract hacker attention).

The thing is that Apple's version of UAC (I don't know the formal name, so I'll call it User Confirmation) is much less invasive than Vista's UAC. In MacOS, you will be asked for your system's admin password if you install something that changes the operating system, and it will ask you if you really want to open an application that you recently installed, with the option to visit the application's website if available. If you don't have access to an admin user, or choose not to open a recently downloaded application after all, it's the same as an abort. Once that application has been launched for the first time, you basically confirm that it's safe and will no longer be prompted for confirmation to open the application.

UAC in Vista basically blocks the application/installation by default, and then you have to unblock it. Plus UAC has a tendency of acting up for even the smallest of things, which in this case is the fundamental problem of UAC. It simply tends to act up for things that don't even require security because they are harmless, plus applications that you have confirmed as safe, will sometimes still trigger UAC, even though the application was confirmed as safe. This makes the user confirmation in MacOS much more convenient and, as said before, non-invasive than Windows Vista's UAC.


User currently offlineStarAC17 From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 3354 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (5 years 7 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1377 times:



Quoting LTU932 (Reply 10):
The thing is that Apple's version of UAC (I don't know the formal name, so I'll call it User Confirmation) is much less invasive than Vista's UAC.

It hardly prompts you when using your computer for average daily operations. Its annoying if you have just formatted and are installing a lot of applications and drivers getting everything going, for that you can turn it off and enable it later.

When SP1 came out this past March it really cut down the amount of prompts you get. For example initially when you go into Msconfig and change startup applications the prompt comes up to get into it and then when you reboot to make the changes it prompted you again until you selected "Save these settings"

With SP1 they have taken that out so its far less intrusive.



Engineers Rule The World!!!!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Microsoft Vista Question posted Sat Mar 8 2008 07:41:15 by MadameConcorde
Need Windows Vista/Flight Sim X Help posted Tue Dec 25 2007 13:55:41 by BR715-A1-30
Install Windows Vista Using An External DVD Drive? posted Sat Dec 15 2007 08:27:47 by Jamesbaldwyn
Unistalling Windows Vista posted Wed Oct 17 2007 20:17:00 by QANTAS077
Windows Vista Wallpapers: But This Is Cape Town! posted Sun Sep 9 2007 19:40:05 by Umfolozi
MacBook / Parallels Desktop / Win Vista Question posted Sun Sep 9 2007 18:45:36 by Aloges
Windows Vista And Yahoo Games posted Fri Jun 29 2007 05:22:59 by Freshlove1
Windows Vista And The Recycle Bin posted Mon May 14 2007 02:03:51 by Jycarlisle
Windows XP To Windows Vista Help posted Mon Apr 9 2007 14:19:56 by PAHS200
LCD Monitors - Windows Vista Certified? posted Sun Apr 8 2007 19:20:56 by 2H4