VirginLover From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 958 posts, RR: 16 Reply 2, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 713 times:
Please don't mention Hillary and President in the same sentence...
Chris28_17 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1439 posts, RR: 11 Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 707 times:
That is a scary scary thought. Hillary is possibly the most Anti-family person in the world.
The scariest thing is that, it might just happen..
Woody From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 174 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 706 times:
Why all this sudden hate for Hillary? She is perhaps the strongest person in the spotlight. After all that's happened she's proved that she's got more guts than most of the men she'll be joining in the Senate. Are you upset because Hillary might run for President, or is it just the fact that a woman has a chance to win the presidency that scares you?
Branvan3k From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 168 posts, RR: 1 Reply 5, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 701 times:
If Hillary Clinton ran I would personally dedicate my time to her campaign.
Man I love her so much! She is a very resilient person who has been scrutinized by the
media for things that weren't her fault. And she stuck by her man, how loyal is that?
I want to know what so many of you have against Hillary Clinton?
Chris28_17 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1439 posts, RR: 11 Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 695 times:
Those of you hillary fans, read Gary Aldrige's book "unlimited access".. it will open your eyes like you will not believe. Hillary is not the innocent "strong" lady you think she is.
The sheer truth in that book frightened me about hillary. I encourage everyone to read that book.
Cba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4530 posts, RR: 3 Reply 7, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 690 times:
You people who hate Hillary have still not given a reason why you feel so strongly against her.
I'd also like to make a note about republicans; all you do is bash Gore, but you have yet to say anything good about Bush. You can only say negative things about Gore.
Greeneyes53787 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 844 posts, RR: 0 Reply 9, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 678 times:
Many on this forum give the Democrats too much credit!
Yes, HRC is a sociallist and probably quite capable of destroying entrepreneurship here and abroad. But Democrats generally are not particularly bright people. To believe that Hillary, a common Democrat, has a big plan is to believe more into them than exists (I hope).
It is the principalities and powers that manipulate the Democrats that cause them to continue on their seaming plan of total American destruciton. Yes, it is true that the Democratic platform calls for taxing and possibly an increase of taxing, the significance of which eventually could criple our economy to cry out for total socialism. This is probably a fact. But to think that they actually realize what they are doing, I don't think so. No human in the world, that can read a ballot, could be that limited in intelligence, let alone intellect.
No, I choose to believe that the Democrats, Hillary included, are not planning and scheming. They are just generally mentally limited beyond the basic Republican.
And I forgive them for this.. However, I am not happy about it, and I don't plan to just allow it to consume me or my country.
Woody From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 174 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 676 times:
Will you get off your holier-than-thou-art pedestal. If Republicans are so much smarter, then explain to me why a good percentage of people with higher education voted for Gore? And heaven forbid us from helping people for unfortunate than us. If that makes me a socialist then I proudly take the title. IMHO I think that it is people who put down other people and act like they're better than everyone else who are ruining society.
Johnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2469 posts, RR: 1 Reply 11, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 674 times:
OH PLEASE! Perhaps Hillary will grow to Godzilla size and destroy New York and Washington in the process also. Why aren't you little turds out protesting some injustice instead of mouthing off about Democrats, like normal young people? However,Jesse could be my president anytime! I for one would love to see the Republicans get in office, then BAM! the economy stops, and we kick them out for another 50 years. Let's just get it over with, please!
Cba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4530 posts, RR: 3 Reply 13, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 666 times:
I still haven't read a post where someone is saying something good about Bush. All I've seen are posts bashing Gore and Hillary. Can anyone say anything good about Bush?
I didn't think so. Bush is a dolt. Gore is an intelligent, seasoned politician, who has had much more experience than Bush. Gore is the best choice for president.
Last night, I had dinner with my friend's family. They all are republicans. One of them said, "Being the governor of Texas for 5 years isn't enough experience to be president." They all voted for Gore, even though they are republicans. Why? Because they understand that Bush is a dolt, and he does not have the experience to run the country. Gore does.
Ctbarnes From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3491 posts, RR: 52 Reply 14, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 664 times:
Please! We haven't finished this election yet. Could we at least wait a week after this one is finished before we start speculating on the next one?
Charles
The customer isn't a moron, she is your wife -David Ogilvy
Woody From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 174 posts, RR: 0 Reply 16, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 655 times:
For those of you who think Bush is a good choice, listen to this. Bush is having Chaney choose his advisors. If Bush can't choose his advisors himself then how can make decisions for the country? He'll do what his advisiors tell him to do.
Cba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4530 posts, RR: 3 Reply 17, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 650 times:
Woody hit it right on the dot! Bush is surrounding himself with his father's friends. Dubya won't run the country, his father's friends will.
The only reason Bush got into Yale and Harvard was through a legacy and his father's status.
Mx5_boy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 18, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 647 times:
Go Hillary, Go!
When Clinton and Hillary were in Sydney they were extremely popular. Particularly Hillary. Our current Prime minister's dreadful dull wife, Jeanette, was asked to organise a meeting of "power women in Australia" at the Opera House with Hillary as the primary guest. Jeanette had invited a bevy of business women and friends, creating what one media observer considered, a highly conservative garden party to greet Hillary. Left off the list of guests were many famous Australian "power" women, many who actually turned up to the event as Hillary had personally invited them.
Jeanette banned these women from entering the function and they were only allowed in at Hillary's insistence, the women included members of the Labor party and high profile aboriginals. Jeannette had invited a society list instead of the requested forum (Australian Power Women), including daughters of society friends. Suffice to say the entire function was a disgrace and an embarrassment to many of the people who Hillary invited, who were clearly not invited because of race and political persuasion.
Disgraceful behaviour in typical conservative fashion. (Jeanette is a Liberal - (as in Republican ))
So I say to all of you in the United States, you could do a lot worse than Hillary as president.
L-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29350 posts, RR: 62 Reply 20, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 643 times:
Sorry Hillary is not a good person. And I mean that in every sense of the word.
OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
Matt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 51 Reply 22, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 625 times:
Of course this is a no brainer:
She has aspirations to get to the White House.
Some of you will think I'm a traitor for what I'm about to say, but here goes. I speak the truth as much as I can.
Hillary will do very well, and be very popular as a Senator. She will work hard and try her best not to piss anyone off. She will remain low key, and will get a lot done. I might even go so far as to say that New York may actually get better because of her.
Now don't think I'm turning Democrat. I'm simply stating the obvious. If she has hopes of moving up the political ladder, she needs to do everything I said. She needs to let the controversy surrounding her die out. She needs to build a real following based on her accomplishments, not on her name (as she did this time). She will then be in a position to say to everyone who doubted "Look I told you I would be a good senator".
She will have no more scandals. No divisiveness, and will have a green light to the Democratic endorsement in '04 or '08.
I'm sure she knows that as well. I've always said that she has a Napoleon complex, but she isn't dumb. She's very bright and knows exactly what she's doing.
Lax2000 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 541 posts, RR: 0 Reply 24, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 617 times:
I think if George W. wins and isn't a very popular president Hilary will probably run in 2004 and a have a good chance of winning.
If Al wins and isn't popular, which would probably be the case if he won, the Dems wouldn't have a chance in 2004 and would be a bad year for a Democrat woman to run. In any case I think she would do a good job as president and could possibly win especially if G.W. doesn't do too well and runs against Hilary in 2004.
Adam
25 VirginLover: If she was smart, she would have left Clinton, to hell with loyalty, he was a jerk, and if she had no desire for politics, she would have left him. I
26 Trvlr: If she graduated first in her class at Yale I figure she at least has the brains to become a good president. If there wasn't anyone else good out ther
27 TWFirst: If Hillary does divorce Bill over the next four years and then runs for president, I think she'd improve her chances even more. However, when was the
28 Sccutler: There is no doubt in my mind that Senator-elect Clinton has White House ambitions... and I think she will be a formidable contender for the post. I wo
29 Johnboy: Matt D is right on the nose; you don't have to be Democrat or Republican to call it as you see it. Hillary is a political animal. Divorcing Bill would
30 Ctbarnes: But that still begs the question: When Bill leaves office will the Clintons divorce? Charles
31 Greeneyes53787: George Washington was our first single president. And every four years we either elect or re-elect a single president. And even now with the talk of o
32 DG_pilot: Greeneyes and VirginLover: I always enjoy reading your posts. Hold up the fort from the idiots at all costs! Dustin "Down with the radical Dems" Grave
35 Woody: George Washington was married to Martha Washington. I'm suprised that you didn't learn that in history class. They got married in 1759. Also the reaso
Sponsor Message: 
From South Africa, joined May 2000, 297 posts, 
From UK - Scotland, joined Dec 1999, 1875 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 958 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
Printer friendly format 
