Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Official 2009 March Madness Thread  
User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets87 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1381 times:

Well the 2009 NCAA Tournament bids were just announced, with the Louisiville Cardinals taking the Number 1 overall seed.

Who do you see going all the way?

My guess: Final Round:
Louisville 75
UNC 85

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUSPIT10L From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 3295 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1375 times:



Quoting FlyDeltaJets87 (Thread starter):
Who do you see going all the way?

Pitt might still have a chance. As good as Louisville has been, you never know how it'll turn out.



It's a Great Day for Hockey!
User currently offlineNorthstarBoy From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1812 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1366 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I can't help but wonder, who was smoking what when those divisions were created?

Uconn in the west?
Arizona in the south?
Wisconin in the east?
USC in the east or Midwest?

how hard is it to put the schools in divisions according to where the are geographically?



Why are people so against low yields?! If lower yields means more people can travel abroad, i'm all for it
User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets87 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1364 times:



Quoting NorthstarBoy (Reply 2):
I can't help but wonder, who was smoking what when those divisions were created?

The division has nothing to do with where the school is located - its the region of the country where the team will play in its bracket as it moves to Midwest Bracket will play some of their games in Kansas City while teams in the West will play in Boise and Portland. And the bracket a team is selected to play in is based on its overall ranking (For example, Louisville will play ythe 64th or 65th ranked team, depending on who wins that game). It seems complicated but it makes sense.


User currently offlineJpetekYXMD80 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 4355 posts, RR: 27
Reply 4, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1360 times:



Quoting NorthstarBoy (Reply 2):
I can't help but wonder, who was smoking what when those divisions were created?

Uconn in the west?
Arizona in the south?
Wisconin in the east?
USC in the east or Midwest?

how hard is it to put the schools in divisions according to where the are geographically?

The selection committee will try and protect 1-4 seeds and try to get them as close to home as possible. Other than that....they don't care about, where you go you go. It really is difficult enough to make the bracket without trying to get everyone close to home. For all intents and purposes, the title of the brackets are irrelevant for the teams they contain. Even more so now with the 'pod' system for the first and second rounds. For instance, the #1 sees in the east and midwest will both first play in Dayton. Part of the west bracket will be played in Philadelphia. This system was designed to have teams play closer to home, but that is only a priority for the top 4 seeds.



The Best Care in the Air, 1984-2009
User currently offlineTZ757300 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 2866 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1347 times:

Thought I'd plug in the pick'em I made for the site. Last year we had quite a few people sign up. Hopefully we get lots of people as well.

http://tournament.fantasysports.yahoo.com/t1/register/joinprivategroup_assign_team?GID=90430&P=airliners

password is airliners

I have it as Uconn and Pitt at the end with UConn winning.

Edited to fix the link

[Edited 2009-03-15 20:38:06]


LETS GO MOUNTAINEERS!
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1345 times:

I'm picking Memphis to win it all.

And congrats to the state of Ohio! Five of our teams made the tournament: Ohio State, Cleveland State, Akron, Dayton and Xavier. Good showing for the Buckeye state.

The only selection I had trouble with was Arizona at 19-13, with a terrible road record, and they didn't win anything in the PAC-10. They should not have made the dance.


User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets87 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1337 times:

Submitted my bracket for the A.net group. Unfortunately I'm better at picking upsets in football than I am in basketball. Guess we'll see how this goes.

User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1334 times:

I've got Memphs v. UNC in the finals, with Memphis winning. They're gonna play with a chip on their shoulder, after losing a toughie last year, and not getting a #1 seed, despite having the best record in the nation this year.

User currently offlineDc-9-10 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 583 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1321 times:



Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
The only selection I had trouble with was Arizona at 19-13, with a terrible road record, and they didn't win anything in the PAC-10. They should not have made the dance.

I agree with you there, no way an at-large team should have under 20 wins, especially when there are legitimate teams with a better RPI and more wins preparing for the NIT. Additionally, the Big Ten with 7 teams? There is just no way that they should get as many teams as the Big East and the ACC, Wisconsin should not have made the dance. My final complaints is that only 4 non "BCS" schools got an at-large bid. This number has been dropping pretty much every year and before we know it the only recourse that Mid-majors will have is to win their conference tournament. That is bad for college basketball. I think the "committee" needs to go straight best remaining RPI for the at-large bids. None of the "whole body of work" nonsense, it is to subjective and places conference and school recognition over a more objective (albeit not perfect) computer ranking.

Dc-9-10


User currently offlineJpetekYXMD80 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 4355 posts, RR: 27
Reply 10, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1315 times:



Quoting Dc-9-10 (Reply 9):
Wisconsin should not have made the dance.



Quoting Dc-9-10 (Reply 9):
I think the "committee" needs to go straight best remaining RPI for the at-large bids.

How do you reconcile those 2 comments together?

Quoting Dc-9-10 (Reply 9):
This number has been dropping pretty much every year and before we know it the only recourse that Mid-majors will have is to win their conference tournament

It's been dropping recently since the huge year the MVC had a few years ago. It goes in cycles, I don't see why this would be down permanently.



The Best Care in the Air, 1984-2009
User currently offlineTiger119 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1312 times:



Quoting Dc-9-10 (Reply 9):
Additionally, the Big Ten with 7 teams?

- I really can not argue with that but THREE Big East teams as Number One Seeds? I watched my fair share of college hoops this year (notice I typed "watched" and not listened? I usually will turn the volume down unless they are really good broadcasters) but really did not think they were that strong a conference. I knew Louisville was doing well (I live just 90 miles north of Louisville) but still, three teams from the same conference as number ones?

David



Flying is the second greatest thrill known to mankind, landing is the first!
User currently offlineTiger119 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1311 times:

An article from their website:

http://www.bigeast.org/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=19400&ATCLID=3693798



Flying is the second greatest thrill known to mankind, landing is the first!
User currently offlineDc-9-10 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 583 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (5 years 1 month 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1282 times:



Quoting JpetekYXMD80 (Reply 10):
How do you reconcile those 2 comments together?

http://ncaabasketball.fanhouse.com/r...age=1&sortCol=rpi_rank&sortDir=ASC

Looking at it again, Wisconsin probably would make it in, but San Diego State and Creighton should take out Arizona and Maryland respectively, on a straight RPI basis. (I might have missed another at-large with a lower RPI than Wisconsin, if I did my bad).


User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets87 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (5 years 1 month 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1221 times:

Well already down one point since A&M defeated BYU. Damn.  mad 

User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets87 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (5 years 1 month 16 hours ago) and read 1199 times:

So the BYU - Texas A&M game was the only game I didn't get right today. 15 out of 16 isn't too bad though.  Smile Tied for first in the A.net bracket.  biggrin  (that won't last, I'm sure)

Hope I'm right with my upset predictions again tomorrow.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
January 2009 Self Pic Thread posted Wed Dec 31 2008 20:43:06 by MCOflyer
The Official NHL Off-Season Thread posted Fri Jun 20 2008 14:04:18 by Srbmod
Official 2008 American Idol Thread posted Tue Feb 19 2008 20:53:10 by A340Spotter
The Official A.Net Super Tuesday Thread! posted Tue Feb 5 2008 11:10:43 by QuantasA380
The Official German Autobahn Speedlimit Thread posted Fri Jan 25 2008 06:52:13 by TheSonntag
The Official Super Bowl XLII Thread! posted Sun Jan 20 2008 19:19:39 by Allstarflyer
The Official BCS Title Game Thread posted Thu Jan 3 2008 16:11:34 by Falcon84
The Official College Football Bowls Thread posted Thu Dec 20 2007 16:11:34 by Mke717spotter
The Official 2008 NFL ProBowl Thread posted Tue Dec 18 2007 13:48:45 by CO7e7
The Official 2007 Bowl Selection Thread posted Sun Dec 2 2007 09:34:25 by JetBlueGuy2006