Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Napster Vs Retail  
User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 47
Posted (14 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 943 times:

Here we have a schizoid situation brought about and perpatuated by Napster (including all Napster copycats) users and the music companies alike.
Two things I feel are indisputable:

CD prices have mushroomed from an average of $14 to about $19 within the last two years.

Napster users have no intention to buy what they download.

So here we have our quandry:

Napster proponents argue that the costs of CD's are too high. Music companies argue that Napster users siphon off revenue from lost sales, causing the need for higher CD prices to offset th. So, CD prices go up. MORE people use Napster. Sensing a further loss in revenue, the CD prices go up AGAIN, causing MORE people to use it.
It's a vicious cycle from which there appears no exit.

Is it a case of greed on the part of the record companies? Is it a case of a new generation of tightwad kids trying to slither out of paying? In other words, 'legalized' shoplifting.

I hear that Napster is going to start charging on a per use basis (which IMHO they should've been doing all along). Will that bring CD prices down, or will just a new Napster-like site pop up, taking us back to square one?




2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline747-451 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2417 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (14 years 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 920 times:

Napster is the result of $20.00 CD's and the fact that there isn't a single artist out right now that I would even bother spending 10 cents, let alone 20 dollars on!

BTW, I don't bother with Napster either, since an artists work is theirs and not for FREE unless they want it to be. It is their right not to be stolen from.


User currently offlineAa737 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 849 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 904 times:

I use Napster and buy CDs. There are some atrists/groups that I really like, and I will enjoy listening to all the songs on the CD. In this case I will buy the CD. CD prices are high, but I am used to paying 16 pounds in England (~$23) so I actually feel like CDs are a good price here. (The same goes for gas with me, after the prices in England I don't find $2 a gallon overly expensive.)

Most of the stuff I download off napster is stuff I would have never bought the CD for, I only wanted one song so it wasn't worth spending the $20. I would have just gone with out the song.

I think when napster starts charging some people will stick with it, but a lot will find some other program offering the same services.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
ITunes Vs Napster. posted Wed Mar 28 2007 22:13:09 by Cumulus
Flying Business/first Vs Staying In Decent Hotel posted Wed Mar 4 2009 05:05:31 by Krje1980
Iphone Vs. HTC Touch HD. posted Sun Feb 1 2009 13:26:31 by Cumulus
Properties In LAX VS Properties In SFO posted Mon Jan 26 2009 22:41:23 by United Airline
Ilife'08 Vs Ilife09 And .wmv Files. posted Mon Jan 26 2009 18:49:40 by Mirrodie
Sirius Vs. XM posted Mon Jan 26 2009 18:07:24 by VonRichtofen
Iran: Men Vs. Women Game Draws Punishment posted Mon Jan 26 2009 12:53:51 by Starbuk7
Gibson Les Paul - Studio Vs. Standard? posted Sat Jan 24 2009 17:08:33 by Nitepilot79
Super Bowl Xliii From TPA: PIT Vs. ARZ posted Wed Jan 21 2009 10:37:43 by FlyDeltaJets87
Honda Civic Hybrid Vs New Insight Vs Toyota Prius posted Wed Jan 21 2009 10:32:18 by AI