Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
White House Official Resigns Over AF1-NYC Flight  
User currently offlineCzbbflier From Canada, joined Jul 2006, 973 posts, RR: 2
Posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1735 times:

Oooooooh boy am I ever going to burn in heck for this thread..... but I can't find any discussion over the AF1 photoshoot debacle over New York. Pleeeeeze don't flame me for bringing this up- I'm just curious what others think or more to the point whether others might have the same fear as I have.

After reading this article, Caldera resigns after flyover debacle by Josh Gerstein at Politico.com I started to get chills down my spine.

This is very scary left-hand-doesn't-know-what-the-right-hand-is-doing kind of stuff. Here's my question:

Ready?

Is this the first move on the part of certain elements within the US defense / security community to begin undermining the President of the United States?

Over 40 years on and conspiracies still abound about the fate of JFK and about who actually planned the assassination etc.

These three paragraphs speak to my fears most clearly. It's already too neat, too tidy. Limited investigations restricted to the White House- no inquiry along the 'chain of command'. Conversations amounting to 'asides'. Emails conveniently sent only after the flight had occurred. And seemingly, only the White House has egg on its face: the military has gotten off scott free! (Or am I wrong about that?)

Quote:
Caldera did not recall the April 20 conversation and described the April 24 conversation as an “aside” in a hallway. Caldera also said he did not see an e-mail Mulligan sent the same day about the impending flyover until after the flight occurred. Caldera never told Gibbs or Messina about the planned mission, the report said.

The counsel’s office report, which is unsigned, says little about the motivation for the flight. The work of the White House lawyers was quite limited in scope and did not examine the involvement of Defense Department officials and Federal Aviation Administration personnel in the incident.

Caldera said he was never asked to approve the mission and did not understand that it would involve an Air Force One aircraft flying at low altitude over the New York area. And the lawyers’ report found there is no clear procedure for the White House’s participation in decisions about training missions.

Sorry for the spectre of what I'm raising but am I right to feel concerned?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
White House Shamrock Ceremony Will Go Ahead posted Thu Feb 26 2009 15:34:12 by AmricanShamrok
Census To Be Managed By The White House posted Fri Feb 6 2009 17:37:58 by Dreadnought
White House 'buried British Intel. On Iraq WMD's posted Wed Aug 6 2008 03:43:58 by Mortyman
Judge: White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed posted Thu Jul 31 2008 08:50:56 by Aaron747
Tony Snow Out As White House Press Secretary posted Sat Aug 18 2007 03:41:05 by JetBlueGuy2006
Ex-Surgeon General: White House Squashes Science posted Thu Jul 12 2007 03:15:41 by Aaron747
Sen. Thompson -- Mole For Nixon White House posted Sat Jul 7 2007 02:45:50 by AeroWesty
White House Plans To Cut Iraq Troops By Half In 08 posted Sat May 26 2007 04:02:14 by Jimyvr
White House Threatens To Veto Hate-crimes Bill posted Fri May 4 2007 07:04:31 by Diamond
Bill Richardson Enters White House Race posted Sun Jan 21 2007 19:58:01 by Klima