Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Euros Hypocritical On Seal Hunts  
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17339 posts, RR: 46
Posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1327 times:

I was wondering why the EU suddenly cared about seals...

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13649231

"Every year, 300,000 seals meet their end not by mauling from a polar bear, but instantaneously from gunshot or a blow from a club. Four years ago the WWF, an environmental organisation, commissioned an independent vet’s report which concluded that seal clubbing is not cruel if it is properly done by competent and trained professionals. "

" Europe’s fur farms produce over 30m mink and fox pelts a year. Every four or five days Europe kills more animals for their fur than the entire annual Canadian hunt does in a year. Seal hunting sounds unfair; but Europeans are reluctant to ban the hunting of similarly defenceless game birds, deer or wild boar"

"Why did the European Parliament overlook all this? Seal-murdering foreigners are a soft target and animal-welfare groups have been lobbying MEPs for years. It may not be a coincidence that they finally voted for a ban just a month before they face elections. Having been invisible to their constituents for the past five years, what better way for MEPs to save their own skins than to fight valiantly for those of baby seals?"


E pur si muove -Galileo
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineArrow From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 2676 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1300 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

This is what most upsets Canadians -- including people like me who don't particularly like the seal hunt. The hypocrisy is staggering. If NAFTA (US, Canada and Mexico) passed a joint resolution calling on Spain to end bullfighting -- and backed it with a ban on all products containing Spanish leather -- there'd be hell to pay.

From a Globe & Mail column using the Economist piece as a catalyst:

And what about the corrida? If the seal hunt is "inherently inhumane," as the European parliamentarians say, why do they tolerate bullfights? Answer: They take place in Europe and banning them would create political havoc. Throughout Spain, and in some areas of southern France, bulls are regularly killed for the mere enjoyment of the spectators, by people who could easily do something else for a living. (I must confess that I've seen bullfights and found the ritual magnificent.) In any case, far from seeing the corrida as a barbaric custom, the European Union found a new label: Bullfights are a part of Spain's cultural heritage and, as such, they can be preserved.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...gnon18/BNStory/specialComment/home



Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
User currently offlinePhotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2717 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1244 times:

Ya, well if you want to read something really hypocritical, read up on how the French make "Foie Gras" by force feeding ducks and geese. You want to talk about inhumane treatment.

User currently offlinePyrex From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 3938 posts, RR: 28
Reply 3, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1196 times:



Quoting Arrow (Reply 1):
If NAFTA (US, Canada and Mexico) passed a joint resolution calling on Spain to end bullfighting -- and backed it with a ban on all products containing Spanish leather -- there'd be hell to pay.

I would actually totally support that - bullfights are barbaric, no other way around it. But two wrongs don't make a right...



Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
User currently offlineFLY2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1181 times:

The phrase "inhumane" is hypocritical in itself. Inhumane literally means un-human. Animals are not human. Therefore, animals shouldn't be treated like humans and I don't see why they should have the same rights as us.

I don't agree with random torturing of animals just for fun like some sick people do. But, say, asking to send cows to the spa and give them royal treatment before they're sent to the slaughterhouse so we can later feed on them? That's ludicrous.  Yeah sure


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Court Makes Hypocritical Ruling On Terror Case posted Sat Dec 6 2003 02:52:06 by BarfBag
Spotting On Google Earth posted Sat May 16 2009 06:36:48 by Ferengi80
Obama Does U-turn On Guantanamo posted Fri May 15 2009 09:08:21 by Windy95
Written On A Bathroom Stall... posted Wed May 13 2009 20:21:24 by Jetplaner
WestJetForLife, Come On Down! posted Wed May 13 2009 09:55:31 by WestJetForLife
Medical Advice, I'm Getting Woozy On Bridges posted Tue May 12 2009 20:18:48 by STT757
Chrysler, Fiat Planning Avoid Cap On Exec Pay posted Tue May 12 2009 17:52:13 by Dtwclipper
Business Open On Sunday--Against The Law?!? posted Sun May 10 2009 20:25:19 by Lincoln
Calling On All A.netters In Dubai - QE2 Concern! posted Sat May 9 2009 23:54:09 by MadameConcorde
Who Is On UK 'least Wanted' List? posted Wed May 6 2009 00:31:43 by Baroque