Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Liberty U. Bans College Democrats  
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2004 times:

From the article I'm about to post:

"'You can't be a Democrat and be a Christian and be a university representative.'"

And now, the short article from CNN.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...sity-bans-college-dems/#more-52973

A private University like this has a right to do this. Every right. But I'd like to ask our conservative bretheren on here: is THIS where you want conservatism to go? Banning those who don't agree with your views.

And how many of you really believe the quote above? I'm a liberal. I'm a Chritian. I am not affilliated with a Church now, but I have a strong faith in Jesus Christ. Is conservatism becoming so extreme that it REALLY believe that a Democrat cannot be a Christian, and cnnont represent a University?

This does not obviously represent the views of all conservatives, that is a given, but it is troubling that this seems to be the path conservatism is taking-one that is purging itself of anything that does not conform to a narrow view on politics, economics and society.

It troubles me, and I truly hope that some conservatives find this apalling as well.

38 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMattRB From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1624 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1996 times:

I find the irony that this is happening at LIberty University somewhat amusing.


lib·er·ty [ líbbərtee ] (plural lib·er·ties)


noun
Definition:

1. right to choose: the freedom to think or act without being constrained by necessity or force

2. freedom: freedom from captivity or slavery

3. basic right: a political, social, and economic right that belongs to the citizens of a state or to all people ( often used in the plural )



Aviation is proof that given, the will, we have the capacity to achieve the impossible.
User currently offlineShyFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1982 times:



Quoting Falcon84 (Thread starter):
But I'd like to ask our conservative bretheren on here: is THIS where you want conservatism to go?

Nope.

Quoting Falcon84 (Thread starter):
And how many of you really believe the quote above?

No, not in the least.


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11414 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1961 times:

Bye bye federal student aid at Liberty University!

They should expect a tax audit too. Just like Arizona State.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineSan747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4949 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1923 times:

I just read about this.

Not surprising, I suppose, but still troubling to hear, even at a place like that. As much as Republicans, anti-gays, fundamentalists and hate-mongers love to use the 1st Amendment to their defense, they also forget that freedom of speech means people who DISAGREE with them have that same freedom as well.

And yes, I know this is a private school and they can do whatever they want, but that's no excuse and it's extremely hypocritical and somewhat ironic given the university's name, as pointed out above.



Scotty doesn't know...
User currently offlineUAXDXer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 765 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1915 times:

Just curious...... why would a liberal want to go to a school such as Liberty U to begin with?


It takes a bug to hit a windsheild but it takes guts to stick
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1869 times:



Quoting UAXDXer (Reply 5):
Just curious...... why would a liberal want to go to a school such as Liberty U to begin with?

Just curious: why would a conservative want to go to Oberlin College, one of the most liberal schools in the nation? For the education, perhaps? Yet they go there. There is a Republican student group at Oberlin, and I dont' see them being tossed.


User currently offlineUs330 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 3873 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1861 times:

Yes, they have every right to do it because they are a private university.
That said, if their goal is to graduate future leaders of the conservative movement and the religious right, they should strongly reconsider. What better way for some of these future leaders to gain experience in debating and arguing with others that have a viewpoint similar to those that they might face in the future in the relatively sheltered environment of their own campus?
It's the perfect opportunity for these kids to take risks and debate in a controlled environment, so they can get some experience before they do it in the real world.
Besides, as often as those who have strong opinions about certain topics end up changing their views when exposed to the opposition, a roughly equal number end up becoming more convinced in the truth behind their opinions when confronted with the opposition.


User currently offlineDXing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1848 times:



Quoting Falcon84 (Thread starter):
It troubles me, and I truly hope that some conservatives find this apalling as well.

As appalling as you find it if I said that all liberals were pro choice which you have repeatedly said you are not.

Quoting UAXDXer (Reply 5):
Just curious...... why would a liberal want to go to a school such as Liberty U to begin with?

My question exactly.

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
Just curious: why would a conservative want to go to Oberlin College, one of the most liberal schools in the nation? For the education, perhaps? Yet

Perhaps because it is a Liberal Arts University? Huge difference between that and Conservative Religious University. Unless of course you are conferring religious status on the Liberal Arts? BTW take a look at the postions of the conservative group at Oberlin, all three of them.....
http://www.oberlin.edu/stuorg/ocr/positions.html
Not a word about abortion. So maybe it is possible that a politcal party could have more than one type of group in it? Go figure.

In addition the Oberlin group clearly states in their charter that:

Section 2. The CRs acknowledges and adopts the values and principles of Oberlin College as expressed in the Preamble of the Constitution of the Association of Students of Oberlin College, the Oberlin College Student Regulations, Policies, and Procedures Handbook, and the Oberlin Statement of Goals and Principles in the Preface to the Oberlin College Bulletin.

http://www.oberlin.edu/stuorg/ocr/charter.html

Something that evidently the democrat club did not adhere too if the Liberty University officials are to be believed.

http://www.wdbj7.com/global/story.asp?s=10411963

Liberty officials say the student group did nothing wrong. Their problem lies with the National Democratic Party.

"We just simply will not lend the name or the funds to any club, Democrat, Republican, independent, or non-political, that carries on activities that are counter to the core mission of the University," says Mathew Staver, the Dean of Liberty University School of Law.


In addition the story says that the University is trying to come to terms with the group and that:

LU officials say the College Democrats can still meet on campus, they just can't promote their cause on school property and they won't get any money from the school.

So it's not as if the LU officials are going to sick attack dogs on the group if they try to meet.

I still find it kind of puzzling that if you read the doctrinal and mission statements of LU why you would for a second think that it would lend its name to a goup that organizes under a group that believes in something that is the complete opposite of what the University stands for?


User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8866 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1837 times:

Guys, c'mon, this is Jerry Falwell U. It's a bunch of evangelists. Having democrats there would be like inviting Exxon representation at an Earth First! rally.

Personally, I don't care, they can do what they want. I have no use for evangelists, I am pro-choice, and have a lot of other problems with their agenda. I wouldn't want to attend that University, and I am a conservative - why would a liberal democrat want to?



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19927 posts, RR: 59
Reply 10, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1790 times:



Quoting Falcon84 (Thread starter):
I'm a liberal. I'm a Chritian.

No you aren't. Didn't you read the article? You CAN'T be both at once.  Wink

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 9):
Guys, c'mon, this is Jerry Falwell U. It's a bunch of evangelists. Having democrats there would be like inviting Exxon representation at an Earth First! rally.

Nice! Very nice! Always have to give props to a good metaphor (simile, even!).  thumbsup 


User currently offlineUal747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1784 times:

Interesting....

They are a private institution who can do whatever they want, accept who they please, and dictate what goes on on campus as long as it abides with the law (note, not all discrimination laws apply here).

However, if they believe that democrats and their values are not Christian, then that is completely and utterly wrong. I would probably be about right in saying that 80-85% of people that voted democrat in the last election were Christians. Being a democrat stands for more than just pro-gay marriage and pro-choice. In fact, stating that you are a democrat does not mean that you have to agree with those viewpoints. It seems that since those are hot issues with both parties, they use those issues to combat each other, when in reality, labeling yourself democrat or republican can stand for a wide variety of issues, excluding or including the aforementioned issues.

When I was on Student Senate back in the college days, we were in control of providing funding for student organizations. We determined which groups could exist, which ones couldn't, and which ones were good ideas, but could merge with another existing group because the principles were the same. The Republican and Democratic groups were top tier groups, and integral to the University. While I didn't go to an evangelical university, to exclude these groups excludes freedom of thought and debate. While LU can do whatever it wants, it should realize that advocating for same sex marriage and supporting abortion is NOT a prerequisite to being a part of the Democratic Party. In fact, one could argue that it's fiscal policy that is the main issue between the two parties.

But, if you decide to go there, and you were brought up in the same type of evangelical environment, you should know what you are getting yourself into. I do think, that if they receive federal funding, it should be denied, but I won't get my hopes up as the church has had it's hands around the governments nuts and in it's pocketbooks since the inception of our society. I seriously don't know why the church gets tax exempt status either.

On a side note: Does this University have a medical school? Or have a Pre-Med major? I'm sorry, but I'd rather not have a doctor working on me who was taught creationism. No offense, but I don't think it's beneficial. Same goes for pre-law/law.

UAL


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11414 posts, RR: 52
Reply 12, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1773 times:



Quoting Ual747 (Reply 11):
They are a private institution who can do whatever they want, accept who they please, and dictate what goes on on campus as long as it abides with the law (note, not all discrimination laws apply here).

Yes, they can do this within the First Amendment freedom of association since they are an "expressive association" whose membership is bound by their common trait of evangelical Christianity.

However, just because they have a right to silence members that do things that they feel are against their expression, they do not have a right to federal funding, and will most assuredly lose it after this.

I predict a backtrack within one week.

Quoting Ual747 (Reply 11):
On a side note: Does this University have a medical school? Or have a Pre-Med major? I'm sorry, but I'd rather not have a doctor working on me who was taught creationism. No offense, but I don't think it's beneficial. Same goes for pre-law/law.

They do have a law school. I really hate law school snobbery, but I would be weary of hiring an LU grad to work for me if they are actively restricted from hearing other viewpoints in their education.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineUal747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1755 times:



Quoting D L X (Reply 12):

However, just because they have a right to silence members that do things that they feel are against their expression, they do not have a right to federal funding, and will most assuredly lose it after this.

I stated in my previous post that their federal funding, if they receive it should be denied.


User currently offlineAGM100 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 5407 posts, RR: 17
Reply 14, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1729 times:

This is a huge issue indeed. This argument will only increase over the next years in the USA . As we become more polarized into our separate sides of the the social issues I expect more and more things like this to happen. Sadly .

Liberty does not take federal funds ,, it is a far right Christian college. They are open about there curriculum , they do not promote diversity at the college. It is a college for fundamental Christians , and does not claim to be anything else.

Frankly anyone who would want to go there that does not want this type of education is suspect to me. Its like me going to a Madrasah and expecting to learn about Judaism .

Quoting Falcon84 (Thread starter):
Is conservatism becoming so extreme that it REALLY believe that a Democrat cannot be a Christian, and cnnont represent a University?

In some conservatives eyes the answer is yes. You can not support abortion , gay marriage , and the ideas of the liberal social agenda and still follow the teaching of the bible. Its like being sorta pregnant in there eyes. Sorry but that is the way they see it. I know , I broke away from a similar group , they did not appreciate me playing in a rock band and , having girlfriends and drinking alcohol . To them you must live the life and uphold the standards of the teachings of Jesus .. as they interpret it.



You dig the hole .. I fill the hole . 100% employment !
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8866 posts, RR: 24
Reply 15, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1719 times:



Quoting AGM100 (Reply 14):
In some conservatives eyes the answer is yes. You can not support abortion , gay marriage , and the ideas of the liberal social agenda and still follow the teaching of the bible

Conservatism as a economic/political movement has nothing to do with these guys. Conservatism is described by its name - In the recognition that society is a very delicate balance, that we should conserve the institutions that have been proven to work and be very careful about messing with it without very good reason. It is about the respect of natural law. It has nothing to do with religion.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineDXing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1710 times:



Quoting D L X (Reply 12):
However, just because they have a right to silence members that do things that they feel are against their expression,

So you are advocating that despite their mission statement, doctrinal statement, and goals statement, and even though the students elected to be there that University has no say in how or when its corporate logo or brand name is used? Again, from the article I linked too:


http://www.wdbj7.com/global/story.asp?s=10411963

Liberty officials say the student group did nothing wrong. Their problem lies with the National Democratic Party.

"We just simply will not lend the name or the funds to any club, Democrat, Republican, independent, or non-political, that carries on activities that are counter to the core mission of the University," says Mathew Staver, the Dean of Liberty University School of Law.

In addition the story says that the University is trying to come to terms with the group and that:

LU officials say the College Democrats can still meet on campus, they just can't promote their cause on school property and they won't get any money from the school.



So if these students decide to have a beer bong bash and wet t-shirt contest on MTV wearing LU athletic jerseys and t-shirts your position is that they are expressing their right of freedom to associate (which I support) and because of that the University can have no say in what they certainly would consider to be a violation of their mission/goals/doctrinal statements and an infringement of their trade mark?


User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (5 years 5 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1655 times:

Fine, DXing, the Democrats get no money from the school. In turn, the school should get no money from the Federal Government. I think that's very fair.

And, again, while they have the right to do what they did, for any school to blacklist a legitimate group, because they don't like their politics is intellectually dishonest. All it does is make them look like small-minded fools. If that's what they want to look like, more power to them, I guess.


User currently offlineKSYR From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (5 years 5 months 22 hours ago) and read 1618 times:



Quoting San747 (Reply 4):
Not surprising, I suppose, but still troubling to hear, even at a place like that. As much as Republicans, anti-gays, fundamentalists and hate-mongers love to use the 1st Amendment to their defense, they also forget that freedom of speech means people who DISAGREE with them have that same freedom as well.

Works both ways. Look back to Tom Tancredo's speech at UNC-Chapel Hill a few weeks ago, where crazy liberal protesters threatened Mr. Tancredo, assaulted police officers, threw a brick through a window and forced him to be evacuated for his own safety. A week later, another conservative speaker came to campus to speak and was met with another hostile response. This time, however, university police were prepared and promptly arrested those trying to disrupt the speech.

Intolerance isn't confined to Democrats or Republicans. Both sides share equal blame and have their share of black eyes.


User currently offlineDXing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (5 years 5 months 19 hours ago) and read 1583 times:



Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 17):
And, again, while they have the right to do what they did, for any school to blacklist a legitimate group, because they don't like their politics is intellectually dishonest.

How well do you think a KKK group would be recieved at Fisk or Tuskegee? Think the college elders would be happy to fork over money to a group that represents the ideals of racial purity even though that flies in the face of their mission statements? Would the federal government be within their rights to then deny either university money? Both are private institutions.


User currently offlineIpodguy7 From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 365 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (5 years 5 months 19 hours ago) and read 1579 times:

Wow the media is all over banning Liberalism, but when Obama tries to silence conservatives (e.g. Fairness Doctrine with Conservative Radio) and when UK bans conservative talk show hosts, the media seems to be silent. Now, I am a conservative and the PRIVATE college has every right to ban whoever they want, BUT if i was the president of the college, I would not ban democrats from my univeristy. Now thats just my opinion and as far as I know Obama hasn't made it completely illegal to have an opinion (yet).
GOD BLESS AMERICA



AA/DL/NW/CO/UA/US/AC/FI/EI/BD/BA/AF/AZ/DY/SK/QF/JQ
User currently offlineAGM100 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 5407 posts, RR: 17
Reply 21, posted (5 years 5 months 9 hours ago) and read 1537 times:



Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 15):
Conservatism as a economic/political movement has nothing to do with these guys

Agreed ... however as a fiscon we must understand that the liberal left has essentially grouped us into one category. I myself am less social conservative than I am fiscal conservative , but the two are intertwined now in America.

There is little doubt in my mind that the left has used the social agenda to divide the country and in turn are now attacking fiscon ideas. So they win a election using the social agenda to solidify the base, then essentially attack fiscon ideas. My point is ,, they have grouped themselves into a single "team" and they have also managed to group the conservative side as well.

I believe that there will be a separation within the conservative side over the next years. I believe that the social cons and the fiscons will be divided. This may well make it even harder for the GOP to make a solid return. I guess we have been divided and ...conquered .



You dig the hole .. I fill the hole . 100% employment !
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11414 posts, RR: 52
Reply 22, posted (5 years 5 months 8 hours ago) and read 1527 times:



Quoting DXing (Reply 16):
So you are advocating that despite their mission statement, doctrinal statement, and goals statement, and even though the students elected to be there that University has no say in how or when its corporate logo or brand name is used?

HUH?

No, I said the exact opposite. I said they DO have the right to kick the dems off their campus. But exercising that right has consequences. You can't get federal funding at the same time that you discriminate based on religion and political viewpoints.

Quoting DXing (Reply 19):
How well do you think a KKK group would be recieved at Fisk or Tuskegee?

My god. I seriously can't believe you would go there. Are you actually telling me you can't see a difference between the democrat party and the KKK? DXing, I think you've just stepped in it.

Quoting DXing (Reply 19):
Would the federal government be within their rights to then deny either university money? Both are private institutions.

It's not a matter of rights. The federal government does not have "rights," it has powers. No, the federal government would not have the power to remove funding for a school that banned a violent hate group from their school.

Quoting Ipodguy7 (Reply 20):
Wow the media is all over banning Liberalism, but when Obama tries to silence conservatives (e.g. Fairness Doctrine with Conservative Radio)

 Yeah sure

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/firs...e-house-opposes-fairness-doctrine/

I think that dispatches this crazy counterargument nicely.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 21):
however as a fiscon we must understand that the liberal left has essentially grouped us into one category.

HAH!!! Give me a damn break!

Don't blame liberals, blame NIXON! Blame REAGAN! Blame DUBYA! Blame all the state republican party chairs that made sure that there would be some sort of gay marriage thing on the ballot when Bush was running for reelection, to make sure that Bush would get fundamentalist voters. These were the men (and presumably some women) that insisted on pushing the religious right into the forefront of the republican party. Liberals are just calling you what you want to be called: republican!

I swear, it is becoming the standard republican to blame other people for your faults. You guys have to get out that habit.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineDXing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (5 years 5 months 8 hours ago) and read 1515 times:



Quoting D L X (Reply 22):
No, I said the exact opposite. I said they DO have the right to kick the dems off their campus. But exercising that right has consequences. You can't get federal funding at the same time that you discriminate based on religion and political viewpoints.

So your position is that that a private institution has no right to protect its trademark, which is what the University is essentially doing, even when the beliefs behind that trademark are known in advance?

Quoting D L X (Reply 22):
My god. I seriously can't believe you would go there. Are you actually telling me you can't see a difference between the democrat party and the KKK? DXing, I think you've just stepped in it.

Sure, there is a huge difference, but is freedom of association protected or not?

Quoting D L X (Reply 22):
It's not a matter of rights. The federal government does not have "rights," it has powers. No, the federal government would not have the power to remove funding for a school that banned a violent hate group from their school.

I said that the mythical group at Fisk or Tusgekee advocated racial purity, not violence just as the students at LU don't seem to believe in all the democratic party planks. But what you seem to be saying is that those two Universities would be able to protect their trademarks while LU is not.


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11414 posts, RR: 52
Reply 24, posted (5 years 5 months 7 hours ago) and read 1510 times:



Quoting DXing (Reply 23):
So your position is that that a private institution has no right to protect its trademark

DXing, READ what I wrote. The institution absolutely has the right to protect its trademark. It does NOT have the right to federal funding though.

Quoting DXing (Reply 23):
Sure, there is a huge difference, but is freedom of association protected or not?

This isn't a freedom of association issue. And if you had read and comprehended what I've been saying all along, the university has the first amendment right under the freedom of association to freely associate and kick out members that do not adhere to their expression. I've said that in every post I've made on this thread.

What you're not understanding is that the freedom to associate ONLY means that the government cannot break up an association because of its expression. The freedom of association does not in any way confer upon them any additional privileges, such as receiving federal funds.

Quoting DXing (Reply 23):
I said that the mythical group at Fisk or Tusgekee advocated racial purity

Spare me. The KKK is not a "mythical" group.

Quoting DXing (Reply 23):
But what you seem to be saying is that those two Universities would be able to protect their trademarks while LU is not.

If you can't spot the difference, I can't help you.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
25 AGM100 : A little of the cart before the horse , but it is true that the republicans have done the same thing. My reply to dreadnaught was from a fiscon stand
26 DXing : Evidently not since you are advocating a double standard. One University should be sanctioned for protecting their trademark and stated aims while th
27 D L X : And I stand by that. It is an idiotic notion that a school banning a violent hate group (the KKK in your example) is remotely similar to a school ban
28 Falcon84 : Since it's not defensable, no one can. And DXing knows it.
29 DXing : I know I don't need anyone to back me up to know what is right. LU has every right to protect their brand name and trademark against persons or organ
30 Tugger : I agree that it is disgraceful but again as you noted, the university and local police cracked down on the "protesters" and removed them. This is imp
31 DXing : Correct which is why I worded the mythical group as I did, believing in racial purity with no mention of the violence associated with the main body.
32 D L X : NO ONE has argued against that. Not one person. So why do you keep saying that? If you didn't mean KKK, you should not have said KKK. I don't know an
33 DXing : Uhh...I'm not the one capping. Talking of starting over... Exactly where is the University silencing them or saying they have the right too? Again..
34 D L X : I have no idea what that means. I do know that you have not taken up the challenge to try your analogy again with less inflammatory examples. Huh? Yo
35 San747 : For the record, I absolutely agree. Human nature is human nature, no matter what the political preference.
36 DXing : Your argument is, as I understand it: My disagreement with that argument is that one, the students are not being silenced, and two the University has
37 IADCA : This "incident," if it must be called that, is interesting from a couple fronts. There's a legal aspect, which I'd prefer to stay out of as much as po
38 DocLightning : Actually, why would ANYONE want to go there? The only accreditation that LU has is SCAS, which isn't exactly considered a valid accreditation by most
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any College Student Registered For Fall Classes? posted Sat May 9 2009 11:31:14 by MCOflyer
Statue Of Liberty's Crown To Reopen posted Fri May 8 2009 07:01:23 by Cadet985
EU Bans Seal Products posted Tue May 5 2009 15:43:21 by AF340
Corrupt Democrats, Another Example posted Tue Apr 21 2009 06:12:43 by CALTECH
College Students: Classes You're Taking? (2009) posted Thu Mar 26 2009 13:27:30 by FRAspotter
College Football And The BCS Fall Out posted Tue Jan 6 2009 02:00:21 by UAXDXer
College Bowl Games. How Are Teams Selected? posted Fri Jan 2 2009 15:25:32 by Silverfox
Facebook Bans Breast-feeding Photographs posted Tue Dec 30 2008 04:31:03 by Mortyman
College Football Bowl Season Begins! posted Sat Dec 20 2008 14:58:22 by QXatFAT
Thai High Court Bans Ruling Party posted Mon Dec 1 2008 22:06:38 by Lufthansa411
Why Aren't College Scholarships Taxed? posted Sun Jan 2 2011 15:49:44 by EA CO AS
FDA Finally Bans Painkiller After 30 Years? posted Sat Nov 20 2010 23:18:59 by Aaron747
Advice...getting Into College (Mature Student) posted Mon Nov 8 2010 08:53:53 by yooyoo
Lady Liberty Struck By Lightning posted Sat Oct 16 2010 11:45:50 by DocLightning
SoCal School District Bans Dictionary In School posted Thu Oct 14 2010 23:18:40 by dxing
Uefa Bans Vuvuzelas - Thank You! posted Wed Sep 1 2010 16:09:46 by TheSonntag
Ncaa Top 12 College Mascots.... posted Wed Sep 1 2010 15:25:54 by AirframeAS
College Sports Realignment Returns! posted Wed Aug 18 2010 17:40:06 by Alias1024
Obama's Oxymoron Speech On College And Jobs. posted Mon Aug 9 2010 08:41:37 by fxramper
Ncaa College Reallignment 2010 Edition posted Thu Jun 10 2010 11:16:03 by casinterest