Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
N. Korea May Launch Missile At Hawaii On July 4th  
User currently offlineJakeOrion From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1255 posts, RR: 3
Posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 5641 times:

Oh, this ought to get real fun if this is true.

According to Japanese intelligence:

Quote:
North Korea may launch a long-range ballistic missile towards Hawaii on American Independence Day, according to Japanese intelligence officials.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worl...aunch-Hawaii-Independence-Day.html


Every problem has a simple solution; finding the simple solution is the difficult problem.
119 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 27325 posts, RR: 60
Reply 1, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 5638 times:

Hopefully its not true and just media hype. If it were true and did happen then I fear what would happen next.

User currently offlineJakeOrion From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1255 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 5630 times:



Quoting OA260 (Reply 1):
If it were true and did happen then I fear what would happen next.

You think China or maybe even Russia would get involved?

Or are we looking at total decimation of North Korea via US and South Korea, probably Japan as well?



Every problem has a simple solution; finding the simple solution is the difficult problem.
User currently offlineJetsGo From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3086 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 5629 times:

Wow. This is a bit of a step up from their usual rhetoric isn't it? Are they threatening to launch in the general direction or actually to make a hit? I can only imagine the response...

Save us Obama  Yeah sure



Marine Corps Aviation, The Last To Let You Down!
User currently offlineJpax From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 1020 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 5601 times:



Quoting JetsGo (Reply 3):
Save us Obama

He will, undoubtedly! The proper recourse should a strike actually take place is a stern wag of the finger and stiffer economic sanctions.  Wink


User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15833 posts, RR: 27
Reply 5, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 5602 times:

Someone should really remind the North Koreans what happened to the last people to take a potshot at Hawaii.  flamed 


Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlineHomer71 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2254 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 5586 times:



Quoting Jpax (Reply 4):
The proper recourse should a strike actually take place is a stern wag of the finger and stiffer economic sanctions.

Hmm, sounds kind of harsh, don't you think?

Sincerely,
The UN



"On spaceship earth there are no passengers...only crew."
User currently offlinePhoenix9 From Canada, joined Aug 2007, 2546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 5580 times:



Quoting JakeOrion (Thread starter):
Oh, this ought to get real fun if this is true

Well fun isn't the word I would use to describe it....but if it is true....it will get "interesting" (read: sht will hit the fan)

Quoting JetsGo (Reply 3):
Save us Obama

Why must you turn this into something about Obama???



Life only makes sense when you look at it backwards.
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11572 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 5577 times:

If North Korea fires a missile at Hawaii on July 4, we'll know that the real fireworks will be in Pyongyang on July 5.


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlinePhoenix9 From Canada, joined Aug 2007, 2546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 5572 times:



Quoting D L X (Reply 8):
we'll know that the real fireworks will be in Pyongyang on July 5

Probably more like 1-2 hours later on July 4th....5th would be the end of the fireworks.



Life only makes sense when you look at it backwards.
User currently offlineB6JFKH81 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2902 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 5556 times:

How long does it take to build a fallout shelter??  scared 

Let's face it, the leader of N. Korea is a total nutjob. While the rest of the world is trying to figure out how to live in a world w/o nuclear weapons, N. Korea wants to launch something towards the only country that actually used a nuclear weapon during a war. Talking about stepping back in time a few decades...

~H81



"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15833 posts, RR: 27
Reply 11, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 5548 times:



Quoting Phoenix9 (Reply 7):
Well fun isn't the word I would use to describe it....but if it is true....it will get "interesting" (read: sht will hit the fan)

Well, not if you happen to be North Korean. The result would be something like Carlos Zambrano throwing to little leaguers. If they are serious about this, Kim had better get himself a nice comfy bunker, and I'll get some popcorn and a CNN live feed.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlinePhoenix9 From Canada, joined Aug 2007, 2546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 5543 times:



Quoting B6JFKH81 (Reply 10):
How long does it take to build a fallout shelter??

I don't think they have a capability of launching a missile with a nuclear warhead....if anything it will be a conventional missle....which will probably be intercepted mid-air and NK will be looking red-faced with a large number of missles pointed at or lodged up their  butthead 



Life only makes sense when you look at it backwards.
User currently offlineB6JFKH81 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2902 posts, RR: 7
Reply 13, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 5529 times:



Quoting Phoenix9 (Reply 12):
I don't think they have a capability of launching a missile with a nuclear warhead....

...yet. Give 'em time. Good thing my 2nd job is at a state facility that has buildings from a long time ago and some still have signs indicating that there are fallout shelters inside!!!!

Considering how far I am from HI, I know I am safe for now, but it really amazes me that it just seems there will NEVER be a time when things will be somewhat peaceful. Guess it's just living in a post 9/11 world.



"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
User currently offlinePhoenix9 From Canada, joined Aug 2007, 2546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 5501 times:



Quoting B6JFKH81 (Reply 13):
Give 'em time

Of course, with time anything is possible. But don't you think development of a nuclear warhead by July 4th is cutting a bit too close?



Life only makes sense when you look at it backwards.
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7979 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 5452 times:

Well hope it doesn't come down to this but I'm ready to defend you A.Netters! Let's hope this maniac will be removed from office soon...


Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 5433 times:

The story says, actually, that they may fire a missile in the direction of Hawaii, sometime between the 4th and 8th. Semantics aside, this is clearly a provocative step by the DRPK, and God help them if they wold hit any U.S. territory. In fact, even if it comes in the vicinity of Hawaii, I think a proportionate response would be firing some cruise missles at some of their military installations.

Quoting Phoenix9 (Reply 12):
I don't think they have a capability of launching a missile with a nuclear warhead....if anything it will be a conventional missle....

There won't be any ordinance on there, once would think-although with those lunatics, you never know. It'll be a dummy warhead. They just want to test and see how far they can shoot the thing.


User currently offlineTheCol From Canada, joined Jan 2007, 2039 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 5419 times:



Quoting JakeOrion (Reply 2):
You think China or maybe even Russia would get involved?

It's a given Putin would sit it out. China would probably object to military action at first, then change their minds shorty after.

Quoting Phoenix9 (Reply 12):
I don't think they have a capability of launching a missile with a nuclear warhead

Or launch a missile that far. They might do a few missile tests, but none of them will be nuclear tipped and won't make it across the pacific.

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 5):

Yeah, it's getting to that point. If Kim does try to push his luck as far as Hawaii, then a nice naval blockade might get his attention.



No matter how random things may appear, there's always a plan.
User currently offlineStasisLAX From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 3287 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 5418 times:

The Associated Press is reporting that the U.S. military is tracking a ship from North Korea that may be carrying illicit weapons, the first vessel monitored under tougher new United Nations rules meant to rein in and punish the communist government following its recent nuclear test, officials said Thursday.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he has ordered additional protections for Hawaii just in case North Korea launches a long-range missile over the Pacific Ocean.

The suspect ship could become a test case for interception of the North's ships at sea, something the North has said it would consider an act of war."  box 

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090619/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_us_nkorea



"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety!" B.Franklin
User currently onlineER757 From Cayman Islands, joined May 2005, 2607 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 5408 times:

Maybe I am wrong, but my guess is that the USA would just shoot the damned thing down within minutes of launch. I'm just guessing here, but would seem logical that they would have some ABMs in South Korea. Patriots at the very least. While the idea that Kim's palace would just be a smoking hole about an hour after he launched the missle is an amusing thought, I don't think it would come to that. Although it might be a good time to take this punk down a peg or two. If they actually did send something in the general direction of a U.S. territory I seriously doubt there would be outrage or retaliation from any other country if a few US bombs fell on N.K. as a result.

User currently offlineSpringbok747 From Australia, joined Nov 2004, 4387 posts, RR: 10
Reply 20, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 5407 times:

Time to end this once and for all. It's time for Obama to show true leadership, and take out those launch sites. Blow that missile out of the sky. Enough with the UN sanctions and other crap. All the UN does is talk..and look how well that's turning out.


אני תומך בישראל
User currently onlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 5381 times:



Quoting ER757 (Reply 19):
I'm just guessing here, but would seem logical that they would have some ABMs in South Korea. Patriots at the very least

There are Patriot batteries in South Korea protecting various US Military bases, however they are not long range and will only shoot down missiles heading their way. If North Korea fires a Ballistic missile towards Hawaii it's going out over Japan and then pretty much open Ocean to Hawaii.

If they are going to shoot it down it would be from an Aegis Cruiser/Destroyer in the sea of Japan or a THAAD battery that Gates just deployed to Hawaii, THAAD is much better at targeting Ballistic missiles than Patriot.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineDahawaiian From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 229 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 5373 times:

The North Koreans may not be able to put a nuke warhead on any of their missiles at the moment, however they are thought to have chemical and biological weapons. Apparently the Navy sent out the X-Band Radar from Pearl Harbor a few days ago in anticipation of the North Korean test. The THAAD system on the island of Kaua'i would likely be the weapon used to shoot down any North Korean missile headed towards the Hawaiian Islands. Unlike the previous missile launches, it appears as though the US will shoot this time should the opportunity present itself.

User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13200 posts, RR: 15
Reply 23, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 5364 times:

Rockets can be notiously fickle (recall the destruction of many rockets in the early days of USA rockets). Wouldn't it be too bad if on of the NK's rockets blew up about a kilometer up in the air and the debris landed on the 'Dear Leader' and his top military staff.

If the rocket is aimed anywhere near Alaska or Hawaii and happens anywhere near our Independence Day, you can bet we (the USA) will launch as many interceptor rockets as possible, although success would be difficult. I would think the people of the USA would call for immediate retaliation upon NK, it would dominate then news for days, every politican would call on the President for it. Such a provication would be see like 9/11 or 12/7/1941 in Pearl Harbor. It could be a disasterous situation for South Korea. I hope they don't persue this and are just trying to extort more money and food for who they want to get it in NK.


User currently onlineBraniff747SP From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 3014 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 5540 times:

Within 30 minutes of these nutjob's missle launch, the missle will be in the ocean and North Korea will be no more. (If the missles get launched, of course)


-BN



The 747 will always be the TRUE queen of the skies!
25 FLY2HMO : I'm calling BS on this. I mean heck its also my birthday. They wouldn't dare mess with my birthday
26 Jpax : Ah, so that's why people shoot off fireworks around here on July 4th!
27 Blackbird : Is North Korea really that stupid? If they launched a nuke at us we'd blow them off the map completely (and if this administration still thinks like o
28 FLY2HMO : Duh, I'm just cool like that ya know...
29 IliriBDL : The 5th would find North Korea off the map. And China and Russia wouldn't dare get involved, they know damn well how strong the US is together with a
30 N776AU : Because he won't do shit about it...
31 Revelation : Maybe we should fire a "test" SLBM that will detonate over the Dear Leader's house containing a bunch of white phosphous and a bunch of pamphlets sayi
32 Baroque : Stick with your dates D L X. A bit of a worry that some have not worked out that July 4 in Hawaii IS July 5 in N Korea, well for most of the day. I t
33 Iowaman : IF they did have a nuclear warhead someday and launched it at Hawaii, what would be the ramifications of nuclear radiation if the U.S. shot it down ov
34 Baroque : Are you "planning" on having it detonate successfully or not? 1. If it detonates, about the same as early Bikini tests. 2. If it is does not detonate
35 MIAspotter : I dunno what to say about this, I find hard to believe anything that comes out of NK, I don't think they have the capacity to launch a missile that fa
36 OA260 : Well I dont think Russia actually would do anything even if they wanted to . As for US and their allies , I dont think the allies would be too intere
37 Danfearn77 : I agree. Kim is doing this to buy time whilst he makes his Nuclear weapons. The more he spouts off about launching missiles, the more time he has to
38 Cpd : North Korea should be careful what it wishes for. The response to anything like this would be overwhelming and permanent. My guess is that China would
39 Danfearn77 : I honestly dont know what he is smoking. He must know that as soon as NK launch a rocket, he is toast. Him, his administration and the infrastructure
40 Zentraedi : Well, it's clear that everyone believes the NK regime would be gone, but exactly what form would retaliation take? What would be the goals? What exact
41 MadameConcorde : I read somewhere that the said NK missile has a range of 4000 miles. I think Hawaii is within a much further away distance than that from NK if I am
42 Cpd : Retaliation: Overwhelming and utterly complete. Goals: Total destruction of the regime, military assets, with secondary goal of convincing the populat
43 Danfearn77 : True, but its the fact he is aiming it at Hawaii too. Just because it doesnt reach its still an act of war.
44 Zentraedi : So you're saying Pyongyang would be completely flattened? If it is "utterly complete", who will be around?
45 Post contains links MadameConcorde : This is just about the singularly most upsetting thing I have ever watched. If you think NK is any threat or are in any doubt about the "normal " (non
46 Cpd : The regime in North Korea must be removed, we know that. It's just a matter of how determined the army is to fight - and if the leader were gone, wou
47 Us330 : From a strategic standpoint, this move is not one of Pyongyang's better moves--they will have given the U.S. a valid reason for going in and taking ou
48 RJ111 : There's no way NK are going to launch a missile at Hawaii. So let's stop salivating at the thought of the US flexing it's military muscles.[Edited 200
49 Stretch 8 : In the event of such a launch, the complete desctruction of the North Korean nuclear and missle capability is an option that must be considered. Enoug
50 Baroque : I am with you Zentraedi, Seoul will be mentioning to Washington that they are threatened by some incredible number of artillery pieces and short rang
51 Post contains images Oly720man : Is this active yet?
52 Falstaff : I've seen that docmentary and I was amzed. I have never seen anything like it in my life. The thing about North Korea that interests me is : what do
53 BMI727 : I don't believe so, but I do think that it should be fast tracked.
54 Ual777 : Bunkers and caves are two different animals.
55 BMI727 : The problem with caves isn't necessarily that we can't hit them, we just don't know which one. I would expect that we have a pretty good idea of what
56 NIKV69 : Nahh, all he needs to do is go there and talk to them. After that all will be well. Remember he doesn't want to be a chest thumper or anything.
57 Post contains links MadameConcorde : The U.S. military is planning to intercept a flagged North Korean ship suspected of proliferating weapons material in violation of a U.N. Security Cou
58 Falcon84 : Who cares. Better than worrying about radiation near Hawaii. But for now, this is a dummy "warhead", I would imagine. They're sounding stupid just do
59 NIKV69 : If this was the Bush days it would have never gotten to this point. NK is pushing because they read Obama as weak, and rightly so.
60 MadameConcorde : Why would they tell in advance when they will shoot the missile? I think this would be quite a stupid move on their side. I bet they will not tell whe
61 Falcon84 : ALL of this is a result of the Bush days, NIK. He was so ineffective with the DRPK that this is WHY we're hear. Clinton got them to the table, and Bu
62 CrimsonNL : I'm pretty sure the pentagon has all those options avail with the push of a button (figuratively speaking) The NK government makes me sick, the entir
63 Slider : And an apology. For what? Just for being American. Because that’s what he’s excelled at so far with Obama’s Global “We Suck” Tour 2009. Chi
64 Post contains images StasisLAX : At some point sooner or later - this will be the result
65 NIKV69 : You got that backwards don't you? All of this mess between NK and Iran are a result of Obama doing absolutely nothing but sit back and blame Bush for
66 Cws818 : You actually believe that the post-election events in Iran were caused by Obama? Have you heard Obama blame Bush for what has happened in Iran over t
67 ER757 : You know, at some point, L'il Kim has to be taught that if he keeps teasing the big dog, eventually the big dog's gonna bite. I am as averse to confl
68 Springbok747 : 1. Sorry, but why the hell are some of you blaming Obama for this? He is legitimately trying to change America's image in the world. Just go overseas
69 QANTAS077 : or it could be that the Japanese are feeding disinformation to get a certain outcome from China, Russia and the US...I don't believe the story, nor do
70 JetsGo : Maybe because this is a military situation and he is our Commander in Chief? Yet you're willing to believe a well respected nation such as Japan woul
71 QANTAS077 : you're so full of it that its a joke, actually, I believe you spit this crap out but don't truly believe it...if you think a 70million population of
72 QANTAS077 : the Japanese have been kicking up a stink because they haven't been getting outcomes they want regarding North Korea, for a secret state like North K
73 Falcon84 : You're joking right? The Iranian and DRPK nuke quest has been going on for YEARS, but you conveniently blame the guy who's been in office 5 months? F
74 NIKV69 : Not directly but his been passive has only emboldened Ahmedinejad and made him believe we are not going to do anything as he pursues a way to harm Is
75 JetsGo : The same applies to North Korea. They have been using their weapons as a bargaining tool for sometime now. And now that they aren't getting their des
76 Falcon84 : Not if you favor starting wars that shouldn't have been fought; shtting all over our allies and friends because they didn't agree with us; trying to
77 Post contains links Don81603 : This mess goes back much farther than Bush... The seed for this mess was firmly planted on Jan. 23 1968 when they NK hijacked, boarded and effectivel
78 Us330 : I like the analogy, but I would go one step further: if that ankle-biting labradoodle could shoot a gun in your direction, wouldn't you be a bit more
79 Cws818 : Please note that you do not speak for all of us.
80 QANTAS077 : please...if I sat around wasting energy on hating you I'd be old by now, believe me, I have better things to do with my time...its just odd that you
81 Falstaff : People are stuck on unimportant stuff like that and ignore real threats in the world. Not being liked because you're gay doesn't mean anything when y
82 Acheron : Then please, don't bitch and moan about the "anti-americanism" in the world because that's pretty much what you are asking for with that attitude.
83 Cws818 : Well said. As one with an American passport who travelled extensively overseas and lived overseas during the Bush years, such attitudes are familiar.
84 Falcon84 : Does it make it less wrong when no one you personally know has it done to them? Did not our Constitution say that "all men are created equal"? And do
85 Falstaff : But it also says: Amendment V " No person shall be held to answer for capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of
86 Post contains images NIKV69 : Kind of like how Obama is treating Israel? Yea we noticed. Could you point out when I bitched about it? No that is the thing a country does when it c
87 Falcon84 : Then, in that case, since it is WAR, they should be held as prisoners of war. We can't have it both ways-we can't say we're in a war, yet deny people
88 J.mo : I hope "we" is you and your idiot friends because the majority of Americans obviously wanted and got a change. Maybe if Bush II and his puppet master
89 FCA767 : I don't understand that bit...does that say... North Korea has a ship in north...then it says...if it's a ship it would consider it an act of war
90 BMI727 : The Israelis don't particularly want peace. They'll either take peace on their terms or just continue the way that they have for the last 60 years. I
91 Phoenix9 : I thought this thread was about North Korea...when did it turn into right vs left / bush vs obama thread? What is happening in NK is to be blamed on i
92 Yellowstone : Have you been following the stories about the release of the Uighurs? They were never terrorists, but we still detained them at Gitmo for several yea
93 FCA767 : Why would North Korea want to export weapons to anywhere?
94 NIKV69 : See, this is why you and the left will never understand. We are at war. As far as AQ, Hamas and the rest are concerned this is a war. They treat it a
95 D L X : Nik, this is your best closing ever. You end an off topic tirade with a salute to a completely new off topic issue. Awesome.
96 Falcon84 : I found it also interesting that he ended his participation in a thread about North Korea with a salute to the...people of Iran? Typical conservative
97 Ken777 : Sometimes it's better to stay out of a cat fight. Right now the leaders in Iran are telling their people that the US is behind the demonstrations. Qu
98 Falcon84 : Outstanding post, Ken. I only disagree with you on if the missile comes near our territory. I send them an unmistakable sign, in the form of an attac
99 BMI727 : None of that was their (or any politician's) fault. Taking a potshot at us or one of our allies most certainly is a big deal. Apparently the North Ko
100 Falcon84 : Then if that's the case, why are you on the bandwagon critisizing Obama for his policies? Truth is, Charles, it was very much their fault-at least a
101 BMI727 : What policies? I never said that it was Bush's fault or Obama's fault that the economy tanked. It is a natural part of the business cycle and it foll
102 Post contains links USAirways787 : Personally, I could care less if I were to get flamed, everyone has formed their opinion so here is mine. I am calling North Korea's bluff. They have
103 Mandala499 : Hmm... will Kim the Ill give the US a 4000NM rocket trip for his own demise? Knowing that the world may be on his little state within days if not week
104 Lnglive1011yyz : That is exactly the same belief the US had during both WWII (pearl harbor) and 9/11, and look where that got them. Unfortunately, threats like this,
105 Post contains links JakeOrion : And North Korea continues to up the ante: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090624/ap_on_re_as/as_koreas_nuclear_91
106 QANTAS077 : North Korea couldn't wipe North Korea off the map, let alone the USA...when Kim starts this nonsense its because he wants something, that something i
107 Danfearn77 : Exactly. He is in shit. He knows he is in deep shit and he knows Obama will go for the democratic way first, by means of sitting down and talking. Bu
108 Danfearn77 : Brilliant post Ken. I have to agree with everything you have said. Just because Kim is blabbing a load of crap, thats not justification for starting
109 Travelin man : Is there an over/under on whether or not this missle will even get as far as Japan? I'll take the "under".
110 QANTAS077 : and Seoul would be in ruins right now...use your brain!
111 Mandala499 : And Kim decided to play Bush, or beyond. I think that Kim has lost whatever sense he has left and his idea of fun is taunting the world... If the wor
112 Don81603 : From what I've seen, it never even left the silo. More hot air from the world's hot air leader...
113 FCA767 : Couldn't Hennesy stop selling him the cognac...Apparently he is the Biggest Importer in the world...That might make the leader think ...Probably not..
114 DocLightning : And when, exactly, did NK and Iran listen to posturing from the U.S.? NK knows damned well that if they fire a missile at us, we will come down on th
115 Post contains links MD11Engineer : From what I´ve read on the BBC website, North Korea launched several short to medium range Scud type missiles on July 4th in the general direction of
116 TSS : Wait, wait, wait... North Korea's most capable missile is called the "Nodong"? Are you serious? What, are these missiles female missiles or something
117 DocLightning : As I said, if Obama thought it was worth a response, he would have given one. :D
118 Post contains links Yellowstone : Actually, their not-really-ICBM's are called Taepodongs, as Jon Stewart has pointed out several times over the years: http://www.thedailytube.com/vid
119 Slider : Well, I wouldn’t worry because I happen to be holding the bag of dog food. If doggie gets out of line, he doesn’t eat. Simple. And I’d have a b
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
On Today, 4th May 2005 posted Wed May 4 2005 11:27:54 by 707CMF
Born On The 4th Of July; A Great US President posted Sat Jul 3 2004 05:53:57 by MD-90
What I Did On Vacation Over July 4th posted Sun Jul 7 2002 04:48:08 by TechRep
North Korea Test Fires Missile posted Sat Apr 4 2009 20:54:33 by Falcon84
Justice Ginsburg Hints At A Retirement On The SC posted Fri Mar 13 2009 15:36:19 by DXing
Car Clocked At 250KM/H On Highway posted Tue Mar 3 2009 17:42:22 by Greasespot
Anyone Going To Be At DTW On The 26th? posted Tue Nov 25 2008 08:53:26 by Falstaff
Jones Resigns At Hawaii posted Sun Jan 6 2008 07:21:42 by AirCop
At Home On A Saturday Night posted Sat Aug 4 2007 11:24:40 by Bill142
Choice Of Barbeque Sauce On The 4th? posted Wed Jul 4 2007 06:45:55 by LAXspotter