Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
American Host City In 2012.  
User currently offlineAerLingus From China, joined Mar 2000, 2371 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1194 times:

Which American city would YOU nominate to host the 2012 Summer Olympic Games?

Would you choose:

-Houston, Texas.

-Washington, DC.

-New York City, New York.

-San Francisco, California.

I am biased toward San Francisco. In my opinion, it is the best choice. Great summer climate, tons of public transit already in place, sites already chosen for events, and much of it is privately funded, minimizing the taxpayer burden. Plus, it's San Francisco, for crying out loud! Why not?

Houston's image is troubled after the Enron collapse, plus it was recently named the fattest city (also, it's too damn hot and polluted).
New York has bigger things to worry about, DC does too. SF is in a perfect position to be the host nomination for the US.

But this isn't about what I think. What do you think?


Get your patchouli stink outta my store!
32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineLindy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1164 times:

WASHINGTON DC We deserve something!!!!

User currently offlinePROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5630 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1156 times:

I'd go with Washington. While San Francisco is an attractive candidate too, Washington's status as the nation's capital should count for something. Washington also seems to have the necessary facilities as well as a good transit infrastructure. Houston does not have such an infrastructure and (no offense intended) is simply not as "distinctive" a city as Washington or for that matter San Francisco. New York would be a decent choice but would never be able to get the necessary facilities built in time.


"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16812 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1150 times:

NY all the way, we need the revenue.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1149 times:

Prosa makes good points about Washington, but that city's government borders on chaos half the time, and ripe for falling into the kind of payola traps that Salt Lake suffered.

Houston is quite possibly the worst place to hold a summer Olympics, although maybe the concept of being on a world stage would finally convince those pig-headed Texans to get their ass in gear about pollution control.

New York City will need a few years to recover from the massive public money drain the events of last year caused, though 2012 is ten years away...I could see NYC pulling it off.

My vote is for the Bay Area. There are few American cities as beautiful as San Fransisco.


User currently offlineN202PA From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1556 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1140 times:

Despite New York being the obvious favorite, the massive security concerns might outweigh the positives of having the Olympics held there.

Though I'm a lifelong Washingtonian, I don't want the Olympics here. They're too expensive, cause too much disruption of the local area, and are a massive waste of the area's time and energy. We have absolutely no need for the dozens of facilities that they're proposing to build (including a 100,000-seat Olympic stadium built on the foundations of RFK Stadium), and will not use them post-Olympics if they do get built.

San Francisco would be a very good selection; my money is on New York or San Francisco. But in the end, I think they will lose out to an international city, particularly if Toronto enters the bidding for 2012.


User currently offlineMls515 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3076 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1132 times:



Houston, pollution, yea. Don't forget where the 2004 olympics will be held. Or are supposed to be held.


User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1123 times:

Houston is polluted and named the fattest city. There is some hard hitting reasons why not to have the Olympics there.  Sleepy Oh, and the Enron collapse hurt the city? How would that be?

I would like to see NYC get it to a point. Also, they could easily get anything built that needed to be built. Considering the many stadiums in the imiediate area, not much would need to be built. Despite all this, I am going with Houston. It's a nice city, no more polluted then any other city, expecially foreign, has a great location being on the gulf. Plenty of space and money to get the job done.


User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16245 posts, RR: 56
Reply 8, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1116 times:

After the logistical failures at ATL in 1996, I think the IOC should give the US a miss for a generation or so.

Also, with SLC in 2002, the Olympics have had a heavy US flavour lately.

Let's spread the pie around....time for a summer Olympiad in South America or Africa.

Santiago, Rio or Cape Town......would be great O cities.

In short, none of the above US choices.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1111 times:

Yeah, let's have the Olympics in Rio. Actually I heard the Crime commity down there was pushing the issue.

User currently offlineRedngold From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 6907 posts, RR: 45
Reply 10, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1076 times:

Cleveland OH!  Big grin

redngold



Up, up and away!
User currently offlineCV990A From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1413 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1076 times:

As a part-time NYC resident- I don't think the city can deal with the Olympics- even before the events of last year. I think DC should get the nomination.


Kittens Give Morbo Gas
User currently offlineRogueTrader From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1074 times:

After the logistical failures at ATL in 1996, I think the IOC should give the US a miss for a generation or so........time for a summer Olympiad in South America or Africa.

Well, unfortunately for your idea only the US and its western allies have the facilities and can afford to have an Olympics. Even Greece, a so-called full fledged member of the EU is struggling to have Athens set up adequately for the upcoming games there.

Why should a S. American or African country spend money on something as frivolous as sports when their economies are in crisis and, at least for Africa, many of their people are starving?

kind regards,

RogueTrader


User currently offlineLOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1062 times:

We could have the olympics in memphis or detroit.....ehhehe

User currently offlineBH346 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3265 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1054 times:

I was thinking MEM-fis or DEE-troit, too.


Northwest Airlines - Some People Just Know How to Fly
User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1037 times:

ONe- Houston is not the most polluted city, you can check the stats. All Houston did was Pass LA in Ozone only for two years (99, and 2000), Houston has already dropped to 5th on the EPA's list and is falling. For overall Particulate matter it was lower as well.

Two- Houston is very international with 75 Foreign Consulates, and even more trade missions (plus Russia coming soon), the largest Foreign port in the USA, and 8th largest Airport Gateway

Houston already has the venues built for everything, and the light rail being built to connect them, and the Funding ready.

and this 'fattest city' nonsense is BS, Chicago was second fattest (from their list they measured donut shops per capita as a factor-OK????) but is still great. Philly, Detroit and Dallas were also in the Top 5, I find it all nonsense (another seperate Pub had New Orleans and San Antonio at 1 and 2) . Houston also has the most playmates in Playboy history so we do have some hot woman willing to get naked as well  Smile

Houston has constantly ranked as the 4th best Restaurant city in the US (ZAGAT, Wine Spector, etc) Behind San Fran, NYC and Chicago. Also Houstonians eat out more than any other big city, on average 4.6 times a week (maybe they think that makes you fat.....)


Houston has many amenities. The Second Largest DT theatre district outside New York. A very low murder and violent crime rate (check FBI,a nd the state websites you can see the stats). Thankfully NY murder rate is down now as well. 4th Biggest museum district. The Texas Med Center, largest in the World. Houston has a low cost of living unlike the other 3 cities mentioned. Houston has touristy stuff all over Like NASA (Houston was the first word from the moon  Smile ) and the San Jacinto monument----and shopping like the Galleria (largest Galleria in the US) and the Park shops DT

Houston has improved it's traffic index 11 of the last 13 years. with more improvments coming now, plus light rail and a great bus system.

and last, it is the Summer olympics, it is supposed to be Hot (all the venues in those cities will be HOT, with San Fran the 'coolest')

I could go on but will stop now.

Thus my vote goes to Houston, (hell no one thought we would make the first cut but we did  Smile )

I'm not saying the US will win but I hope Houston getst he bid, if for some reason not, then my second vote goes to San Fran


Ciao and Hook 'em Horns,
Lt-AWACS




User currently offlineILOVEA340 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 2100 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1030 times:

It would be hell if it were in San Francisco... Th elogistics of it are just incomprehendable.
We have 2 bridges and 2 freeways leaving the city.
It isn't enough even on a normal day like today.
They would need to call it SF but actually build the stadium South of San Jose and then just maybe it would work.


User currently offlinePacificjourney From New Zealand, joined Jul 2001, 2731 posts, RR: 8
Reply 17, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1027 times:

Washington DC, broke and inept government !

San Francisco,, ILOVEA340 said it, congestion !

NYC, No reason why not but I think the sympathy factor will fade fast i.e. they will have to work for it !

Houston, is a good candidate re. facilities, communications, etc but it is HOT. Perhaps if the games were in Decvember or January.

In my opinion, if it goes to North America in 2012 it will be Toronto.



" Help, help ... I'm being oppressed ... "
User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1018 times:

Houston is "hot". Who cares? It is the summer Olympics. They happen in the summer...when it is hot. Funny, in 88 Barcelona was *gasp* hot. Who cares...

User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16245 posts, RR: 56
Reply 19, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1015 times:

Actually RT, capital spending for an Olympiad usually pays huge dividends in terms of recognition, tailing investment, tourism.

Mexico City, Seoul, Barcelona have all hosted successful O's. You are correct about Athens though.....they are having problems with infrastructure devt.

Crime? I feel safer in Rio than Washington DC. The US has the worst urban crime on the planet.

Besides, ATL was a logistical failure. The US should suffer for that in future O consideration.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineAerLingus From China, joined Mar 2000, 2371 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1006 times:

Yes, SF has only a few freeways leading out of town, but the entire Olympics are not going to be held in the city. Don't forget that SF's bid is a regional bid, and for that we have ample mass transit options and a number of freeway options.

Regional Transit:

BART- Bay Area Rapid Transit, or BART offers high speed rail service to many of the Bay Area's more populated areas. A BART connection to San Jose will be completed by 2010, linking most of the Bay Area.
Caltrain- Caltrain links the communities along the heavily populated Peninsula with heavy rail connections.
Altamont Commuter Express- ACE offers daily services from Moraga/far eastern Bay Area to bay side of the hills.

Local transit:
VTA: Valley Transit Authority links the city of San Jose and surrounding area with an efficient bus and light rail network.
AC Transit: Links all of Alameda County with extensive bus services.
San Francisco Municipal Railway: Covers the city with an extensive bus and light rail service (above and below ground).
Golden Gate Transit: Links the North bay with the City of SF.

Major Ferrys:
Oakland/Alameda Ferry (Oakland to SF)
Golden Gate Ferry (Marin area to SF)
Vallejo Baylink Ferry (Vallejo Area to SF)

In addition to that, Amtrak California offers frequent rail service to Sacramento, with the Sacramento bus and light rail system in place to handle passengers there.

Furthermore, there is an extensive schedule of flights from Northern California to the LA area (which will hold soccer events, if I'm not mistaken).

It's possible and convenient to go anywhere you need to go in the Bay Area without an automobile.



Get your patchouli stink outta my store!
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16245 posts, RR: 56
Reply 21, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 995 times:

Santiago de Chile, Buenos Aires, Rio, Sao Paulo....all cities in countries with higher PCI than China. All could host a successful O.

Even Havana. China has a worse human rights record than Cuba, so Havana should be considered as well.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineILOVEA340 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 2100 posts, RR: 4
Reply 22, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 975 times:

BART- Its a mess... I have tried to take it a few times and there is not way it could handle an influx of hundred of thousands of people.
Caltrain- While it is getting better these days, It is to selective of a service. Its great if you are going SF to Palo Alto or San Jose but try to get to Stockton or sacramento and your stuck.
I do not know a single foreigner that could figure out muni or Sam Trans. Hell I have lived hee like 16 years and I still don't get it. I know the N train because it leaves from caltrain but after that I know no more. I have tried to take the busses but it is just a mess.
The fact remains that outside of SF there is no way to branch out the people. If your hotel is in the Palo Alto hills or tracy or Santa Rosa how are you going to get to SF... Its not going to be easy. They would need to do a major revamp of public transportation in the SF area and northern California in general to have any chance.
Also Americans like their cars. They will tend to try to drive to SF or wherever. Traffic is bad enough around here w/o an extra 500 thousand people.

anyways... by 2012 I will no longer be living in the Bay Area so personaly I really don't care...


User currently offlinePacificjourney From New Zealand, joined Jul 2001, 2731 posts, RR: 8
Reply 23, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 966 times:

Point taken about it being the summer games KROC but have you ever been to Houston in summer ?

My advice is don't, you wouldn't want to leave the house let alone run a marathon. From March till November the humidity is just overwhelming.



" Help, help ... I'm being oppressed ... "
User currently offlineRen41 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1524 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 954 times:

Boston...If the Big Dig is done by then

25 Post contains images Airsicknessbag : Hello? Olympics in the US - again? There are 190+ other countries, most of them waiting for their very first Olympic Games. In comparison, look at the
26 Deltaflyertoo : Oh please not San Francisco. The city is beautiful but so over rated. DC would be cool. But I think Houston would be great. The city is a gem just wai
27 Lt-AWACS : To continue from my above posting on Houston and to answer pacjourney's "Point taken about it being the summer games KROC but have you ever been to Ho
28 Yyz717 : Havana would be a good choice. Eastern time zone. Close to the US. Good infrastructure. Better human rights record than both USSR and China. I'm prett
29 ILOVEA340 : The USA doesn't deserve to and shouyld not get it IMO for at least another 50-60 years once many other countries get the chance to. What about eastern
30 OzarkD9S : I was so embarassed by the constant "USA -USA -USA" chants in SLC this year if we NEVER host another Olympiad I would be thrilled. Having said that, m
31 Post contains images Lowfareair : I think it should go to a foreign city, but if it HAD to be in the US for whatever reason, my vote would go to: Cincinatti It is the last main DL fort
32 RayChuang : I think once the embargo against Cuba by the US ends Havana could be a very good choice for a Summer Olympics. However, it would require a massive reb
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Host City For 2012 Olympics posted Mon May 17 2004 22:38:13 by FraT
St. Louis The Most Dangerous City In The USA posted Mon Oct 30 2006 19:11:33 by Charger
Milwaukee Named Drunkest City In America posted Fri Aug 25 2006 03:04:15 by MKEdude
Best City In Texas posted Mon Oct 17 2005 23:26:26 by MFEFlyer
Worst City In The World To Drive posted Fri Sep 23 2005 22:16:42 by Vio
Best Golf City In Texas posted Wed Jul 13 2005 05:12:26 by BaylorAirBear
If You Could Live In Any City In The World! posted Sun May 1 2005 00:26:43 by LegalEagle
Best City In Europe For A Single Man! posted Tue Apr 5 2005 05:14:18 by LegalEagle
Visit To Ybor City In Tampa Florida posted Wed Mar 30 2005 14:56:06 by RAMPRAT980
Commercial Hydrogen Vehicle On Sale In 2012 posted Thu Mar 17 2005 13:00:26 by KiwiNanday