Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Conspiracy Theories  
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19965 posts, RR: 59
Posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3974 times:

This isn't a thread to share your favorites, it's a thread as to why.

Why are there so many people who, in spite of mountains of evidence to the contrary, are convinced that Obama was not born in the U.S. (especially when we know that John McCain was not born in the U.S.)?

Why are there theories that Obama is going to use the H1N1 vaccine to tag people with irremovable RFID bracelets?

Why do people actually believe in chemtrails? Why do people state that the UA 767 that hit the WTC was a military plane and use the two silver patches on the underbelly as proof when it's plainly obvious that all UA aircraft in that C/S have those silver patches?

Can anyone explain the psychology behind the complete rejection of fact and reason?

And why does this seem to me to be so much more prevalent in the U.S. than in any other country?

44 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFLY2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3919 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
Can anyone explain the psychology behind the complete rejection of fact and reason?

This sums it up nicely:



Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
Can anyone explain the psychology behind the complete rejection of fact and reason?

My thinking is that some people just loooooooove drama, and some fail to accept reality.

Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
And why does this seem to me to be so much more prevalent in the U.S. than in any other country?

It's not more prevalent, it just seems like it. Of course in the US nobody really cares about any conspiracy theories elsewhere. But I will say the amount of conspiracy theories here south of the border is sickening too.


User currently offlineJetsGo From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3085 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3908 times:

Man made global warming? What about that one?


Marine Corps Aviation, The Last To Let You Down!
User currently offlineForce13 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 229 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3899 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
Why are there theories that Obama is going to use the H1N1 vaccine to tag people with irremovable RFID bracelets?

I knew I didn't get flu shots for a reason Big grin

Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
Can anyone explain the psychology behind the complete rejection of fact and reason?

Sure! I co-wrote a paper in college about the concept of conspiracy theories and why people believe them. (Sociology and pyschology were fun!) I'll give you the basic report since we did turn in an 18 page paper.

1. We found that most people who believe conspiracy theories have trust issues (shock, shock) relating to breach of trust at either a young age or a traumatic event.

2. Political affiliation plays a role.

3. Distrust in the media as well as government. (This was the touchy one to explain because, for example, I don't really believe the media but I never succumbed to any breach of trust or traumatic event.....unless I'm really good at repression lol)

4. Personal interpretation of facts and surroundings. For example..... I see a shady area on a grassy knoll in Dallas but see a tree making the shadow. Someone else see's the shady area...but not the sun hitting the tree which causes the shadow....and thinks it's another gunmen.

Another example.... The UAL 767 that hit the South Towere and people saying it was a grey military aircraft

Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
use the two silver patches on the underbelly as proof when it's plainly obvious that all UA aircraft in that C/S have those silver patches?

We, the geeks of A.net, understand and know what those silver patches are. Someone who is not aviation savvy may see those same patches and interpret them as something else to satisfy their uncertainty.

Hope this helps!



Do not taunt. Do not shake. Do not pander. Add coffee. Subject should be slightly human within an hour.
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8866 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3901 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
Why are there so many people who, in spite of mountains of evidence to the contrary, are convinced that Obama was not born in the U.S. (especially when we know that John McCain was not born in the U.S.)?

Obama caused that one by not releasing his records for an awful long time (in fact I think he never did release his medical records), and then publishing a birth certificate that was clearly not an original. In spite of there being reasons why the original was not available, the resulting questions were inevitable.

Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
Why are there theories that Obama is going to use the H1N1 vaccine to tag people with irremovable RFID bracelets?

Never heard that one.

Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
Why do people actually believe in chemtrails? Why do people state that the UA 767 that hit the WTC was a military plane and use the two silver patches on the underbelly as proof when it's plainly obvious that all UA aircraft in that C/S have those silver patches?

Never heard that one either.

Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):

Can anyone explain the psychology behind the complete rejection of fact and reason?

Simply that it is a mathematical certainty that half of the population is dumber than everyone else.

Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
And why does this seem to me to be so much more prevalent in the U.S. than in any other country?

LOL, good question...



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19965 posts, RR: 59
Reply 5, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3894 times:



Quoting Force13 (Reply 3):

We, the geeks of A.net, understand and know what those silver patches are. Someone who is not aviation savvy may see those same patches and interpret them as something else to satisfy their uncertainty.

What makes you not investigate? Or, when you investigate, lie about what you found?

Why wouldn't someone just want to know the truth?


User currently offlineJetsGo From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3085 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3884 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Reply 5):

Why wouldn't someone just want to know the truth?

I think this is the fundamental problem behind most theories. People don't care about the truth and want to push their own idea/agenda in order to..... SELL SELL SELL!



Marine Corps Aviation, The Last To Let You Down!
User currently offlineForce13 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 229 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3884 times:

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 5):
What makes you not investigate?

Sometime people will accept things at face value. 2+2+4

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 5):
Or, when you investigate, lie about what you found?

If it were found out that 2+2=3 that would cause a complete change in how and what we know as math. If that was a society for example, it could be complete revolution.

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 5):
Why wouldn't someone just want to know the truth?

It could any emotional reactiom such as fear or anger. Some people simply don't care, believing it to have no impact on their lives

[Edited 2009-10-06 11:14:17]


Do not taunt. Do not shake. Do not pander. Add coffee. Subject should be slightly human within an hour.
User currently offlinePacNWjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 980 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3880 times:

Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
Can anyone explain the psychology behind the complete rejection of fact and reason?

It's called "cognitive consistency" and is a pretty well established phenomenon in the study of human psychology. Basically, human evolution favored brain development that allowed humans to establish and recognize familiar patterns. This is an advantageous evolutionary adaptation because it saves humans the time of figuring out a phenomenon every time they come across some manifestation of it. For example, a human can see a rose, a daisy, and a tulip and then establish the pattern of "flower" in their brain. The next time he or she encounters a new species of flower, say, a carnation, his or her brain can search established patterns, identify "flower," and then recognize the heretofore unknown carnation as a flower. When it comes to recognizing things such as food and predators, cognitive consistency is an advantage, and therefore has survived the evolutionary process in humans.

The flip side of this is that, because of the innate predisposition to cognitive consistency, humans are known to avoid "cognitive dissonance." That is, the brain is developed in such a way that it rejects information that contradicts the patterns already established in the brain. Again, there is an evolutionary advantage in this since it is time-consuming to re-think a phenomenon every time someone comes across a slight variation of it.

However, this is where cognitive consistency has a downside. For example, a human will recognize, say, rocks, and be able to distinguish them from, say, fish. So let's say a human is wading in shallow water and sees what appears to be a rock that is moving. The brain says," rocks do not move, so it is O.K. to step on that rock." It turns out, however, that the rock is actually a poisonous fish that uses camouflage and when the human steps on the fish the fish's poisonous spines penetrate the human and cause serious harm.

In other words, it can be useful for human to accept a certain degree of cognitive dissonance in their thinking, as this is as evolutionarily advantageous as having an innate predisposition to cognitive consistency (since it allows humans to stop and think if perhaps what appears to be a rock actually is a poisonous fish).

People who subscribe to conspiracy theories are like those who fail to acknowledge that something that appears to be one thing (a rock) can actually be something else (a poisonous fish). Their brains are developed to over-emphasize information that is consistent with what they already think. Therefore, their brains cram all sorts of dissonant information into established patterns. If they think one thing, everything else must support that one thing. Hence, they take all sorts of information that others would recognize as disparate, and fit it into one set of thoughts about a given phenomenon.

This is the root of a conspiratorial mind. It sees every piece of information as confirming something that is already believed. If the person's mind thinks that the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks on September 11, 2001, then all information, even that information that other people would clearly recognize as discrepant, is fit into a single model so as to compulsively and obsessively maintain cognitive consistency. It is a peculiar manifestation of cognitive development that illustrates the endless variation of the human species.

There you have it.

[Edited 2009-10-06 11:23:15]

User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13229 posts, RR: 77
Reply 9, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3861 times:



Quoting JetsGo (Reply 2):
Man made global warming? What about that one?

Ironic that actually those who deny it are the conspiracy nuts.
Still, a lot of you out there still have trouble with basics like evolution so no big surprise there.

To the general point, there is usually a nasty idea behind conspiracy theories, since the biggest one of all was used by a bunch of people called the Nazis, that whole 'world Jewish conspiracy and it's still cited today by like minded types.

Really, common sense and the power of reasoning of a normal, fairly well informed adult, is the best cure.
Those who believe these ideas about huge plots seem to have trouble with the idea that a two bit piece of political espionage, like the Watergate affair, involving very few people, was exposed.
It felled a (paranoid) President yet we are supposed to believe that massive conspiracies involving multitudes of people can somehow be covered up?
Human nature suggests not.

The Obama ones are a mix of epic sore loser-dom, coupled with the reasoning and emotional responses of a not very bright, but very bratty, 13 year old.
Extremists always use conspiracies to justify themselves, since a US political party, many of whom it seems believe they have a divine right to rule, have been increasingly taken over by far right wing/religious extremists, perhaps these recent ones are no surprise.

To me, belief in great conspiracy theories are at best, like wearing a dunce cap, at worst, usually have behind them some very dark ideas.
History has shown this.

There is no real difference in '9/11 Truthers', 'Birthers' and 'Holocaust Deniers', all use the same methods, many believe in all three.
Birds and a feather, flock together, as they day.

Bur fear can also be an element, lower down the chain, some people just cannot accept that life, events, can be random.
This sort of disorderly world is fearful for many very religious people.
Add in many who cling to a mad theory since it may encourage their own idea of how they, or their race, or their nation, or their faith, are somehow 'special'.
They seem to, into adulthood, carry the same emotional response, but for life, that a child briefly has when they realize life is finite, that we all die.


User currently offlineArrow From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 2676 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3840 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
And why does this seem to me to be so much more prevalent in the U.S. than in any other country?

Oh, I wouldn't say that. We have lots of conspiracy theorists here, and many of them direct their conspiratorial bent at the US! You just don't hear about those.

I have friends who are conspiracy theorists -- kinda hard to have a useful discussion with them about their pet theories.

Think about it -- how else to explain the phenomenal success of the da Vinci Code. We all love the thought of a conspiracy, but some people get carried away with it.



Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
User currently offlineSlider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6865 posts, RR: 34
Reply 11, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3824 times:

Well, the connotation herein is that conspiracy theorists or cover-up people are kooks. Certainly there are those in that group. But whatever happened to intellectual investigation, healthy skepticism and a level of critical analysis that doesn’t simply believe everything the government does or some people do? The flipside to jamming on the “conspiracy kooks” is that you might squelch legitimate criticism of those who use power to distort reality. What’s more dangerous?

User currently offlineManuCH From Switzerland, joined Jun 2005, 3011 posts, RR: 47
Reply 12, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3807 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR



Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
And why does this seem to me to be so much more prevalent in the U.S. than in any other country?

Don't worry, we have our fair share of conspiracy theorists in Switzerland as well. I have several friends (OK, more "acquaintances") that believe in conspiracies. Just like Arrow said, it's very hard to have a useful discussion with those people when these arguments come up.

Quoting PacNWjet (Reply 8):

Thank you for this very interesting explanation. It definitely makes sense and gives me some peace of mind when dealing with skeptics.

Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
Can anyone explain the psychology behind the complete rejection of fact and reason?

PacNWjet already gave a plausible explanation. I can only add my personal experiences to this. I have noticed that people who subscribe to conspiracy theories are the same people who also think that authorities are evil - even on a municipal level. They think that everything is done to somehow hurt them. They think their 1000 soul village's mayor has actually only been elected to change the laws in order to allow him to take away other people's properties away to build his own. They blindly believe in chain emails telling them that that Hotmail virus from 1997 will rip their PC apart. They believe that their broadband router is built in a way that it breaks when lightning strikes so that you have to buy a new one (I kid you not!). The same broadband router is also built in a way that it will break after the warranty expires, so you need to buy a new one. They believe their lawyer won't listen to them anyway because lawyers only listen to rich people. Their MD gives them prescriptions only to make the pharmaceutical industry richer. And the list could go on forever.

In my not-at-all-statistically-representative sample I have noticed that these people generally have a low education and have a hard time grasping complex concepts in general. Disclaimer: I don't want to say that all people believing in conspiracies are stupid. But those I know certainly are.

It can become really unnerving to spend time with conspiracy theorists. But sometimes I do because I love to analyze the stuff they say and try to find a logical explanation for it... yes, to each his own hobby  Smile



Never trust a statistic you didn't fake yourself
User currently offlineTugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5676 posts, RR: 10
Reply 13, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3795 times:



Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 4):
Simply that it is a mathematical certainty that half of the population is dumber than everyone else.

You forgot the corollary to this rule: And most everyone is always CERTAIN that THEY are not in the dumb half.

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 5):
Why wouldn't someone just want to know the truth?

....must....resist..... no.... can't....can't resist.....

Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I think I'm entitled to them.
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I want the truth!
Jessep: You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives...You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall.
We use words like honor, code, loyalty...we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something. You use 'em as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it! I'd rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!

 Smile

Quoting GDB (Reply 9):
Add in many who cling to a mad theory since it may encourage their own idea of how they, or their race, or their nation, or their faith, are somehow 'special'.

Additionally the need to "belong" is important to many people and in order to belong, in many situations you are required to agree or support the common point of view for that group.

The best way to avoid becoming a "groupie", whether it be about conspiracy or a race or anything, is to maintain the ability to look at evidence separately and without influence of those around you. And then to be able to hold your view without needing to be supported by others in you group. But that seems to have become darn near impossible for anyone nowadays. If you disagree you are attacked by others and this is across the range of topics from government to science to religion to humanity.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineEZEIZA From Argentina, joined Aug 2004, 4967 posts, RR: 25
Reply 14, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3792 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
And why does this seem to me to be so much more prevalent in the U.S. than in any other country?

No offense to anyone intended, but his may be due to the fact that the US has been involved in several conspiracies in the past, so the outcome is to have people that will not believe in anything official. Most times conspiracy theories are complete BS, but other times they are not, so some people just won't buy official reports no matter what evidence.



Carp aunque ganes o pierdas ...
User currently offlineUs330 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 3873 posts, RR: 14
Reply 15, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3765 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
And why does this seem to me to be so much more prevalent in the U.S. than in any other country?

Maybe it has to do with the sheer size of the population. We're the fourth largest country in the world, with high literacy rates, freedom of speech, and easy access to computers.
Maybe the percentage of people who are aluminum foil-hatters is generally consistent among all developed countries, but because we have more people than other developed countries, we have more of these aluminum foil-hatters.

There also might be a rural-urban difference as well. Maybe people who live in rural areas are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories than urbanites because their exposure to a diverse group of people is likely more limited.


User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19965 posts, RR: 59
Reply 16, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3721 times:



Quoting GDB (Reply 9):
that whole 'world Jewish conspiracy and it's still cited today by like minded types.

Which, BTW, I am very upset about because I am Jewish and I have yet to receive my invitation to join!

Quoting EZEIZA (Reply 14):
No offense to anyone intended, but his may be due to the fact that the US has been involved in several conspiracies in the past,

Give me some examples. I'm straining to think about them. At least not in the recent past.

There was Watergate, which you could consider a conspiracy, even if it didn't really directly affect the ordinary American, but that got caught. Iran-Contra and Panama didn't really affect the ordinary citizen. I can't think of a time when a vast number of American civilians have been unwittingly harmed by the U.S. government. Concentration camps for Japanese in WWII, yes. But sneak stuff like the conspiracy theories usually boast... I can't think of any.

Quoting PacNWjet (Reply 8):

In other words, it can be useful for human to accept a certain degree of cognitive dissonance in their thinking, as this is as evolutionarily advantageous as having an innate predisposition to cognitive consistency (since it allows humans to stop and think if perhaps what appears to be a rock actually is a poisonous fish).



Quoting PacNWjet (Reply 8):
People who subscribe to conspiracy theories are like those who fail to acknowledge that something that appears to be one thing (a rock) can actually be something else (a poisonous fish). Their brains are developed to over-emphasize information that is consistent with what they already think. Therefore, their brains cram all sorts of dissonant information into established patterns. If they think one thing, everything else must support that one thing. Hence, they take all sorts of information that others would recognize as disparate, and fit it into one set of thoughts about a given phenomenon.

I like this. Now THIS is the kind of discussion that would lead to middle-of-the-night, 3AM conversations in college! Big grin

So, if this is the phenomenon, a deficiency in assimilating dissonant information, why is it so common? You would imagine that this would have gotten weeded out by evolutionary pressures as soon as humans (or more likely their predecessors) became a social species. And is there a way to prevent it from happening? I think we'd get a lot farther a lot faster if this deficiency could somehow be treated.

Quoting Tugger (Reply 13):

....must....resist..... no.... can't....can't resist.....

 praise  a performance worthy of an Oscar!  praise   rotfl 

Quoting ManuCH (Reply 12):

PacNWjet already gave a plausible explanation. I can only add my personal experiences to this. I have noticed that people who subscribe to conspiracy theories are the same people who also think that authorities are evil - even on a municipal level. They think that everything is done to somehow hurt them.

This is very true. A very valuable insight into paranoia.  thumbsup 


User currently offlineZentraedi From Japan, joined Jun 2007, 660 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3695 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Reply 16):

Give me some examples. I'm straining to think about them. At least not in the recent past.

There was Watergate, which you could consider a conspiracy, even if it didn't really directly affect the ordinary American, but that got caught. Iran-Contra and Panama didn't really affect the ordinary citizen. I can't think of a time when a vast number of American civilians have been unwittingly harmed by the U.S. government. Concentration camps for Japanese in WWII, yes. But sneak stuff like the conspiracy theories usually boast... I can't think of any.

There's also USS Liberty incident. Personally, I do believe the crew's version of events over the "official" version. In some circles, this does place me in the "tin foil hat" category, but that doesn't really faze me. First off the official version sounds a bit ridiculous and second a large of number of those actually involved in the attack contradict official statements.


User currently offlineMaverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 5675 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (5 years 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3658 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Reply 16):
would have gotten weeded out by evolutionary pressures as soon as humans (or more likely their predecessors) became a social species

Ah, you should know evolution takes time. And we've only been the top-dog predator for a couple thousand years, and have only become mostly urban in the last 500. It is getting weeded out, which is why we have huge amounts people that can critically analyze data and come up with right and sane solutions.

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 16):
And is there a way to prevent it from happening? I think we'd get a lot farther a lot faster if this deficiency could somehow be treated.

Yes, let's all take pills so we don't have to think outside the box! Now there's a conspiracy theory!

(just to clarify, that was in jest)



"PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13229 posts, RR: 77
Reply 19, posted (5 years 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3577 times:

I see the USS Liberty as an example of 'cock up'.
Someone fell down on the job, what 'conspricy' there is is really about people trying to cover themselves.

This indeed is how, in the UK, most ministers end up sacked.
Often what they've done is pretty minor, they panic though, try to cover up and it's the attempt to do that which gets them.

DocLightning cited other examples of alleged US conspiracies, problem is, we know about them.
Which reinforces my point about how these 'massive' ones remain covered up?


User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19965 posts, RR: 59
Reply 20, posted (5 years 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3555 times:



Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 18):
Ah, you should know evolution takes time. And we've only been the top-dog predator for a couple thousand years, and have only become mostly urban in the last 500. It is getting weeded out, which is why we have huge amounts people that can critically analyze data and come up with right and sane solutions.

But we've been living in social groups of hunter-gatherers for at least 50,000 years, if not far longer. In fact, proto-humans probably lived in similar groups. If you have continuous paranoid ideation, that can't be evolutionarily advantageous. Over timescales of tens of thousands of years, human genes do change and I'm shocked this one is still around. Perhaps it is the product of genes that are adapted to small groups where you know everyone personally being thrust into a massive civilization in which you know comparatively very few people personally.

Quoting Zentraedi (Reply 17):


There's also USS Liberty incident

Sounds more like a poor attempt at a cover-up than a conspiracy.


User currently offlineCasInterest From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4673 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (5 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3537 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
Can anyone explain the psychology behind the complete rejection of fact and reason?

And why does this seem to me to be so much more prevalent in the U.S. than in any other country?

Wasn't it said by P.T. Barnum or one of his Circus Competitors
" A sucker is born every minute"

The Circuses are famous for luring people in by false pretenses and making money off of the swindle.

There is money to be made by Conspiracy Theorists. Some of them may just thrive on the thrill of the swindle. Some may actually beleive it.



Older than I just was ,and younger than I will soo be.
User currently offlineSeb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11721 posts, RR: 15
Reply 22, posted (5 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3533 times:

Looking at the conspiracy theories surrounding DEN and also around Freemasons, I would classify them in the same category as staring at static on the TV for three hours: Eventually, you see something....


Life in the wall is a drag.
User currently offline7324ever From Serbia, joined May 2009, 563 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (5 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3510 times:



Quoting DocLightning (Thread starter):
This isn't a thread to share your favorites, it's a thread as to why.

Why are there so many people who, in spite of mountains of evidence to the contrary, are convinced that Obama was not born in the U.S. (especially when we know that John McCain was not born in the U.S.)?

Why are there theories that Obama is going to use the H1N1 vaccine to tag people with irremovable RFID bracelets?

Why do people actually believe in chemtrails? Why do people state that the UA 767 that hit the WTC was a military plane and use the two silver patches on the underbelly as proof when it's plainly obvious that all UA aircraft in that C/S have those silver patches?

Can anyone explain the psychology behind the complete rejection of fact and reason?

And why does this seem to me to be so much more prevalent in the U.S. than in any other country?

I can answer all of these in 2 parts. Security can money.

People never can accept the simple answer we are programed to want to know the WHOLE story. Fir instance 9/11, some people cannot accept the fact a bunch of religious extremest hijacked planes and crashed them into things to make a statement, they want to know the whole story and cant accept the simple answer so they go off on their own and come up with the complicated answer they want to give them the safe sence of security they so desperately need. Now most of the public accept the general answer and will drop it there but some people feel it necessary to jump through hoops to make it make sence because the simple answer is not good enough. Like a math problem 2+2=4 some people accept that as knowledge and general probability, but some out there feel it needs to be dissected to prove others wrong and gain their own sence of security.

And money a great one, there is big bucks in conspiracy theories it has to be a multi million dollar industry im sure. The people who come up with these theories write books, make movies, preform lectures ect... all to make the quick buck from them, as is said "there is an ass for every seat" in the sence that if you write a book and hit the right notes the someone will buy it.

And all a conspiracy theory is, is the little "loose ends" of things all balled up into one thing saying its all concrete.

And for it taking place in the US, I would guess 50% of it is people think the government has too much power. For example 9/11 bush was in office at the time Bush=Conservative=Hated by liberals, who when ever I hear 9/11 conspiracies its usually the liberals saying it was bushes excuse for oil. For the H1N1 and birther load of crap is easy Obama=Liberal=Hated by Conservatives who need to do anything to tear him down to give them self's a sence of security. As for the other half is access to media, 24 hour news, blogs, and other media sites give people a way to communicate their loads of crap fast and fling from New york to Tokyo in a blink of the eye.



Anything the US and EU build the Russians do it better! i.e. TU-144 vs Concorde and TU-154 vs The 727...
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13141 posts, RR: 15
Reply 24, posted (5 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3507 times:

Another reason for many 'conspiracy' beliefs is that many cannot believe that 1, 2 or only a relatively small group of people (as with the 19 on the planes in the 9/11 attacks) and a small amount of resources or money can cause a huge event like the assassination of JFK, the Murrah (OKC) Federal Building terror attack or the 9/11 attacks. They assume that there had to be a lot more people involved, even involving major government figures, people of a certain ethinc/religious/political belief and so on or wonders how they got so lucky.

The Assassination of JFK probably cost less than $500 in today's money, the gun, a few bullets and a person who worked in a building along the publized route and a President who was riding in an open car. The OKC bombing, maybe $2,500 for truck rental, cheap to make detinators and using relatively cheap chemicals and diesel fuel and allowing a truck to park in front of government building, something learned long before not allowed in Europe and elsewhere. The 9/11 attacks - total of maybe $300,000 sourced from the small donations of many 100's of like-minded people or even a few rich ones (like Osama himself), taking a few flights to figure security weaknesses, weak travel Visa laws (and enforcement of those out of Visa time), poor airline/flight security and so on as well as an FBI that had horrible facilites and not enough into dealing with terrorists.


25 PacNWjet : There are all sorts of recessive genes that afflict people who nonetheless live to the age at which they can reproduce themselves at which time the g
26 EZEIZA : The biggest one, despite not recent (but still fresh in everyone's mind) is the JFK assasination. IMHO that's the biggest one and the one that has ma
27 DocLightning : I don't.
28 EZEIZA : one shooter? really?
29 GDB : EZEIZA, you must disregard the movie, effective cinema that it was, 'JFK'. Beyond that film, what it did was bring together all the myths around this
30 Us330 : Apparently, the History Channel is running a two parter on the Kennedy Assassination this sunday. What's different, though, is that there are no voice
31 LMP737 : My take on it is this. Belief in a conspiracy theory makes some people feel more important than they really are. It gives them the impression that th
32 LMP737 : Since you live in the US it's only natural that you would get that impression. Also the two big conspiracy theories out there right now, 9-11 and Oba
33 EZEIZA : Possibly because Oswald was killed too, before he could even say anything, and by a mobster. That to me is enough to understand why some people can b
34 GDB : Ruby was no mobster. He might have cultivated an image of someone on the fringes of the law, when in fact he was a chancer, a small time nightclub ow
35 LMP737 : Demonizing Clay Shaw, an innocent man, was not much help either.
36 MadameConcorde : Are UFO sightings a part of conspiracy theories? I see all this stuff all the time about UFO sightings everywhere in the world while I have been an ac
37 David L : I'm going to agree with Arrow on that. We have our share of conspiracy nuts here, too. I've known a few of them personally. They were harmless and am
38 Seb146 : I believe I have seen UFOs. I also believe that with all those stars out there that we can see and all those we can not but know are there, we are su
39 RFields5421 : This is a major component of long running conspiracy theories. Another is 'celebrity' or recognition. Folks like Jim Marrs have made millions of doll
40 LMP737 : Go into any Borders or Barnes & Noble and you will find some of these conspiracy theory books. Granted, not some of the more extreme ones like "Jews
41 AlexEU : A.net is a conspiracy.
42 DocLightning : OK, but if you look at, say, Sickle trait, there is an advantageous aspect to that. I suppose that paranoia also has an advantageous aspect. But why
43 L410Turbolet : My favorite conspiracy theory is KAL 007 and to be honest I don't know which version requires greater degree of "rejection of fact and reason" whethe
44 Offloaded : How about the one where the South Africans were responsible for PA103? Well, Pik Botha was originally booked on PA103 but flew out on PA101. UN Commis
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Most Unpersuasive Conspiracy Theories posted Fri Jul 14 2006 06:04:28 by AerospaceFan
How To Confute 9/11 Conspiracy Theories posted Tue Dec 6 2005 16:23:40 by ManuCH
9/11 Conspiracy Theories posted Thu Nov 11 2004 01:42:44 by Ozzie
So Begins The Conspiracy Theories From The Left posted Thu Nov 4 2004 14:31:40 by Techrep
Do You Have Any Conspiracy Theories? posted Tue Oct 28 2003 01:01:31 by Charleslp
List Your Favorite Conspiracy Theories posted Thu Apr 24 2003 03:22:59 by IHadAPheo
Loose Change: 9/11 Conspiracy? posted Sun May 17 2009 01:45:48 by Longhornmaniac
Major UBS Fraud: Client Tax Evasion Conspiracy posted Wed Feb 18 2009 15:22:23 by Aaron747
Get Ready For A Conspiracy Theory For Dennis K posted Wed Dec 19 2007 12:09:22 by OPNLguy
The Most Wacked-Out 9/11 Conspiracy I've Seen posted Sun Aug 19 2007 18:07:35 by Falcon84