Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Citi To Repay $20 Billion In Bailout Money  
User currently offlineFuturePilot16 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2035 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1754 times:

Quote:
NEW YORK - Citigroup said Monday it is repaying $20 billion in public bailout money, freeing the banking giant from the close scrutiny and pay restrictions that came with the rescue program. The government will also sell its stake in the company.

The key words here are " The government will also sell it's stake in the company". If this does happen, which I think it will, then will republicans keep throwing the word socialist out there? Of course they will, but maybe they'll tone it down a bit. (Yeah right)  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34412816/ns/business-us_business

[Edited 2009-12-14 10:45:34]


"The brave don't live forever, but the cautious don't live at all."
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1748 times:

Non issue really. The companies that don't want to be told what to do have to give it all back. Which they are doing. Has nothing to do with calling Obama a socialist. His views and those of Pelosi are what lead people to believe that. Not a bank.

User currently offlineMD11junkie From Argentina, joined May 2005, 3148 posts, RR: 57
Reply 2, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1748 times:



Quoting FuturePilot16 (Thread starter):
" The government will also sell it's stake in the company"

Wouldn't the Citi's USD 20B return would actually buy back the Government's stake in the Group?

Is the Bank of America out of the "bailout fund" yet?

Saludos,



There is no such thing as Boeing vs Airbus as the queen of the skies has three engines, winglets and the sweetest nose!
User currently offlineFxramper From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 7247 posts, RR: 85
Reply 3, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1731 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

CriminalGroup? The day they cancelled a bunch of gas cards nationwide they sent me a letter for updating card agreement; they wanted to up finance rate to 29.99%! Too bad I paid the balance and cancelled the reward card two days before. Good job, CriminalGroup!

User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 4, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1720 times:



Quoting MD11junkie (Reply 2):
Is the Bank of America out of the "bailout fund" yet?

Yes, they paid back all their money last week.

Quoting Fxramper (Reply 3):

What did they do that was criminal? Poor business practice? Sure. Criminal? i'm not sure.

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 1):
is views and those of Pelosi are what lead people to believe that. Not a bank.

 sarcastic  Here we go again....



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineMuzyck From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 47 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1716 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Fxramper (Reply 3):
The day they cancelled a bunch of gas cards nationwide they sent me a letter for updating card agreement; they wanted to up finance rate to 29.99%!

All banks will end up doing the same thing as a result of new "consumer protection" legislation. In the future the banks wil not have the ability to raise the rates of those that fail to make payments. Consumers will be locked in. Banks will balance this by raising all rates. In effect, the legislation will increase the burden on those who have good credit.


User currently offlineFuturePilot16 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2035 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1698 times:



Quoting Fxramper (Reply 3):

This is why i'm looking at alternative ways to gain credit. A credit card is just plain suspect if you ask me



"The brave don't live forever, but the cautious don't live at all."
User currently offlineMaverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 5592 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1694 times:



Quoting Muzyck (Reply 5):
In the future the banks wil not have the ability to raise the rates of those that fail to make payments.

Wrong. Banks will not be able to raise the rates of people (like me) that make their payments on time. Which is how it should be. There's no reason I need to be paying 25% on a 1000 dollar balance.

Quoting Muzyck (Reply 5):
In effect, the legislation will increase the burden on those who have good credit.

This is the temporary effect; once it becomes law, banks won't be able to issue enough new credit if they keep rates where they are now. They'll come back down.



"PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 8, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1687 times:



Quoting FuturePilot16 (Reply 6):
. A credit card is just plain suspect if you ask me

Pay your bills on time and you wont have anything to worry about. It's sad that so many americans cant grasp what should really be a simple concept.



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineMaverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 5592 posts, RR: 6
Reply 9, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1682 times:



Quoting Cadet57 (Reply 8):
Pay your bills on time and you wont have anything to worry about.

Except that before this new law takes effect, you do have to worry about a bank raising your rates for no reason. That aside:

Quoting Cadet57 (Reply 8):
It's sad that so many americans cant grasp what should really be a simple concept.

Agreed.



"PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 10, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1676 times:



Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 9):
you do have to worry about a bank raising your rates for no reason.

As said above. If you are making your payments they cant change your rates.



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineMuzyck From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 47 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1658 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 7):
Wrong. Banks will not be able to raise the rates of people (like me) that make their payments on time. Which is how it should be. There's no reason I need to be paying 25% on a 1000 dollar balance.

Agreed. There is no reason that I would keep doing business with a company that charged a high rate if I only had $1,000.00 balance. I would pay off the card and take my business elsewhere. If my overall credit rating is good, the rate will reflect that.If I can't get a better rate than 25%, I would bet that it is a reflection on my credit rating, not the availability of a revolving credit at a lower rate.

Post legislation, those rates will not be as low.

[Edited 2009-12-14 13:03:14]

User currently offlineMaverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 5592 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1635 times:



Quoting Muzyck (Reply 11):
There is no reason that I would keep doing business with a company that charged a high rate if I only had $1,000.00 balance.

I'm not. It'll be paid off in 2 months, and I'm taking my accounts elsewhere.

Quoting Cadet57 (Reply 10):
As said above. If you are making your payments they cant change your rates.

I assume you're talking about when the new law takes effect in February. Because my rate jumped by almost 15%, even though I've never missed a payment in the 4 years I had my card.



"PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 13, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1632 times:



Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 12):
I assume you're talking about when the new law takes effect in February. Because my rate jumped by almost 15%, even though I've never missed a payment in the 4 years I had my card.

I guess. That said, none of the 3 cards I have (two have no balance) have raised my rates, and one is used for college expenses, so you can imagine what that one looks like  covereyes 



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineStarAC17 From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 3359 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1616 times:



Quoting Cadet57 (Reply 8):
Pay your bills on time and you wont have anything to worry about. It's sad that so many americans cant grasp what should really be a simple concept.

 checkmark 

And do it in full, they all make a point to highlight the minimum payment in bold size 24 font and but the full balance in 10 font at the corner of the bill.

Credit cards are the easiest way to gain credit and good luck getting a gym membership, a car, a hotel room or a cellphone without one.

However there will be torches and pitchforks the day they start penalizing people like me who in over 6 years have never paid one cent of interest towards a credit card. I fear this day is coming when people begin to become more responsible and credit card companies start taking from people like me.



Engineers Rule The World!!!!!
User currently offlineRojo From Spain, joined Sep 2000, 2445 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (4 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1596 times:

After being saved from Bankruptcty and the government backing losses during the hard times, it is normal that Citi wants to be out of TARP now that things are back to normal. Therefore, the socialist for losses and capitalist for profits stand that the US government showed last year was unfair for the small banks that did things correctly and were never near bankruptcy. Citi should have been broken in peaces and sold to these small banks.

Overall, the new capitalism is to start a business, grow it till it is too big to fail and once an economic crisis comes, the government will save it from going out of business...


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
MJ Could Face Up To 20 Years In Jail (again) posted Wed Nov 30 2005 07:01:17 by Kevin
Up To 20 Users In "Respected Users" List posted Mon Nov 27 2000 07:40:40 by Administrator
Nickelodeon To Build Theme Park In New Orleans posted Tue Aug 18 2009 10:59:51 by MSYtristar
Return Car To Dealership But They Want More Money! posted Thu Jul 2 2009 15:25:36 by Dazed767
EU To Allow Ugly Fruits In Push To Cut Bureaucracy posted Tue Jun 30 2009 19:21:37 by PPVRA
What To Do For 3 Days In SF? posted Fri May 22 2009 01:41:47 by Tusaadvantage
How To Read Conjunct Consonants In Burmese Script? posted Thu Apr 16 2009 07:39:18 by Sonic
Ford Sheds $9.9 Billion In Debts posted Mon Apr 6 2009 11:27:09 by Greaser
Obama Slams Bankers For $18.4 Billion In Bonuses posted Thu Jan 29 2009 19:54:00 by StasisLAX
Woolworth's To Close All Stores In The UK posted Wed Dec 17 2008 07:27:50 by EWRCabincrew