Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Saudi Quote  
User currently offlineTwaneedsnohelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 821 times:

The New York Times reported yesterday that a "person close to the [Saudi] crown prince" said this regarding Saudi-American relations during the Prince's trip to Texas to meet Pres. Bush:

"It is a mistake to think that our people will not do what is necessary to survive and if that means we have to move to the right of bin Laden, so be it; to the left of Qaddafi, so be it; or fly to Baghdad and embrace Saddam like a brother, so be it. It's damned lonely in our part of the world, and we can no longer defend our relationship to our people."


Does that just make you want to puke?

People question why the US supports Israel, heres your answer.

TNNH

33 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 777 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I wonder what Bush/powell and co were thinking when he said that!




In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlinePROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5644 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 768 times:

The New York Times reported yesterday that a "person close to the [Saudi] crown prince" said this regarding Saudi-American relations during the Prince's trip to Texas to meet Pres. Bush:
"It is a mistake to think that our people will not do what is necessary to survive and if that means we have to move to the right of bin Laden, so be it; to the left of Qaddafi, so be it; or fly to Baghdad and embrace Saddam like a brother, so be it. It's damned lonely in our part of the world, and we can no longer defend our relationship to our people."
Does that just make you want to puke?
People question why the US supports Israel, heres your answer.


I actually don't see what's so bad. While Saudi Arabia is hardly my favorite country, this remark makes it clear that the Saudis are pragmatists with a strong survival instinct. You can hardly blame them for that, even if their interests don't always coincide with America's.



"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 750 times:

Twaneedsnohelp,

You want to honestly know what I think he means?

I think he means that the Saudi's are fed up of watching America babysit Israel and let this 60-year old Israeli-Palestinian conflict continue since the US is sided with the Israeli side.

The Middle East is fed up, they've had enough.

That's what I think it means...........



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 25
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 725 times:

That's ridiculous BA, its as if you don't even read the post. You just get out of it what you want to get out of it, anti-Israel rhetoric, and completely ignore everything else.

Well lets ask you this, would you rather have a Saudi Arabia friendly to the United States, or a Saudi Arabia hand in hand with Bin Laden, Qadaffi, or Saddam Hussein?

I think the choice is obvious.



NO URLS in signature
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 724 times:

This is a threat, it's not actually happening. Saudi is saying that if the US keeps on blindly supporting Israel it -- Saudia Arabia, one of America's friends in the Middle East -- will become more hardlined.

Be warned America.


User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 721 times:

To think it was only ten years ago that America saved Saudi from the clutches of Saddam...have they forgotten that already?  Insane


Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 58
Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 699 times:

Tbar220,

I very well know that it is a threat to the US! I'm simply stating the reason why they are threatening the US is because they are fed up. TWAneedsNOhelp claims that this is why the US is sided with Israel, but does not realize that the reason why this person said these harsh words is because of US' strong ties with Israel which isn't helping the Israel-Palestinian crisis.

And of course, I would not want Saudi Arabia to side with Bin Laden. However I highly doubt that will ever happen since Saudi Arabia did take away Bin Laden's citizenship and banish him from Saudi Arabia.

It's simple, Saudi Arabia is pissed! They really are! This is why this person said this threat.

This is why the US needs to change it's foreign policy in the Middle East to include the rest of the Arab world and not just Israel.

That's how I interpret it. They are fed up.

Very well said, 777236ER. It is simply a threat.

Marco,

The Saudi's don't care about America saving them from the clutches of Saddam. Right now, they are fed up with America and how it babysits the US and that is why this person said these harsh words to the US.

It's simple my friend, they are fed up, and I don't blame them! The Israeli-Palestinian crisis has gone nowhere in the last 60 years, it's only getting worse. More hatred between the 2 sides, and more bloodshed between the 2 sides.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineArtsyman From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4745 posts, RR: 33
Reply 8, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 693 times:

The arabs want America to be less one sided in their support for Israel, well maybe they should have a look at their own policys, and maybe be less one sided in their dislike of Israel

Jeremy


User currently offlineDavid B. From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3148 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 693 times:

Thats why their one sided because of the US policy anti-arab pro israel. It has to change. Thats why the WTC is no more.


Teenage-know-it-alls should be shot on sight
User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 677 times:

Thats why the WTC is no more.

I see you've bought OBL's propoganda. Pity for you. The WTC isn't there any more for one reason-hatred. You can make up excuses, or buy into propoganda, David B, but hatred is the primary reason.


User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 673 times:

Alpha, are you telling me that pre-second world war the Arabs hated the US?

User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 672 times:

777236ER, what does pre-WW II policy have to do with answering David B about the WTC being gone?

User currently offlineDavid B. From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3148 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 668 times:

Dont know about you alpha but I personally think the US should take a more balance stance when it comes to the middle east. Alpha, you are buying into propoganda too. You can come down hard on others for not supporting that country but I personally think that the US should take a more balanced stance on middle eastern issues.

Why do they hate us Alpha.......? Answer.........because of anti-arab US policies. Something you refuse to realize.



Teenage-know-it-alls should be shot on sight
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 668 times:

Alpha 1, let me explain. You say the WTC was destroyed because of hate. But WHY is there hate?! It didn't just spring up from no-where. As I was saying, there wasn't any anti-US hate in the mid east before world war two, it's all been after then and after the creation of Israel. Telling, no?

User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 664 times:

No I won't tell you no, 777236ER, but maybe you should pose that question to all those wonderful Arabs who hate the US, and not me, an American citizen. If they hate because of Israel, maybe it's they, not the US, who has the problem.

And why? I don't give a rats ass why, but when they blow up our people and our buildings, you expect me, or the US to take a more balanced approach to them? Riiight.


User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 58
Reply 16, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 659 times:

Alpha 1,

They hate Israel because Israel dictates over the Palestinian people and does not let them live a free life like us Americans. The US at the same time is completely sided with Israel, and sends $3 billion to Israel every year. That's why the Arabs hate us.

The US needs to rework it's foreign policy to INCLUDE the rest of the Middle Eastern countries and to STOP babysitting Israel. Then you will see the hate go away.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 660 times:

Look, Alpha, let's be simple. Some Arabs hate the US because of Israel. Let's look at the pros and the cons:

Cons:

-Threat of attack from pissed off Arabs (already happened, 3000 dead)


-Lots of money being poured into a country which should be able to support itself (Israel boasts about being rich, about being civilized, advanced etc, how about doing what every other civilised, advanced country does and buy their OWN stuff)

-Upsetting a couple of dozen other countries (why is Israel more important to keep friendly that other countries, such as Saudia Arabia? Saudia Arabia is one of the countries stopping the Middle East from descending into complete termoil, yet the US continually pisses them off.)

-Annoying their own population (I may be wrong, but i suspect quite a lot of Americans couldn't give a fuck about Israel, especially if it's causing their own country problems)

-loss of support from Allies. (The EU and especially the UK is getting a bit more annoyed at the moment)

Pros:

-helps maintain democracy (the result? A semi-mad leader who refuses to let in the UN, despite allegations of war-crimes)

-helps keep the region calm (although the occasional Israeli offencive, and allegations of slaughter of civilians don't help)

-money given to Israel buys US military weapons (how exactly does this help keep the region calm? Is ALL the money given to Israel returned to the US, as some have said?

Any more?


User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 652 times:

They hate Israel because Israel dictates over the Palestinian people and does not let them live a free life like us Americans.

They hated Israel long before Israel dictated ANYTHING to Palestinians, so that's not the reason.

The US needs to rework it's foreign policy to INCLUDE the rest of the Middle Eastern countries and to STOP babysitting Israel.

Are you sayiing Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the Emriates, aren't included. Seems to me the US includes most of the Middle East in it's policies. And if the US were really babysitting Israel, I think American blood would now be spilling in the Occupied Territories.

And 777236ER, let me answer what you brought up.

-Threat of attack from pissed off Arabs (already happened, 3000 dead)

So, because the Arabs are pissed, the U.S. should hang a friend and ally out to dry? I think instead you might going after some of these pissed Arabs.

-Lots of money being poured into a country which should be able to support itself (Israel boasts about being rich, about being civilized, advanced etc, how about doing what every other civilised, advanced country does and buy their OWN stuff)

The UK, Canada, Japan, Germany, even Russia, supports themselves, but the U.S. still gives them aid, and a hell of a lot of it. And Israel does build some of their own weapons. So does the UK, but it doesn't stop either from buying weapons from the US, does it?

-Annoying their own population (I may be wrong, but i suspect quite a lot of Americans couldn't give a fuck about Israel, especially if it's causing their own country problems)

Watch the language-it's in violation of the rules here. And who do you think Americans are more annoyed at these days-Israelis fighting suicide attacks, or Arabs attacking and threatening continuted attacks and killings of U.S. citizens?

-Upsetting a couple of dozen other countries (why is Israel more important to keep friendly that other countries, such as Saudia Arabia? Saudia Arabia is one of the countries stopping the Middle East from descending into complete termoil, yet the US continually pisses them off.)

Why is Saudi Arabia-a country paying the families of suicide bombers, a country that, even after 9/11 hasn't come out against terrorism, more important than Israel? Seems to me that the Saudi's are guilty of being as hypocritical as you say Israel is. And is Saudi Arabia TRULY stopping the Middle East from cascading into complete turmoil? Seems to me they're doing as much as anyone to sow dissent.

-loss of support from Allies. (The EU and especially the UK is getting a bit more annoyed at the moment)

It's not the U.S. fault that Europe has lost its way when determining the difference between right and wong in the world. That's their problem.

Pros:

-helps maintain democracy (the result? A semi-mad leader who refuses to let in the UN, despite allegations of war-crimes)


Sharon may be mad, but to me, the Palestinians are as much to blame for his rise as the Israeli people. I'm no fan of that idiot, but the difference, I believe, between Sharon and Israel, and, say, Iraq, is that when the Israel people decide that Sharon should go, he will go. I don't think you'd see that from most anyone else in the Middle East.

-helps keep the region calm (although the occasional Israeli offencive, and allegations of slaughter of civilians don't help)

You have the cart before the horse again-the occasional Israeli offiensive is normally in response to the more-than-occasional Palestinian terror. The region would be completely calm if the Arabs ever wizened up and tried a peaceful path, as Anwar Sadat and King Hussein did.






















User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21467 posts, RR: 53
Reply 19, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 650 times:

Alpha 1: They hated Israel long before Israel dictated ANYTHING to Palestinians, so that's not the reason.

So occupying the country and chasing off the former inhabitants wasn´t a "dictate" to you?  Wink/being sarcastic








User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 647 times:

So occupying the country and chasing off the former inhabitants wasn´t a "dictate" to you?

Occupying what country? Was there another recognized nation in there before 1948, when the U.N. gave it's blessing to letting an Israel exist? Not, I don't think that was a dictate to anyone. Maybe, to some people, it was a stupid decision, but the hatred of Israel happened before there was any "Palestinian question".

And again, had the Arabs acted with any kind of statesmanship, something that is very alien to them, apparently, maybe this mess would have been solved a long time ago.


User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 58
Reply 21, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 644 times:

Alpha 1,

They hated Israel long before Israel dictated ANYTHING to Palestinians, so that's not the reason.

Ummm......Israel has been dictating the Palestinians since the creation of the Israeli state in 1948..........

Are you sayiing Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the Emriates, aren't included. Seems to me the US includes most of the Middle East in it's policies. And if the US were really babysitting Israel, I think American blood would now be spilling in the Occupied Territories.

Yes, I am saying that Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the Emirates aren't included enough. The US focuses on Israel more than any of the arab countries, which is why the Arabs hate us.

The US giving $3 billion a year to Israel from tax money is what I consider babysitting.

No other country in the world gets the amount of treatment and aid that Israel gets from the US.....



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineFSPilot747 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 3599 posts, RR: 12
Reply 22, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 643 times:

Israel isn't a country, its a 51st state.

-FSP


User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11153 posts, RR: 58
Reply 23, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 642 times:

Alpha 1,

Yes, Palestine did exist before Israel.

Before the Ottoman Empire fell, Palestine was under Ottoman Empire rule, along with Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. After the Ottoman Empire fell, Palestine became a British Colony until 1948 which is when Israel was created.

Just because it was being ruled by an Empire or a British Colony does not mean it did not exist.

India was a British Colony for a long time, yet it was still the country of India.

FSPilot747,

LOL! Good one!



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineDavid B. From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3148 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (12 years 4 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 639 times:

Alpha will never learn. He will kill everone in this country to save a patch of sand in the ME. Cut aid to Israel and take a more balanced stance. The violence will decrease for sure. Alpha wants Israel to take over the whole ME region and Sharon to be the absolute dictator.

Sharon is like a god to him. Sorry pal but that will never happen. Both leaders must go now because they are both causing more trouble then good. Israel can defend themselves. Leave it up to them. The American people are more worried about attacks at home not on a slab of sand in the ME.

A1 has declared war against Arabs  Acting devilish Watch out if you have dark skin you are targeted. Acting devilish Acting devilish

I may be wrong, but i suspect quite a lot of Americans couldn't give a **** about Israel, especially if it's causing their own country problems
I agree  Big thumbs up Thanks to the media and Jewish lobby for making everyone seem like they want to die for a slab of sand.



Teenage-know-it-alls should be shot on sight
25 Alpha 1 : Alpha 1, Yes, Palestine did exist before Israel. Before the Ottoman Empire fell, Palestine was under Ottoman Empire rule, along with Lebanon, Syria, a
26 Post contains images BA : Alpha 1, Ummmm.........yes there was a Palestinian state, it was under Ottoman rule and British Rule after WWI........
27 BA : And another thing Alpha 1. Before Israel's creation, Geography books said "Palestine" and not "Israel". Palestine did indeed exist even though it was
28 Alpha 1 : Alpha 1, Ummmm.........yes there was a Palestinian state, it was under Ottoman rule and British Rule after WWI........ Ummmmm.....no there wasn't. The
29 BA : Alpha 1, You have this logic that if a land has been under foreign occupation, it means it never existed. I guess that means Italy is only 200 years o
30 Stratofish : Why does that matter anyway? The fact that someone has always been denied his/her right does not justify further denial.
31 Alpha 1 : You have this logic that if a land has been under foreign occupation, it means it never existed. I guess that means Italy is only 200 years old, and I
32 BA : Alpha 1, They were not indepentant nations but they STILL existed. It was called India 1000 years ago, it was called Italy 1000 years ago. Just becaus
33 PROSA : Upsetting a couple of dozen other countries (why is Israel more important to keep friendly that other countries, such as Saudia Arabia? Saudia Arabia
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Saudi Judge, It's OK To Slap Spendthrift Wives posted Sun May 10 2009 17:48:43 by Dtwclipper
Name The Movie Quote! posted Thu Apr 9 2009 20:40:18 by FXramper
Are Things Changing In Saudi Arabia? posted Sat Feb 14 2009 11:35:05 by Oly720man
Top Saudi Cleric: OK To Wed Young Girls posted Sat Jan 17 2009 05:52:02 by Dtwclipper
Saudi Arabia: 8year Girl Forced To Marry 58y Man posted Sat Dec 20 2008 07:31:12 by NA
Saudi Cleric Issues Deathfatwa Against TV Producer posted Sun Sep 14 2008 03:29:01 by Beaucaire
Quote This Picture! posted Fri Feb 22 2008 09:57:39 by CO777ER
Saudi Arabia To Execute Woman For Witchcraft posted Thu Feb 14 2008 10:18:28 by PA110
Saudi Bans All Things Red For Valentines's Day posted Tue Feb 12 2008 05:07:35 by AirxLiban
FL Taser Victim Has Quote Of The Year! posted Wed Dec 19 2007 12:21:41 by WellHung