Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Scott Brown Under Fire For Going Rogue On Jobs Bil  
User currently offlineATTart From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 638 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2024 times:

Scott Brown and four other Republicans voted for the Jobs Bill, and one Democrat voted against the Jobs Bill.


http://www.aolnews.com/2010/02/23/sc...g-rogue-on-jobs-bill%2F19369827%2F


Remember: When someone talks behind your back, it only means you're two steps ahead of them!
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11583 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1999 times:

What's this? Massachusetts elected a Massachussetsan?*

You mean, they didn't elect a Jim DeMint or a Mitch McConnell?
You mean this isn't the obvious tide of "The American People" striking back at Democrat policies?

Let me whip out my shocked face for a second.


(* Yes, I know they're actually called Bay Staters.)



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 2, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1993 times:

Quoting ATTart (Thread starter):
Scott Brown Under Fire For Going Rogue On Jobs Bil  

Going... Rogue? You mean not voting on party lines just because? I'm not sure why people are surprised, he even said in his campaign he would vote on both side of the aisle depending on what the issue was.

Quoting D L X (Reply 1):
(* Yes, I know they're actually called Bay Staters.)

I prefer:



  



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5374 posts, RR: 25
Reply 3, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1954 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 1):
What's this? Massachusetts elected a Massachussetsan?*

You mean, they didn't elect a Jim DeMint or a Mitch McConnell?
You mean this isn't the obvious tide of "The American People" striking back at Democrat policies?

Let me whip out my shocked face for a second.

I am shocked and appalled. Scott Brown's victory was supposed to be a giant middle finger to the Democratic Party, and here he is breaking party ranks. This is not the turning of the tide that I expected it to be. I am deeply ashamed at Scott Brown right now.   



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlineFr8Mech From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 5660 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 1923 times:

So the man still wants to get re-elected. In order to do that he needs to be a little moderate, just the way he campaigned. Not really unexpected.

Quoting OA412 (Reply 3):
Scott Brown's victory was supposed to be a giant middle finger to the Democratic Party,

No, it was supposed to be a middle finger to the triumvirate trying to slam health care reform down our throats.



When seconds count...the police are minutes away.
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11583 posts, RR: 52
Reply 5, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 1914 times:

Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 4):
Not really unexpected.

I agree that it was expected, which was my point. On election night, republican fans were all about showing how this was proof that "The American People" want conservatives right now and that this was a changing tide towards the right. Well, Massachusetts has a long history of republicans that would in no way be electable south of Virginia. As you said, this moderation was expected.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 1909 times:

Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 4):
So the man still wants to get re-elected. In order to do that he needs to be a little moderate, just the way he campaigned. Not really unexpected.

  


People seem to forget he wasn't far right to begin with and not only that but he was against the health care bill not because he cares about party lines but because it was a terrible bill. I haven't seen the jobs bill but I would probably vote for it too. One bill doesn't mean anything toward the other. Scott Brown has proven he can do something the Democrats can't. Think for himself.


User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8965 posts, RR: 24
Reply 7, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 1908 times:

Brown never said he was a small-government, control-spending conservative. I don't see why people are so upset. He's a centrist Republican, called a RINO in some quarters. Better than a liberal, but in the same way that a bee sting is better than a rattlesnake bite.


Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineTugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5798 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 1876 times:

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 6):
Scott Brown has proven he can do something the Democrats can't. Think for himself.

No need to paint with a broad brush. It does nothing to advance the discussion. I will agree that it does appear that Sen. Brown is thinking for himself and working for his state.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 7):
Brown never said he was a small-government, control-spending conservative. I don't see why people are so upset. He's a centrist Republican, called a RINO in some quarters. Better than a liberal, but in the same way that a bee sting is better than a rattlesnake bite.


The RINO label is one that has been applied far to widely. Apparently he is being painted as that for this vote. Any Republican can be and will be a RINO at some point if they are thinking person and answerable to their constituents. I don't say this to mean that Republican's are dumb or unthinking, but to say that everyone has slightly different priorities and items that they will focus on and that is the way any political party should be (except perhaps the Chinese Communist party and United Russia....).

Tugg

[Edited 2010-02-23 17:32:55]


I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineMoltenRock From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1870 times:

A RINO is applied to anyone voting against waiting for God to come back to America to help any American, or anyone who votes against sending a military they themselves dodged the draft on, to every country on the face of the planet to carry out war on behalf of the true "Republicans".

A real Republican politician/leader today would be disowned by Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Nixon as being a radical, uneducated, buffoon of which they are. Just ask the leaders of the Republican party Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Sarah Palin.

[Edited 2010-02-23 17:11:59]

User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8299 posts, RR: 26
Reply 10, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1857 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 7):
He's a centrist Republican, called a RINO in some quarters. Better than a liberal, but in the same way that a bee sting is better than a rattlesnake bite.

RINO is an idiotic label and the people calling it out are largely responsible for keeping away those of us who would otherwise join the party. Nobody is a true conservative if they support global military overreach, continued entitlement programming, and religiously-inspired laws that infringe on individual liberty.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5374 posts, RR: 25
Reply 11, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1842 times:

Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 4):
Not really unexpected.

I agree that it wasn't. My point is that a lot of people were painting this as a huge defeat for the Democrats and as the beginning of a movement toward the right in this country. As was expected by many of us, their doomsday predictions have failed to materialize.

Quoting D L X (Reply 5):
I agree that it was expected, which was my point. On election night, republican fans were all about showing how this was proof that "The American People" want conservatives right now and that this was a changing tide towards the right. Well, Massachusetts has a long history of republicans that would in no way be electable south of Virginia. As you said, this moderation was expected.

     

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 10):
RINO is an idiotic label and the people calling it out are largely responsible for keeping away those of us who would otherwise join the party.

The Republican party made a huge mistake when it sold its soul to the religious right, and these accusations of RINO are keeping A LOT of people away from the party. In essence, it gives people the impression that unless you blindly tow the party line, you cannot be a true Republican.



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11583 posts, RR: 52
Reply 12, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1788 times:

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 6):
People seem to forget he wasn't far right to begin with

Yeah! You were one of them!



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5374 posts, RR: 25
Reply 13, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1769 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 12):
Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 6):People seem to forget he wasn't far right to begin with
Yeah! You were one of them!

In the future, please refrain from posting facts. They make people uncomfortable.  



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11583 posts, RR: 52
Reply 14, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1711 times:

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 6):
Scott Brown has proven he can do something the Democrats can't. Think for himself.

Oh, and this comment deserves a big   . Don't even pretend for a second that Democrats aren't "thinking for themselves." Thinking for themselves and disagreeing with each other is why they couldn't pass health care with a supermajority. If you want to look at people who can't think for themselves, it's so incredibly clearly your beloved Republican party that votes NO without even thinking. They even vote no on the things they sponsored. Why? Because they can't think for themselves.

Partisan Nick, you never fail to disappoint.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8299 posts, RR: 26
Reply 15, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1690 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 14):
Partisan Nick, you never fail to disappoint.

With all due respect, and we agree completely in this case, are you not just as partisan? You guys are literally heads and tails.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 16, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1684 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 14):
Partisan Nick, you never fail to disappoint.

Pot, Meet kettle



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1651 times:

Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 4):
No, it was supposed to be a middle finger to the triumvirate trying to slam health care reform down our throats.

I agree, that's the #1 reason Brown won. The Mass. voters knew the implications of their actions in this case and saw it as an easy way to check health care reform as Obama/Reid/Pelosi wanted it.

Quoting OA412 (Reply 11):
The Republican party made a huge mistake when it sold its soul to the religious right, and these accusations of RINO are keeping A LOT of people away from the party.

Amen to that. Both parties are guilty of playing to the extremes here. The Democrats go in search of the far left, and the Republicans go for the religious right. They both need to go after centrists, and the Democrats need to restrain themselves fiscally (well, so do the Republicans   and the Republicans need to lay off the religious crackpipe.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 18, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1649 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 17):
Democrats need to restrain themselves fiscally

Why? They pretty much have a blank check right now   



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11583 posts, RR: 52
Reply 19, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1636 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 15):
are you not just as partisan? You guys are literally heads and tails.

If you think I am, you're entitled to your opinion. I think closer inspection will see that I do not tow the liberal line. I think for myself, and express my disagreements with them frequently. That this goes unnoticed does not surprise me.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineseb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11814 posts, RR: 15
Reply 20, posted (4 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1597 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 17):
The Democrats go in search of the far left, and the Republicans go for the religious right.

I disagree with this opinion. I think, instead, what happens is the extremes from both sides come out screaming and invoke a few catchy words and phrases. The other extreme hears those catchy words and phrases and starts screaming even louder about how the other side is nuts because of their beliefs. They, then, tie in these extremists with the entire side and is snowballs from there.

Using this line of thinking, what I see is Harry Ried and Nancy Pelosi speaking. And, because they happen to have a (D) behind their names, people like Limbaugh, Hannity, Boener, and Palin start screaming about how that is how ignorant/out of touch everyone on the left is. People see that shouting going on and fire back with "Well, your people said these two from our party is ignorant/out of touch, associated it with the rest of us, so the rest of you must be nothing more than brainless sheeple" and so on and so forth to where it becomes a pointless shouting match. Who was it that said "I have met the enemy and they are us?"



Life in the wall is a drag.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Hitler Reacts To Scott Brown Election Victory posted Fri Feb 19 2010 17:05:42 by styles9002
Why Do Used IPhones Sell For $400-600 On Ebay? posted Wed Dec 9 2009 13:58:41 by 2H4
Sarah Palin: Going Rogue (pic) posted Fri Oct 2 2009 08:22:56 by Fxramper
Student To Be Suspended For Going To Prom... posted Mon May 11 2009 00:53:02 by FRAspotter
Top Gear Under Fire posted Tue May 5 2009 14:41:14 by Dreadnought
A Case For Price Controls On Oil posted Thu Dec 4 2008 08:50:26 by Derico
Support For CA Ban On Same Sex Marriage Drops posted Thu Sep 18 2008 16:06:59 by Travelin man
Briton Arrested For Sex Attacks On Sheep posted Fri Jul 18 2008 17:49:01 by 777ER
Looking For Some Advice On Tokyo posted Wed Feb 6 2008 06:39:05 by B78710
USAF Requests $88M For Bunker-Buster On B2 posted Wed Oct 24 2007 12:58:56 by Diamond