Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Manager Wouldn't Employ Service-people  
User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4881 posts, RR: 37
Posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1656 times:

http://www.news.com.au/business/busi...diers/story-e6frfm9r-1225841579613

My goodness, talk about lousy. These men and women put their lives on the line to serve their country and people - and this is the treatment they are given?  

Very, very disappointing. I might not always agree with the conflicts they get sent to - but that's a different thing, and the people serving their country in the armed forces deserve nothing less than the full support of their country.

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8951 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

Quoting cpd (Thread starter):
My goodness, talk about lousy. These men and women put their lives on the line to serve their country and people - and this is the treatment they are given?

What do you expect, with all the leftist crap people have been spouting for years about our troops being babykillers and war criminals?



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently onlineAirstud From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2759 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1641 times:

WTF

In the U.S., it's patently, statedly, printed-by-law-on-all-job-application-forms ILLEGAL to discriminate based on someone's veteran status.



Pancakes are delicious.
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8974 posts, RR: 39
Reply 3, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1635 times:

His belief, his rights, agree with his opinion or not.


"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14139 posts, RR: 63
Reply 4, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1616 times:

Well, I used to be a volunteer in the German civil defense (in a heavy technical rescue unit) for almost 20 years. I left after I had a serious clash with my (British) station manager on a former job. A few years ago there were heavy floods in the eastern part of Germany and Poland. My unit was called out to get there to help to build flood defenses (sandbag barriers) and to help to supply people cut off in their villages with bringing in supplies by boat. We were told to expect to be gone for several weeks. Now by law my bass was supposed to let me go and to continue to pay me my salary (he would get compensated in turn by the government later).
Well, my boss told me in no uncertain words that I was either working for him or the civil defense and that if I obeyed my orders, he would find a reason to have me sacked (no employee is so good that a determined boss will not find a reason to get rid of him if he really wanted to). Mind you, this was the first time in years (and while working for this boss) that I was called out.
When I told my company commander, he told me not to go, since losing a (wellpaid) job in this economical situation would be stupid.
I also remember the case of a voluntary firefighter (a former colleague) in a village near Berlin, which was near a busy Autobahn intersection. He was being called out so often due to trafic accidents on the Autobahn that our boss told him to make up his mind and either work for the fire service or for LH.

I can see bosses rejecting applicants who have commitments to the military or rescue services because they can´t rely on their employees being around when they need them.

Jan


User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4881 posts, RR: 37
Reply 5, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1593 times:

In this country, what Jan described is highly illegal - and managers who try to do that can get in extremely serious trouble with the law. The last time it happened that I know of - the manager was arrested, and the company the manager worked for got in very serious trouble.

Maybe this law to be moved to other countries as well.


User currently offlineseb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11794 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1556 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 1):
What do you expect, with all the leftist crap people have been spouting for years about our troops being babykillers and war criminals?

Pull yourself out of the 1960s. Where have you been when the "leftists" have been shouting about the leaders and not the troops? That comment is WAY off topic. I understand what he is talking about, but I do not support that line of thinking. That is simply the wrong way to go about it.



Life in the wall is a drag.
User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4881 posts, RR: 37
Reply 7, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1554 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 1):
What do you expect, with all the leftist crap people have been spouting for years about our troops being babykillers and war criminals?

This is well off topic and not relevant. The topic is about managers refusing to employ service people, or otherwise - refusing to let service people take military leave. It is not about Communism, reds and leftists or rightists.

If things can't be kept civilised and on topic, I'll request the moderators remove the entire topic.

[Edited 2010-03-16 17:21:19]

User currently offlineYellowstone From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3071 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1517 times:

Quoting cpd (Thread starter):
Very, very disappointing. I might not always agree with the conflicts they get sent to - but that's a different thing, and the people serving their country in the armed forces deserve nothing less than the full support of their country.

I definitely disagree with this business owner's choice not to hire veterans, but I think his extreme hard-line stance is obscuring a point that is worth discussing. Do soldiers bear some degree of personal responsibility for the actions they take while in uniform--not just war crimes, but also actions that follow the rules of war? If a conflict is immoral or unjust, is it not also immoral or unjust to willingly take up arms to perpetuate that conflict?



Hydrogen is an odorless, colorless gas which, given enough time, turns into people.
User currently offlinestarac17 From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 3410 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1502 times:

Quoting Yellowstone (Reply 8):
Do soldiers bear some degree of personal responsibility for the actions they take while in uniform--not just war crimes, but also actions that follow the rules of war?

If those action include violating things like the Geneva convention then the soldier should be held responsible even if they are following orders and those commanders should be punished as well. Remember the "I was just following orders" excuse was not accepted in WW2 trials and that was before we had the Geneva convention.

Quoting Yellowstone (Reply 8):
If a conflict is immoral or unjust, is it not also immoral or unjust to willingly take up arms to perpetuate that conflict?

Immoral or unjust is a matter of point of view on a particular conflict.

You can but then you are going to get in trouble for that, when you join the army you do as you're told no matter how much you disagree with the mission.

I do wonder what this guy's stance would be if someone who went AWOL for say disagreeing with the war in Afghanistan wanted to work for him.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 1):
What do you expect, with all the leftist crap people have been spouting for years about our troops being babykillers and war criminals?

The leftists you speak of hate the war and not the troops, the media makes a false connection to them hating the troops.



Engineers Rule The World!!!!!
User currently onlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8951 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (4 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1464 times:

The leftists you speak of hate the war and not the troops, the media makes a false connection to them hating the troops.

Some do

http://thingsihate.org/article/393/i_hate_soldiers

And I don't want to hijack the thread by posting pictures of some of the vile posters at antiwar protests that expressed hatred for our troops (in the US and elsewhere)

cpd and others are right - it's a distraction.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Dell Customer Service Sucks posted Mon Mar 1 2010 19:11:06 by Springbok747
Israeli Assassins Fake Real People's Passports? posted Thu Feb 25 2010 19:58:42 by NAV20
I Don't Like It When People Say "And/Or" posted Thu Feb 25 2010 00:37:45 by FCA767
Americans Most Attractive People... posted Thu Feb 18 2010 03:41:42 by solnabo
Facebook Airline Manager Part 9 posted Thu Feb 11 2010 19:17:10 by MCOflyer
Facebook Airline Manager Part 8 posted Fri Jan 29 2010 20:52:55 by MCOflyer
"Twice Daily Maid Service"? posted Sat Jan 23 2010 11:40:06 by Lincoln
Rant: People Who Can't Handle Their Big SUV posted Fri Jan 22 2010 14:30:42 by Sabena332
Facebook Airline Manager Part 7 posted Thu Jan 7 2010 21:01:37 by MCOflyer
MCO Automated People Mover Vehicle Replacement? posted Wed Jan 6 2010 15:22:00 by 1337Delta764