Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
U.S. Approves Targeted Killing Of American Cleric  
User currently offlinePNQIAD From India, joined May 2006, 586 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1602 times:

I was not really surprised that this hasn't been given a lot of attention by the US right or the left - it is inconvenient for them both and just as well to the media in general.....

U.S. Approves Targeted Killing of American Cleric

The man in question is a born US Citizen.

Inconvenience for those on the Right: They believe (sometimes conveniently so) that the President has unlimited authority in defending the US. However, for them there is a little pesky document called the Constitution which guarantees due process and fair trial.

Inconvenience for those on the Left: They cried hoarse for 8 years that President Bush was pushing the envelop on executive authority but now President of their own party is going even further. They were agitated with the warrant-less wiretapping etc. but this is just as much egregious to some if not more....

So what do you all think about this?

[Edited 2010-04-08 08:26:06]

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19416 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1582 times:

I think that there's bipartisan agreement that this man needs to be removed from the world. He lives to kill others. If they cannot catch him alive (and there is still an "alive or dead" out on him) and bring him to trial, then they would like him dead.

If Mr. Alwaki feels that there has been a misunderstanding, he is free to walk into a police station, give his name, cooperate with the investigation, and be exhonerated.


User currently offlinecasinterest From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4498 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1548 times:

I see no conflict. This man is a member of Al Qaeda. He is now involved in plots against the US as a Terrorist, and as such is a military target under international law.

Same rules for him as OBL. Dead or Alive.



Older than I just was ,and younger than I will soo be.
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19416 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1519 times:

"As a general principle, international law permits the use of lethal force against individuals and groups that pose an imminent threat to a country, and officials said that was the standard used in adding names to the list of targets."

It is not illegal to shoot a suspect if he does not submit to arrest.

The U.S. would much rather capture this man alive. A corpse isn't very useful.


User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1517 times:

Time for this guy to die, I hope someone finds him and puts a bullet in his head. Hopefully he doesn't die quickly.

User currently offlinefuturepilot16 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2035 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1503 times:

Quoting PNQIAD (Thread starter):
Inconvenience for those on the Right: They believe (sometimes conveniently so) that the President has unlimited authority in defending the US. However, for them there is a little pesky document called the Constitution which guarantees due process and fair trial.

Personally, I think that If we have a chance to kill these terrorists in another country of conflict, they should be denied due process, even if they are U.S. citizens.

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 4):
Time for this guy to die, I hope someone finds him and puts a bullet in his head. Hopefully he doesn't die quickly.

  



"The brave don't live forever, but the cautious don't live at all."
User currently offlinedeltaownsall From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1173 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (4 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1455 times:

   to the five responses here.

The idea here is not that you are somehow magically protected because of where you are born, but that you are responsible for your actions.

I love that "pesky" Constitution as much as the next guy, but don't forget that it also grants the President the powers of "Commander in Chief." The cleric is a traitor and a dangerous enemy to the United States.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
YET Another Travesty Of American Justice DUI/MS posted Tue May 8 2007 00:17:35 by TedTAce
Senseless Killing Of A Community Activist In Nola posted Tue Jan 9 2007 04:50:10 by 767Lover
Scary Poll Of American Muslims posted Mon Oct 30 2006 07:04:48 by RJpieces
Wussification Of American Kids Continues posted Thu Aug 10 2006 02:12:01 by Mdsh00
Current Feeling Of American's About Politics posted Fri Sep 16 2005 13:12:20 by LGW
The State Of American Public Schools posted Sat Feb 19 2005 06:45:38 by MaverickM11
Half Of American Bankrupcies Due To.... posted Thu Feb 3 2005 00:31:50 by Airplay
DVD Of American's Beheading Is Hot Item In Gaza posted Wed Sep 29 2004 22:26:57 by Jutes85
FDA Approves Medical Use Of Maggots! posted Wed Aug 4 2004 01:31:46 by L-188
Opinions Of American Tourists? posted Tue May 11 2004 01:29:20 by DFWLandingPath