Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Volcano Effect On US Rail Development?  
User currently offlineblink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5477 posts, RR: 15
Posted (4 years 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1995 times:

Hi All,

Currently in Europe, extra trains are being added and are going out full. Despite the air traffic mess on rail travel, the fact that rail travel is still usable has done some alleviation to the air traffic problem. If rail networks weren't so strong, Europe's highways would be completely clogged(and perhaps they may be).

I know that a few countries, such as the US, have traditionally shied away from high speed or even regional rail development. Does anybody think the events in Iceland will finally provide an impetus for a movement to build up the US's high speed networks?

I'm thinking much more along the lines of Acela's Boston-NY-Washington triangle. Maybe Acela could be extended to Portland ME and include Baltimore and Philadelphia.
There could maybe be a Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Charlotte link
Other possible links include New Orleans-Houston-San Antonio-Austin-Dallas-Oklahoma City-Tulsa-Kansas City.
On the West Coast I'd imagine something like San Diego-LA-SF-Portland-Seattle

etc.

I realize Americans like road travel, but high speed rail would be far faster. For example, high speed rail is the fastest link between Barcelona and Madrid, once flight waiting times are involved. I don't have any data on me, but does the world's reliance on air travel need a back up? Could this week's events provide enough reason for high level investment in high speed rail development?

I'm curious what you all think.


Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinerwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3068 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (4 years 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1936 times:

Personally, I think this will be yet another missed wake-up call for the US.

1970s oil crisis = no change in policy
gulf war = no change in policy
9/11 = no change in policy
$4+ gallon gas a few summers ago = no change in policy

I think the US government will not even begin considering alternative solutions until every last drop of oil is burned up. History has a way of repeating itself - outcry, rage, anger at higher gas prices, then comfortably settling back into the status quo once the crisis is over. This time will be no different. For some reason, Americans seem to prefer being held hostage to oil prices and weather events, and apparently do not want other options. I say this as a very frustrated American who wonders how I will be able to get around 40 years from now. Short-sightedness on such things is already starting to hold the US back today, and I really have to wonder how much worse it will be in the future.


User currently offlineDXing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (4 years 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1936 times:

The chunnel running at full tilt couldn't keep up.

Here in the United States the distances involved are usually the limiting factor invovled in high speed rail. That plus the enviromental impact and other legal obstacles that are demanded by the supposedly sympathetic.


User currently offlinecasinterest From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4158 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (4 years 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1936 times:

Quoting blink182 (Thread starter):
I'm thinking much more along the lines of Acela's Boston-NY-Washington triangle. Maybe Acela could be extended to Portland ME and include Baltimore and Philadelphia.
There could maybe be a Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Charlotte link
Other possible links include New Orleans-Houston-San Antonio-Austin-Dallas-Oklahoma City-Tulsa-Kansas City.
On the West Coast I'd imagine something like San Diego-LA-SF-Portland-Seattle

Quite a few of these routes already exist in some form or another.

http://tickets.amtrak.com/secure/content/routeatlas/index.html

Quoting blink182 (Thread starter):
realize Americans like road travel, but high speed rail would be far faster

Possibly, but it is only faster on a Point 2 Point basis between stations. Add in multiple rail stops and destinations that are not located within 50 miles of a station, and Rail travel becomes slower than Molassis.

I think if I tried to take the line from Raleigh to NYC, it would take 10 hours station to Station. Plus I would have to waste an hour or 2 with luggage, and destination transport for around 12-13 hours. I could drive it in 8.5 door to door. Even with some traffic problems.


Rail in the US won't ever meet the European model, mostly because the Freeways and Interstates are too efficient. Anything beyond a Day's travel or 2 is more efficient by air for most folks.



Older than I just was ,and younger than I will soo be.
User currently offlineflanker From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 1624 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (4 years 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1908 times:

Quoting blink182 (Thread starter):
know that a few countries, such as the US, have traditionally shied away from high speed or even regional rail development. Does anybody think the events in Iceland will finally provide an impetus for a movement to build up the US's high speed networks?

Nope, there is no point here in the states.



Calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented immigrant' is like calling a drug dealer an unlicensed pharmacist
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8876 posts, RR: 40
Reply 5, posted (4 years 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1890 times:

Quoting blink182 (Thread starter):
I know that a few countries, such as the US, have traditionally shied away from high speed or even regional rail development

The US has not shied away from rail investment, including high-speed rail. Up until the 1940s it had some of the fastest trains around on a significant network (obviously the "HSR" standard back then was much different). With the massive subsidization of highways beginning around that time, as well as airport infrastructure and burdensome rail regulations, the U.S. passenger rail industry collapsed over the next few decades. Freight rail lasted longer and barely made it to the 1970s, when Carter deregulated it, turning it completely around.

If we refuse to fix the environment to give rail a chance to succeed, it never will. The problem is that the US has discouraged rail development (and killed an entire, historically-vibrant industry I might add) through certain policies.

[Edited 2010-04-19 13:00:00]


"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlinerwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3068 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (4 years 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1799 times:

Quoting flanker (Reply 4):
Nope, there is no point here in the states.

Not sure why you would say that. There are several corridors in the US that have population density equal or greater than parts of Europe. The Northeast corridor and California are the obvious examples.

Quoting casinterest (Reply 3):
Rail in the US won't ever meet the European model, mostly because the Freeways and Interstates are too efficient. Anything beyond a Day's travel or 2 is more efficient by air for most folks.

In dense population corridors, the freeways/interstates are anything but efficient. Try driving I-95 during a weekday between Washington and New York. Or I-5 between LA and San Diego. Hell, even I-5 between Seattle and Portland is a mess just about every weekend. Not efficient at all.


User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 18704 posts, RR: 58
Reply 7, posted (4 years 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1787 times:

Quoting blink182 (Thread starter):
I know that a few countries, such as the US, have traditionally shied away from high speed or even regional rail development. Does anybody think the events in Iceland will finally provide an impetus for a movement to build up the US's high speed networks?

No, because...

Quoting rwSEA (Reply 1):
Personally, I think this will be yet another missed wake-up call for the US.

Bingo. The U.S. is far too short-sighted.

Quoting DXing (Reply 2):
The chunnel running at full tilt couldn't keep up.

That's because they don't have the train capacity. The line sure does. Unfortunately in an immediate disaster, Eurostar couldn't just come up with an extra 30 trainsets.

Eurostar could do a full trainset every 15 minutes around the clock if there were enough trainsets. I don't know the exact numbers, but a full-length trainset probably has twice the capacity of a 744.


User currently offlinecasinterest From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4158 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (4 years 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1774 times:

Quoting rwSEA (Reply 6):
Try driving I-95 during a weekday between Washington and New York

Done it many times. Avoid rush hour or take alternative routes. The trains are no more efficient, as the main operational centers you are speaking of generally have crud traffic at that time anyway on all routes, plain , train, or automobile.



Older than I just was ,and younger than I will soo be.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Chavez Blames Haiti On US "Earthquake Weapon" posted Mon Jan 25 2010 19:21:45 by FriendlySkies
8 Year Old On US No-Fly List posted Thu Jan 14 2010 01:58:31 by Elite
Frequent Fliers Pull A Fast One On US Mint posted Mon Dec 7 2009 12:55:46 by Fxramper
"We're #37" Music Video On US Healthcare posted Thu Sep 10 2009 23:34:51 by WestWing
My Essay On US Airways- Feedback Please! posted Thu Apr 9 2009 13:49:20 by Braniff747SP
War In Georgia: Influence On US Election posted Sun Aug 10 2008 07:10:23 by Columba
Top Gear On US TV? posted Thu Mar 15 2007 07:17:52 by KBFIspotter
New Study By CNN On US Troops With Felon History posted Thu Feb 8 2007 05:33:58 by Wardialer
BBC Survey On US Role In World posted Tue Jan 23 2007 14:23:24 by Baroque
Is It Illegal To Write On US Currency? posted Sun Dec 3 2006 18:32:10 by VarigB707