Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Stop Dropping Breast Cancer Patients  
User currently onlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8220 posts, RR: 8
Posted (4 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1713 times:

Quote:
U.S. to Wellpoint: Stop dropping breast cancer patients

In a letter dated April 22 to Angela Braly, WellPoint's chief executive, Sebelius said she was "surprised and disappointed" to learn from a Reuters report that the company has specifically targeted women with breast cancer for aggressive investigation with intent to cancel their policies.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE63M2YM20100423

While many may consider Wellpoint's actions just a Good Old American Tradition of putting profits above patients I believe that the article demonstrates one of the key reasons why reform was needed. We simply cannot trust health insurance companies these days.

What I would like to see passed is a law that allows patients who have been kicked off the insurance companies profit plates to immediately join a modified form of Medicare. Then fine the insurance companies the full charges of caring for these people - the full cost, not a discounted cost. And don't allow the fines to be a tax deduction. Won't take long before the crooks decide to end that sham.

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8123 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (4 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1684 times:

Quoting Ken777 (Thread starter):

What I would like to see passed is a law that allows patients who have been kicked off the insurance companies profit plates to immediately join a modified form of Medicare

The kind of punitive punishment you advocate is going a bit too far. These companies are trying to kick these people off because they can - it's not illegal per se. I'd rather see a law that says they can't cancel coverage for cancer patients who are diagnosed after joining a policy.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlinenewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 30
Reply 2, posted (4 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1668 times:

Quoting Ken777 (Thread starter):

What I would like to see passed is a law that allows patients who have been kicked off the insurance companies profit plates to immediately join a modified form of Medicare. Then fine the insurance companies the full charges of caring for these people - the full cost, not a discounted cost. And don't allow the fines to be a tax deduction. Won't take long before the crooks decide to end that sham.

Then they would just raise rates for everyone else. Hooray!



Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlinemt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6575 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (4 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1657 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting newark777 (Reply 2):
Then they would just raise rates for everyone else. Hooray!

Right! Keep the "Death Panels" Going.. and here i thought that they were a NEW idea. Silly me..



Step into my office, baby
User currently onlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8220 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (4 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1632 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 1):
The kind of punitive punishment you advocate is going a bit too far.

The actions of the insurance companies is far greater punishment for the cancer patient and her family than what I advocate. Basically my approach would stop the shafting of patients who could have been paying premiums for years, only to be left with medical bills that can easily lead to bankruptcy. It stops them because they can see screwing patients is less profitable than taking care of them under the provisions of the policies.

Quoting newark777 (Reply 2):
Then they would just raise rates for everyone else. Hooray!

And you REALLY don't believe that they are going to raise rates for everyone anyway? Gimme a break!


User currently offlinenewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 30
Reply 5, posted (4 years 4 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1607 times:

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 4):
And you REALLY don't believe that they are going to raise rates for everyone anyway? Gimme a break!

Of course they are, and any addition fines are going to be passed along to the policyholders as well.



Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8957 posts, RR: 40
Reply 6, posted (4 years 4 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1601 times:

Quoting Ken777 (Thread starter):
We simply cannot trust health insurance companies these days.

Sounds more like. . .

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 4):
It stops them because they can see screwing patients is less profitable than taking care of them under the provisions of the policies.

. . . you can't trust your legal system to enforce contracts.



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineGatorFan From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 331 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (4 years 4 months 2 days ago) and read 1532 times:

A reasonable medium would be to make health insurance policies subject to a guaranteed renewability provision. Then simultaneously enact an incontestibility provision in the law, that says that after a certain amount of time (~1 yr) an insurance company cannot contest the validity of the policy for any reason, including fraud. This sort of provision is common in life insurance where a similar situation existed. Companies would collect premium for years and then contest coverage based on a misstatement on the application 10 or 20 years in the past.

This gives the insurance company an incentive to identify and resolve fraud early on in the process and it allows an insured to know that coverage exists when they need it the most.


User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9907 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (4 years 4 months 2 days ago) and read 1514 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PPVRA (Reply 6):
. . . you can't trust your legal system to enforce contracts

According to the article, it's more like they just do an intensive search for any legal reason to drop the patients. So technically they may very well be within their rights per contract, but targeting breast cancer patients is certainly quite deplorable.

Reuters reported on Thursday that WellPoint, the largest U.S. health insurer by enrollment, was using a computer algorithm that automatically targeted patients recently diagnosed with breast cancer.

The software triggered an immediate fraud investigation by the company as it searched for excuses to drop coverage, according to government regulators and investigators.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently onlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8220 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (4 years 4 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1508 times:

Quoting PPVRA (Reply 6):
. . . you can't trust your legal system to enforce contracts.

Considering that Oklahoma sent their Insurance Commissioner to prison for accepting bribes you can pretty well guess how much I trust the insurance companies. The Wellpoint article is simply an example of what is happening every day to the average people in this country who get sick.

Quoting GatorFan (Reply 7):
Companies would collect premium for years and then contest coverage based on a misstatement on the application 10 or 20 years in the past.

Of course they do. That's their game - pull in the money as long as it's profitable, then pull in the lawyers.

Quoting GatorFan (Reply 7):
This gives the insurance company an incentive to identify and resolve fraud early on in the process

I doubt if the insurance companies really care about "fraud" as long as the account is profitable. It's only after a diagnosis of an expensive medical condition that they sick the lawyers on the patient.

That's why I believe that we need to have laws that make it immediately painful to shaft the policyholder/patient. No long term argument form the insurance companies. A patient files a complaint, shows their payment history and proof of diagnosis. Insurance companies have 7 days to reinstate or the fine is levied, starting with the date of diagnosis.


User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8957 posts, RR: 40
Reply 10, posted (4 years 4 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1481 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 8):
According to the article, it's more like they just do an intensive search for any legal reason to drop the patients. So technically they may very well be within their rights per contract, but targeting breast cancer patients is certainly quite deplorable.

Chances are, they are just prioritizing their investigative resources in areas where abuse are most likely to happen and where they may be most costly. Saying that they are "targeting breast cancer patients" sounds like omissive propaganda designed to bring about emotional reactions for a politically motivated attack, rather than anything remotely close to the truth.

I am sure insurance companies don't "hate" breast cancer patients, unlike Sebelius' comments suggests.

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 9):
Considering that Oklahoma sent their Insurance Commissioner to prison for accepting bribes you can pretty well guess how much I trust the insurance companies.

And the insurance regulators?

[Edited 2010-04-23 12:09:12]


"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently onlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8220 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (4 years 4 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1454 times:

Quoting PPVRA (Reply 10):
Chances are, they are just prioritizing their investigative resources in areas where abuse are most likely to happen and where they may be most costly.

Sure they are. In which case they should have no issue with the law I'm proposing as it wouldn't adversely effect the "honest" companies.  
Quoting PPVRA (Reply 10):
And the insurance regulators?

The commissioner is the top regulator in the state. 'Nuff said?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
ESPN's Robin Robers Has Breast Cancer posted Tue Jul 31 2007 19:13:02 by ORFflyer
Kylie Minogue Diagnosed With Breast Cancer posted Tue May 17 2005 11:09:23 by Gkirk
Elizabeth Edwards Has Breast Cancer posted Thu Nov 4 2004 18:51:53 by Dl021
Study: Fellatio Decreases Breast Cancer posted Fri May 7 2004 01:00:44 by Galaxy5
AUS Tells Japan To Stop Whaling posted Thu Feb 18 2010 22:24:13 by NIKV69
Big Toyota Recall, Sales & Production Stop posted Tue Jan 26 2010 20:16:35 by LTBEWR
This Is Why We Can't Stop Somali Pirates posted Mon Jan 18 2010 11:03:48 by NIKV69
German Government: Stop Using Internet Explorer posted Sun Jan 17 2010 23:54:35 by Elite
Cat Bothers Police Officer On A Traffic Stop posted Wed Nov 18 2009 02:05:20 by Tiger119
Curry Cures Cancer! posted Wed Oct 28 2009 06:55:44 by Nighthawk