Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Obama Offered Sestak A Job?  
User currently offlinewindy95 From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 2690 posts, RR: 8
Posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2482 times:

White House mum on whether Sestak offered a job

Quote:
What job did the White House offer Democratic Rep. Joe Sestak if he skipped the Pennsylvania Senate primary and who made the offer?

Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2010/05/23...-whether-sestak.html#ixzz0owTM0Ycu

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...ing-white-house-illegal-job-offer/

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/world...8500281&pid=94731464#axzz0owVsvFP2

Sestak has admitted on numerous occasions that the Whitehouse offered him a position to leave the primary race against Arlen Spectre. Obama had already backed Spectre in the race so Sestak needed to be moved out of the way. Sestak will not say what job was offered to him but the rumour is that he was offerd the Sec. of the Navy.

So either Sestak is lieing and his campaign will sink form this or the Obama adminstration did do this and they should be facing 3 felony accounts. Sestak need to come clean and tell what position was offered. To think he can say something was offered and then to just forget about it will not fly with the voters. Congress will be looking into this since he is a member also.

Robert Gibbs has alos been fumbling his answers on the subject making things worse.

Sestak, Gibbs Skirt Questions About Alleged Job Offer


http://news.yahoo.com/s/cq/20100523/pl_cq_politics/politics3669567

Quote:
Rep. Joe Sestak, winner of the Pennsylvania Democratic Senate primary, is refusing to provide more information on what job he was offered by a White House official to drop of that race, although he confirmed again that the incident occurred.

The White House was backing incumbent Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) in the primary. Sestak acknowledged in an interview in February that he was offered a position by an unnamed White House official - a potential violation of federal law - but has not offered any specifics on conversation. Republicans are trying to use the issue against Sestak in the November Senate race.

"It's interesting. I was asked a question about something that happened months earlier, and I felt that I should answer it honestly, and that's all I had to say about it." Sestak said Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." "Anybody else has to decide on what they will say upon their role. That's their responsibility."

Yet Sestak confirmed to NBC's David Gregory that the incident did take place.

"I was offered a job, and I answered that," Sestak said. "Anything that goes beyond that is for others to talk about."
http://www.politico.com/blogs/politi...et_out_of_Senate_race.html?showall

I want to see them sweep this one underr the rug.....


OMG-Obama Must Go
54 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineseb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11133 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2412 times:

So, Sestak was offered a job in the WH but no one including Sestak will say exactly when that job was offered to him? It looks to me, at this point, the right is trying really hard to play "connect the dots" but leaving a few spaces out. Kinda like Beck and his chalk board. Has anyone attacking the Obama administration bothered to ask WHEN this job was offered? Not in the articles I read in the OP link. They are all saying "He was offered a job to quit the race." Well, that is not what Sestak nor the WH say. All that they have said is "a job was offered." Jumping the gun a bit. I know the right hates Obama, but quit grasping at straws.


Life in the wall is a drag.
User currently offlineYellowstone From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3071 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2409 times:

Quoting windy95 (Thread starter):
So either Sestak is lieing and his campaign will sink form this or the Obama adminstration did do this and they should be facing 3 felony accounts. Sestak need to come clean and tell what position was offered. To think he can say something was offered and then to just forget about it will not fly with the voters. Congress will be looking into this since he is a member also.

Dunno about you, but I don't really see the problem here. None of those links you posted state that the job offer was illegal. The only person claiming that a felony occurred is Darrell Issa, as quoted in the Fox News piece, and he's - how should I say this? - kind of an idiot. No money's changing hands, and Sestak would have been entirely qualified for the SecNavy position (if that's what was suggested). Not only that, but you don't think this kind of thing happens all the time? Parties regularly try to convince members to run for particular offices rather than others, so as to get their favored candidates in favored positions. The big example has to be Obama giving Clinton the SecState position - I'd bet money that she backed down in the primary fight in large part because Obama had promised her that job.



Hydrogen is an odorless, colorless gas which, given enough time, turns into people.
User currently offlinegatorfan From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 331 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2402 times:

Quoting Yellowstone (Reply 2):
Dunno about you, but I don't really see the problem here. None of those links you posted state that the job offer was illegal. The only person claiming that a felony occurred is Darrell Issa, as quoted in the Fox News piece, and he's - how should I say this? - kind of an idiot. No money's changing hands, and Sestak would have been entirely qualified for the SecNavy position (if that's what was suggested). Not only that, but you don't think this kind of thing happens all the time? Parties regularly try to convince members to run for particular offices rather than others, so as to get their favored candidates in favored positions.

Funny but didn't the Obama Administration's Justice Department indicit Gov. Blagojevich even though no money changed hands? Does that make the Administration equally idiotic?


User currently offlinedxing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2390 times:

Have to say I'm in the ?? camp on this one. They didn't offer him a job to vote a certain way on legislation, that would have been a bribe. They offered him a job to prop up Specters chances at staying in the Senate. Seems to me that the Sestak camp has created its own tempest. They are damned no matter what. If the Obama administration doesn't come out and confirm what he says then Sestak himself looks like a nut. If they do come out and confirm what Sestak says then they look like they were at least interfering in State politics. All in all it's just another example of Chicago type politics, nothing new, move along.

User currently offlineSlider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6661 posts, RR: 35
Reply 5, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2381 times:

The Chicago way....

Nothing new here. Although some accountability would be nice.


User currently offlinemayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 9970 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2380 times:

Quoting Yellowstone (Reply 2):
Dunno about you, but I don't really see the problem here.

I don't suppose you would.


This looks to be Chicago style politics at its finest.

Quoting Yellowstone (Reply 2):
Parties regularly try to convince members to run for particular offices rather than others, so as to get their favored candidates in favored positions.

But, according to the articles, that's not what happened here. They weren't trying to get Sestak in a favored position, but to get him out of the way, completely, so that Specter would have a better chance in the primary.

Quoting Yellowstone (Reply 2):
The big example has to be Obama giving Clinton the SecState position - I'd bet money that she backed down in the primary fight in large part because Obama had promised her that job

I would expect no different from both sides in that fight.



"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently offlineokie From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2854 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2345 times:

Quoting dxing (Reply 4):
All in all it's just another example of Chicago type politics, nothing new, move along.



Unfortunately if they were offering him a Secretary position that would imply that the president was involved and would ultimately end up with an impeachable offence.

I think the country needs better than "Chicago Politics"

Okie


User currently offlinedxing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2333 times:

Quoting Yellowstone (Reply 2):
The big example has to be Obama giving Clinton the SecState position - I'd bet money that she backed down in the primary fight in large part because Obama had promised her that job.

The primary fight was already over at that point. Clinton fought till hard till the last and actually had more of the popular vote than President Obama did. It was only the superdelegates endorsements that put him over the top. His reasoning for offering her the Sec State position was simple. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. With her in the administration he didn't have to worry about being sniped at by someone on his own side. Not the same thing as the Sestak affair at all.


User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2332 times:

What did they offer Harold Ford to not run? Was probably a better deal since he actually took it. I think Sestak is an idiot for letting this out. It will probably harm him more than help.

User currently offlineAGM100 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 5407 posts, RR: 16
Reply 10, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2327 times:

Quoting windy95 (Thread starter):
I want to see them sweep this one underr the rug.....



I do as well .... the last thing we need is a big hoopla over this. As conservative / republicans (myself) we will never beat the left on these kinds of tabloid whodunit soap operas . We need to sweep them from power with a good strong election ...preferably one with overwhelming victories . This kind of "Watergate" BS is the tool of the weak .... let is go and lets get on with the election .

We need to win on principles ... not by beating up on personalities . Nothing will stick to this President ... nothing , and the accusers will come out looking like cry baby racists . Just look at the power Clinton has ... you can not even make it up .. the guy was humiliated in front of all the country and he runs around like he is the greatest president of all times. How can you shame a party who has such operators within it? .... you cant , they will always win these fights.



You dig the hole .. I fill the hole . 100% employment !
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8711 posts, RR: 24
Reply 11, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2262 times:

Quoting seb146 (Reply 1):
They are all saying "He was offered a job to quit the race." Well, that is not what Sestak nor the WH say. All that they have said is "a job was offered."

Wrong:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/politi...et_out_of_Senate_race.html?showall

Quoting Yellowstone (Reply 2):
Dunno about you, but I don't really see the problem here. None of those links you posted state that the job offer was illegal.
Quote:
Title 18, U.S.C. Section 211 says, “Whoever solicits or receives, either as a political contribution or for personal emolument, any money or thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year or both.”

Title 18, U.S.C. Section 595, which says, “Whoever, being a person employed in any administrative position by the United States … uses his official authority for the purposes of interfering with, or affecting the nomination of, or the election of any candidate for office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representative…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

Title 18 U.S.C. Section 600, which says, “Whoever directly or indirectly promises any employment position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, in favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

Sestak refuses to say what the job was or who at the White House offered it to him. It's like a rape victim refusing to name the assailant. Earlier this year, Robert Gibbs repeatedly tried to stonewall the matter hoping reporters would drop it, but never denied it. Finally this Monday Axelrod said that the matter had been looked into and that “nothing inappropriate happened.” He refused to give any details and quickly changed the subject. Wonderful - the administration investigated itself and found nothing wrong - what a surprise.

Something smells fishy here doesn’t it? Either Sestak was offered a job, in which case it could be a violation of federal law or he wasn’t offered a job and is lying about it. Nobody in the administration has denied it - they just claim it's no big deal. If “nothing inappropriate happened” why won’t the White House come forward and describe the contacts staffers had with Sestak to get him out of the race with Specter? And if any serious cabinet level job offer was considered it would have to have been made with the full knowledge and assent of the President.

One wonders how long a President that championed transparency and openness during the presidential election can continue to stonewall and evade a full and complete accounting of White House activity with Sestak. Clearly someone here is lying.

[Edited 2010-05-25 10:06:13]


Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlinewindy95 From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 2690 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2237 times:

Quoting okie (Reply 7):
Unfortunately if they were offering him a Secretary position that would imply that the president was involved and would ultimately end up with an impeachable offence.

That is the million dollar question. Also the fact that Sestak had been supported by Hillary in the past adds even more intrigue to this.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
One wonders how long a President that championed transparency and openness during the presidential election can continue to stonewall and evade a full and complete accounting of White House activity with Sestak. Clearly someone here is lying.

Bingo. Who is not telling the truth. One will cost Obama alot of political capital if not his job. The other will give Toomay the Penn. Sen. seat.



OMG-Obama Must Go
User currently offlinewindy95 From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 2690 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2222 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
Title 18, U.S.C. Section 211 says
Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
Title 18, U.S.C. Section 595
Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
Title 18 U.S.C. Section 600

looks like someone should be going to jail. And if it was the Sec navy position that had to come from the top...



OMG-Obama Must Go
User currently offlinefxramper From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 7129 posts, RR: 87
Reply 14, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2175 times:

Quoting seb146 (Reply 1):
Sestak will say exactly when that job was offered to him?
Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
Sestak refuses to say what the job was or who at the White House offered it to him.

David Gregory on Sunday's Meet the Press said the position was the Secretary of Navy.


User currently offlinedxing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2134 times:

Quoting okie (Reply 7):
Unfortunately if they were offering him a Secretary position that would imply that the president was involved and would ultimately end up with an impeachable offence.

I really don't see how.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
Something smells fishy here doesn’t it?

It's fishy, but not in an illegal way, just in a tacky way.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
Either Sestak was offered a job, in which case it could be a violation of federal law or he wasn’t offered a job and is lying about it.

In the 3 statutes you list, where is the word "primary" election mentioned? Who was going to make money off the deal? Think of it this way, if it were illegal to offer a Congressman, or any other elected person a job in the Administration then probably all Presidents would be guilty of impeachable offenses. This strikes me as of being on the same level as the outright firing of the Assistant AG's during the Bush administration. A lot of democrats got all lathered up around the mouth about that but in the end it was shown that nothing illegal had occured.


User currently offlineUSPIT10L From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 3295 posts, RR: 7
Reply 16, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2131 times:

Quoting windy95 (Reply 12):

Bingo. Who is not telling the truth. One will cost Obama alot of political capital if not his job. The other will give Toomay the Penn. Sen. seat.

First off, it's Specter and Toomey. Not Spectre or Toomay. Secondly, there's nothing wrong with offering a job to anyone. PA just lost quite a bit with Specter's inability to get renominated, much more than we lost when Santorum wasn't re-elected.



It's a Great Day for Hockey!
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8711 posts, RR: 24
Reply 17, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2100 times:

Quoting USPIT10L (Reply 16):
Secondly, there's nothing wrong with offering a job to anyone.

Wrong - it is clearly against the law to promise a government job to someone in return for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office.

You can offer such a job after the fact. But promising a job in advance is illegal.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineSlider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6661 posts, RR: 35
Reply 18, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2069 times:

Quoting windy95 (Reply 12):
Bingo. Who is not telling the truth. One will cost Obama alot of political capital if not his job. The other will give Toomay the Penn. Sen. seat.

That’s the key point, isn’t it?

Toomey would be wise to hammer and hammer and hammer on Sestak. And the tighter the race gets, guess what’ll happen? Obama will throw his weight into the race. Given that he’s pretty much 0-5 thus far, I love the fact that the Sestak skeleton in the closet and corruption is something that can become a lightning rod. Either way, it’s more leverage for the GOP.


User currently offlineUSPIT10L From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 3295 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2058 times:

Quoting Slider (Reply 18):

I'm afraid the race will really get ugly now, not that I have any incentive to vote after Specter's ouster. The PA governor's race is just as bad, Allegheny County's a$$clown chief executive Dan Onorato vs. PA Attorney General Tom Corbett.



It's a Great Day for Hockey!
User currently offlineseb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11133 posts, RR: 15
Reply 20, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2036 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 11):
Wrong:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/politi...owall

Right. I read that one when Windy posted it. Again: how is any of this wrong? Back in February, Sestak said he was offered a position sometime earlier. He has yet to say when he was offered that position. I have yet to read anywhere that says "The WH says if you don't run, we will give you the Sec of Navy spot." I don't see that anywhere and no one, not Sestak, not the WH, no one is saying that.

Sestak says "Something happend, but I am not giving any details." That in and of itself sounds fishy. What does Sestak have to hide? What is he doing with his right hand while he is getting everyone to look at his left?



Life in the wall is a drag.
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8711 posts, RR: 24
Reply 21, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2009 times:

Quoting seb146 (Reply 20):
I have yet to read anywhere that says "The WH says if you don't run, we will give you the Sec of Navy spot." I don't see that anywhere and no one, not Sestak, not the WH, no one is saying that.
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/84835732.html

Quote:
Sestak made his startling claim Thursday during the taping of Comcast Network's Larry Kane: Voice of Reason, a public affairs show televised on Sunday evenings.

"Were you ever offered a federal job to get out of this race?" Kane asked near the end of the 30-minute interview.

"Yes," Sestak answered.

Technically you might be right - he hasn't said it in complete sentences. But he did answer a very direct question.

If you want to argue semantics, go ahead. But you are not going to convince anyone.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineaa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3345 posts, RR: 8
Reply 22, posted (3 years 11 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1997 times:

Quoting USPIT10L (Reply 16):
First off, it's Specter and Toomey. Not Spectre or Toomay. Secondly, there's nothing wrong with offering a job to anyone. PA just lost quite a bit with Specter's inability to get renominated, much more than we lost when Santorum wasn't re-elected.

We lost nothing when Specter wasn't reelected. I was a huge Specter fan and would have remained a fan if he stayed true to his principles. Instead, he just voted the party line as soon as he became a Democrat. Its a shame a few months will severely tarnish the vast majority of his excellent career in the Senate.

Quoting seb146 (Reply 20):
Sestak says "Something happend, but I am not giving any details." That in and of itself sounds fishy. What does Sestak have to hide? What is he doing with his right hand while he is getting everyone to look at his left?

First of all, Sestak has to win a general election and Obama's help may be useful, despite recent evidence to the contrary. Assuming that this is illegal or, at the very least, questionable, I don't think his new Democratic peers in Congress are going to like him for getting Obama into hot water.


User currently offlineseb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11133 posts, RR: 15
Reply 23, posted (3 years 11 months 17 hours ago) and read 1918 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 21):
Technically you might be right - he hasn't said it in complete sentences. But he did answer a very direct question.

Again: Back in February. All he has said out of all the interviews is "The Obama administraion offered me a job." That's it. No one has said what that job is or when it was offered. Could it have been offered when he told someone close to the administration he was thinking about running and had not officialy announced? Or, could he just be making the whole thing up? Or, could the administration have offered him a job because he announced? Or, could the administration offered him a job and, coincidintally, he announced he was running and someone in the administration said "Well, if you take this post, you will have to give up running for Senate."?



Life in the wall is a drag.
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8711 posts, RR: 24
Reply 24, posted (3 years 11 months 17 hours ago) and read 1907 times:

Quoting seb146 (Reply 23):
Again: Back in February. All he has said out of all the interviews is "The Obama administraion offered me a job." That's it

Stop the BS. He was asked, point blank, "Were you ever offered a federal job to get out of this race?". He answered "Yes". That is the federal crime right there.

Your questions about which job was offered and the exact date are immaterial, but considering Sestak is a sitting congressman, the job would be Cabinet-level or maybe just below that, and timing was obviously pretty recent.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
25 mayor : Or could the administration have just screwed up and offered him the job to get out of the race? Is there just that possibility in this Chicago polit
26 EA772LR : Ugh, ugh, no way. Not with Obama. He's brought a new level of government transparency...it's called opaque, or maybe obtuse?
27 seb146 : Or that. There are any number of possiblities to this story since no one is saying anything about it. I know there is a lot of hatred toward anyone o
28 bjorn14 : It depends how they made the job offer. "The President would be honored if you would serve as his Sec. of Navy" or "Get out of the PA race and will g
29 Post contains links dxing : Well then that hatred must also be harbored inside Dick Durbin, that hard core neoconservative Senator from Illinois! http://politicalticker.blogs.cn
30 mayor : And sometimes they are.
31 seb146 : No one on the right believes anyone on the left has any class. Like clearing brush and swilling cheap beer is the only way to show class. Nope. The c
32 Dreadnought : Yes, which is why we want it investigated. The scenario you propose would also be illegal. You forget that not only did Sestak make the claim, but no
33 dxing : And if you had bothered to read the entire article you would have read in the last paragraph (bold is mine): Durbin said the White House can provide
34 mayor : You've left out one important detail, again. When asked a direct question on whether he had been offered the job in return for dropping out of the pr
35 seb146 : And you left out one important detail again: He said *in February* he was offered a job at some point before February. No one is questioning whether
36 bjorn14 : At his first press conference in 308 days while claiming credit for the plugged Gulf leak, Obama was asked about Sestak and he replied "We'll get back
37 Dreadnought : Grasping at straws, aren't you. He has been repeatedly asked whether he was offered a job IF HE DROPPED THE RACE. That means it had to be after Augus
38 okie : I have caught a replay of that when questioned about the job offer to Admiral Sestak. I was waiting on the "I am not a crook" There obviously are pro
39 seb146 : I have read the links over and over and over and over and over and have yet to see anywhere where Sestak says "the administration offered me a job if
40 Dreadnought : Jeezus H fricken... Direct answer to a direct question.
41 seb146 : And this points to Obama...... how? He says one time he was offered a federal job to drop out of the race. Funny how nothing else, NOT ONE WORD, has
42 mayor : You are. Apparently, it's easier to divert attention away from this by referencing the previous administration than to admit that this administration
43 bjorn14 : I think Sestak just wanted to tell the peeps that the Obama Regime saw him as a threat and could easily beat Specter (which he did). Not thinking tha
44 Dreadnought : That does not make sense. If Sestak made it all up, then the administration would have denied the conversation ever happened.
45 seb146 : Oh, for the love of.... Look, even I have said that anything (including breaking the law) could have happened. It has nothing at all to do with diver
46 AGM100 : = Billy Clinton .... what perfect cover for the legal council I have to give it to em ... they are creative.
47 Post contains links and images fxramper : Breaking on AP and NBC News. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37381922/ns/politics-white_house/ Bill Clinton was the White House contact that approached S
48 DL021 : so now that it's come out that President Clinton, at Emmanuels request, on behalf of President Obama, approached Sestak, are you less solid on your c
49 mayor : Just as you are speculating. BTW, all of us that are speculating on this are not all, necessarily, "right-wing", as you state. For some reason, you a
50 Post contains links N328KF : The Wall Street Journal corroborated this: http://on.wsj.com/adpZdI
51 bjorn14 : I don't think he made it up. He was just trying to make himself look good in front of the Dem peeps and that Obama had offered him a job because he w
52 bjorn14 : The Washington Post is also confirming the Clinton story too. “Whoever solicits or receives … anything of value, in consideration of the promise o
53 Dreadnought : Doesn't have to be a paid position. Let's see where this ends up.
54 Ken777 : Well, let's build some new prisons for lobbyists and legislatures, as well as staff. Or are campaign contributions exempted? And senior military offi
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
GM To Offer 60-day Money Back Offer On Cars. posted Fri Sep 11 2009 06:20:28 by FXramper
I Would Like To Offer You All A Fruit Pastille posted Thu Dec 25 2008 13:07:17 by Gofly
Hillary Clinton To Accept Secretary Of State Offer posted Mon Nov 17 2008 16:29:29 by Blrsea
Damascus Meeting With Peace-offer To Israel.. posted Thu Sep 4 2008 08:51:50 by Beaucaire
Ford Will Offer Limited Mustang "Bullitt" Car posted Fri Nov 9 2007 14:26:44 by PSA53
Maine School To Offer Birth Control To Grades 6-8 posted Thu Oct 18 2007 20:11:06 by KFLLCFII
Torre Rejects Yankees' Offer posted Thu Oct 18 2007 13:29:21 by AAce24
Real Estate: How Much Below Ask To Offer? posted Sat Jul 21 2007 00:54:04 by Lincoln
Placed An Offer On My First House! posted Sun Jun 24 2007 05:54:02 by AA787823
We Got An Offer, But.... posted Tue Apr 3 2007 13:07:43 by Disruptivehair