Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Senate Passes Financial Reform  
User currently offlinepropilot83 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 604 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1519 times:

The US Senate has passed Financial Reform today 07-15-10 in Congress. What a glad thing to hear thank God. No more tricks or traps from Wall Street to Main Street of America. So we have Health Care Reform passed, Financial Reform passed, the House has passed a Climate Energy Bill that is currently still pending in the Senate, and Immigration Reform will be the toughest of all I believe   

http://www.cnn.com/2010/BUSINESS/07/.../us.financial.reform.ft/index.html

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlinefr8mech From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 5490 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (4 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1500 times:

Oh joy. The industry that is second only to healthcare in regulation will get more regulation.

I feel giddy all over.

So, more and more of the private sector is falling under government control. This is something to be happy about?

Just a mere 109 days. Though it scares the crap out of me as to what this lame duck congress will try to do in November and December.



When seconds count...the police are minutes away.
User currently offlinethegreatRDU From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2310 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (4 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1494 times:

Too much red tape....
It's sad now....poll shows Obama approval ratings 44%..congress under 20%...
Americans are suffering from "reform fatigue"

Quoting propilot83 (Thread starter):
What a glad thing to hear thank God. No more tricks or traps from Wall Street to Main Street of America. So we have Health Care Reform passed, Financial Reform passed, the House has passed a Climate Energy Bill that is currently still pending in the Senate

You love big government don't you?



Our Returning Champion
User currently offlinecasinterest From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4671 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (4 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1482 times:

Quoting fr8mech (Reply 1):
So, more and more of the private sector is falling under government control. This is something to be happy about?

Ubnfortunately in this case. Yes.
http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-bud...110085/what-financial-reform-means

This bill addresses a lot of the problems that led to the disaster in the last two years.

1. Mortgage Reform: No More "Liar Loans' or loans without documentation. You would think this would have been an easy one for most lenders to follow, but since brokers kept getting paid to sell mortgages, they stopped caring about whether consumers could pay for them or not. Now Authentic documentation is required . You may argue that this is unnecessary regulation, but as we are learning about now, it is not unnecessary.

The down side. It will cause housing prices to keep going down for awhile. Not pretty, but that is what we get in this free trade econony of globalization where we can't hold Manufacturing jobs.


2. Prepayment Penalties will no longer be allowed.

I like this one. No one should have to pay a penalty for being able to pay off a debt sooner than required. Banks can use the added capital to go make more loans so they shouldn't profit off it both ways.

3. Debt Card Interchange Fees.

This could have been left out for all I care. I say let the free market decide. However mastercard and visa have a pretty heavy duopoly on this, so I can see this being needed to hold down the charges.

4. An All-Powerful Consumer Watchdog

This is the part of the bill that troubles me. I see the need for it with payday loans and all, but I do think this is a waste of spending.

5. Bank Bailouts. This language is definately needed. We need to know what and where the governemnt will step in. It also makes the lines pretty clear as to what will occur if they do step in.


The investor portions of the bill are pork and will protect no one that doesn't investigate items for themselves.


All in all we need thsi bill. Parts of it .. no. But sadly we need most of it.



Older than I just was ,and younger than I will soo be.
User currently offlinepropilot83 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 604 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (4 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1435 times:

Yes baby reform after reform, we need laws or else these country would be headed straight into the sewer. Yes we need big government, dont you just like the world "Federal"? I love it, I mean I moved from an old sticking as* 3 bedroom apartment paying $1,300 after my father passed away in 2006 and we moved into a 3 bedroom nice apartment complex in a rich community under HUD (Housing and Urban Development) Section 3 low income. They only charge 30% of your gross income for rent, so I only pay $391 a month right now. If you stop working or loose your job, then your rent is $0  Wow! thats right, how cool is that   I mean its not a good thing to loose or job or quit working, I am just saying that if you get fired or laid off or something, big government helps out big time. When a repair or work order is needed, onsite maintenance technicans repair or replace whatever needs to be fixed in the apartment (plumbing, electrical, HVAC, etc. etc.) When I lived in my other apartment that wasnt under HUD, there were no safety inspections, no repairs for years, my A/C never worked and was never repaired by the damn greedy owner of those apartment complexes and the manager of those apartments couldnt do anything.

Quoting casinterest (Reply 3):
This bill addresses a lot of the problems that led to the disaster in the last two years.

1. Mortgage Reform: No More "Liar Loans' or loans without documentation. You would think this would have been an easy one for most lenders to follow, but since brokers kept getting paid to sell mortgages, they stopped caring about whether consumers could pay for them or not. Now Authentic documentation is required . You may argue that this is unnecessary regulation, but as we are learning about now, it is not unnecessary.

The down side. It will cause housing prices to keep going down for awhile. Not pretty, but that is what we get in this free trade econony of globalization where we can't hold Manufacturing jobs.


2. Prepayment Penalties will no longer be allowed.

I like this one. No one should have to pay a penalty for being able to pay off a debt sooner than required. Banks can use the added capital to go make more loans so they shouldn't profit off it both ways.

3. Debt Card Interchange Fees.

This could have been left out for all I care. I say let the free market decide. However mastercard and visa have a pretty heavy duopoly on this, so I can see this being needed to hold down the charges.

4. An All-Powerful Consumer Watchdog

This is the part of the bill that troubles me. I see the need for it with payday loans and all, but I do think this is a waste of spending.

5. Bank Bailouts. This language is definately needed. We need to know what and where the governemnt will step in. It also makes the lines pretty clear as to what will occur if they do step in.


Thats right baby, reform after reform, laws after laws.
  


User currently onlinefr8mech From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 5490 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (4 years 3 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1388 times:

Quoting propilot83 (Reply 4):

I am absolutely astounded by this line of thought. Astounded. There are so many counter-points to be made, but would be well off topic that I will just say...astounded.

Quoting casinterest (Reply 3):

cas, this whole thing can be regulated by the market, if the government and other special interest groups allow the market to work.

For one, I believe the Community Reivestment Act shoulld be repealed before this monstrosity is rolled out. The act actually encouraged lenders to lend to borrowers that may not have been able to repay, among its other provisions.

I'm sorry, I just can't endorse bigger government in area that it already has a massive presence. To me, this recession was gaoing to happen (normal business cycle) but was much steeper and dangerous because of government regulation and interference, not the lack of it.



When seconds count...the police are minutes away.
User currently offlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 2923 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 3 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1385 times:

Quoting fr8mech (Reply 1):
Oh joy. The industry that is second only to healthcare in regulation will get more regulation.

They brought it on themselves

Quoting fr8mech (Reply 1):
So, more and more of the private sector is falling under government control. This is something to be happy about?

Yes and that dosen't make us socialists as some righties claimed



short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8325 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (4 years 3 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1375 times:

Quoting fr8mech (Reply 1):
Oh joy. The industry that is second only to healthcare in regulation will get more regulation.

Are you in favor of abolishing government oversight of health care? Maybe we can start with the taxpayers money wasted on testing medical professionals to see if they should be given a license. Hell, get rid of the license alltogether - it's a socialist plot!

And requiring drug companies to go through rigorous testing for new drugs? All that does is delay entry into the market, robbing shareholders of the profits they deserve.

And all of this socialist mamby-pamby of taking care of people who can't afford care. Total waste of the taxpayer's money. Just let them die fast so the socialist in the White House won't need to steal as much of our hard earned money.

Same for other industries, like commercial air travel. We can cut half of the costs of an airline if we get rid of all that overpriced regulation.

And, let's face it. The financial sector is supposed to make really, really big profits from the lower class. Why should they be regulated? It's just inefficient and we're supposed to be a free society.


User currently onlinefr8mech From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 5490 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (4 years 3 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1361 times:

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 7):
Are you in favor of abolishing government oversight of health care?

That's a straw man argument and you know it. No where have I said that government should not regulate healthcare or the fianancial sector or other areas of the economy, where necessary. What I am saying is that over-regulation by any government is inefficient and causes more problems than it solves.

Is some regulation necessary? Yes, but there is a point of diminishing returns where regulation becomes burdensome and counter-productive.

Quoting alberchico (Reply 6):
They brought it on themselves

No, it was thrust upon them by the feel-gooders around the country who demanded that the banks abandon their good sense and lend to every Tom, Dick and Harry that walked through the door. The causes of this recession are complex and diverse, but a main component was the housing crisis, and that was thrust upon the banks by the proponents of the CRA and other feel good entities.

Oh, by the way, foes this monstrosity of legislation address Freddie and Fannie?


Quoting alberchico (Reply 6):
Yes and that dosen't make us socialists as some righties claimed

Closer and closer. We're not Europe or Canada, but, we're getting there.

107 days to go.



When seconds count...the police are minutes away.
User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8325 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (4 years 3 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1360 times:

Quoting fr8mech (Reply 8):
That's a straw man argument and you know it.

It doesn't matter if it's medicine or the financial sector - there will always be a group that will develop new scams, or ways to rip off patients or the public. They open a hole and we close it with new regulations - and hopefully prison sentences.

And here is the newest scam in medicine"

Insurers Push Plans Limiting Patient Choice of Doctors

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/business/18choice.html?hp

Notice it's the insurance companies, not the government, playing the game. Sort of like the HMO rip-offs of the 90s.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Financial Reform Bill - Have You Read It? posted Thu Apr 15 2010 23:54:23 by MoltenRock
Senate Passes $10 Billion Jobless Benefits posted Tue Mar 2 2010 22:30:50 by ProPilot83
President Obama's New Financial Reform To Protect posted Sat Jun 20 2009 11:18:13 by Propilot83
Senate Votes For Health Reform Debate posted Sat Nov 21 2009 20:50:26 by Ken777
Obama's Speech On Financial Regulatory Reform posted Mon Sep 14 2009 23:34:28 by Propilot83
Dick Cheney Endorses Rubio In Florida Senate Race posted Thu Apr 22 2010 09:44:10 by Ken777
Will The Republicans Block Finance Reform? posted Fri Apr 16 2010 12:10:51 by Ken777
Health Care Reform Passed (Part 3) posted Sun Mar 28 2010 04:16:25 by SA7700
GOP Shuts Down Senate Hearings! posted Wed Mar 24 2010 18:49:28 by stasisLAX
Judicial Nominee Goodwin Liu Faces The Senate Soon posted Wed Mar 24 2010 15:09:52 by AirStairs