Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Limbaugh's Comments Toward Michelle Obama  
User currently offlinefuturepilot16 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2035 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2940 times:

Really gotta like this guy. What does Michelle Obama's vacation have to do with slavery and the redistribution of wealth? Limbaugh's got the answer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qztS34TI-30


"The brave don't live forever, but the cautious don't live at all."
50 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAirstud From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2660 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2914 times:

The media - liberal or conservative - made too big a damned deal about one trip to Spain.

Rush Limbaugh is here making too big a deal out of the media's reaction, or non-reaction - however he sees it.

And here's Cenk Uygur making too big a deal out of the nonsensical crap that Limbaugh spat out in this one instance.

Spitting out nonsensical crap is all that Limbaugh ever does.

Trolling the net and other media for whatever nonsensical crap he can find from conservatism's fringe elements, then presenting it on Young Turks as though it's all that any conservative in the country has to say, is all that Cenk Uygur ever does.

Substance, please?



Pancakes are delicious.
User currently onlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8135 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2893 times:

Quoting Airstud (Reply 1):
Trolling the net and other media for whatever nonsensical crap he can find from conservatism's fringe elements, then presenting it on Young Turks as though it's all that any conservative in the country has to say, is all that Cenk Uygur ever does.

That's all these idiots know how to do - and they have absolutely no shame or sense of responsibility about it. Media talking heads are out to make a buck - and Limbaugh has by far been the most successful. All they need to do is stir the pot and throw shit to the wind and they just get richer - without any regard to the consequences for public discourse. They more than likely revel in the fact that they have had so much influence on what people are saying and thinking. Nothing would make me happier than to see popular movements on both sides of the political spectrum put these attention whores out of business.

Of course that's about as likely as seeing epaulets on a pig the next time I board an airliner...



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5249 posts, RR: 25
Reply 3, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2852 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 2):
Nothing would make me happier than to see popular movements on both sides of the political spectrum put these attention whores out of business.

A-freaking-men!!! People need to give these guys (all of them, left or right) the boot. Political discourse in this Country is the worst it has been in recent memory, and these men and women share a great deal of the blame for that. People need to start thinking for themselves again, and stop listening to and parroting everything that this talking heads say.



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlinecpd From Australia, joined Jun 2008, 4879 posts, RR: 38
Reply 4, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2838 times:

Mr Limbaugh reminds me of this guy:

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-electi...down-the-front-20100810-11ufj.html

Both of them seem to pride themselves on ever more outrageous and outlandish comments.

I've had enough of the extreme fringe troublemakers like these. Bring on truth in media reporting laws - where it is a criminal offence to publish unsubstantiated, or untruthful claims.


User currently onlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8135 posts, RR: 26
Reply 5, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2804 times:

Quoting cpd (Reply 4):

I've had enough of the extreme fringe troublemakers like these. Bring on truth in media reporting laws - where it is a criminal offence to publish unsubstantiated, or untruthful claims.

We already have laws against libel and slander - but they don't go as far as your suggestion. That would never fly in the states - it's too much of a limitation on free speech. I for one would never support that. The proper way to rid the airwaves of these people is to shout them down until nobody wants to help them make their megabucks by giving them ratings anymore.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlinedxing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 2758 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 2):
Nothing would make me happier than to see popular movements on both sides of the political spectrum put these attention whores out of business.

Good luck with that. They've always been around. From the late 80's to now it's been Limbaugh. Prior to that it was cross fire on CNN. In the 70's it was mostly local bomb throwers like Gary Dee at WHK in Cleveland and Alan Berg out in Denver who paid for his comments with his life. Back into the 60's and 50's when radio stations were still syndicated you had the Drew Pearsons of the world. So they've been there in one form or another for decades. Since they garner ratings the advertisers aren't going anywhere any time soon. Witness Glen Beck. Wasn't too long ago everyone here was predicitng his downfall because one sponsor had left. That spot was almost instantaneously filled and there was probably a bidding war for the slot.

Quoting OA412 (Reply 3):
People need to start thinking for themselves again, and stop listening to and parroting everything that this talking heads say.

They've been listening and reading to those people for quite awhile. Like it or not they aren't going away anytime soon, especialy with the advent of the internet.


User currently offlineKFLLCFII From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3301 posts, RR: 30
Reply 7, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2710 times:

Quote:
futurepilot16

Joke's on you.



"About the only way to look at it, just a pity you are not POTUS KFLLCFII, seems as if we would all be better off."
User currently offlineSlider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6799 posts, RR: 34
Reply 8, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2598 times:

Quoting OA412 (Reply 3):
Political discourse in this Country is the worst it has been in recent memory, and these men and women share a great deal of the blame for that.

So the observers of the behavior are to blame for the actions of a First Lady who is tone deaf?

With 10% unemployment, no signs of economic recovery, the total economy being taken over by the government, she goes across the pond to vacation like a queen? Largely funded by taxpayers?

Hey, I’m all for presidents to vacation. None of us can comprehend the stress they endure, no matter the party designation, but a family junket like this (with TWO more planned before school starts for their daughters) is just in terribly poor taste. It think it’s especially haughty to talk about supporting the Gulf Coast and then not bother to vacation there, or in the States. Once again, the brazenness of the ruling class on display for all to see. Even the Europeans are catching on.


User currently onlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8135 posts, RR: 26
Reply 9, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2562 times:

Quoting Slider (Reply 8):
None of us can comprehend the stress they endure, no matter the party designation, but a family junket like this (with TWO more planned before school starts for their daughters) is just in terribly poor taste. It think it’s especially haughty to talk about supporting the Gulf Coast and then not bother to vacation there, or in the States. Once again, the brazenness of the ruling class on display for all to see.

This complaining is totally out of place. I don't see you complaining about what Lloyd Blankfein did with his $60m bonuses after Goldman walked away with TARP money. Whether you like them or not, the Obamas have millions in royalties coming in that they made of their own accord. Not millions they made from siphoning off whatever lobbyists were around like the two morons in the House currently facing ethics charges. As we have seen since the days of the robber barons, those with millions in the bank live however they please and never answer to us for it...and why should they care, really? The only reason anyone's even talking about this is because she's the First Lady - but when you strip that away, she's no different than any other millionairess.

As I previously stated in another thread, I agree that if she's going to drop this kind of coin on a vacation, it shouldn't be overseas. But it is what it is...and it's her money and her poor judgment. Just like Blankfein and his endless jaunts to the Caribbean on post-crash bonuses. She couldn't turn away the USAF transportation even if they wanted to.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlinedxing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2552 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 9):
Whether you like them or not, the Obamas have millions in royalties coming in that they made of their own accord.

Then for a purely personal trip like this let her foot the bill for the aircraft. If' they are worth millions and the trip is so important to her, 187K should be worth it.

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 9):
She couldn't turn away the USAF transportation even if they wanted to.

Then let her travel on the AMC lift to Naval Station Rota. Or use a smaller plane and pay for it herself. I just can't countance public figures using public funds for purely personal needs.


User currently offlinemt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6582 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2544 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

[/quote]

Quoting dxing (Reply 10):
Then for a purely personal trip like this let her foot the bill for the aircraft.
Quoting dxing (Reply 10):
Then let her travel on the AMC lift to Naval Station Rota. Or use a smaller plane and pay for it herself. I just can't countance public figures using public funds for purely personal need

How many times did Laura Bush did this?



Step into my office, baby
User currently offlinedxing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2544 times:

Quoting mt99 (Reply 11):
How many times did Laura Bush did this?

Evidently not many if any at all since the press would have made a huge deal about her doing it. But feel free to do the research and return with some facts.

[Edited 2010-08-10 12:35:15]

User currently offlinemt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6582 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2537 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting dxing (Reply 12):
Evidently not many if any at all since the press would have made a huge deal about her doing it. But feel free to do the research and return with some facts.

So you were OK with Laura Bush using Presidential planes?

Quoting dxing (Reply 12):

Evidently not many if any at all since the press would have made a huge deal about her doing it

Why would they?



Step into my office, baby
User currently onlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8135 posts, RR: 26
Reply 14, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2518 times:

Quoting dxing (Reply 10):
If' they are worth millions and the trip is so important to her, 187K should be worth it.

When has any President or their family members paid the government for use of 89th AW services? There's absolutely no precedent for that.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineUH60FtRucker From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2499 times:

Quoting futurepilot16 (Thread starter):

The guy has like what, a million listeners?

When you post this junk, all you're doing is giving him more attention. I guarantee you that 95% of the people on this forum would have never known what he said, had you not given him the pleasure of more airtime.

"Don't Feed The Trolls" goes for idiots like him, also. Ignore him and he'll eventually just go away.


User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5249 posts, RR: 25
Reply 16, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2456 times:

Quoting Slider (Reply 8):
So the observers of the behavior are to blame for the actions of a First Lady who is tone deaf?

Yeah that's exactly what I said.  . The fact of the matter is that political discourse in this country is in the toilet. The "observers" as you call them are a huge part of the problem. They don't observe and report objectively, they misconstrue, tell half-truths, and fan the flames of anger, all in the interest of lining their own pockets.



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19603 posts, RR: 58
Reply 17, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2434 times:

Quoting futurepilot16 (Thread starter):
Really gotta like this guy.

Who? The man who said that drug abusers should be "sent up the river"? The man who repeatedly trashed the ACLU and then enjoyed their amicus brief in the same case where he was in court for drug abuse? Sorry, I have no respect for him or his opinions. Mr. Limbaugh is a buffoon and his views (and those who take them seriously) are not to be taken seriously.


User currently offlinedxing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (4 years 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2377 times:

Quoting mt99 (Reply 13):
So you were OK with Laura Bush using Presidential planes?

I didn't say that. I said show that she did. That part is up to you since you are making the accusation that she might have.

Quoting mt99 (Reply 13):
Why would they?

Probably because her last name is Bush.

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 14):
When has any President or their family members paid the government for use of 89th AW services? There's absolutely no precedent for that.

You are the one that says she is worth millions. If that is true then she can afford to pay for her own transportation. I'll ask again, where do we start saving? If it isn't going to be with the big programs then where? I have a large problem with politicians using military transport for their own personal needs. You have yet to answer why an AMC lift wouldn't be good enough for her.


User currently onlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8135 posts, RR: 26
Reply 19, posted (4 years 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2365 times:

Quoting dxing (Reply 18):
You are the one that says she is worth millions. If that is true then she can afford to pay for her own transportation. I'll ask again, where do we start saving? If it isn't going to be with the big programs then where? I have a large problem with politicians using military transport for their own personal needs. You have yet to answer why an AMC lift wouldn't be good enough for her.

The last few Presidents have been worth millions as well. Why didn't they pay??

I don't know the answer to your question other than the 89 AW has traditionally provided transportation for the President and First Lady regardless of the nature of their travel.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlinedxing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (4 years 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2352 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 19):
The last few Presidents have been worth millions as well. Why didn't they pay??

That's a good question and one I've always asked. Same goes for the Speaker or any politician going on a "fact finding" junket. If it can't be fully justified they ought to be flying commercial. In this case if she wanted to go to Spain then the AMC lift was available. At least if she stays in the U.S. there can be some justification for it in that ordinary citizens get to meet the First Lady. But a trip outside the U.S., to meet up with friends? That's just not right. Part of our countries long history includes not treating the leaders as if they were royalty, this smacks of royal treatment.


User currently offlineAKviator From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 120 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (4 years 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2344 times:

Rush Limbaugh is not to be taken seriously. Not even a little bit. Ever. He was born into wealth, and has done nothing his entire life except talk on the radio. He dropped out of Southeast Missouri State University after like a year after flunking just about everything. I punched his name to Wikipedia and found the following:


Limbaugh is critical of feminism, saying that "Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society."

Limbaugh has asserted that African-Americans, in contrast with other minority groups, are "left behind" socially because they have been systematically trained from a young age to hate America through a widespread movement headed by figures such as Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, and Barack and Michelle Obama.

For a time, Dionne Warwick's song "I Know I'll Never Love This Way Again" preceded reports about people with AIDS. These later became "condom updates" preceded by Fifth Dimension's song, "Up, Up and Away (in My Beautiful Balloon).

"For two weeks in 1989, on his Sacramento radio show, Limbaugh performed "caller abortions" where he would end a call suddenly to the sounds of a vacuum cleaner and a scream. He would then deny that he had "hung up" on the caller, which he had promised not to do. Limbaugh claims that he used this gag to illustrate "the tragedy of abortion" as well as to highlight the question of whether abortion constitutes murder.

During the Clinton administration, while filming his television program, Limbaugh referred to media coverage of Socks, the Clintons' cat. He then stated, "But did you know there is also a White House dog?" and a picture of Chelsea Clinton was shown. When questioned about it, Limbaugh claimed that it was an accident and that without his permission some technician had put up the picture of Chelsea.

On October 3, 2003 the National Enquirer reported that Limbaugh was being investigated for illegally obtaining the prescription drugs oxycodone and hydrocodone. Other news outlets quickly confirmed the investigation. He admitted to listeners on his radio show on October 10 that he was addicted to prescription painkillers and stated that he would enter inpatient treatment for 30 days, immediately after the broadcast. Limbaugh stated his addiction to painkillers resulted from several years of severe back pain heightened by a botched surgery intended to correct those problems.

Before his addiction became known, Limbaugh had condemned illegal drug use on his television program, stating that "Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. ... And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up."


But then again- Wikipedia is probably just part of the liberal "drive-by media".


User currently offlineslider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6799 posts, RR: 34
Reply 22, posted (4 years 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2265 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 9):
This complaining is totally out of place. I don't see you complaining about what Lloyd Blankfein did with his $60m bonuses after Goldman walked away with TARP money.

Dude, clearly you haven't been paying attention. I've been screaming about ALL government corruption, bailouts, slush funding, etc. You know, there ‘s a very sad and intellectually disingenuous tool used with great frequency on this board, especially of late.

It’s the retort to anything by saying “But you didn’t complain when ABC did XYZ” in a means of refuting or invalidating the original argument. And it’s total bullshit.

I am a constitutional conservative who rages against government fraud, waste and the omnipotent reach of Federal tentacles into every orifice of our lives (like that imagery? Haha). But if I were to enumerate each and every time that happens, I’d be living on this board and get nothing else done and STILL never scratch the surface of how big a problem it truly is.

But in this case, the utter hubris and taxpayer waste of Queen Michelle’s vacation is flabbergasting. I derided Jorge Bush for being a drunken sailor spendocrat, a man who refused to protect our borders, who grew government under the wholly specious construct of ‘compassionate conservatism’ and I took after him pretty hard and pretty damn frequently. But it’s the height of hypocrisy to see liberals who nuked Bush for going to Crawford with some frequency VS the vacationing and golfing Obamas heading to far-flung locations. The Queen may have paid for her room and dresses she bought, but not the 60+ rooms at a 5 star hotel, certainly not the massive delegation’s costs, nor the transportation and all that crap. And it speaks to the tone deaf out of touch attitude the Obamas really have to America. Visit the Gulf, don’t visit Vegas. We’re going to Spain.

Quoting OA412 (Reply 16):
The fact of the matter is that political discourse in this country is in the toilet. The "observers" as you call them are a huge part of the problem. They don't observe and report objectively, they misconstrue, tell half-truths, and fan the flames of anger, all in the interest of lining their own pockets.

If you want to talk about people lining their pockets, go to DC.They’re doing it whilst breaking the law, engaging in blackmail, bribery, payoffs right in front of our very noses, wallowing at the trough of taxpayer money, slushing around in lobbyist and campaign funds, twisting law to their advantage, and breaking the constitution on a near daily basis.

Limbaugh and any other ‘observer’ is simply exercising their free speech and not breaking any laws to do it. Don’t like him? Turn off your radio. You have a choice.

You do not, however, have as much voice, much less say, with the runaway rampant federal leviathan, corrupt and rotting, violating the will of the people, betraying their oaths.


User currently offlinemt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6582 posts, RR: 6
Reply 23, posted (4 years 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2251 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting slider (Reply 22):
It’s the retort to anything by saying “But you didn’t complain when ABC did XYZ” in a means of refuting or invalidating the original argument. And it’s total bullshit.

I don't think it invalidates the argument at all. It just exposes hypocrisy, and exposes a different agenda than the original argument.



Step into my office, baby
User currently offlineslider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6799 posts, RR: 34
Reply 24, posted (4 years 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2241 times:

Quoting mt99 (Reply 23):
I don't think it invalidates the argument at all. It just exposes hypocrisy, and exposes a different agenda than the original argument.

Not necessarily hypocrisy, just a lack of time sometimes!!  


25 Post contains images mt99 : Didn't have the time in 8 Years.. You sure are a busy boy
26 Aaron747 : I started a couple threads on the Goldman CEO and how he thinks he's "doing God's work" by erasing billions of perfectly good dollars overnight and t
27 dxing : First you have to have facts to back up your argument to even begin to validate it. We know the First Lady went to Spain on a purely personal tirp an
28 mt99 : When she went down to Crawford, did she take a military cargo plane?
29 dxing : Did she go by herself or was she accompanying her husband? If I recall she didn't travel all that much outside of official business. If they were tra
30 Aaron747 : It still would have been irrelevant in that case too as the 89 AW states plainly that they provide transportation for the First Lady.
31 mt99 : So all you need is proof that she (or any her daughters) use the services of the 89 AW just one time to go to Crawford by themselves? What will you d
32 dxing : Big deal. Just because they say that has no real meaning. The DOD could change their mission tomorrow and they would have not a single thing to say a
33 mt99 : All i'm saying is that i find it hard to believe that Laura Bush did not set foot inside a "government" transport (be it a plane, a car, a motorcycle
34 Aaron747 : I don't see how really when their mission has been relatively unchanged in the last three decades.
35 PSA53 : I heard his statements.Those comments were just uncalled for.
36 Post contains links mt99 : Discuss away.. No mention of Military Cargo Flights per your suggestions... http://www.correntewire.com/separate_vacations_north_and_south http://www
37 nyc2theworld : So lets say Ms. Obama did fly a military flight, with a raise of hands, who here would be complaining that she and her staff, daughters and SS agents
38 Post contains images bjorn14 : Well we did have Swine Flu awhile back. The Supreme Court settled along time ago that Public Officials cannot sue for libel or slander. According to
39 dxing : No mention of how she got there, save a train, period. Despite that I'll repeat, for the third time, what I've already said, if she used public trans
40 ltbewr : I have no problem with critizism of politicans and governemnt policies, that is fully protected by our Freedom of Speech parts of our Constitution and
41 Post contains links mt99 : Know what will? Go back to your original thread First Lady's Vacation In Spain (by dxing Aug 6 2010 in Non Aviation)#113 And awknoldege that Laura Bu
42 nyc2theworld : And what does your airline have to do with this? The "big wigs" at your airline do not have to deal with anywhere near the logistics of security a fi
43 dxing : I have already said, this is the fourth time now, that no first lady, or any public official, save the President himself for which a travel budget ex
44 nyc2theworld : I'm saying that those in the 89th go through a more thorough background process. In fact, all the people in support roles of the Office of the Presid
45 windy95 : How much more secure can you feel with a TSA inspected Plane? But as we see with this administration what is good enough for us commoners may well no
46 vio : Rush Limbaugh is an IDIOT... I don't even know why people still listen to this racist, extremist redneck. The America and Americans we look up to are
47 bjorn14 : And how do you know this? Is this hearsay since you live in Canada? Have you ever listened to him for more than thirty seconds? Sounds like you are j
48 Post contains images soon7x7 : Quite frankly, Americans have no one to voice their interests anymore...while the ratings moguls (talk show entertainers) talk about this administrat
49 Post contains images vio : That's quite a statement to make, considering you don't even know me. I did listen to him, to Glenn Beck and other colorful characters that need no m
50 soon7x7 : I have had the pleasure of travelling to Europe many times for business, Wales, Germany, Austria, Norway, Switzerland. The one concept that I come ba
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
$30,000 Ring For Michelle Obama? posted Tue Dec 2 2008 09:00:00 by JakeOrion
Michelle Obama In Boulder, Colorado Today posted Wed Oct 1 2008 09:57:46 by AirframeAS
Does Michelle Obama Try To Follow Hillary Clinton? posted Tue Aug 26 2008 15:37:44 by JetBlueGuy2006
Michelle Obama Thesis Was On Racial Divide posted Fri Feb 22 2008 23:31:49 by KC135TopBoom
Rush Limbaugh: I Hope Obama Fails posted Sun Jan 25 2009 12:20:24 by Dougloid
Chavez Says No To New Obama Ambassador. posted Sun Aug 8 2010 19:54:21 by fxramper
25% Of Americans Still Believe Obama Foreign-born? posted Sun Aug 8 2010 00:04:14 by Aaron747
Hearing Set For Soldier In Obama Birth Certificate posted Fri Aug 6 2010 08:17:32 by Ken777
Happy Birthday Obama! posted Wed Aug 4 2010 08:21:58 by fxramper
Obama's HealthCare.gov Website posted Wed Jul 28 2010 12:15:27 by propilot83