Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LCD TV Advice  
User currently offlinewashingtonian From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1736 times:

I'm replacing a 6 year old TV. My choices are a Samsung 19 inch or a Toshiba 19 inch that has a built-in DVD player. The Samsung TV looks better and sleeker, but I'd have to buy a separate blu-ray player so I'm not sure it's worth it. Any thoughts on Toshiba TVs with internal DVD players?

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinecontrails15 From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1181 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1685 times:

Blu ray players are so inexpensive now. Most people don't need the top of the line players as most of us first don't know what any of it does and second don't know how to use it. I've always had Samsung everything. I like the way they look and never had a problem with any of the TV's or dvd players.

I don't like internal DVD players only because something happens to the dvd player, well now your out a TV and vice versa. Those TV's are also more money and take longer to fix. So my advice is go with a Samsung TV and get a separate DVD player. Thats my opinion. One thing that good is your getting a LCD and not Plasma.



Giants football!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User currently offlineflyawa From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 201 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1681 times:

I bought a 19" LED TV to use as my PC monitor. It's nice to witch back and forth to TV when I want.

The very best LCD TVs these days are the ultra-thin LED-LCD TVs. My friend got a Samsung LED 46-Inch 1080p 240Hz HDTV. It has the full array backlighting versus being edge lit. See http://www.presentationtek.com/2010/...y-vs-edge-lit-led-lcd-comparison/.



Better than most, not as good as some.
User currently offlineAlias1024 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2753 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1680 times:

Quoting contrails15 (Reply 1):
I don't like internal DVD players only because something happens to the dvd player, well now your out a TV and vice versa.

Agreed. Unless you don't have the space for a separate blu ray, I'd avoid getting one built into the television.

Quoting contrails15 (Reply 1):
One thing that good is your getting a LCD and not Plasma.

Not much choice in that small of a screen size, but I'm curious as to why you say this?



It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems with just potatoes.
User currently offlinecontrails15 From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1181 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1677 times:

If space is a problem then built in DVD in the way to go. Thats the market there geared too. As far as plasma's go, they are very expensive to repair and have a limited life time. They burn out so If your someone who gonna keep theres for a long time, LCD is the way to go. I just don't like plasma technology. I have a LED 46 samsung 6000 series and it kicks the crap out of my friends 52" sony plasma. Plasma though you'll find is a lot cheaper then LCD and LED but that because people are staying away from the technology.

One thing is for sure...... This 3D technology is a waste of money right now. Keep words are "right now". The 3rd and 4th generation 3D TV's will be much better and far less expensive. $200 for the 3D glasses. LMAO give me a break.



Giants football!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User currently offlinewashingtonian From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (3 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1549 times:

Another question. I'm debating upgrading my basic standard cable box to an HD box. My question: Is there a difference in quality for non-HD channels with the HD box versus the standard box? RCN is my provider.

User currently offlineGo3Team From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3267 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (3 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1515 times:

Quoting washingtonian (Reply 5):
My question: Is there a difference in quality for non-HD channels with the HD box versus the standard box?

Non HD looks more crappy, but that has to do with the TV, not the cable box. I wouldn't even bother with HD on a 19". Then again, I have no use for a 19".



Yay Pudding!
User currently offlinewashingtonian From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (3 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1498 times:

Quoting Go3Team (Reply 6):
Non HD looks more crappy, but that has to do with the TV, not the cable box. I wouldn't even bother with HD on a 19". Then again, I have no use for a 19".

I think you misunderstood my question. Do non-HD channels look better on an HD box attached with an HDMI cable?


User currently onlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 2915 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

Quoting washingtonian (Reply 7):
Do non-HD channels look better on an HD box attached with an HDMI cable?

Yes, absolutely the image looks sharper and better but keep in mind that you now have to deal with those black bars on the sides which can be a pain.



short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlinewashingtonian From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (3 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1484 times:

Quoting alberchico (Reply 8):
Yes, absolutely the image looks sharper and better but keep in mind that you now have to deal with those black bars on the sides which can be a pain.

What do you mean? I am not familiar with HDTV really.


User currently onlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 2915 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1478 times:

This



most tv's or cable remotes have a zoom or aspect ratio button to eliminate these bars



short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5502 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (3 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1462 times:

Quoting contrails15 (Reply 1):
One thing that good is your getting a LCD and not Plasma.
Quoting Alias1024 (Reply 3):
Quoting contrails15 (Reply 1):
One thing that good is your getting a LCD and not Plasma.

Not much choice in that small of a screen size, but I'm curious as to why you say this?

Unless you are viewing HD plasma has a better image and even then plasma is still the overall best option unless you are concerned about power. If HD then LCD is great but you have to watch out for a good refresh rate or you will have pixelation and trails.

Quoting washingtonian (Reply 5):
Another question. I'm debating upgrading my basic standard cable box to an HD box. My question: Is there a difference in quality for non-HD channels with the HD box versus the standard box? RCN is my provider.

No. To my knowledge there is not upscaling in cable boxes.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlinewashingtonian From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (3 years 11 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1364 times:

Quoting tugger (Reply 11):
No. To my knowledge there is not upscaling in cable boxes.

Interesting. Well most of the channels I watch are available in HD anyway, so I think I'm gonna try the HD box for a few weeks and see if I like it better.


User currently offlinetype-rated From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 4976 posts, RR: 19
Reply 13, posted (3 years 11 months 21 hours ago) and read 1260 times:

For those who are looking at flat screens I heard a report the other day on the news that there is a huge surplus of LCD screens around. This should result in greatly reduced prices for this Christmas. The reporter indicated that you should be able to buy a 42" LCD for about $300.00 later this year.


Fly North Central Airlines..The route of the Northliners!
User currently offlineasuflyer05 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2371 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (3 years 11 months 14 hours ago) and read 1223 times:

I always hesitate to purchase all-in-one TVs because if the DVD player goes, now you need to replace the entire unit. I'd go for separate pieces. Not sure if you're a Costco member, but we picked up an LCD TV and DVD (non-Blue Ray) there about 2 months ago and got a great deal.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Buy A 52" 1080p LCD TV For $9.99 posted Wed Aug 12 2009 05:42:49 by GOCAPS16
HD LCD Tv - Views posted Mon Feb 19 2007 05:09:11 by HAWK21M
LCD Tv V/s Digital Flat Screen Tv - Life posted Sun Jan 8 2006 16:00:23 by HAWK21M
Plasma Tv V/s LCD Tv posted Sun Oct 23 2005 11:27:05 by HAWK21M
NYC LCD/Plasma TV Store, Where? posted Thu Jun 4 2009 04:44:39 by ReguPilot
Cracked Laptop LCD... Advice posted Mon Dec 22 2008 18:38:39 by Ebs757
Advice/Opinions: I'm Thinking Of Getting Sky TV posted Wed Oct 22 2008 14:42:57 by MWHCVT
TV Tech Problem: Advice Needed posted Thu Sep 7 2006 17:32:07 by RNOcommctr
Advice On A New TV posted Tue Apr 1 2003 23:46:39 by ADG
Is There A Dr. On A-Net? Medical Advice! posted Mon Sep 6 2010 11:40:02 by futurepilot16