Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Super Strict Drink Drive Law In BC  
User currently offlineYVRLTN From Canada, joined Oct 2006, 2548 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3143 times:

Further to my disgust at ICBC and their insurance rip off

Insurance Rip Off - Encourages Dishonesty? (by YVRLTN Oct 6 2010 in Non Aviation)

A new 0.05 blood alcohol concentration drink drive law has been passed in BC, along with new stricter speeding laws.

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/tou...ws+start+Monday/3547095/story.html

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ng-laws-in-country/article1548399/

Dont get me wrong, drink driving is not to be condoned, but for the average male at least 0.05 is not considered 'drink driving'.

The idiots will probably still be idiots, while the average law abiding citizen will now no longer be able to have a glass of wine when out for dinner or a beer with the boys after work. What is most disturbing is the police are now given on the spot powers to make judgements and hand out the penalties, whatever they see fit in their eyes. I respect the police force for what they do generally, but there are officers in the RCMP round here anyway who have a serious chip on the shoulder and no doubt this will only fuel their power trip.

So we have the provincial car insurance scheme raping people for a minor scratch and now we have persons ending up with criminal convictions because they had a date with their wife and had a glass of wine. As far as I can see, its all in the name of safety and appeasing MADD (in itself a comendable concept but has been taken too far), but is just another cash grab from a province who's citizens already may much more for everything than the rest of the nation. Way to go Gordon Campbell and BC...gotta pay for those games somehow eh!

As an aside, its easy top say 'get a cab' etc etc, but in this economy all many can afford is maybe a simple meal for a special occasion (maybe because they were screwed by ICBC.....) and adding cab fares makes it even harder. I know for a fact the local bars are really really hurting already. People will simply stay home rather than pay for the cab so both couples can have bottle of wine, or the idiots will still continue to be idiots.

The speeding laws I can understand more, 40 over in a 50 zone for example is probably dangerous. 130 on a highway though??? Not so sure...


Follow me on twitter for YVR movements @vernonYVR
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFly2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3128 times:

Quoting YVRLTN (Thread starter):

Dont get me wrong, drink driving is not to be condoned, but for the average male at least 0.05 is not considered 'drink driving'.

Says who? I've known plenty of guys who with just one or two glasses of wine get noticeably tipsy. And some girls more so. I'm not too sure a standard glass of wine will make you blow a .05 though. However, it has been proven that even sips of alcohol can affect how you drive.

Honestly though, I'm more worried about the retards that take 500mg or more of Tylenol/Bendaryl/Sudafed etc etc just because they have a slightly runny nose/headache/whatever, and then decide it's a good idea to drive. I bet those are way more dangerous drivers than those that had a glass of wine or two. And it's (technically) not illegal.

Quoting YVRLTN (Thread starter):
The speeding laws I can understand more, 40 over in a 50 zone for example is probably dangerous. 130 on a highway though??? Not so sure...

May want to specify that's in KmH   

[Edited 2010-10-08 20:57:51]

User currently offlineQuokka From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3123 times:

We have the same0.05 limit here in Western Australia. The Drug and Alcohol Authority has produced a Standard Drink measure of 10gm of pure alcohol. To stay within the limit they recommend that for men you consume no more than two standard drinks in the first hour and no more than one per hour after that. For women they recommend no more than one standard drink per hour.

Examples of standard drinks include:
  • 1 375ml glass of mid-strength beer (3.5% Alc/ Vol);
  • 30 ml nip of spirits like whiskey, rum, or brandy (40% Alc/ Vol); or
  • 100ml of wine (12% Alc/ Vol).

So it should still be possible to go out and have a meal and share a bottle of wine or have a couple of beers.


User currently offlinegreasespot From Canada, joined Apr 2004, 3086 posts, RR: 20
Reply 3, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3101 times:

As a designated expert (in the eyes of the criminal code) in this two things.

The .05 limit is a provincial limit and is not a criminal conviction it just goes on your driving record only(like a traffic ticket). To get a criminal charge you still need to blow greater than .08g/100ml.

After doing hundreds and hundreds of breath tests. I have learned this. At .05 in a large proportion of people there is significant impairment.

Here is my example. One course I was a volunteer drinker and i pounded them back and blew a 182 and pretty much remember nothing. On another course I drank like i normally did. I was sure I would blow over 100 and I felt hammered. I blew a 62. That was after 5 drinks in an hour.

It is not on the spot judgments. The driver will have to blow an alert on a roadside alcotest. These are calibrated to blow an alert between .05-.99g/100ml of alcohol in blood. This is a court approved instrument and not based on some random judgement.

gs



Sometimes all you can do is look them in the eye and ask " how much did your mom drink when she was pregnant with you?"
User currently offlinefridgmus From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 1442 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3092 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

And then you have guys like me who don't drink and who are more than happy to drive you home, and no, I don't charge a thing, just a handshake and promise you won't drive drunk ever. (Lost a best friend that way).

I know I'm not alone, we're out there.

Enjoy

F



The Lockheed Super Constellation, the REAL Queen of the Skies!
User currently offlineFly2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3061 times:

Quoting fridgmus (Reply 4):
I know I'm not alone, we're out there.

That makes two of us.

The ladies seem to appreciate it especially, and I've been, uhm, "rewarded" for my good deeds after the fact once they sober up.    Provided they remember of course  


User currently offlineGST From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2008, 938 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3037 times:

I'm only learning to drive here, so have no intention of drinking before lessons, but even on getting a license I plan to get into a car like I get into a glider...not within 12 hours of drinking, and even then only in moderation, and feeling no ill effects. I just don't see it being worth the risk, the statistics speak for themselves.

Quoting fridgmus (Reply 4):
Quoting Fly2HMO (Reply 5):

                    


User currently offlineRussianJet From Belgium, joined Jul 2007, 7719 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3035 times:

What is the problem? If you want to go out and not pay for a taxi, then don't drink - what is so important about those couple of drinks anyway??


✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
User currently offlinemelpax From Australia, joined Apr 2005, 1648 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3009 times:

Quoting Quokka (Reply 2):

The limit has been .05 here in Victoria since the 70's. Yes, you can still have a glass of wine with dinner or a beer with the boys after work, as long as you don't over do it. If I'm driving, I normally only have a couple of 'normal' drinks, or else I'll drink light beers. Not worth losing your licence for 18 months or more over 1 or 2 extra drinks.....



Essendon - Whatever it takes......
User currently offlineOzGlobal From France, joined Nov 2004, 2732 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3007 times:

Quoting YVRLTN (Thread starter):
A new 0.05 blood alcohol concentration drink drive law has been passed in BC, along with new stricter speeding laws.

0,05 is the normal limit in most responsible societies. By 0,08 your reflexes, regardless of what you say or perceive are cut in half. After 0,05, reflexes diminish EXPONENTIALLY with additional parts of alcohol. 0,05 is normal in most places NOT 'super strict'. It has been the standard in most of Australia since the 70's for that reason. That was when 0,08 vs 0,05 was debated and decided. I'm shocked that, 40 years later, it is not the case in Canada.



When all's said and done, there'll be more said than done.
User currently offlinegosimeon From Ireland, joined Jan 2008, 663 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3006 times:

It's very low where I come from too (Ireland). As far as I am concerned, if it saves one life and prevents one family from going through the grief car accidents cause, these laws are justified.

User currently offlineLuftfahrer From Germany, joined Mar 2009, 1041 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2911 times:

Irregardless of laws, I've chosen to never drink and drive. Small amounts of alcohol may not affect one's driving ability so much, but no alcohol does not affect one's ability to drive at all.

[Edited 2010-10-09 13:09:42]


'He resembled a pilot, which to a seaman is trustworthiness personified.' Joseph Conrad
User currently offlineIH8BY From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1143 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2892 times:

Quoting RussianJet (Reply 7):
What is the problem? If you want to go out and not pay for a taxi, then don't drink - what is so important about those couple of drinks anyway??

  

I don't quite understand how some people find it impossible to go an evening without a drink. I like the odd drink every so often, but if I'm driving, I just don't drink anything. That said, it's still annoying in some ways even though I actually really like non-alcoholic drinks - people rarely provide nice drinks for those who aren't drinking alcohol and you end up having a choice of warm tap water or warm tap water, or getting the patronising 'driving, are we?' comments should you choose to have Coke. I think we need to get over the 'not drinking' issue that exists in this country - it'd almost certainly make the roads a safer place.



Have you ever felt like you could float into the sky / like the laws of physics simply don't apply?
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 20336 posts, RR: 59
Reply 13, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2875 times:

I'm all for drunk driving laws.

Make the limit 0.2%, for all I care. And make it a felony.

BUT... provide alternative transport.


User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2857 times:

Quoting RussianJet (Reply 7):
What is the problem? If you want to go out and not pay for a taxi, then don't drink

  

My girly and me drunk for approx. 100 EUR yesterday night. When I have 100 EUR for alc, then I have also 35 EUR for a taxi!

Quoting Luftfahrer (Reply 11):
Irregardless of laws, I've chosen to never drink and drive.

Same here!

I admit, I drove totally drunk a couple of times when I was younger, especially when I was on vacation in Spain. Nowadays I do not drink a drop of alc when I know that I have to drive afterwards, I do not fancy to crash my car (with no insurance because I was drunk) and to lose my drivers license, both were pretty expensive and I don't want to pay again for them.

Patrick


User currently offlineyfbflyer From Canada, joined Sep 2006, 299 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2791 times:

Quoting YVRLTN (Thread starter):
Way to go Gordon Campbell and BC

"According to court records Campbell's blood-alcohol level was more than twice the legal limit"

Yeah way to go Gordo   


User currently offlineQuokka From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2790 times:

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 13):
Make the limit 0.2%, for all I care. And make it a felony.

This is already the norm in many countries in Europe, some in Africa and elsewhere. Some countries are even stricter with lowere limits and much harsher penalties. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drunk_driving_law_by_country
At least in major European cities there is usually cheap and efficient public transport to get people home if they do go out for a meal and a drink.


User currently offlineYVRLTN From Canada, joined Oct 2006, 2548 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2787 times:

Quoting Fly2HMO (Reply 1):
Honestly though, I'm more worried about the retards that take 500mg or more of Tylenol/Bendaryl/Sudafed etc etc just because they have a slightly runny nose/headache/whatever, and then decide it's a good idea to drive. I bet those are way more dangerous drivers than those that had a glass of wine or two. And it's (technically) not illegal.

This is more my point, sure, crack down on drink driving, but is it really in the name of safety, or is it a further cash grab? The officer decides on the sport what the penalty will be and it can be anywhere within a range of $3000+. Is there a standard system to base the penalty on?

So if youre cracking down on drink driving, then how about those who smoke pot & drive? Pretty hard to test for it. Then there are the said retards who pop all sorts of medications and cough syrups, or even undergoing treatments. Even though driving while on a cellphone is now also illegal, it is still done regularly and is just as dangerous, and Im not too sure handsfree makes a vast improvement either, most can easily drive with one hand, but the phone call generally gets more attention than the road from personal observation. Then theres fatigue, do you then ban someone for driving because they didnt sleep? And the moms with screaming / fighting kids. Morons with poodles on their laps. Those scanning for a radio station / adjusting the satnav. All these things make drivers impaired

Im also not convinced 0.05 = impaired on a 250 lbs male. It may, but everyone is different and the effects are different, which is why discretion is required.

Quoting IH8BY (Reply 12):
I don't quite understand how some people find it impossible to go an evening without a drink

Its not impossible, but its quite normal to have a glass of wine with a steak for example. Personally Im pretty sure I will be fine as Quokka says, but I will never take the risk. So if you have an extreme view, you could say a police state are taking away your simple pleasures in life.

And Im pretty sure the idiots who used to get completely blotto and drive will continue to do so.

Quoting fridgmus (Reply 4):
And then you have guys like me who don't drink and who are more than happy to drive you home

Great, but not all of us have someone who can do that for us. We have zero family here and no friends who live in our town.

Quoting Sabena332 (Reply 14):
My girly and me drunk for approx. 100 EUR yesterday night. When I have 100 EUR for alc, then I have also 35 EUR for a taxi!

For some of us, eating out is a luxury, so no, we dont spend EUR 100 and we cant afford the taxi.

Quoting Fly2HMO (Reply 1):
May want to specify that's in KmH

Seeing as my flag says Canada and the topic is about BC  



Follow me on twitter for YVR movements @vernonYVR
User currently offlinefridgmus From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 1442 posts, RR: 11
Reply 18, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2775 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting YVRLTN (Reply 17):
Quoting fridgmus (Reply 4):
And then you have guys like me who don't drink and who are more than happy to drive you home

Great, but not all of us have someone who can do that for us. We have zero family here and no friends who live in our town.

I've driven lots of strangers home. I just don't want anyone to get into a wreck and kill or injure someone. If I see you in a bar/restaurant and you're drunk, I'll offer to drive you home, no charge. I do it all the time when I'm in the US.

If more of us non-drinkers did that, then we'd have a better world, Doc Lightning could concentrate on playing with Paco and cops could eat more doughnuts!!! (No offense to our Law Enforcement Brothers and Sisters!).   

And besides, my best friend who taught me to skydive would still be alive today!



The Lockheed Super Constellation, the REAL Queen of the Skies!
User currently offlineWildcatYXU From Canada, joined May 2006, 2659 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2719 times:

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 13):
Make the limit 0.2%, for all I care. And make it a felony.

I think you mean 0.02%, don't you?  The problem with so low levels is that's almost impossible to measure it accurately in field conditions.

No greasespot, your beloved alcolyzer is not that accurate. The person who made it court approved should be shot.


User currently offlineStuckInCA From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1999 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2703 times:

Quoting Quokka (Reply 2):
mid-strength beer (3.5% Alc/ Vol);

3.5% = "Mid-Strength" beer?!?

Now I know to never drink beer in Australia.

Anyway, the new law in BC doesn't sound all that strict to me. Drinking and driving is disgusting.


User currently offlineLowrider From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 3220 posts, RR: 10
Reply 21, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2668 times:

.05 doesn't seem unreasonable to me. The disappointing part is that repeat offenders do not face tougher penalties. I think anyone who gets caught a second time should lose all driving privileges for at least a year, maybe more. I get so fed up with hearing about people who have 10 - 15 DWI convictions. If someone gets caught driving while intoxicated, odds are it is not the first time they have done so, its just the first time they have been caught. To get caught a second time, it would have to be a pretty routine event.


Proud OOTSK member
User currently offlineWildcatYXU From Canada, joined May 2006, 2659 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2659 times:

Quoting fridgmus (Reply 18):
If more of us non-drinkers did that, then we'd have a better world, Doc Lightning could concentrate on playing with Paco and cops could eat more doughnuts!!!

Actually, I don't think it's necessary. You don't have to serve us, drinkers. It's all about responsible drinking. All we have to do is to leave our cars home or in the parking lot wherever we drink. Cabs are there, more than willing to take us home. As a heavy drinker, brewery employee and car owner/driver, all I have to say to cops: please do more spot check.
Alcoholic beverages and driving don't mix well. Please take off the roads all those who can't understand it.


User currently offlineRussianJet From Belgium, joined Jul 2007, 7719 posts, RR: 21
Reply 23, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2601 times:

Quoting WildcatYXU (Reply 19):
The problem with so low levels is that's almost impossible to measure it accurately in field conditions.

So arrest on suspicion and take to the station for more accurate analysis, as is required in the UK. No problem.

Quoting Sabena332 (Reply 14):
My girly and me drunk for approx. 100 EUR yesterday night. When I have 100 EUR for alc, then I have also 35 EUR for a taxi!

Precisely. Either walk, pay for a cab, get a lift, or don't drink. There is no rocket science here. I have just come back from a nice dinner. We didn't want to drive, so we forked out for a cab. Expensive evening, but you make your choices.



✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
User currently offlineWildcatYXU From Canada, joined May 2006, 2659 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (4 years 2 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 2591 times:

Quoting RussianJet (Reply 23):
So arrest on suspicion and take to the station for more accurate analysis, as is required in the UK. No problem.

Sure. Except this is not an option in Ontario (I don't know about other provinces). Once the thing shows you the number, you're guilty.


25 Post contains images DocLightning : Meh. What's a decimal point among friends?
26 Post contains images Kent350787 : Australia's favourite racing driver (until Mark Webber wins the F1 WDC ) Peter Brock raced with the number "05" from the late 1970s, as a specific rec
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will This Hard Drive Work In A Macbook Pro? posted Sun Mar 8 2009 11:52:09 by Cadet57
QE2 New Owners Plan To Cut Ship In Two posted Mon Jan 12 2009 12:52:10 by MadameConcorde
New Study: Obama Most Liberal Senator In 2007 posted Thu Jan 31 2008 14:21:50 by Diamond
New Ad Campaign For Gay Marriage In California posted Tue Oct 9 2007 17:32:42 by Johnboy
New Nuclear Power Plants & Reactors In The U.S. posted Fri Sep 7 2007 19:07:54 by Da man
Just Took The New C-Class For A Test Drive posted Thu Aug 16 2007 04:45:27 by Springbok747
New Series Of Prison Break, Showing In UK posted Sat Jan 13 2007 22:36:54 by Chachu201
Front Plate Law In Texas posted Mon Nov 6 2006 00:53:33 by Silverfox
Sharia Law In Australia posted Sat Sep 2 2006 00:35:59 by Thomasphoto60
Law In International Airspace/Waters? posted Wed Mar 22 2006 23:01:10 by Sabena332