Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Obama Not Legit..Because Hawaii Is Not A US State?  
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8135 posts, RR: 26
Posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2995 times:

A very interesting legal game is afoot in Hawaii as a local political science professor, Dr. Keanu Sai, has launched a federal lawsuit alleging that his 1997 conviction for investigating Hawaiian land title claims was invalid due to his attempts at "administering Hawaiian kingdom law".

Among the points made in his lawsuit:

- An executive agreement made in 1893 between Hawaii's Queen and President Cleveland is still in effect
- All subsequent land exchanges up to the declaration of statehood are invalid and have no continuity since they do not properly execute the 1893 agreement
- President Obama must be reinstated as president owing to the fact he was not actually born in a territory of the United States, thus has no authority to continue imposing federal law on residents of Hawaii. This assertion that he is not legitimately the President has to be one of the most original such claims since he has taken office!

There have been several amended filings since the original lawsuit was filed in June, and the latest developments could blow this thing up much more:

In November 2010 Dr. Sai filed a motion with the court to amend his complaint by adding 35 foreign nations as defendants. These are nations who “illegally” maintain consulates in Hawaii and recognize the sovereignty of the United States here...The clear implication is that they could be liable for actual and punitive damages to Dr. Sai and to the Kingdom of Hawaii, and that they should withdraw their consulates.

http://www.hawaiireporter.com/defend...gainst-hawaiian-sovereignty-attack

All of his pleadings and the government's responses are available on his website. It's worth noting that while this guy claims to be a "pro-tem of the Hawaiian kingdom" but his court filings are impressively researched, and the government's responses to his complaint seem to be missing a clear refutation of his claims regarding the 1893 agreement, which would seemingly invalidate his points.

http://hawaiiankingdom.org/sai-obama.shtml

Interesting to see where this one goes.


If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinefalstaff From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 6088 posts, RR: 29
Reply 1, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2649 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Well, my flag has a star for Hawaii so that means it is a state....  


My mug slaketh over on Falstaff N503
User currently offline4holer From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 3013 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2581 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter):
Interesting to see where this one goes.

Not interesting. Getting pretty tiresome actually.



Ghosts appear and fade away.....................
User currently offlinedlflynhayn From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 425 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2570 times:

Quoting falstaff (Reply 1):
Well, my flag has a star for Hawaii so that means it is a state....

Why cannot just erase one star? or take Hawaii off and add Puerto rico! hmmmmm


User currently offlineQuokka From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2555 times:

As fascinated by US history as I am , even I can't get excited by this.

The chances of success are extremely slim and a successful outcome would bring into question how other States of the Union came into being. Given that there is precious little evidence that the aboriginal inhabitants wanted to be dispossessed a ruling that Hawaii was unlawfully "acquired" might open the way to further claims. In the absence of a widely supported and continuing movement for Hawaiian independence I fail to see how such a claim can be successful.

Apart from this person who has been previously convicted for fraud, is there any genuine desire for independence among Hawaiians?


User currently offlinejetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2786 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2534 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

This to me is just rediculous. Just another way to try to rid Obama from the presidency (coming from a strong Libertarian). The guy is president, Hawaii is a full state and has been one for 50 years, get over it.
Blue



You push down on that yoke, the houses get bigger, you pull back on the yoke, the houses get bigger- Ken Foltz
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8135 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2526 times:

Quoting 4holer (Reply 2):
Not interesting. Getting pretty tiresome actually.

Interesting because this is the first time someone has mounted a well-researched legal case the government seems to have difficulty responding to. I suspect he has help from a ghost writer.

Quoting Quokka (Reply 4):
The chances of success are extremely slim and a successful outcome would bring into question how other States of the Union came into being.

This guy cites some 20 other cases where states were admitted to make note of Hawaii's abject uniqueness of process, despite claiming in the pleadings that the suit is not about the legitimacy of the state, rather the interruption of process from the 1893 agreement that violates executive orders.

Quoting Quokka (Reply 4):
aboriginal inhabitants

Most of these claims are not about aboriginal inhabitants - rather they are made by folks who claim some genetic bloodline to Hawaiian royalty and thus stand to hugely benefit monetarily.

Quoting Quokka (Reply 4):
Apart from this person who has been previously convicted for fraud, is there any genuine desire for independence among Hawaiians?

Enough that various movements with different goals have stayed alive since 1959.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineKCmike From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 537 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2513 times:

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 5):
This to me is just rediculous. Just another way to try to rid Obama from the presidency (coming from a strong Libertarian). The guy is president, Hawaii is a full state and has been one for 50 years, get over it.

Well said. I'm not a huge fan of the guy, but he's been President for almost two years now and will be for atleast the next two. Nothing is going to change that. So who cares.



Dustoff
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8135 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2495 times:

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 5):
The guy is president, Hawaii is a full state and has been one for 50 years, get over it.

This guy is not going to get over it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0asu1wfUrY

Come to find out he is actually an ex-US Army officer who resigned his commission in 1994.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14003 posts, RR: 62
Reply 9, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2483 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 6):
This guy cites some 20 other cases where states were admitted to make note of Hawaii's abject uniqueness of process, despite claiming in the pleadings that the suit is not about the legitimacy of the state, rather the interruption of process from the 1893 agreement that violates executive orders.

Well, the coup by American planters against the Hawaiían Queen and the susbsequent takeover by the US in the 1890s was a bit dodgy. But this was a period of outright imperialism in the US (and other countries). Just look at the Spanish-American war and the takeover of the Philippines as a colony by the US during this time (though there were many Americans against territorial expansion overseas, foremost Mark Twain).
These aquisitions were mostly made on behalf of American planters, who feared cheap competition from abroad.

But this happened several generations ago. It should be mentioned for historical reasons (as not to sweep the bad parts of a country´s history under the carpet, e.g. slavery or dictatorship), but I don´t see any need for restitutions and compensations. The people, who got directly affect are long dead.

Jan


User currently offlineQuokka From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2482 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 6):


How widespread are the various bodies (for want of a better word) that oppose US statehood? Do they really have that much support? I ask because there has been nothing in the Australian media about this - a cat stuck up a tree in Arkansas is more likely to receive attention.

In the links provided in the original post, the suggestion is that the motivation for US intervention and subsequent annexation was instigated by people who were not born in Hawaii but who may have suffered economic loss due to changes in import restrictions. That is, they may have found it difficult to export from Hawaii to the US and so they favoured US annexation. While it is obvious that the supporters of Keanu Sai wish to gain financially, do they enjoy wider support? Do "ethnic" Hawaiians generally support this claim or do they believe that nothing is to be gained from a challenge to US sovereignty of which they are generally supportive?

I ask the question not just because of a general fascination, but also because of the issues that Australia faces with land rights and native title. Sometimes decisions by courts overseas can influence the decisions of judges here in Australia.


User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8135 posts, RR: 26
Reply 11, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2468 times:

Quoting Quokka (Reply 10):
Do "ethnic" Hawaiians generally support this claim or do they believe that nothing is to be gained from a challenge to US sovereignty of which they are generally supportive?

If you asked 10 "native" Hawaiians about this, you'd get 10 different answers. The problem is that most Hawaiians are poor, and despite billions held in trusts established by the royals, they have remained poor. Statehood didn't change their situation - so I suspect many don't really care one way or the other at this point. But that's not to say there aren't some who are strongly opposed to what they see as continued "occupation."

Quoting Quokka (Reply 10):
How widespread are the various bodies (for want of a better word) that oppose US statehood? Do they really have that much support?

From what people who have lived here a lot longer than me have said, it ebbs and flows but there are probably in the neighborhood of 25,000 people actively involved in those efforts.

Quoting MD11Engineer (Reply 9):
It should be mentioned for historical reasons (as not to sweep the bad parts of a country´s history under the carpet, e.g. slavery or dictatorship), but I don´t see any need for restitutions and compensations.

Nor do I. Except this guy wants a judge to actually go much further than that. I think what he underestimates is their lack of ability to do so.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineQuokka From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2453 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 11):

Thanks for the reply with some background information. I appreciate it.
So maybe a floating 2% of the population may agree with this guy?

You mention trusts held by the royals holding billions. I don't wish to tire you with questions, but how were these established and were they actually meant to benefit ordinary Hawaiians? And what do you think the reasons for the failures to address poverty may be?


User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8135 posts, RR: 26
Reply 13, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2439 times:

Quoting Quokka (Reply 12):
You mention trusts held by the royals holding billions. I don't wish to tire you with questions, but how were these established and were they actually meant to benefit ordinary Hawaiians?

A lot more than I could ever tell you here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamehameha_Schools

Quoting Quokka (Reply 12):
And what do you think the reasons for the failures to address poverty may be?

Just my personal suspicion, but keeping people poor often serves a political purpose.

A lot of people unfamiliar with the local culture will tell you Hawaiians are simply lazy and don't desire education, preferring to spend time with family, eat, and surf. While stereotypes are often partially based on true observations, I don't think this is generally true as the Hawaiians have been strong workers, designers and innovators through their history. The primary reason is that the drivers of wealth in statehood-era Hawaii - real estate development, military contracting, and agriculture, have mostly been instigated by people from outside the islands, and with the exception of Hawaiian trustees of developed lands, most Hawaiians have not been in a position to gain excess financial advantage from these activities.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineKiwiRob From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 7292 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2382 times:

Quoting Quokka (Reply 4):
is there any genuine desire for independence among Hawaiians?

I've met a number of native Hawaiians who would love an independant Hawaiian nation, I believe a lot of them feel they have been robbed.

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 13):
A lot of people unfamiliar with the local culture will tell you Hawaiians are simply lazy and don't desire education, preferring to spend time with family, eat, and surf.

Pretty much the same (minus surfing) as most other pacific islanders, they live a slower paced life, which appears to be a lazy existance to most of us.


User currently offlineOzair From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 846 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (3 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2190 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter):
- An executive agreement made in 1893 between Hawaii's Queen and President Cleveland is still in effect
- All subsequent land exchanges up to the declaration of statehood are invalid and have no continuity since they do not properly execute the 1893 agreement

Seeing these kind of reports always reminds me of a guy we have here. He seceded from Australia on 21st April 1970. Not serious but certainly amusing although he could do with hiring a better web designer.

http://www.principality-hutt-river.com/


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Obama If DEM Nominee - Will Not Become President posted Mon Jan 7 2008 09:26:31 by Bmacleod
S.A.R.S. - Revenge For Not Joining US Coalition? posted Tue Apr 1 2003 13:02:39 by B747-437B
Why The Iraqi People Will Not Accept A US Invasion posted Fri Mar 14 2003 22:39:41 by Cedarjet
Britain Will Not Support US Military Against Iraq posted Sun Jan 12 2003 23:16:01 by Scotty
Is The US Closer To Legalizing Marijuana? posted Tue Mar 9 2010 00:46:06 by boeingfever777
Iran Proclaims It Is Now A Nuclear State posted Thu Feb 11 2010 06:03:36 by FuturePilot16
Why Is The US Government So Inept? posted Mon Feb 8 2010 17:49:35 by DocLightning
Nuclear Secrets Probe Thwarted By US State Dept posted Mon Jan 28 2008 17:56:57 by StasisLAX
College Hockey: Christmas Break Is Upon Us posted Mon Dec 10 2007 20:09:33 by Graphic
Louisiana Is Overall Worst State In USA; Worthless posted Mon Nov 12 2007 17:40:44 by ConcordeBoy