Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
3D TV Without Glasses: A Different Approach  
User currently offlineManuCH From Switzerland, joined Jun 2005, 3031 posts, RR: 44
Posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1834 times:

OK, this one really surprised me. I was aware of new technology to produce 3D TV images without glasses, but this approach is different. Have a look!


I think it's hilarious... I would also hope that it's some kind of a joke.

What do you think? Is this just a prank that even Engadget believes in?

Never trust a statistic you didn't fake yourself
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineFly2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1827 times:

I have heard of other techniques to have stereoscopic vision without lenses but this is new to me. This is very clever.

Quoting ManuCH (Thread starter):
What do you think? Is this just a prank that even Engadget believes in?

It's real as far as I can tell. The tiniest amount of electricity in the right spot will trigger muscles accordingly. However, I can't imagine this being approved by the FDA.

[Edited 2011-01-19 09:48:46]

User currently offlineALTF4 From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1215 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1791 times:

Hahaha - yeah, that post. I follow engadget religiously and lol'd when I saw that.

It is a joke.

Put the youtube video up on full HD and watch the eyelids - they are definitely CG. They picked a good guy to use, though, because if you watch his blinks, he shows very little signs of other muscles being used, but there is a definite difference between the real blinks and the CG blinks.

Lastly, try blinking really fast (and you're not even blinking half as fast as you need to) for 5 minutes straight. Thats all that is needed to convince yourself its not real. That is completely ignoring the impresiceness of the blinks as well (yes, I know, they are supposed to be electronically triggered) - mechanical glasses will always be more accurate and timed better when it comes to speed and precision and I don't think your muscles would co-operate for a whole movie.

Edit: Also, notice the tags engadget used when posting it: "humor", "joke" and "funny", among others.

[Edited 2011-01-19 10:20:22]

The above post is my opinion. Don't like it? Don't read it.
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 8724 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (5 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1712 times:

Has anyone been to that one rollercoaster in MGM (I think,) the Rock and Rollercoaster (or something along those lines)? In the line to get on, there are 3-D videos in there that looked very cool to me. You didn't need glasses and it looked very realistic. The screen was back against the wall and there was a window you looked through (that created the 3D effect I believe.) Hard to explain if you never seen it.

Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Wetten, Dass..? Stunt Goes Wrong On TV posted Mon Dec 6 2010 07:12:26 by D L X
Will We Ever See Another Star Trek TV Series? posted Sun Dec 5 2010 12:18:35 by 2707200X
What Do You Watch On TV Now? posted Thu Oct 14 2010 20:13:39 by KGRB
Interesting Slip-up On TV posted Tue Oct 5 2010 21:16:46 by cpd
LCD TV Advice posted Fri Sep 10 2010 17:18:29 by washingtonian
Poker On TV posted Wed Aug 25 2010 12:52:48 by 747srule
Anyone Remember This Tv Show? posted Wed Aug 18 2010 04:00:02 by aerdingus
Actress In Diaper Tv Ads Is An Abortion Activist posted Mon Aug 2 2010 15:07:32 by Derico
TV Networks That Have Changed Formats posted Mon Jul 26 2010 16:03:02 by 2707200X
Do You See Movie Remakes Of TV Shows Any Good? posted Thu Jul 15 2010 15:37:02 by 2707200X