Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Farewell, HMS Ark Royal  
User currently offlineBMIFlyer From UK - England, joined Feb 2004, 8810 posts, RR: 58
Posted (3 years 6 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1548 times:

Portsmouth bids farewell to warship HMS Ark Royal.....

The carrier was opened up to the general public today so they could see what life is / was like on board this vessel. She is due to be retired and then scrapped very soon.

HMS Ark Royal has clocked up 621,551 nautical miles as part of her service

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-12251800

The early retirement and subsequent scrapping of this ship is something that I don't agree with, at least in the current climate. It's ironic that we will now be left with no carrier defence until later in the decade when HMS Queen Elizabeth arrives on the scene. It won't be until 2019 that we have any aircraft capable of operating from a carrier, when the US built JSF arrives.

So, I all I have left to say is 'goodbye' to a mighty fine warship, which has served us well over the last 25 years.

Anyone here have any fond memories??


Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineZANL188 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 3500 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 6 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1523 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I understand taking her out of service, with no aircraft and all. But why scrap her? She's relatively new, mid 1980s as I recall - a youngster in carrier years...


Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
User currently offlinephotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2717 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (3 years 6 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1489 times:

Quoting BMIFlyer (Thread starter):
It won't be until 2019 that we have any aircraft capable of operating from a carrier, when the US built JSF arrives.
Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 1):
I understand taking her out of service, with no aircraft and all. But why scrap her? She's relatively new, mid 1980s as I recall - a youngster in carrier years...

Because if Britain's hopes are on the JSF, then I fear they will be still waiting long past 2019.


User currently offlineCadet985 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 1551 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (3 years 6 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1460 times:

Isn't the HMS Illustrious still in service? Also, why wouldn't the Ark Royal be kept in some sort of reserve fleet in case it should be needed?

Marc


User currently offlineBongodog1964 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2006, 3535 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (3 years 6 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1338 times:

Quoting Cadet985 (Reply 3):
Reply 3, posted Sat Jan 22 2011 20:20:46 your local time (15 hours 51 minutes 32 secs ago) and read 121 times:


Isn't the HMS Illustrious still in service? Also, why wouldn't the Ark Royal be kept in some sort of reserve fleet in case it should be needed?

Marc

I doubt that Ark Royal will be disposed of in the near future. Invincible has only just been offered for scrap, having been out of service for a good few years, having been tied up at Portsmouth as a spares source for Illustrious and Ark Royal. The sale particulars for Invincible stated that she has no engines, pumps etc, having been stripped of everything useful. I imgaine this will now be the fate of Ark Royal, a floating spares source for illustrious.
Obviously her state of readiness will gradually reduce as more and more parts are removed.


User currently offlinedl021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11446 posts, RR: 76
Reply 5, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1262 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

To be fair the state of naval aviation in the UK has been lacking for years. Currently the UK cannot send her aircraft carriers into harms way without being in company with other forces that can provide air defence, and since the retirement of Sea Harrier and their AIM120 capability there has been little remedy for that. In that light it was a fairly honest and easy target for budget cutters who couldn't see as much utility in what are basically helicopter carriers that can carry Harriers that are being retired anyway (as evidently the entire Harrier force is being done in).

Without airplanes there is no need for these carriers and the UK has been spending money keeping them going for years now without good reason. Until they have a credible air defence capability and are capable of projecting power without assistance they are as much a liability as anything else. The Italians, Spanish, Indians and French all maintain air defence capabilities on their vessels and retain the ability to project power (the primary reason for a carrier). The British chose not to do so.

Whether the decision to go with the C model F-35 was right or not is another story. It may be less complicated but it requires more complex and expensive machinery on the carrier making it less likely to get two of them. One carrier is also a liability since any carrier spends more than half it's life in port.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineBongodog1964 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2006, 3535 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (3 years 6 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1233 times:

Quoting dl021 (Reply 5):
To be fair the state of naval aviation in the UK has been lacking for years. Currently the UK cannot send her aircraft carriers into harms way without being in company with other forces that can provide air defence, and since the retirement of Sea Harrier and their AIM120 capability there has been little remedy for that. In that light it was a fairly honest and easy target for budget cutters who couldn't see as much utility in what are basically helicopter carriers that can carry Harriers that are being retired anyway (as evidently the entire Harrier force is being done in).

Its good to see that you realise that we lost our ability to defend our carriers years ago with the scrapping of the Sea Harrier. The Uk press totally failed to appreciate this when the carriers and the Harrier force were axed recently. Our government has wasted money for the past 5 years on a carrier force which could never be sent into a danger zone, as it had only mud movers on board.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Royal Caribbean And Carnival Cruise Leave LA. posted Sun Jan 16 2011 17:32:04 by 2707200X
Protocol And The Royal Wedding posted Wed Jan 12 2011 20:42:06 by DocLightning
Farewell Paco posted Sat Jan 8 2011 12:25:42 by DocLightning
Ark. School Board Member: "queers" Must Die posted Wed Oct 27 2010 19:34:06 by Airstud
HMS Astute Runs Aground! posted Fri Oct 22 2010 07:48:28 by scbriml
Royal Mail Never Deliver posted Fri Oct 15 2010 05:01:22 by fca767
The Royal Danish Navy Turns 500! posted Tue Aug 10 2010 06:10:51 by AirPacific747
Should The United Kingdom Ditch The Royal Family? posted Sat Jun 5 2010 11:01:23 by T8KE0FF
Royal Caribbean To Return To New Orleans posted Sun Apr 25 2010 11:51:31 by MSYtristar
Will There Be A New Royal Yacht? posted Mon Dec 14 2009 19:31:16 by United Airline