Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rummy Refuses To Accept Blame - Period  
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8153 posts, RR: 26
Posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1735 times:

Diane Sawyer's plain biases aside, the Donald Rumsfeld interview on ABC last night was just embarassing. With an ego like this, the guy should have been an actor or rock star. He was defensive and defiant throughout the interview, although he actually appeared human when talking about his wife's illness. Bottom line - he will not accept any blame for failed DOD policies during Iraq:

Rumsfeld was reluctant to endorse Bush's assessment that the decision to draw down US troops shortly after the 2003 invasion of Iraq was "the most important failure in the execution of the war."

Telling Sawyer that assessment was "possible," Rumsfeld also cautioned that "the path you didn't take is always smoother."


Um, your boss, a bunch of generals, and military analysts all over the planet disagree with you sir. Can you just admit your assessment was wrong? Apparently not.

The admissions largely echoed his memoir, in which he laid blame for much of the failings and heavy bloodshed of the Iraq war on "too many hands on the steering wheel."

What is that supposed to mean? Had everyone at the table just listened to him, things would have turned out better?

Just as in his book, the former defense chief also ripped into some of George W. Bush's closest advisers, saying Condoleezza Rice lacked experience and Colin Powell showed poor management skills.

Perhaps those things are true, but if he really felt it was a dire situation, he should have made an impassioned case about his concerns to his boss. Both the National Security Advisor and Secretary of State are positions whose efficacy are essential to the success of a DefSec. What a rube  http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110208...aryiraqbookrumsfeld_20110208133019


If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
45 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21467 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1724 times:

Rumsfeld? Blame? Does not compute.

For Rumsfeld, responsibility is when he's giving orders, they're executed without question and any failures can by definition never be his fault.

He's never understood what the word actually means.


User currently offlineAGM100 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 5407 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1673 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter):
Telling Sawyer that assessment was "possible," Rumsfeld also cautioned that "the path you didn't take is always smoother."



He is so right .... this is a pretty simple issue . You either agree with the war or you don't. If you don't ...then nothing Rumsfeld or anyone else say's really matters .

For instance ...
If you understand the war and agree with it ... the questions may be centered around troop levels , equipment types ...levels of destructive power , allied involvement and other policy issues. But If you are against the war .... none of that matters ... right ? I often hear anti war voices bring up disbanding the Iraqi Army .... I ask them .,.. why do you care ? You disagree with the entire effort ... what does it matter if we made major mistakes ..??? . (Other than ego stroking .... and feeling vindicated by you own intellect).

Rummy should have staid buried ....



You dig the hole .. I fill the hole . 100% employment !
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8153 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1668 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 2):
Other than ego stroking .... and feeling vindicated by you own intellect

Are you suggesting that's what the former President was doing when he stated his opinion that the troop numbers used were a mistake? Can't have it both ways dude. Rumsfeld is a rube.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 2):
He is so right .... this is a pretty simple issue . You either agree with the war or you don't.

Um no, you either want the United States to look competent in all that it does, or you don't. I'm quite sure that's what the uproar was all about from the various career military professionals who took issue with Rumsfeld's troop number suggestions. The problem with Rumsfeld is there was no room for anyone else's opinion, and in most organizations, that's a significant management issue. He criticized Ms. Rice for "having meetings to make everyone feel good". What kind of crap is that? Meetings are useful as long as they are not excessive.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21637 posts, RR: 55
Reply 4, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1653 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter):
The admissions largely echoed his memoir, in which he laid blame for much of the failings and heavy bloodshed of the Iraq war on "too many hands on the steering wheel."

What is that supposed to mean?

He's right - there were too many hands on the steering wheel. One too many. Specifically, his.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 2):
But If you are against the war .... none of that matters ... right ?

Not really, no.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 2):
I often hear anti war voices bring up disbanding the Iraqi Army .... I ask them .,.. why do you care ? You disagree with the entire effort ... what does it matter if we made major mistakes ..??? .

Because you can disagree with going to war but still want to win the war once you're in it. I didn't think going into Iraq was a good idea, but it was decided that it was going to happen, so once that decision was made, I wanted my government to run it competently.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineAGM100 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 5407 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1639 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 3):
Rumsfeld is a rube.


Anyone who makes decisions at that level is going to be hated by many . I have been a CEO who has had to make decisions that people didn't like ... My mentor told me "If you are not pissing people off you are most likely not doing anything" . Rumsfeld is open to criticism ... have at it but his boss told him to invade a country by a certain date and that is what he did .. like it or not he did it with what he had at hand.
Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 3):
The problem with Rumsfeld is there was no room for anyone else's opinion


You actually believe that the SECDEF was not in discussions with the Military leadership ? And had a give and take with the men and women doing the job ? I just don't buy it ... but at the end of the day he had to make the tough call. Of course there is always going to be Generals who want to go in with a "dream army" and they are obviously correct... but that is true in any war.
Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 3):
Um no, you either want the United States to look competent in all that it does, or you don't


I happen to know a little about the prep and operational events that took place to move, equip and prepare our forces for the invasion. It was a immense undertaking ... the Military and CRAF elements did a amazing job leading up to the invasion and drive to Baghdad. To move the amount of equipment ,organize the logistics of ports of transit and the final arrival of the forces with reserve supplies in that amount of time is staggering.

I say again...if you don't agree with the invasion then none of that matters. Why would anyone be motivated to wish for success in a endeavour they disagree with ? Especialy when it is such a juicy politcal spring board ... ( not directed to you personally I don't know if you agree with the war or not).



You dig the hole .. I fill the hole . 100% employment !
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8153 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1633 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
Why would anyone be motivated to wish for success in a endeavour they disagree with ?

Because they want their country to be that shining city on the hill?? ...just a thought.

You spent a lot of time responding to everything but the fact that Rummy's ex-boss doesn't agree with his assessment and I'm still wondering if you think it was out of need for "ego stroking" or "vindication of intellect."



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineAGM100 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 5407 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1619 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 6):
Rummy's ex-boss doesn't agree with his assessment and



Of course I don't .... it does not surprise me that the President said that ., I was talking about folks who appose the war and then go on about how many Tanks we should have had. That's all ...

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 6):
Because they want their country to be that shining city on the hill?? ...just a thought.



Sorry ...but the Democrats did not want the war to go well for Bush and Rumsfeld.. body bags meant votes and claiming the war was lost secured a Senate Majority leadership. Tough ? Maybe... but it is true.



You dig the hole .. I fill the hole . 100% employment !
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8153 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1609 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 7):
Sorry ...but the Democrats did not want the war to go well for Bush and Rumsfeld.. body bags meant votes and claiming the war was lost secured a Senate Majority leadership.

I have no idea what you're on about. This is not about Democrats - this is about a guy who can't take responsibility for anything. A real man can admit when he is or was wrong.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21467 posts, RR: 53
Reply 9, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1605 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
Anyone who makes decisions at that level is going to be hated by many .

Irrelevant here.

He was and still is openly shunning his responsibility. In a top-level job like his that is completely inexcusable, doubly so when his job involves life-or-death decisions.

You either accept and deal with your own failures as well as your successes or you have no business being in a responsible position.


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21467 posts, RR: 53
Reply 10, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1596 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 7):
I was talking about folks who appose the war and then go on about how many Tanks we should have had. That's all

Being against the Iraq invasion under obviously false pretenses was a matter of basic common sense.

Being mindful of the required resources once the idiots at the top had stupidly commited the USA to at least salvage the wreckage as far as possible was and is a matter of competence and responsibility, both of which apparently lacking in Rumsfeld.


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21637 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1591 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
You actually believe that the SECDEF was not in discussions with the Military leadership ?

I believe he had discussions. I don't believe he paid much attention to them.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
Rumsfeld is open to criticism ... have at it but his boss told him to invade a country by a certain date and that is what he did .. like it or not he did it with what he had at hand.

And he sucked at it. Which is why he was, and still is, criticized.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
I happen to know a little about the prep and operational events that took place to move, equip and prepare our forces for the invasion. It was a immense undertaking ... the Military and CRAF elements did a amazing job leading up to the invasion and drive to Baghdad. To move the amount of equipment ,organize the logistics of ports of transit and the final arrival of the forces with reserve supplies in that amount of time is staggering.

The first part of the war (up to the fall of the Iraqi government) was very well done - nobody disputes that fact. But it was blindingly obvious, from many accounts (including Rumsfeld's own statements) that there was no plan for what to do after that.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
Why would anyone be motivated to wish for success in a endeavour they disagree with ?

Because it's good for the country as a whole. You don't have to think it's a good idea, you don't have to think it's an idea that's going to work, but when it comes to stuff like that, you do have to hope that it does work, even if you're trying to change it in the meantime. The alternative, in this case, is to be, at best, ambivalent to the needless deaths of US servicemen, the spending of billions of dollars more than necessary, and a tarnished international image. Why would anyone be in favor of any of those?

If it had been up to me, we wouldn't have gone into Iraq. But it wasn't up to me, and we did. Such is life - things don't always go your way. That doesn't mean I don't have a vested interest in what happens as a result of not agreeing with the decision.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
Especialy when it is such a juicy politcal spring board ...

Not everyone is a blind partisan.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineAGM100 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 5407 posts, RR: 16
Reply 12, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1591 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 8):
A real man can admit when he is or was wrong.



I am happy he is not falling into the trap of "admitting " mistakes . That is exactly what his opponents what him to do .... our troops have suffered enough indignities by the anti war crowd .. the SECDEF should not further the effort. And he should not have written this book either .... it was bad judgement and timing IMO.



You dig the hole .. I fill the hole . 100% employment !
User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8544 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1570 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
his boss told him to invade a country by a certain date and that is what he did ..

What his boss told him to do doesn't excuse his personal complicity in the slightest.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 12):
I am happy he is not falling into the trap of "admitting " mistakes .

The judgment of such a man is irrelevant. As someone who belongs in a gas chamber, his moral subtleties are the last thing of interest.

I heard a funny firsthand story... Rummy was skiing in Taos NM. He went through the food line in the chalet. The cashier said, "Oh, I'm sorry. We don't serve war criminals here. You will have to leave." Then the cashier repeated himself. I guess Rummy had to leave. Take the story for what it's worth, a heart-warming and possibly true tale.


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21467 posts, RR: 53
Reply 14, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1570 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 12):
I am happy he is not falling into the trap of "admitting " mistakes

What else do you think a responsible executive should do with mistakes when you think admitting them is out of the question?


User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8153 posts, RR: 26
Reply 15, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1547 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 12):
And he should not have written this book either .... it was bad judgement and timing IMO

He's been shopping around for book deals since the first few months after his resignation. He doesn't care what you or anyone else thinks anyway.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 12):
I am happy he is not falling into the trap of "admitting " mistakes

It's a trap? Whatever. It's called being a stand-up guy.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 12):
opponents

Like Bill Kristol, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Trent Lott, Gen. Shinseki, Gen. Batiste, just to name a few?

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 12):
our troops have suffered enough indignities

Yeah, having been presided over by such an incompetent civilian leader, for one. I don't know about military members of your family, but those in mine couldn't stand the guy. Them and a lot of our servicemembers on this very forum as well.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8841 posts, RR: 24
Reply 16, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1513 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 11):

The first part of the war (up to the fall of the Iraqi government) was very well done - nobody disputes that fact. But it was blindingly obvious, from many accounts (including Rumsfeld's own statements) that there was no plan for what to do after that.

Let's correct something that you may or may not consider a matter of semantics. Of course they had a plan for the post-major combat time-line. It may have been completely wrong for a variety of reasons, and commanders on the ground quickly saw that they needed to come up with something new on-the-spot, but there was a plan. As someone once said, a plan never survives first contact with the enemy intact. Sometimes they are slightly modified, sometimes they go right out the window.

That said, There is no question the Rumsfeld is far too in love with himself. GWB has accepted responsibility for mistakes he's made, why can't Rumsfeld over issues that clearly were under his direct control?



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21637 posts, RR: 55
Reply 17, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1503 times:

Quoting Flighty (Reply 13):
As someone who belongs in a gas chamber

Okay, that's a little much. I've got no love for the guy, but to wish him dead is pushing it.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 16):
Of course they had a plan for the post-major combat time-line. It may have been completely wrong for a variety of reasons, and commanders on the ground quickly saw that they needed to come up with something new on-the-spot, but there was a plan.

Fair point - I'd agree that they did have a plan. I'd argue, however, that it was a very poorly constructed plan, based on idealistic scenarios and a willingness to play down the possible negative implications of an invasion to make it seem more palatable to the American public.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 16):
As someone once said, a plan never survives first contact with the enemy intact.

This too is true, but there's a difference between a sound plan that doesn't pan out as intended and a crap plan that is all but assured of failure. I've seen enough evidence to suggest that the plan for post-war Iraq was of the latter sort, based on comments from members of the administration as well as from members of the military who had made their concerns known.

If your argument is that Rumsfeld was charged to develop a plan and did so, then I agree. But this isn't kindergarten, and there's no A for effort.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 18, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1482 times:

I have two words for Rumsfeld...

Pat Tillman

..and I bet that whole entire subject... was completely avoided.

BN747



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10035 posts, RR: 26
Reply 19, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1457 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 2):
I often hear anti war voices bring up disbanding the Iraqi Army .... I ask them .,.. why do you care ? You disagree with the entire effort ... what does it matter if we made major mistakes ..??

Seriously? I'm actually amazed that I just read that.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
Why would anyone be motivated to wish for success in a endeavour they disagree with ?

Say I disagree with sending astronauts to the Moon, or Mars, or something. Am I going to hope they fail, and possibly die? What kind of absurd logic is that?

If I disagreed with Apollo, would I be happy that the Apollo 1 astronauts died in that fire?

I know a lot of people who disagreed with the war. Not a SINGLE ONE hoped we failed and our soldiers died. No one should hope for that, whether or not you agreed with the initial decision.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 12):
I am happy he is not falling into the trap of "admitting " mistakes

You know that the first step in correcting a mistake is admitting you made one, right?

It's not a trap - a real man can admit he screwed up. Now obviously, if he doesn't believe he did, then fine, but that's not what you said.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineMudboy From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1167 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1402 times:

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 19):
I know a lot of people who disagreed with the war. Not a SINGLE ONE hoped we failed and our soldiers died. No one should hope for that, whether or not you agreed with the initial decision.

You no man, I disagree with this, I do think there are many that hope we fail over here, and that the Iraqis fail, just so they can say, " I told you so". I am here in Iraq, and I have seen the improvements here, and I want this country to succeed, I will be proud to say that I was a part of giving this country a chance. So many lives have been lost here on both sides, and it would be sad to see it all for nothing. I do believe there are people that have so much hatred for the Bush administration, that even if 20 years from now, going into Iraq was the right thing, and Iraq is a thriving nation, these same people will never admit the they were wrong, but only time will tell?

As far as Rummy goes, he was an idiot, the Troops could have been much better equipped, fewer Soldiers would have died, so I am voting him into the azzhat HOF, but I am in no way qualified to do his job.
Stay Safe!

[Edited 2011-02-08 19:33:14]

User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8278 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1389 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 2):
He is so right .... this is a pretty simple issue . You either agree with the war or you don't.

Nope. A lot of people trusted the President and his Administration.

We believed the "intelligence" that there was a clear and eminent danger.

When that was clearly crap then the [b]reason[/] for our support evaporated.

Quoting Mir (Reply 4):
He's right - there were too many hands on the steering wheel. One too many. Specifically, his.

Two too many in my book - you need to add Cheney into the equation for developing the WMD argument.

Quoting Mir (Reply 4):
Because you can disagree with going to war but still want to win the war once you're in it.

It is more than acceptable for Americans to put a very high priority on our troops when it comes to war. We learned some harsh lessons in Vietnam - lessons that the Cheney & Rumsfeld obviously didn't learn.

How many Vietnam Vets do yo think are around, supporting those in the military, but having zero tolerance for those who are so casually and ignorantly indifferent of the fate of those troops.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
My mentor told me "If you are not pissing people off you are most likely not doing anything"

These days my preferred CEO is Steve Jobs, who mainly pisses off the competition. And Microsoft.

The key is that you can look at performance (company & share).

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
his boss told him to invade a country by a certain date and that is what he did .. like it or not he did it with what he had at hand.

Rummy was the Brilliant Mind behind the faster, reduced force. Maybe one reason he was so hot for the invasion was because it would let him prove his theories. It didn't take a lot of intelligence to see that the troops did a fantastic job in their drive to Bagdad. It was also pretty clear that Rummy hadn't understood that those same troops needed all the behind the lines support - and that wasn't there. Just like the post invasion planning was totally pathetic.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
but at the end of the day he had to make the tough call.

Bull. He could have demanded the same standards we we had in GW1. But then his theories would have been pushed off the table right of the start of planning.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 5):
the Military and CRAF elements did a amazing job leading up to the invasion and drive to Baghdad.

They did an amazing job with one hand tied behind them.

The organization that had the best planning was Haliburton. With their CEO sitting in the White House that isn't really surprising. I would love to know how early they got the heads up.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 7):
.but the Democrats did not want the war to go well for Bush and Rumsfeld

Believe it or not, Democrats (and even Moderates Liberals) are Americans and love their country as much as the hard right says they love it. And there are actually Democrats, Moderates and Liberals in the military and some who will always support their success.

But the Bush Administration's "war efforts" was a sham from day one and those in the administration who worked to start the war (the Rummies & Cheneys in the Administration) do not deserve the support of this country.

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 7):
body bags meant votes and claiming the war was lost secured a Senate Majority leadership. Tough ? Maybe... but it is true.

Not even close. The BS from the Administration was shoveled out without regard to the costs for our troops. 40,000 Purple Hearts later it is more than clear that their arguments were a farce, their planning incompetent and the war either an Ego War, or a a grab for the oil that clearly didn't go as hoped. And let's not forget the Stop Loss - one of the clearest signs you can find on the Administration's incompetence.

It is more than reasonable that Americans have little tolerance at the incompetence (and egos) in the Administration, especially when viewed in light of the KIAs, WIAs and troops who had to endure Stop Loss & multiple deployments with too little time at home to recover and re-eatablish their family relationships.


User currently offline11Bravo From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1718 posts, RR: 10
Reply 22, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1349 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 12):
...our troops have suffered enough indignities...


I agree. I'm particularly distressed by the indignity that almost 5,000 US military personnel suffered when they were killed as a result of one of the most profound lapses of judgement in American history. It is truly amazing that you and your buddies continue to support Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bush and the other imbeciles responsible for this pointless, shameful, and embarassing bit of half-assed leadership. They exercised catastrophically bad judgement, and you think that's great. Good call.



WhaleJets Rule!
User currently offlinecws818 From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 1176 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1336 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 7):
Sorry ...but the Democrats did not want the war to go well for Bush and Rumsfeld..

Exactly - they, and everyone else, wanted the war to go well for the country.



volgende halte...Station Hollands Spoor
User currently offlinecws818 From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 1176 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1334 times:

Quoting AGM100 (Reply 12):
I am happy he is not falling into the trap of "admitting " mistakes . That is exactly what his opponents what him to do

Admitting mistakes can be, and often is, a sign of immense strength. Since Mr. Rumsfeld is neither God nor the Pope, were he to do so it would speak quite well of him.



volgende halte...Station Hollands Spoor
25 ltbewr : For Rumsfeld to ever admit blame for his part in policy in the Bush Administration would be admitting to war crimes. To ever admit would be placing hi
26 SKYSERVICE_330 : For someone who opines endlessly on this board about the virtues of personal responsibility, this is an ASTONISHING statement. Any person of characte
27 AGM100 : The only admission of guilt the SECDEF could possibly issue to satisfy most of you would be . ... " We should not have gone to Iraq". That is what you
28 iakobos : ...add Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton and the other smart members of the New American Century club and it is difficult not to qualify that fanatic bunch
29 AGM100 : I understand the courage to admitted mistakes .,.. I have made many ...and I have openly admitted some of them on here. So what is one thing you woul
30 windy95 : I am disappointed in Rumsfeld lack of admission's. I was also very dissapointed in Bush when he did not dump Rumsfeld before the second election.
31 CargoLex : Well, to be honest, we shouldn't have. There was no connection to 9/11, there were no weapons of mass destruction, and while the dictatorship there w
32 windy95 : If only Bush 41 had the balls to finish Saddam the first time around when he did have WMD's then things might of gone much smoother.
33 AGM100 : Rumsfeld said the same thing in his interview last night .,.. He handed in his resignation and said it was a mistake of the President not to accept i
34 CargoLex : Well here's a rare instance where we agree. If Bush 41 had done more to support the anti-Hussein insurgency in Iraq in 1991-1992, Iraqis themselves w
35 AGM100 : That is fair .... but you certainly cant expect Sec Rumsfeld to issue a apology for that. What good would come of that other than to satisfy Harry Re
36 Aaron747 : Um not so at all. There are plenty of strategic and management blunders he made that have absolutely NOTHING to do with war crimes. I'm not asking fo
37 Ken777 : Bush 41 had far more wisdom, both personally and in his group of advisors, than W. Remember, Stormin Norman was right up there at the top of the list
38 Mir : The poor handling of the post-war operation. I'm not going to give him grief for the decision to go to war - he was only one among many who made that
39 Dreadnought : I saw Rumsfeld interviewed by Hannity last night. He said that one time, at the height of his unpopularity around 2004-5, Somebody told him in regard
40 AGM100 : I just purchased the book .... I have not read the "cheap shots". I will read it over the next day or so and maybe my position on it will change . Do
41 Ken777 : We can start with his involvement in developing the fluff that there were actually WMDs in Iraq. 9/11 was a convenient reason to focus in on Saddam a
42 Aaron747 : He doesn't believe it was unnecessary, so that's both irrelevant and unrealistic. He was quoted saying Powell was a poor manager who allowed many lea
43 Post contains images OA412 : I find it incredibly unfortunate that you are so blinded by partisanship that you would actually make such a statement. You honestly believe that Dem
44 Ken777 : If you read Woodward's two books (on GW 1 and GW 2) the differences are startling - especially the Rummy/Cheney actions leading up to GW 2. Or pushin
45 Mudboy : Dude, enough of this revenge BS. Genocide?? We did not go in to eradicate a race of people, or try to form the 51st state of the US, we removed a Gov
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Woman Wins $43 Million - Casino Refuses To Pay posted Wed Apr 7 2010 13:22:58 by MadameConcorde
Driver Refuses To Work On Bus With Atheist Ad posted Fri Jan 16 2009 04:23:00 by RussianJet
Hillary Clinton To Accept Secretary Of State Offer posted Mon Nov 17 2008 16:29:29 by Blrsea
Reporter Refuses To Do Paris Hilton Story! posted Fri Jun 29 2007 10:53:36 by Trekster
Norwegian Royal Family Refuses To Fly First Class posted Sun Nov 5 2006 23:15:26 by Krje1980
Iran To Accept Nuclear Proposal... posted Sun Jul 16 2006 10:38:51 by Beaucaire
No Subway Service To LGA, Blame The Yankees. posted Wed Apr 26 2006 17:02:44 by STT757
Hamas Refuses To Recognize Israel posted Wed Feb 8 2006 18:35:06 by Cfalk
US Owes Canada $5 Billion And Refuses To Pay! posted Thu Aug 11 2005 16:10:18 by Clickhappy
US Senate Refuses To Beef Up Border Protection posted Fri Jul 15 2005 20:25:13 by Slider