Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ohio's Proposed Changes To Public Sector Unions  
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5675 posts, RR: 10
Posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1391 times:

So with all the hubbub in Wisconsin and all the ire and attention being directed at them, the Ohio Senate just approved a bill that would changes what the public sector employee unions can do:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...ions-factbox-idUSTRE72181N20110302

Quote:
Offers limited collective bargaining rights for wages based on performance; health insurance benefits subject to state limits on percentages; sick leave and other types of leave capped at the level allowed for non-union employees; certain aspects of performance evaluations; and duration of the agreement. Eliminates collective bargaining rights on numerous other issues, including transfers, staffing levels, hours of work, equipment, privatization of services and discipline. It also prohibits seniority from being the sole factor in determining order of layoff.

Other changes:
- Binding arbitration on contract disputes is gone. A final decision is now made by an elected body, such as a city council
- Merit is now the only measure for pay increases (vs length of service)
- Public sector employees no longer have the right to strike

I don't know if Ohio public employees are required to join and pay dues to the union or if this affects that.

It still needs to be approved by the House and signed by the Governor but it is expected to pass.

Actually looking at this, it does not seem "unfair". Basically the employees still have the option of supporting elected officials that will provide better pay and benefits (within the limits the changes allow). If all employees pay into the union then that is still a big stick.

I wonder if the Wisconsin public sector unions would accept something like this? And if Gov. Walker would be willing to consider it.

Tugg


I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8184 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1368 times:

Quoting tugger (Thread starter):
- Merit is now the only measure for pay increases (vs length of service)
- Public sector employees no longer have the right to strike

I agree, this is essentially the way forward. Public sector employees are not the same as private sector in my book and should not have the right to strike. A strike is a refusal to provide the public necessary services and is unacceptable in these positions. Pay increases should never be automatic for longevity and should be based on merit. There is no better incentive for improving public sector productivity and work performance.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineseb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11718 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1314 times:

Quoting tugger (Thread starter):
And if Gov. Walker would be willing to consider it.

No. He has already said it is his way or the highway. He is completely unwilling to compromise. Even though he (and the entire right-wing) is screaming for compromise and cuts from unions and the left, which they already conceded to.

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 1):
Pay increases should never be automatic for longevity and should be based on merit.

So a person who works at a place for 40 years should not be rewarded? I am not saying they should be the highest paid if they have done nothing outstanding, but if they are following the employer guidelines and have zero complaints, very few sick days and so forth, why not reward that employee? I agree it is silly to award merit pay after a year. Maybe after five. But, long term employees should see something extra in their pay check, IMO.



Life in the wall is a drag.
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8184 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1306 times:

Quoting seb146 (Reply 2):
I am not saying they should be the highest paid if they have done nothing outstanding, but if they are following the employer guidelines and have zero complaints, very few sick days and so forth

I would venture this is exceptionally rare. People who come to work every day and make a point of mediocrity are usually not the type of personalities that have zero complaints and perfect attendance.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5675 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1293 times:

Quoting seb146 (Reply 2):
No. He has already said it is his way or the highway. He is completely unwilling to compromise.

That's what I thought, and I agree it is a dumb position to take. "My way or the highway" like "zero tolerance" is seldom ever an effective way to handle things. Negotiation is just that but then people (and it happens on all sides) get greedy and decide they must have everything when some "give" from the opposing side is seen.

Quoting seb146 (Reply 2):
So a person who works at a place for 40 years should not be rewarded? I am not saying they should be the highest paid if they have done nothing outstanding, but if they are following the employer guidelines and have zero complaints, very few sick days and so forth, why not reward that employee? I agree it is silly to award merit pay after a year. Maybe after five. But, long term employees should see something extra in their pay check, IMO.

No, just working at a place for 40 years does not, or at least should not, earn you a raise. A "reward" perhaps, as in a standard bonus or some such that many companies give at 5, 10, 20 (or 25) years of service to recognize an obviously good employee, but not a raise.

The reason you are there still after 40 years should be because you are a good employee and have done good work that merited keeping you on and merited raises during your time there. But not just for time.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineluv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12119 posts, RR: 49
Reply 5, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1269 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 1):
I agree, this is essentially the way forward. Public sector employees are not the same as private sector in my book and should not have the right to strike. A strike is a refusal to provide the public necessary services and is unacceptable in these positions. Pay increases should never be automatic for longevity and should be based on merit. There is no better incentive for improving public sector productivity and work performance.

Well said from someone who lives in Ohio. I remember growing up that public sector work was a way into your field or something you did until something better came along in the private sector.



You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1236 times:

This just brings Ohio (and Wisconsin when their bill finally passes) in line with the Federal Government, which has outlawed union collective bargaining on anything but wages since the Carter administration.

User currently offlinethegreatRDU From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2310 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1232 times:

This is good...it seems like it's full speed ahead as resistance is minimal compared to Wisconsin...and hopefully Ohio can get its swagger back


Our Returning Champion
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Changes To Mark To Market Accounting Rules? posted Thu Apr 2 2009 11:12:04 by Sv7887
Ohio State Loses To Findlay In Hoops posted Tue Nov 6 2007 20:23:29 by Copaair737
Bush Wants To Destroy American Unions posted Sun Jul 16 2006 11:12:31 by NWDC10
EPA Seeks Changes To Gas Mileage Testing posted Wed Jan 11 2006 16:01:23 by PHLBOS
Statue Of Liberty To Reopen To Public posted Tue Mar 30 2004 23:48:35 by ConcordeBoy
Bush To Propose Changes To Mexican Immigration posted Tue Jan 6 2004 02:53:51 by Aloha717200
Dem Lawmaker-Get Bloody To Unions posted Wed Feb 23 2011 07:59:00 by windy95
Public Transportation From Torrington, Ct To EWR posted Wed Sep 29 2010 16:45:48 by 727LOVER
Obama's Proposed Budget Adds $9.7 To Debt posted Sat Mar 6 2010 07:32:22 by windy95
Changes You'd Like To See In Airline Manager? posted Sat Jan 2 2010 17:14:33 by Falcon84